GATES, BOURLA, KUSHNER HAVE MADE A BLUNDER OF EPIC PROPORTIONS IN THINKING THEY CAN CONTROL THE BACKLASH TO THE COVID JAB HARMS THEY CAUSED USING BLUFF AND VIOLENCE
ON ONE OF HIS FAVOURITE PODCASTS, THE DECODER, GATES WAS ACCUSED OF CAUSING COVID AND HAD NO ANSWER EXCEPT AN ANGRY DENIAL AS HIS POWERLESSNESS TO CONTROL THE NARRATIVE BECAME PLAIN
DISASTROUS PODCAST HAPPENED ON THE SAME DAY AS HIS TRIAL IN THE NETHERLANDS FOR DELIBERATELY MISLEADING PEOPLE ABOUT THE COVID JAB HARMS
ABSOLUTE PROOF GATES, BOURLA, SOROS, KUSHNER, TRUMP DELIBERATELY MISLED THE GLOBE ABOUT COVID JABS, EBOLA JABS IS IN D 15 218 AND E 17 449
THEIR CORRUPTION OF DUE PROCESS TO REPEAT THE ORIGINAL CRIMES AGAINT A SCIENCE REPORTER,MYSELF, LEFT A RECORD IN THE OFFICIAL STATE PROSECUTOR PROBES WHICH CANNOT BE ERASED
Gates interview on the Decoder on October 22nd, the very day his lawyers represented him in the trial in the Netherlands against covid vaccine victims, has revealed his great strategic failure and why prison is now all but inevitable for him and his associates Bourla.
He deceived not just the Dutch but also the American public so successfully that their recognition of the deception has turned his greatest source of power into his greatest source of opposition.
He began the Decoder podcast, confident, expecting to control the conversation, preserve his authority, and persuade the audience that he remains master of events, the great tech genius, the authority for AI and a philanathropist with their interests at heart.
Instead, he found himself confronted on familiar ground by the very people whose trust made his power possible with accusations that he caused covid and was planning to orchestrate AI cyberattacks.
The turning point came when the host, Nilay Patel, showed a clip of Ben Horowitz criticizing Gates for his role in covid gof research and was using AI fearmongering and seeking impose control on AI for his private interests
At that moment, Gates had no reply that he had deliberately caused covid levelled by Horowitz except panic and an angry denial.He had no facts to offer now he can no longer dictate, command the meaning of covid and what has happened, presented corrupted justice as legitimate and science reporters as conspiracy theorists.
Gates himself looked visibly more and more agitated, defensive, frightened and evasive. as he moved aound nervously in his seat, using his hands to threaten, intimidate, appeal now his words had so little weight while he interviewer Nilay Patel looked very calm and focussed and unfazed by Gates antics and denials.
Gates could still command attention. He could still raise his voice. He could still threaten and denounce. But these were powers of a different order from the power he had come to exercise. He could compel the ear without commanding the mind.
And so he discovered, before an audience he had once regarded as his own, that a man may retain every outward appearance of authority while losing the one thing that makes authority effective: the confidence of those who grant it.
Gates, Bourla, Kushner and Soros themselvesleft the absolute proofs of the fact people were deliberately manipulated into believing covid was natural and the jabs were safe nd effective in prosecutor probes D 15 218 and E 17 449, ensuring their eventaul conviction now that the US, Dutch and global public is reinterpreting covid and the covid vaccine effects in the light of facts and not their claims.
Patel then pressed Gates on why the public should trust him, given his influence over technology and his past association with Jeffrey Epstein.
Gates had entered expecting to control the conversation. He left having revealed that he could no longer control the interpretation of his own deeds.
What made this Decoder interview different for Gates was that he faced criticism not just about AI policy, but about his credibility and the trustworthiness of powerful technology leaders.
Nilay Patel pressed him on the practical weaknesses of his proposed AI safeguards, the difficulty of holding competing companies accountable, and why the public should trust him given his past association with Jeffrey Epstein.
Rather than simply promoting his views as he was able to do before, Gates was put in the position of defending his judgment, motives, and authority and asked to his face why people should believe him.
He may still dominate institutions, command resources, and frighten his opponents. But in that podcast, something smaller and potentially more dangerous has happened: his audience has begun to think independently of him.
And a deceiver who depends on controlling other people's judgments faces a peculiar danger when those judgments begin to turn against him.
Gates has won the short term game only to lose altogether.
Gates, Bourla,Kushner understand that human beings do not make decisions by logic alone. They have fears, ambitions, vanities, and needs.
A clever opponent does not necessarily defeat people by force; he can defeat them by making them believe that their own interests require obedience.
Gates, Bourla, Rutte persuaded billions to accept the lockdowns and the covid vaccines.
Many believed they were necessary for survival, prosperity, social acceptance, or protection from some terrible danger.
From Gates and Bourla s perspective, the strategy has succeeded.
The population has voluntarily participated in its own subjugation and destruction.
But then the consequences appear
The heart attacks, cancers, strokes, sudden deaths.
Suddenly, the meaning of the original decision changes.
What people thought was the price of security becomes the source of their suffering.
What they believed was a necessary sacrifice becomes evidence that they were manipulated.
The most dangerous victory is one in which the winner persuades his opponents to cooperate in their own defeat.
Yet the victory is not complete until they continue to believe in the wisdom of their choice.
When suffering, sudden deaths, cancers following covid vaccines destroys that belief, the victor, or Gates and Bourla, discovers that he has conquered their judgment without conquering their capacity to judge.
The real turning point, the collapse of belief, has reached even Gates innermot circle, the podcast Decoder, where even the tech nerd community he views as his closest allies are accusing him of causing covid and wrecking their lives.
The crucial event is not merely that billions suffer. It is that they reinterpret their suffering.
Before the covid vaccine damage, the senate report on the covid origins and Ecohealth alliance and the Fauci diaries, Gates may appear powerful, indispensable, and even benevolent.
After all these, Gates appears fraudulent, malicious, or incompetent.
A clip of Ben Horowitz launching accusations against Gates for creating covid was beamed into the studio to confront Gates with something he does not want to recognize, which is the collapse of trust in him, the extent to which his own nerd tech IT, AI peer group considers him a dangerous fraud.
The facts have changed, and something even more important has changed
The framework through which people interpret those facts.
There are three psychological stages:
Trust: “Gates, Bourla, Fauci, Johnson, Mitsotaki Biden know what they are doing.”
Disillusionment: “We were promised safe and effective vaccines and protection, but we have been harmed.”
"We were told the covid virus was natural and dangerous. Now we find it out it came from a very lab in the city where it appeared where it was engineered secretly with funds from Fauci and EcoHealth, funded by Gates."
"We were told science reporters warning us we were being deceived were crazy and evil conspiracy theorists and warned not to listen to the warnings which proved to be true.
Reversal: “Gates, Bourla caused this harm, and we were deceived.”
In strategic terms, Gates and Bourla has created an enormous liability. Its authority rests on a population that has invested its faith, livelihood, and perhaps moral identity in the Gates, Bourla, Kushner promises.
When those promises collapse, the population does not simply withdraw its allegiance. It becomes actively hostile.
This is the difference between defeating an opponent and destroying the opponent's confidence in you. The second can be far more consequential for Gates.
People who have made a disastrous decision on the basis of false assurances and who must suffer ill health, the loss of their livelihoods naturally ask why they should pay the costs of this deception and not the people who organized the deception and violated their right to informed consent.
That demand is entirely legally justified since they were deliberately manipulated and informed consent was undermined.
Gates, Bourla, Kushner and Soros themselves have left the absolute proofs of the fact they were deliberately manipulated in prosecutor probes D 15 218 and E 17 449, ensuring their eventaul conviction.
Financially and psychologically, it can also serve as a means of recovering dignity and agency and a real chance to pay for medical care.
The legal process is such that the evidence must be presented so that the public, judges can see that false promises were made deliberately.
Then justice can at to compensate the victims.
But the larger isssue is the power question.
Reversal of power is discussed on the Decoder podcast where Gates is bascially told “You no longer have the right to dictate to us. You have nothing to say, no credibility, you are guilty of covid harms, AI threats," by a peer techies including Ben Horowitz
The interviewer spends the the final minutes of the podcast confronting Gates with destruction of a relationship of trust to institutions, authorities, and by implication him and his fear mongering about AI.
When people are deceived, they do not merely regret their losses, damage to their health, loss of their jobs
They resents the mind that led them to choose the covid vaccine.
When they discovers that their sacrifice enriched the deceivers, their former obedience may become a demand for restitution.
The greater the confidence with which he entered the bargain, the greater may be his anger when the bargain is exposed.
The deepest strategic problem for Gates is they have mistaken compliance for loyalty.
Billions taking the experimental mRNA covid jab with no assurance of safety and effectivness in statistically meaningful clinical trials would demonstrate extraordinary power over human behavior. But it would not necessarily demonstrate genuine allegiance.
People may comply because they are frightened, because they trust the system, because everyone else complies, or because they cannot imagine a viable alternative.
These motivations are unstable if the consequences become unbearable.
Gates mistake is to assume that, having secured the population's outward obedience, he has secured their inward conviction as well.
The dependence of his continued authority on the credibility of his past promises is his weakness.
Gates and the Epstein circle may, through blackmail and bribery, control the institutions, the economy, and the means of enforcement. Yet the moment the public conclude that Gates, Bourla betrayed them, every previous success can become evidence against it.
Its former achievements are reinterpreted:
Its power becomes proof of how thoroughly it controlled them.
Its promises become evidence of fraud.
Their sacrifices become grievances.
Their obedience becomes something they regret having given.
Gates and Bourla success supplies the scale of its potential backlash.
The suffering finally has caused people to recognize the source of their misfortune and redirect their anger toward the authority they previously trusted.
The crisis of legitimacy for Gates has now reached the nerd, tech podcast community where Gates can no longer count on belief in his good intentions, in his honesty also in relation to his AI fearmongering
Gates a apparent triumph depends on a psychological wager, namely that he can obtain mass compliance to a covid vaccine campaign causing mass sickness and deaths without creating a mass of people who will eventually understand themselves as victims.
Indeed, cynics may say Gates never expected the victims to live for 7 to 8 jabs were planned.
Now that wager has failed, Gates and Bourla must confront a terrible reversal. The same billions whose participation demonstrated its success now possess a shared grievance, a common explanation for their suffering, and a reason to withdraw their allegiance.
The demand for compensation would represent the moment when private suffering becomes a collective accusation.
A tech billionaire may deceive a multitude and call the multitude's obedience a victory.
But obedience is not conviction, and conviction purchased by promises is gone when harshexperience proves the promises empty.
When the promised reward becomes a source of death, sickness, illness and torment, the deceived cease to see themselves as participants in a great enterprise and begin to see themselves as its victims.
Then comes the reckoning.
Covid victims ask what they have surrendered, what they hve lost, what they have suffered, and who has profited.
The billionaire, the self styled philanthropist, the Phrma CEO,the Prime Ministerwho once stood above all opposition must now answer the question of the very people whose submission established his power.
Their greatest victory has become their greatest liability, because Gates and Bourla succeeded in deceiving so many that, when the deception is exposed, they have created a multitude with the same grievance and a common enemy.
.png)