Saturday, 19 September 2026

SENT PHOTOS OF MY EXTREME DEPRIVATION CAUSED BY ONGOING VIOLATIONS OF GATES, KUSHNER, BOURLA, MITSOTAKIS TO KILL A WITNESS

 








https://drive.google.com/file/d/13mtmeSco5Qr8khKd_N_O_FTB2VCAa4nQ/view?usp=sharing

REPORTER SUPPLIES PHOROGRAPHS DOCUMENTING LIFE THRATENING DEPRIVATING IN LARISA, THREATENING A WITNESS TO KUSHNER, BOURLAS COVID CRIMES


19TH SEPTEMBER 2026

To the Embassy of Thailand,


To the Attorney Generals of the USA


To Senator Ron Johnson,



I am a science reporter who has written for Nature, the BMJ, and i have presented evidence that I warned in 2009 about dangers and regulatory or public-health violations associated with covid vaccines including contamination with the SV virus and that the vaccines would cause cytokine storms, and of the crimes committed against me to suppress those warnings and the people idenfied in prosecutor probes D 15 218 and E 17 449 and related including Bill Gates, Jared Kushner, Albert Bourla and Ursula von der Leyen.


Please see summaries here


https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/x6e4i87xnwue8z5r68m6p/TheCaseAgainstAlbertBourla-Pfizer.pdf?rlkey=bmjb55e7r2571d2lz8l7x37rm&st=kjkeek3p&dl=0


https://drive.google.com/file/d/13ctbBU6RMJWya1dGiyhf3V9iro8lx-eB/view?usp=sharing


https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/qrj1m2c85ubx66f0c31sw/Fauci-GatesEvidenceInGRKCriminalProbes.pdf?rlkey=810k73qc9qv2mh4y96dtiumjm&st=uin08hi2&dl=0


I have described the treatment of myself reporter and the deprivation of food and water, exposure to rain, cold and heat, loss of shelter and possessions, refusal of emergency assistance as a deliberate scheme to use the failure to correct the violations to escalate economic coercion and that I need emergency help as soon as possible as dicussed in my email yesterday.


https://drive.google.com/file/d/1qOLudBmFG3S_WwOLtx282HoCR6bC8WFI/view?usp=sharing


I will show the photographs I took today of where I have slept since December 2025, that for tenmonths, focusing also on a camera which observes me day in, day out and its significance given the fact the building is controlled by two brothers who, I allege, work for the Gates, Kushner cartel.


The seeping bag, clothes were all given to be after my othr evictions going back to December 2022 and Ursula von der Leyen as discussed for the evictions are a method to drive deprivation.

Key figures are the Nikopoulos brothers, owners of the buildings, whose sister, Professor Katerina Nikopoulos career in Saudi Arabia took off around 2025 funded by the same eco system of Saudi investment funds as Jared Kushner s Affinity and her carrer accelerated as the retaliation against me intensified to destroy a witness to Kushner s covid jab crimes in E 17 449 as discussed below


KEY DOCUMENTS


https://drive.google.com/file/d/1qOLudBmFG3S_WwOLtx282HoCR6bC8WFI/view?usp=sharing

You stole my sleepingbag

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1YiO5-kqRrV5zjfEIH-9AhujrevuTcQQX/view?usp=sharing

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1gmk7qIhaog9OxOMOPdNWEUkF6Fj0-r4A/view?usp=sharing

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1qNBm2BgIehQAjjER23fym3nxOVXPlIM6/view?usp=sharing


But before I discuss the Nikopoulos connection with Kushner, I will show the photos of where I sleep. Every night taken to day precisely because of the crimes of Kushner and the refusal of the Mitsotakis government to uphld the law driving me to destitution for I have repeatedly informed them by email.


Photo 1 is where I sleep. I have no pillow.


Photo 2

There is no water because the supply has been turned off by the Nikopoulos siblings who own th ebuuilding



Photo 3


The passage is open to the yard and can be seen by the buildings aroun.


Next, I will show the security camera with the red light on which is mounted on the roof above where I sleep and just behind the pillar in the above photo.

I invite you to look closely and see the red light showing it is recording.

This camera records me every morning for ten months. It goes on around the time I get up and it turns off when I leave the building


The red light more clearly


These photos show systematic mistreatment.


They show I live like a Palestinian in Gaza.


But that would not possible if I had my rights and the law was upheld as I show.


There is a direct link to my destitution and the refusal to correct the violations in E 17 449 and D 15 218.


And there is a potential personal connection through Prof Katarina Nikopoulos who talks to her brother KP Nikopoulos several times a day.


I am a person exposed without minimal shelter to rain and snow to a temperature of minus five or more degrees below zero in winter and 40 plus in summer with no water, no food and no help from the Municipality of Larisa


I am not merely deprived of comfort; I am deprived of the conditions necessary to preserve life.

This exposure is deliberate and continued by those who possess the power to prevent it, so the elements themselves have been made an instrument of punishment.


We are not talking about exposure as an incidential inconvenience. The lack of shelter, weather, starvation and death are connected to the broader question of deliberate mistreatment of a reporter and witness and the refusal to correct the violations of D 15 218, E 17 449 and other crimes and refusal to return my 96,000 euros in donations from D 15 218 despite applicable laws and refusal to apply laws protecting the rights of civil party s, whistleblowers and the homeless as I will show below.


I go through all the laws that are being broken by Mitsotakis, the Larisa mayor Athanasios Mamakos to refuse me my rights and to protect utlimately Gates, Bourla, Kushner.


As mentioned, there is an interesting link between the network of Jared Kushner in the Saudi Arabia and UAE he Nikopoulos brothers who own the building along with their sister , Professor Katerina Nikopoulos, because her Saudi career took off in 2025, the very year of my brutal eviction by KP Nikopoulos as discussed.


On December 4th 2025, I was violently evicted by KP Nikopoulos without reason from the flat of his mother where I had stayed for two years due to destitution,


My email on the events of that day


https://drive.google.com/file/d/1qNBm2BgIehQAjjER23fym3nxOVXPlIM6/view?usp=sharing


On January 1 2025, my sleeping bag was stolen by KP Nikopoulss as I email him about,


https://drive.google.com/file/d/1YiO5-kqRrV5zjfEIH-9AhujrevuTcQQX/view?usp=sharing

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1gmk7qIhaog9OxOMOPdNWEUkF6Fj0-r4A/view?usp=sharing


As mentioned, KP Nikopoulos and Katerina talk several times a day. I personally witnessed how almost every day they talked for hours together about everything. According to Ioannis Nikopoulos, she is the “mastermind” gives the marching order and KP Nikopoulos follows.


I spoke to her several times on the phone about her career after she was terminated after her probabatonary period at the beginning of 2025 and I gave her some tips.


She had held the position of

Professor in Management and Deputy Director of Research, Edinburgh Business School / Heriot-Watt University Dubai but the position was terminated in Ferbruary 2025


Upon her temination, her financial situation deteriorated . She also had large legal debts to pay back after taking a case against Strathclyde where she had worked of about 30,000 UKP, I was informed.


After this time, her career took off and she received funds from the same Saudi/UAE sovereign or state-linked investors as Jared Kushner.


That overlap is a legitimate subject for further investigation.

The timing of Nicolopoulou's Saudi research activity in 2025, by itself, establish a financial or causal relationship with Kushner. The fact that two individuals have professional relationships with institutions in the same Gulf region is not sufficient to establish that they belong to a common operation.

But it is interesting that the very witness in E 17 449 to Kushner s covid crimes began to enjoy significant Saudi money just as her brother in Larisa committed crimes against me and nearly killed me.

The question is not whether the existing evidence proves a Nicolopoulou–Kushner financial relationship, but whether documentary records—such as research contracts, grant agreements, consultancy agreements, company records, payments, shared directors, correspondence, or common intermediaries—show an otherwise undocumented connection.

The distinction is important because congressional investigators themselves have raised


And on December 4th, 2025, her brother, with whom she sopeaks constantly, evicts me brutally.


The question I ask is therefore not whether any single circumstance proves a predetermined conclusion. It is whether the documentary evidence, taken together, establishes a connected course of conduct by Gates, Kushner, Bourla and those working for them in Greece to deprive the reporter of justice, of the means to live and drive the person to death through deprivation and identifies the persons responsible for each act and the deliberate violation of laws.

I will place before you photographs documenting the conditions in which I am forced to sleep in the hallway of the closed school building Nikopoelio at Lambrou Katsoni 29 in Larisa since December 2025.

These photographs should not be treated as illustrations or appeals to emotion. They are evidence of physical conditions existing at a particular place and time.

Taken together, the photographs document the bare floor covered with cardboar and the sleeping back on which I sleep without access to water.

The photographs were taken today of the conditions in which I have lived for ten months, from December 4th until September 19th 2026 and without water.

The building belongs to the Nikopoulos siblings.

They have turned off the drinking water requiring me to bring water by bottle from a public spring or source which are up to a kilometre away which is dfficult in a weakened state due to lack of food.

Requests for water and food have been denied to me by the Ioannis and KP Nikopoulos.

The photographs cannot by themselves establish every one of these facts. They can, however, provide direct evidence


Before I discuss the the security camera with the red light on to indicate it is recording, I will show what it records and why I am saying I being driven deliberately to death by this circle who know that the consequences of the violations of my rights are dire danger to my health and life every day.

Not only do I not have water or heat or light. I have no food and no money to buy food. And have suffered serious health consequences


THE SCHOOL BUILDING NIKOPPOLEIO AT LAMBROU KATSONI 29, LARISA





Access to the building s hallway via the steps leading up doors.

There is an alarm deactivated by a remote control in my possession along with the keyes.


The main building inside itself is locked.





It is empty but it is locked. There are rooms, an empty flat. But they are locked off by the relatively wealthy Nikopoulos brothers who live and work around the corner.


The L-shaped hallway leads toward a walled yard, its passageways turning sharply before opening onto the narrow space sheltered a small roof.

Between the outer wall of the building and the yard, I sleep beneath a roof on an unforgiving bare floor, exposed to the elements through the yard.

There is little more than cardboard and a sleeping bag beneath, no accessible water, and a security camera fixed overhead, watching the space in the morning when I get up and leave.





The architecture offers no sense of privacy or escape: walls enclosed the yard, locked doors block off the building, and the camera completes the feeling of constant surveillance.


But watching a person suffering and go hungry day after day without doing anything is morally troubling, particularly if the observer has the ability and responsibility to provide food or alert someone who can as the Nikopoulos brothers do.

They can unlock the building and give me a room inside, the mothers appartment which is still empty, for example. They can bring me water or reconnect the water supply.

But they watch, do nothing

The roof-mounted security camera displays a red light during the morning around the time I get up and the light goes off after I leave the building.

Please see the picture



The camera which goes on every morning to record me as I get up

changes the scene from mere neglect to visible, recorded awarenes.


The presence of a red light appears to indicate the device is actively recording, streaming.


There is a second similar model roof-mounted security camera with a view of the hall that does not appear to show any red light


By contrast, the camera directly above where I sleep in the hallways shows a red light at different times in the morning indicating a manual activation. The light also sometimes goes on and off at odd times. It is clearly manually activated. It does not go on automatically at regular times.


KP Nikopoulos is a self confessed porn addict who has twice threatened me with rape.


This is a very unpleasant situation but I have no alternative as I will show.


Knowledge: A functioning camera may mean that the Nikopoulos brothers can and do observe what happens in the area, including the reporter s condition.


Persistence: If the reporter mains starving or without water while the situation is repeatedly observable, the camera underscores that the suffering is not necessarily hidden or accidental.

Surveillance versus assistance: The contrast between having resources devoted to watching a reporter and the absence of basic necessities suggests deliberately oppressive.

Evidence: If recordings are retained, the camera could potentially document my condition and the duration of the circumstances.

The camera is important not because a camera is evidence of guilt, but because it makes the condition of the reporter an observable fact. If those responsible had the means of seeing a human being lying without shelter, exposed to rain, snow and freezing temperatures, and nevertheless permitted that condition to continue, the recording becomes evidence of knowledge, duration and deliberate failure to intervene.

The persons responsible for the system producing these conditions in which my life is at risk are identified in D 15 218, E 17 449 and interrelated probe.

I am forced to live in the hallway and now threatened by the brothers with eviction even from the hallway as discussed below.

A person left upon the bare floor, without food or water, while being continuously watched and recorded in the morning as they get up, is being subjected to a condition of degradation in which the ordinary necessities of human existence have been withheld.

The camera does not make the deprivation less severe; it makes the suffering an observed and documented act. The question is not whether the person is entitled to comfort, but whether those exercising authority may deliberately deprive a human being of the essentials necessary to live with basic human dignity.

The building is owned by the Nikopoulos brothers.

Kannellos Panagiotis Nikopoulos and Ioannis Nikopoulos.

The camera belongs to them.

Their sister is Professor Katerina Nicolopoulou (often spelled Aikaterini Nikolopoulou or Nikopoulou) who works in the UAE, where Jared Kushner has his business empire.

KP Nikopoulos speaks to her several times a day by phone.

According to Ioannis, she is the mastermind who directs KP Nilkopoulos.


She serves as the Director of the Global Research Cluster for Entrepreneurship and Entrepreneurial Leadership at Ajman University, having previously held leading research roles at the Strathclyde Business School.


  • Ajman is one of the seven emirates of the UAE, and its ruler is Sheikh Humaid bin Rashid Al Nuaimi.

  • Saudi Arabia is a major trading partner for Ajman. In 2023, Ajman's exports to Saudi Arabia were AED 859.8 million ($234 million), up 29% from 2022. Saudi Arabia was Ajman's largest export destination by value of certificates of origin. ددائرة التنمية الاقتصادية - عجمان+1

  • There were 685 Saudi investors in Ajman as of September 2024, involved particularly in construction, hospitality, retail, general trade, and real estate. ددائرة التنمية الاقتصادية - عجمان

  • The relationship is part of the much broader UAE–Saudi relationship, which includes political, security, military, and economic cooperation. The two countries established a UAE–Saudi Coordination Council in 2016. VVAE Außenministerium


  • Kushner founded Affinity Partners after leaving the Trump White House in 2021.

  • Affinity's investors include sovereign wealth funds connected to Saudi Arabia, the UAE, and Qatar. A Senate Finance Committee investigation said roughly 99% of Affinity's assets came from non-U.S. investors. FFinanzausschuss Senat der USA+1

  • The Saudi relationship is the largest and most extensively documented: Saudi Arabia's Public Investment Fund committed $2 billion to Affinity. Affinity charged management fees on that money, generating tens of millions of dollars in fees. Ooversightdemocrats.house.gov+1

  • The UAE connection is separate. Congressional investigators said Affinity's other Gulf investors included the UAE and Qatar, with those investors paying Affinity management fees generally in the 1–2% range. Ooversightdemocrats.house.gov

  • The controversy becomes a potential "quid pro quo" allegation because Kushner had developed relationships with Gulf rulers while serving in the White House and subsequently became financially dependent on investments from those governments. Senator Ron Wyden has explicitly questioned whether foreign governments were using Affinity to funnel money to politically connected Americans. FFinanzausschuss 



The significance of the recording of the camera and the red light indicating recording only in he camera directed at the place I sleep on the bare floor is its purpose


The Nikopoulos brothers know I am being subjected to those conditions day in day out.


The evidence shows:


I am deliberately left on the floor;


food and water are withheld;


The Mayor, authorities and know I am there;


They know I sleep on a bare floor with carboard and no water and no food.


a camera continuously records me in the morning;


the recording was accessible to, or routinely reviewed by, Nikopoulos brothers, who I allege work for the Bourla, Gates criminal network in Larisa for reasons discussed below too.


But it is not just that KP Nikopoulos observes my suffering.


He actively removed a sleeping bag I was given in Decembr 2025 by someone as I had no cover at all and left with me with no covering. I hd left the sleeping bag in the hallway one day and when I returned it was gone. It was minus 5 that night.



Please see my email to KP Nikopoulos.


This email establishes that KP Nikopoulos knowingly took the only sleeping bag available to a person who was sleeping without adequate shelter in freezing conditions, knowing that temperatures were approximately minus five degrees Celsius.

The sleeping bag was never returned to me.

That night I had to go out and find carboard boxes to cover myself as I slept on the freezing ground in minus five degrees with minimal clothing because all my clothes had been seized by Nikopoulos and not returned during his violent and unmotivated eviction on December 4th 2025 into freezing rain and night which I only survived because a friend paid for a hotel. I was able to dry my clothes and warm up.




The significance of the removing of the sleeping bag act lies not merely in the value of the sleeping bag but in the circumstances in which it was taken. And who took it and who they work for together with the brother.


KP Nikopoulos knew the condition of the person from whom it was taken, understood the consequences of removing the only available protection against the cold, and nevertheless deliberately removed it and did not return it.


He communicates constantly with his sister in the UAE, talking several times per day.

She has a professional relationship with Saudi Arabia


Nicolopoulou → Ajman University → research collaborators → Princess Nourah University / Royal Institute of Traditional Arts → Saudi research projects in Riyadh and Al Ahsa.


substantial questions about Affinity's Gulf financing and potential conflicts of interest.


Her publicly documented Saudi-focused research activity became prominent in 2025, beginning with research on women entrepreneurs in Riyadh and expanding into further Saudi research collaborations in 2025–26.


There is a broad geographical and institutional overlap in the Saudi network with Jared Kushner networks forcussed on Affinity Investments.


Her projects are project is funded by the Royal Institute of Traditional Arts (Wrth) and led by Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University in Riyadh. Nicolopoulou is one of the researchers, alongside Nasreen Hasan Ashkanani, Safiya Alshibani and Paul Lassalle.



The publicly documented network looks roughly like this:

UAE

Ajman University

Katerina Nicolopoulou

Saudi research projects

┌────────┴────────┐

│ │

Princess Nourah Wrth / Royal

University Institute of

Traditional Arts

Saudi state/

cultural ecosystem


Saudi PIF ────────┐

Affinity Partners

Jared Kushner


So, Katerina Nikopoulos started to earn an unknown amount from Saudi research and consulting in the very year her brothers nearly killed me as discussed.


And Saudi Aarbia is where Kushner has his main invstment focus.

What makes 2025 stand out

There are several things happening around the same period:

  1. She moved to Ajman University as Professor of Entrepreneurship in August 2025, describing it herself as a “new beginning.” LLinkedIn

  2. In 2025, she began the Saudi-focused research she later described as her first study involving Saudi women entrepreneurs—the “Basta Entrepreneurship” research in Riyadh. LLinkedIn

  3. In November 2025, Ajman University announced a new Global Research Cluster

    for Entrepreneurship and Entrepreneurial Leadership led by Nicolopoulou. 


And at the same time, her borther was depriving me of a sleeping bag I needed desperately.


KP Nikopoulos knew there were no alternatives available to me because I had no money. I had no money because of the retaliation against a reporter and the refusal to give me my rights.

The emails show I asked him to return it, and what happened after those requests were made and rejected was that i continued to have to sleep covered in cardboard

And in the morning, the camera light went on again.

The camera light went on again to observe whether I had survived the night or died from hypothermia. Cold and rain and hunger and exhaustion and minimal clothes cause hypothermia and that causes death.

In these circumstances, the removal of the sleeping bag constitute evidence of deliberate deprivation to the point where the victims risks death rather than an ordinary dispute over property.

K P Nikopoulos is the person who owns the camera. He records my condition and the weather. He was aware that there was no adequate replacement

He was capable of returning it or of giving me my own clothes he had seized back

And yet, knowing the consequences, knowing I could die, he did not return it.

These facts show systematic mistreatment.

I am a person exposed without minmal shelter to rain and show to a temperature of ten five or more degrees below zero.

I am not merely deprived of comfort; I am deprived of the conditions necessary to preserve life.

This exposure is deliberate and continued by those who possess the power to prevent it, so the elements themselves have been made an instrument of punishment.

We are not talking about exposure as an incidential inconvenience. The lack of shelter, weather, starvation and death are connected to the broader question of deliberate mistreatment of a reporter and witness.

The weather and other hazards outside the hall are even more severe. To be left completely under the open skies in rain and snow is a death sentence.

Wet clothes and temperatures of minus 2 to 5 degrees without adequate covering are life threatening

My requests to shelter, warmths, food and water have been rebuffed.

The Nikopoulos brothers, including the wife of Ioannis Nikopoulos are well aware of my situation and have refused all help.

The Mayor has been informed of the exposure + duration since December 2021 + knowledge + recording + ability to intervene + failure to intervene.

That combination is more legally significant than the temperature alone.

The physcial deterioration is a the consequence of deprivation imposed while under another person's authority.

Here is a reporter reduced by hunger to the verge of death. My strength has been consumed, not by battle, nor by disease alone, but by the withholding of the food necessary to sustain human life. When I was no longer maintain its ordinary functions and he is brought to the point of fatal collapse, the question is not merely what ailment I suffered, but by what course of conduct I was brought to that condition

The evidence established that the deprivation was deliberate:

We must move from the physical condition of the reporter → the circumstances producing it → documentary evidence showing who knew about those circumstances → individual responsibility.

In that scenario, the medical evidence would be particularly important because diabetes + inadequate food/medication + a near-fatal hyperglycaemic crisis creates a question of medical causation that should be established by clinicians and contemporaneous records, rather than assumed.

A careful evidentiary formulation would separate four propositions:

I have a pre diabetic condition.

Food and/or prescribed diabetes medication are being withheld or unavailable.

On Wednesday evening I had a hyperglycaemic emergency.

The deprivation materially contributed to, precipitated, or worsened that emergency.

A serious physiological event occurred and that clinicians identified a connection to the deprivation.



On January 1st 2026, at 8 30 am after I got up and managed to walk around and regain my circulation without any thing to eat, to drink, to keep myself warm, I managed to get to a WIFI spot in Larisa and wrote the email.


There are witnesses to this incident in Larisa.

After several days, kind people gave me another sleeping bag, which is the green one in the picture.

I had to carry it everywhere with me for months as I walked around Larisa for fear of leaving it in the hall and having it stolen by KP Nikopuoulos.

This was a man who offered me shelter because he wanted to support my work and reports.


The camera is evidence of knowledge and contemporaneous awareness. It makes it harder to characterize the conditions as something that happened accidentally or without anyone knowing.

The recordings day in day out may provide evidence that the Nikopoulos brothers and whoever they work for and who may have access to the recording authorities knew what condition I was in while the deprivation was occurring.

It is difficult to see why two innocent brothers want to document my condition day in, day out using a security camera but the documenting of my condition bears intent, knowledge, or the deliberate nature of the treatment, depending on the applicable law.

Ioannis and KP Nikopoulos have a

combination of knowledge + authority + continuing observation + failure to intervene to give me the basic necessities.

If those responsible had a live visual record of a reporter lying without food or water, and nevertheless permitted the condition to continue, what inference can reasonably be drawn about their knowledge of, and participation in, that treatment?

The brothers own a building which they have locked and closed. It has rooms and it still has the mothers appartment in it which are empty and they could continue to allow me to stay there.

They have considerable property and rental income, a school

They are able to help.

They refuse to



IOANNIS NIKOPOULOS



Almsot immediately after I managed to send the evidence against Boula to law enforcement, Ioannis Nikopoulos rang me out of the blue at 12 05 pm on Friday afternoon and knowing my situation because he has access to the cameras, told me he would change the lock on Monday morning and evict me.

I allge the short notice was not an accident but deliebrate to cause the maximum deprivation and vulnerability to me.

He has been notified by email of my situation, can foresee I will die from exposure if I have to live outside . He knows I have no alternative.

He has the means as someone who lives in Nikaia and recently bought a 30 K Audi according to his brother.

He complained I did not have water. He can give me the water, turn on the water supply, open the flat to me again. He owns properties, gets rents, has a school. He has the means to help.

He claimed the neighbours were shocked at my situation but when I spoke to some today and explained my situation they were very sympathetic and nice and believed I really was thevictim.



A picture from his FB shows him standing on his porch




https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=2527647100727481&set=pb.100004466468401.-2207520000


Thanks to the flats and schools they inherited the brothers have money.

If K P Nikopoulos has debts it is because he does not work, insists on pursuing doctorates and piost graduate degrees at great expense despite being nearly 60 years old and having a record of failure. He failed to get his PhD from the Open university in Holland.

He is pursuing a Doctorate of Business Administraton at Portsmouth which costs about 9,000 UKP a year for international students, according to AI


https://gr.linkedin.com/in/kanellos-panagiotis-nikolopoulos-7b135413


He was convicted of not paying the staff of his school about 5,000 euros in 2025 according to his communications to me.





DESTITUTION AS RETALIATION


But why am I a graduate of Edinburgh University lying destitute on a building in larisa nd forced to ensure the Nikopoulos brothers?



I refer you to the discussion of the retaliaiton which began against me as soon as I reported on Baxter in Austria.




At that time, I had a flat now worth about 600,000 euros in a sought after area, the Ursulinenhof in Vienna.


A picture of my flat at


Gentzgasse 14 9 12



My father had an almost new beuatiful house in a sought after disctirict in Vienna.


A picture of the address of my late father, Dr Mathias Buerermeister at Nastlbergerg 17, 1130 Vienna




I had no debts, a job.


How did I get to the point of utter destitution and life threatening deprivation in Larisa?


The answer is in the crime against me starting from 2009 immediately after I filed the Baxter charges, the suppression of the evidence against the perpetrators by the corrupt government to allow the cycle to repeat over and over as discud in my submission in detail.


The failure to prosecute and uphold my rights in Austria paves the way for the next crime and the next time and the failure to put the people on trial due to corruption paves the way for the next time.


The crimes exert the maximum pressure on me to defend myself, drain me of money and restrict and hamper my ability to report.


The same cycle was repeated in Greece and the aim is to KILL me by detiitution.


The case is not one of isolated circumstances. It is a chain. The evidence begins with Gates, Kushner and Gates knowledge of the toxic nature of the covid vaccine; it continues through their position, their access to information, and the circumstances in which that knowledge became material. When they negotitd the covid vaccine contracts.


When criminal inquiry would bring these matters to light, the evidence shows interference with the ordinary processes by which those facts might be discovered.


It is then followed by the treatment of the reporter who undertook to expose the facts: deprivation of food and water, exposure to the elements, and surveillance of my condition.

Each circumstance may be explained away when considered alone. The questio is whether they remain reasonably capable of innocent explanation when considered together. Evidence does not become weaker because it is circumstantial; when independent circumstances converge upon the same conclusion, their cumulative force may be greater than that of an isolated witness.

We therefore do not ask you to infer guilt merely from knowledge that covid vaccines were designed to cause cytokine storms and contaminated with SV 40 virus, nor merely from the violations of due process to hide the personal knowledge of Gates, Kushner of the reporters warnins, nor from the treatment of the reporter deprived of justice and emergency assistance

I ask you to consider whether the whole course of conduct demonstrates knowledge, motive, participation, and subsequent efforts to prevent the truth from being established and from th evidence getting out connecting particular people to deliberate interference and showing what they were trying to conceal.

My warnings concerning SV 40 contaminaiton and cytokine storms prosecution argued and information available to Bourla and Gates and Kushner could establish knowledge and, at minimum, a duty to investigate.

Far from investigating, the criminal probes D 15 218 and E 17 449, E 17 378 and E 17 379 establish the determination to suppress all warnings of the dangers of the covid vaccineswhile denying knowledge of criminal misuse.

The probes opened in 2017 show what Kushner, Trump knew and when they knew it, what information they sought and what was as available to him, what actions did they took or authorize, what happened to the reporter attempting to expose the evidence.


EVICTION AS A METHOD USED BY URSULA VON DER LEYEN AND MITSOTAKIS IN 2022


Eviction as a Cause, Not Just an Effect:

The illegal eviction of me in December 2022 by the rogue police plunged me eviction deeper into poverty by depriving me of my clothes, possessions, computers and even money destabilizing my networks, and mental well-being.

I had exposed that Ursula von der Leyen had prior warnings about the dangers of the covid vaccine before she signed the contracts with Pfizer in the form of email communications with her predecessor Jean Claude Juncker and Michael Hubel.

I have been forced into progressively more substandard, and dangerous environments

It is a vicious cycle to reduce people to poverty

I moved into the Nikoupoulos mothers flat in Janaury 2024 despite having zero trust in K P Nikopulos because I had no choice. The cycle of eviction and seizure of property began again with KP Nikopoulos seizing my things and evicting me on December 4th 2025.

I would never have gone to stay in that flat if I had my rights and my money back

I would have left Larisa in 2015.

I have been forced to stay here because of the corrutption and to represent myself.

What connects Gates, Kushner, Mitsotakis to my destitution is their deliberate decision, authorization, or failure to act required by the laws .


THE LAWS THAT ARE BEING VIOLATED


Eviction is a part of a pattern and a self-reinforcing structural mechanism where eviction acts not just as a symptom of poverty, but as a primary driver of it.

And in my case it is related to the refusal to prosecute crimes to allow nea acts of retaliaton

A person participating as a civil claimant in criminal proceedings is entitled to judicial protection and to a fair procedure. Under Article 20 of the Greek Constitution and Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights, access to justice, a fair hearing and determination within a reasonable time are fundamental safeguards. Where proceedings become excessively prolonged, Greek Law 4239/2014 provides a domestic mechanism concerning excessive duration.

The same principle applies when a person alleges that public authorities have failed to correct a violation. Article 20 of the Constitution provides judicial protection, Article 10 protects the right to petition public authorities, and Article 25 requires the State to guarantee the effective exercise of fundamental rights. Article 13 ECHR additionally requires an effective remedy for Convention violations.

Where the person is homeless or inadequately housed, Article 21(4) of the Greek Constitution places housing for persons lacking adequate housing within the sphere of special State care. The constitutional guarantee is implemented through statutory social-protection mechanisms, including programs directed toward homelessness and minimum-income support. It therefore becomes important to establish the person's actual circumstances and eligibility


The intent to corrupt justice is established and connects Gates,Kushner, Bourla and Mitsotakis,

The chain is

The reporter warned that Gates and Kushner knew the covid vaccines could be contaminated with SV and cause cytokine storms from 2015, 2017, and corrupted justice to escape an investigation and have refused to correct the violations or give emergency assistance.

In this context, the camera becomes potentially important evidence of knowledge and continuing awareness of the deprivation and of intention.

If the evidence were that:

the reporter was subjected to crimes because he was investigating or reporting on Gates, Kushner;

Gates, Kushner, Bourla or people acting for then wanted the reporter silence and still do;

the reporter is deliberately denied food and water;

the reporter is kept on a floor exposed to rain, cold and sub-zero temperatures in winter and excessive heat in summer.

the people acting for Gates, Kushner, Bourla could see the reporter through a security camera;

the recording showed my deteriorating physical condition; and

despite seeing that condition, those responsible deliberately allowed it to continue,

The camera could establish a temporal chain of knowledge:

The reporter was in a dangerous condition → the condition was continuously observable → the responsible people had access to the observation → the condition continued → no protective intervention occurred.

That supports an inference concerning knowledge, deliberate continuation, and potentially intent, given the evidence identifying who had authority over the reporter and who actually saw or received the recordings, the Nikopoulos brothers.

The responsibility could extend beyond the person who physically committed an act to people who “incited, ordered, procured, or counseled” a criminal plan, or knowingly participated in it.

Who knew what the camera showed, when did they know it, what authority did they possess to stop the deprivation, and why did the deprivation continue despite the observable danger to the prisoner's life?


THE LAWS BEING VIOLATED IN MY CASE


A “πολιτικώς ενάγων” is person participating as a civil claimant/injured party in a Greek criminal case, there are several layers of protection under Greek law and the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR).

I am a politiki enagon in D 15 218 and E 17 449 as is proven by documents, fees paid.

1. Right to a fair and reasonably speedy trial

The Greek Constitution, Article 20(1), provides everyone with the right to judicial protection and the right to present their views concerning their rights or interests before the courts. Article 20(2) also protects the right to a prior hearing when an administrative measure adversely affects rights or interests.

For criminal proceedings, Article 6 §1 ECHR provides the right to a fair and public hearing within a reasonable time by an independent and impartial tribunal. The European Court of Human Rights assesses "reasonable time" according to circumstances including the complexity of the case, the conduct of the parties, the conduct of the authorities, and what is at stake for the person concerned.

Thus, if a criminal case has been unreasonably delayed, there can potentially be two different issues:

measures concerning the conduct/progress of the pending proceedings; and

compensation for an excessive duration after the statutory conditions are satisfied.

The European Court has also recognized that an effective remedy for excessive duration is required under Article 13 ECHR in conjunction with Article 6.

Constitution Article 10 — the right to petition public authorities.

Constitution Article 25 — fundamental rights are guaranteed by the State, and public authorities must ensure their effective exercise; it also recognizes proportionality and prohibits abusive exercise of rights.

Article 13 ECHR — an effective domestic remedy for violations of Convention rights.

Article 6 ECHR — fair hearing and reasonable time where the Convention applies.

What remedy is actually available depends on who committed the alleged violation (court, prosecutor, police, municipality, administrative authority, private person, etc.) and whether the violation is ongoing or has already occurred.

3. Protection when a person is homeless

There is an important constitutional provision here.

Greek Constitution Article 21(4) states that obtaining housing for persons who lack housing or are inadequately housed is an object of special State care. Article 21(1) also provides for conditions of dignified living through the minimum guaranteed income system, while Article 21(3) refers to care for persons in need.

Current Greek programs include:

Minimum Guaranteed Income (Ελάχιστο Εγγυημένο Εισόδημα), which expressly includes homeless persons living on the street or in unsuitable accommodation, subject to the applicable conditions and registration requirements.

Emergency/social structures for homeless people, including shelters, day centres and other poverty-relief services.

The Housing and Work for the Homeless program, which provides, among other things, rental assistance, household expenses, psychosocial support and employment-related assistance. The program has subsequently been amended by legislation, including Law 5107/2024 and later legislation.

So if someone is currently homeless, it is important not to rely solely on the constitutional provision: the person's municipality/social service or Community Centre can be important for documenting homelessness and accessing the relevant programs.

Yet, I have been refused shelter at the homeless shelter, a paid hotel room or any emergency assistance from Larisa Municpality as I show.


Under the Greek Civil Code, Article 505, a donor may revoke a donation where the donee has demonstrated grave ingratitude through a serious fault, including, specifically, failure to fulfil an obligation to support the donor. The Ministry of Justice's published Civil Code contains the relevant provisions.

The Greek Supreme Court has recently explained that "ingratitude" under Article 505 generally requires serious anti-social conduct attributable to the donee and directly affecting the donor's protected interests; the court evaluates whether the proven facts constitute the legally required grave misconduct.


However, destitution can be highly relevant to the facts—for example, if the donee had a contractual or legal obligation to support the donor, or if the circumstances demonstrate the type of serious conduct contemplated by Article 505. The Supreme Court has recognized that a donee's serious indifference to a donor who is in need of care or support can, depending on the circumstances, contribute to a finding of ingratitude.

There is another potentially important provision: Article 507 allows revocation where the donation was made under a specified condition/mode (τρόπος) and the donee culpably fails to perform that obligation.

And Article 509 provides that revocation is made by declaration to the donee; following valid revocation, the fulfilled donation can be sought back under the rules concerning unjust enrichment.


Date of the €96,000 donation.

It was in transfers for solar panels, hydroponic units, investments of the monastery


A person participating as a civil claimant in criminal proceedings is entitled to judicial protection and to a fair procedure. Under Article 20 of the Greek Constitution and Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights, access to justice, a fair hearing and determination within a reasonable time are fundamental safeguards. Where proceedings become excessively prolonged, Greek Law 4239/2014 provides a domestic mechanism concerning excessive duration.

The same principle applies when a person alleges that public authorities have failed to correct a violation. Article 20 of the Constitution provides judicial protection, Article 10 protects the right to petition public authorities, and Article 25 requires the State to guarantee the effective exercise of fundamental rights. Article 13 ECHR additionally requires an effective remedy for Convention violations.

Where the person is homeless or inadequately housed, Article 21(4) of the Greek Constitution places housing for persons lacking adequate housing within the sphere of special State care. The constitutional guarantee is implemented through statutory social-protection mechanisms, including programs directed toward homelessness and minimum-income support. It therefore becomes important to establish the person's actual circumstances and eligibility


THE REFUSAL TO RETURN THE 96 000 EUROS FROM D 15 218


Under the Greek Civil Code, Article 505, a donor may revoke a donation where the donee has demonstrated grave ingratitude through a serious fault, including, specifically, failure to fulfil an obligation to support the donor. The Ministry of Justice's published Civil Code contains the relevant provisions.

And Article 509 provides that revocation is made by declaration to the donee; following valid revocation, the fulfilled donation can be sought back under the rules concerning unjust enrichment.



1. The assault

If the abbess physically assaulted me . The is preserved in medical records, photographs of injuries, by the any police doctor.

2. The attempt to bribe or influence your lawyer

It is an established fact that Theodekti and the bishops attempted to bribe my the lawyer in police reports with multiple witnesses. She made the approach by phone within an hour of obtaning his mobile number by deceit, and asked to meet him under four eyes to make sure I did not ask for my money to the monastery back as documented in the police report and the lawyers own statments. V

The amount was 96 000 euros in total.

The violations show that what my awyer actually did afterwards was accept the bribe.

The offenses establish the “grave ingratitude” analysis under Civil Code Article 505.

The physical violence, bribery of the lawyer, and conduct toward you after you became destitute establish a statutory ground for revocation.

And the chronology is critical, particularly because of the limitation provision concerning revocation of donations.

I reported the conduct in April 2015 and the violations from January 2016.

I then experienced malicious prosecutions.

II asked that the competent authorities investigate whether the conduct constitutes criminal offences, unlawful retaliation, or another violation of Greek or EU law.

I requested appropriate protection and immediate assistance as well as the return of my 96,000 euros because I am presently destitute/homeless.

But I have been refused my rights.


WHISTLEBLOWER LAWS


Greek Law 4990/2022 remains the principal whistleblower statute and has been amended, including by Law 5321/2026.

The reported conduct must fall within the law's substantive scope and the reporting circumstances must satisfy its requirements.

The National Transparency Authority (ΕΑΔ) currently provides an external whistleblowing reporting mechanism under Law 4990/2022. The official government procedure was updated on July 28, 2026 and allows reports in writing, orally or through an electronic platform.

Εθνικό Μητρώο Διοικητικών Διαδικασιών

Under Law 4990/2022, Greece implements the EU Whistleblower Directive. Its scope expressly includes public health, as well as product safety and compliance.

A report alleging, for example, that a vaccine or vaccination program involved:

unlawful failures concerning public health;

violations of applicable EU public-health requirements;

product-safety or product-compliance violations;

concealment or falsification of safety information;

regulatory violations concerning a medicinal product; or

qualifying corruption/bribery connected with such conduct,

could potentially fall within the material scope of Law 4990/2022. The statute expressly includes public health and product safety/compliance among its covered areas.

In addition, I learned through my professional/work activities that there may be a serious public-health violation involving a vaccine, and I reported it.



THE MAYOR OF LARISA


The Mayor and authorities know about my deprivation and yet the deprivation continue despite the observable danger to the my life.

During rain storms the hall floods. Snow collects on the ground of the garden part. There is frost.

Exact daily low temperatures for specific past dates in winter 2026 (January–February 2026) for Larissa, Greece are not detailed in standard archived summaries, but historical climate records show typical overnight winter lows drop to around 0°C to 1°C (32°F to 34°F) on average, with extreme cold nights occasionally falling below freezing (down to approximately -2°C to -5°C).

https://www.holiday-weather.com/larissa/averages/january/

KP Nickopoulos took a sleeping bag given to me which I stored in the hallway and did not return it despite his knowing I had no coveringas discussed

People had to give me clothes because I had onlytheclothes I was evicted with into apouring ran and freezing cold.


The Municipality has given me zero help.

These facts show systematic mistreatment and the deliberate withholding of help which is required to be given

The Mayor has been informed of the exposure + duration since December 2021 + knowledge + recording + ability to intervene + failure to intervene.

That combination is more legally significant than the temperature alone.

The physcial deterioration is a the consequence of deprivation imposed while under another person's authority.


HUNGER AND HYPERGLYCAEMIC SHOCKS


Here is a reporter reduced by hunger to the verge of death. My strength has been consumed, not by battle, nor by disease alone, but by the withholding of the food necessary to sustain human life even from the Municpality.


When I was no longer maintain its ordinary functions and he is brought to the point of fatal collapse, the question is not merely what ailment I suffered, but by what course of conduct I was brought to that condition

I warned the authorities I have a pre diabetic, diabetic condition.

Food and/or prescribed diabetes medication are being withheld or unavailable.

The consequence is a hyperglycaemic shock which can be fatal.

Severe dehydration, hunger, exhaustion can lead from severe hyperglycemia to a coma and subsequent cardiac arrest in hours for people with my condition.

On Wednesday evening, on 16th September, I had a hyperglycaemic emergency due to extreme hunger, not eating all day, extreme thirst and exhaustion from finishing my submission on Bourla.

I came within minutes of a medical emergency and was saved by someone giving me food and drink.

Yet, my access to emergency assistance is being denied by the Mayor and municiplatiy.


The evidence established that the deprivation was deliberate:

We must move from the physical condition of the reporter → the circumstances producing it → documentary evidence showing who knew about those circumstances → individual responsibility.

In that scenario, the medical evidence would be particularly important because diabetes + inadequate food/medication + a near-fatal hyperglycaemic crisis creates a question of medical causation that should be established by clinicians and contemporaneous records, rather than assumed.



TO SUM UP


The case is not one of isolated circumstances. It is a chain. The evidence begins with Gates, Kushner and Gates knowledge of the toxic nature of the covid vaccine; it continues through their position, their access to information, and the circumstances in which that knowledge became material. When criminal inquiry would bring these matters to light, the evidence shows interference with the ordinary processes by which those facts might be discovered.

It is then followed by the treatment of the reporter who undertook to expose the facts: deprivation of food and water, exposure to the elements, and surveillance of my condition.

The sister of the owners of the building s caeer in Saudi Arabia, UAE accelerates from late 2025 just as the persecution against me accelerates. There is an overlap in her funding sources with Jared Kushner s. She talks to KP Nikopolous several times a day. The bother, Ioannis, joins in to make new threats immediately after my new submission on Bourla, Kushner.


https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/x6e4i87xnwue8z5r68m6p/TheCaseAgainstAlbertBourla-Pfizer.pdf?rlkey=bmjb55e7r2571d2lz8l7x37rm&st=kjkeek3p&dl=0


https://drive.google.com/file/d/1qOLudBmFG3S_WwOLtx282HoCR6bC8WFI/view?usp=sharing


The hardship drives me to a near hyperglycaemic shock on Wednesday, a coma and cardiac arrest.


Each circumstance may be explained away when considered alone. The questio is whether they remain reasonably capable of innocent explanation when considered together. Evidence does not become weaker because it is circumstantial; when independent circumstances converge upon the same conclusion, their cumulative force may be greater than that of an isolated witness.

We therefore do not ask you to infer guilt merely from knowledge that covid vaccines were designed to cause cytokine storms and contaminated with SV 40 virus, nor merely from the violations of due process to hide the personal knowledge of Gates, Kushner of the reporters warnins, nor from the treatment of the reporter deprived of justice and emergency assistance

I ask you to consider whether the whole course of conduct demonstrates knowledge, motive, participation, and subsequent efforts to prevent the truth from being established and from th evidence getting out connecting particular people to deliberate interference and showing what they were trying to conceal.

My warnings concerning SV 40 contaminaiton and cytokine storms prosecution argued and information available to Bourla and Gates and Kushner could establish knowledge and, at minimum, a duty to investigate.

Far from investigating, the criminal probes D 15 218 and E 17 449, E 17 378 and E 17 379 establish the determination to suppress all warnings of the dangers of the covid vaccineswhile denying knowledge of criminal misuse.

The probes opened in 2017 show what Kushner, Trump knew and when they knew it, what information they sought and what was as available to him, what actions did they took or authorize, what happened to the reporter attempting to expose the evidence.

The deprivation is not one of isolated circumstances. It is a chain. The evidence begins with the Kushner, Bourla, Gates and von der Leyen s knowledge of the poisonous character of the covid vaccines; it continues through their position during covid as the main negotiators for covid vaccines, their access to information, and the circumstances in which that knowledge became material. When criminal inquiry would bring these matters to light, the evidence shows interference with the ordinary processes by which those facts might be discovered and violations of due process. The repoter is left more and more destitute and refused help required by the law

I ask you uto consider whether the whole course of conduct demonstrates knowledge, motive, participation, and subsequent efforts to prevent the truth from being established by literally causing the reporter to die from deprivation.


I ask for emergency help from the embassy of Thailand.


Thank you for your attention



Jane Burgermeister


Larisa,


Greece




19TH SEPTEMBER 2026