.png)
Dear Editors,
I am a reporter who has written for Nature, the British Medical Journal, American Prospect, among other media and a civil party (πολιτικώς ενάγων) who has paid the fee in criminal proceedings bearing file number E 17/449 in which
#Donald J. Trump
#Jared Kusner are named as the prime suspects by Greek prosecuting authorities, the Appeals Prosecutors Office, Larisa, Greece.
The complaint I submitted to the Appeals Prosecutors in Larisa, Greece, in 2017 alleges that Donald J. Trump and Jared Kushner used criminal means to bring about my imprisonment without due process in retaliation for my work as a reporter. My complaint further alleges that this retaliation was connected to my reporting on matters including a scheme to use disases like covid and Ebola to overrun the USA for personal enrichment being prepared from 2016 and 2017.
The Appeals Prosecutors opened criminal file E 17/449 following my complaint. I participated in the proceedings as a civil party (πολιτικώς ενάγων) under Greek law.
I participated in proceedings as a witness and gave testimony to the prosecutors on the crimes of Trump and Kushner in November 2017.
I attach my testimony against Trump and Kushner and other key documents including my original charges, and proof that I paid the fee to become a civil party (politik enagon)
I also attach these key documents as links
E 17 449 CivlPartydocs
https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/95d6wvifskv2upvfnguyi/E17449CivilPartyDocs.pdf?rlkey=zwmypzrfrcqvz7aovbg1fz8vm&st=grjod60g&dl=0
Original charges May 2017 and fee for Politiki Enagon
E17378, E17379 Malicious prosecution docs
https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/xtbsrkk51kxl5eguysy3g/E17378cE17379MaliciousProsecutions_compressed-1.pdf?rlkey=omddnsb6ho0lczh0bk70jp2u8&st=b13ojuqj&dl=0
Summaries with links is here
https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/yfreupvzbwqrkc2p05quv/GatesCrimesInTheNetherlandsAndD15218.pdf?rlkey=5w6htfz5320qv7pxdkhlmi7kt&st=zpewgcji&dl=0
My formal status in the proceedings gives me the legal standing of a victim seeking civil redress within the criminal case.
Despite having held this legal status for nearly ten years, I have not obtained a final resolution or effective remedy. I have been subjected to retaliation and revictimization for blowing the whistle.
The case has received little media attention despite involving issues of significant public interest, including accountability, due process, and the treatment of victims in proceedings connected to a President of the United States.
I respectfully ask your newsroom to review the court records and related filings independently. The questions raised by this case extend beyond my personal circumstances and concern the public's interest in transparent justice and equal application of the law.
I prove the relevant court documents, procedural history, and supporting materials for your review as attachments and links.
Summaries in English of the Greek prosecutor office documents are available with screenshots of key documents to help navigate the files.
Briefly stated, on 15th February 2017, I published allegations by a Russian journalist that Jared Kushner and Steve Bannon helped him obtain a visa to interview in June 2016 for a documentary on a broad epidemic disease plan involving viruses like ebola, bird flu, swine flu, covid in which the Russian journalist had sought and obtained a copy of a report I wrote for the FBI in 2009 describing the risks of contaminating vaccine material with viruses like the Simian Virus, SV40.
Following the reporting described above, events occurred that I allege constituted retaliation. Specificlly, a lawyer misrepresented a civil action to file criminal chargs against me for that post, organized that the summons be sent to the wrong address in May 2017 as a pretext to have me arrested for not obeying the summons.
By chance, I found the summons, was able to testify at the required time at Larisa prosecutors office. I filed a complaint in May 2017 to Appeals Prosecutors in Larisa, Greece, against Donald Trump and Jared Kushner and Simos Samaras for the above conduct.
I Authority involved: Appeals Prosecutors in Larisa, Greece, opened an investigation into Trump, Kushner and Samaras in July 2017
Case reference: E 17/449.
I submitted the required filing/fee to participate as a πολιτικώς ενάγων (civil party/civil claimant) in the criminal proceedings.
I provided a statement to the prosecutors as a witness in the proceedings in November 2017.
Despite the passage of approximately ten years, the matter has not reached a final resolution.
Personal impact: The prolonged proceedings have resulted in severe financial and personal hardship.
Chronology of Events and Procedural History
June 2016 — Contact by Russian journalists regarding proposed interview
In June 2016, I received emails from Russian journalists then based in the Kremlin requesting an interview concerning claims of a possible scheme involving billionaire Bill Gates and the use of viruses for political purposes in the United States, defective vaccines. In addition, we discussed crimes against me in a prosecutor probe D 15 218 which captured Bill Gates and George Soros as having personal knowledge of my posts, the motive and the means for the crimes.
I discussed the proposed interview with the journalists before agreeing to participate.
I also discussed probe D 15 218 with them.
A due process investigation into D 15 218 was subjected to massive violations when all the police reports were illegally removed.
The lawyer Simos Samaras filed a SLAPP temporary 30 day civil injunction against me for ten posts when I began to post evidence of the illegal removal of the official files from D 15 218 from January 2016.
On the way to the court in Larisa, Greece, to film a scene, the journalist, Alexander Zamsylov, made the claim about the visa
Evidence available: Email correspondence with the Russian journalists.
June 2016 — Interview in Larisa, Greece
A few days after the initial contact, the interview took place in Larisa, Greece.
In the emails and during the interview, the journalist requested and obtained a copy of a report I had previously written for the FBI in 2009 concerning the release of seasonal flu virus contaminated with the bird flu virus from a Baxter BSL3 facility in Austria, which triggered an investigation by Vienna prosecutors after I filed charges in April 2009. My report covers the broad epidemic disease scheme to weaponize swine flu and use of an emergency as a pretext for rolling out defective swine flu vaccines matching vaccines. In this report, I also warn of the risks of contaminated batches of vaccines given to people, especially of Simian Virus contamination.
At the conclusion of the interview, one of the journalists stated that Jared Kushner, and several members of Trump s innermost circle including Steve Bannon, had assisted him in obtaining a visa.
Evidence available: FBI report
February 15, 2017 — Publication of information concerning the visa allegations
On 15 February 2017, I published information on my since suspended blog concerning the interview and the statement made by the journalist regarding assistance with obtaining a visa.
Evidence available: Archived blog publication.
February 16, 2017 — Criminal complaint initiated against me
On 16 February 2017, Simos Samaras, lawyer submitted a request for criminal proceedings against me at Larisa police station for my 15th February 2017 blog post despite it being under no ruling.
The filing involved the misrepresentation of the 30 day civil injunction for ten other blog posts from a year earlier which had expired legal documents as the legal grounds for prosecuting me for the 15th February 2017 blog posts. Procedural steps were taken in a manner designed to create grounds for my arrest, including sending documents to an incorrect address and preventing proper notice, although this step was delayed until May and I had moved address in Larisa when I informed the court officially of my change of address.
Evidence available: Criminal complaint, legal filings, service records, correspondence.
2017 — Discovery of summons and review of case file
I found the summons, reviewed the case file, and challenged the allegations. I testified to the examining magistrate hat the accusations were false and that the supporting documents did not establish the alleged offenses and showed evidence that the summons had deliberately been sent to the wrong address.
After I posted this information on my blog, James Comey, then FBI director, was fired with the media reporting that Jared Kushner was behind the firing
Evidence available: Case file, summons, submissions made in response.
2017 — Counter-complaint and request for recognition as civil party
Following my testimony, I submitted criminal charges against Jared Kushner and Donald J. Trump and applied to participate as a πολιτικώς ενάγων (civil party/civil claimant) in the proceedings payiing the requisite fee. In these charges in 2017, I asked what the motive for Kushner and Trump could be to wish to kee their role in an alleged biological warfare plan against the USA hidden.
The matter was assigned file number E 17/449 before the Appeals Prosecutors in Larisa, Greece.
Evidence available: Complaint, filing receipt, procedural documents.
November 2017 — Testimony before Appeals Prosecutors, Larisa
In November 2017, I was called to provide testimony regarding the allegations submitted in the criminal complaint against Trump, Kushner, Samaras, the Russian journalists and the FBI report
Evidence available: Summons, testimony record, prosecutorial file references.
Issues Presented for Independent Review
I request independent review of:
1. Whether the criminal proceedings initiated against me in 2017 over my 15th February 2017 blog post complied with due process requirements.
2. Whether legal mechanisms were used improperly to interfere with journalistic activity.
3. Whether the evidence and procedural history in file E 17/449 warrant further investigation.
4. Whether the matter raises broader questions concerning accountability, press freedom, and access to justice.
Document index:
|
Document |
Date |
Source |
What it proves |
|
Journalist emails |
June 2016 |
Email records |
Initial contact and interview request |
|
Interview evidence |
June 2016 |
Notes/recording if available |
What was discussed |
|
Blog post archive |
15 Feb 2017 |
Web archive |
Publication date/content |
|
Criminal filing |
16 Feb 2017 |
Court/prosecutor records |
Filing and allegations made |
|
Summons/service records |
2017 |
Court records |
Notice process |
|
Your complaint |
2017 |
Prosecutor file |
Allegations submitted |
|
Testimony record |
Nov 2017 |
Prosecutor file |
Your participation |
2021— Subsequent defamation proceedings concerning blog publications
Following the events described above, the same lawyer who had initiated the February 2017 criminal complaint against me later brought two separate criminal defamation proceedings concerning the same ten blog posts that had formed part of the earlier dispute.
After several postponements, te proceedings resulted in two trials E 17 378 and E 17 379 in Larisa in September 2021 for the same ten posts which had been central to the events of February 2017 and that the timing and handling of the cases raise questions about whether the defamation proceedings were acts of retaliation and malicious prosecution to silence me for my post on 16th February 2017
The two trials took place on the same day, 20th September 2021, one following immediately on the other.
In the first proceeding E 17 378, handling the ten blog posts and the 15th February 2017 blog posts received an innocent verdict after Simos Samaras asked for me to be declared innocent.
I protested the verdict and asked to be able to present the evidence from E 17 449 as it was material to proving my innocence and the misuse of Samaras of the ten posts to suppress allegations.
The judge agreed with Samaras to declare me innocent in the first minute of the trial.
I was not able to present the evidence in E 17 449.
In the second proceeding E 17 379, the court found me guilty.
I was refused the court judgment from E 17 378 but given the judgment from E 17 379.
I appealed the decision on the grounds the two trials involved the same ten blog posts violating double jeopardy rules and had been cennral to the events of February 2017 when Samaras, Trump and Kushner had ended up being investigated for crimes against me, showing a pattern.
My Appeal was rejected but my prison sentence for one an a half years for offending the honour of Samaras was suspended.
Evidence available:
The two defamation complaints.
Court judgments from trial E 7 379. I was never given the judgment from trial E 17 378 despite requests.
The ten blog posts at issue.
The February 2017 complaint and related procedural records.
Records from the investigation in file E 17/449.
Questions for independent review:
1. Whether the two defamation proceedings were legally and factually independent from the earlier complaint.
2. Whether the two trials concerned the same ten blog posts (the ten blog posts were identical in both cases but with the 15th February 2017 blog post added to one, E 17 378, for which I was declared innocent
3. Whether the differing outcomes in the two trials raise procedural questions.
4. Whether the refusal to give me the judgment to E 17 378 raises procedural questions
5. Whether any information relevant to the 2017 investigation was affected by the subsequent proceedings.
//////////////////////////////////////
I ask your newsroom to review the complaint, the prosecutorial records, and any related court documents independently. My request is not that you accept my allegations as established fact, but that you examine whether the proceedings and the evidence raise issues of public interest deserving further investigation.
The central question is not whether any individual is above criticism, but whether the institutions responsible for ensuring accountability are functioning independently and consistently. When allegations arise that executive authority has been used to influence legal proceedings, delay or avoid accountability, or target journalists through questionable prosecutions or other forms of legal pressure, those allegations deserve careful, evidence-based reporting.
If government power is being used to undermine due process or to discourage investigative reporting, the implications extend beyond any one case. Such actions, if substantiated, would affect public confidence in the rule of law, judicial independence, and constitutional protections for a free press.
I encourage your newsroom to review the available court records, public filings, official statements, and reporting related to these events. Independent scrutiny by multiple news organizations is essential whenever questions arise about the impartial administration of justice or the treatment of members of the press.
This is not a request for advocacy, but for investigation. The public benefits when allegations involving the use of governmental power are examined thoroughly, fairly, and without fear or favor. Regardless of where the evidence ultimately leads, comprehensive reporting helps ensure transparency and accountability.
Over the course of this decade, my case has received little or no sustained media attention. As a result, I believe significant issues concerning the administration of justice and the treatment of victims have remained largely outside public scrutiny.
The prolonged proceedings have also had a severe personal impact. I am now living in financial hardship, and the continuing lack of resolution has affected both my livelihood and my ability to continue my work.
I recognize that my personal experience alone is not the story. The broader public-interest question is whether a victim in a matter involving a sitting or former president has received the same access to justice, transparency, and timely process that would be expected in any other case.
Please note, I am both a
a witness (martyres) who gives evidence, and
a πολιτικώς ενάγων (civil party/civil claimant) asserting a civil claim within the criminal proceedings.
In Greek criminal proceedings, as πολιτικώς ενάγων (politikós enágon) and means a person who participates in a criminal case to seek civil compensation (for example, damages for harm caused by the alleged crime). I am seeking compensation from Donald Trump and Jared Kushner and Simos Samaras.
I include the document from the Appeals Prosecutors from July 2017 showing that they accepted my charges against Trump and Kushner for investigation.
To sum up
I was granted legal standing as a πολιτικώς ενάγων (civil party) in criminal proceedings against Donald Trump and Jared Kushner before the Appeals Prosecutors in Larisa, Greece, concerning file number E 17/449. I believe the legal and factual issues arising from those proceedings warrant independent examination by the international press.
The file E 17 449 contains evidence that could potentially be relevant to authorities in the USA. The proceedings before the Appeals Prosecutors in Larisa, Greece, contains evidence and witness testimony that I believe are relevant to matters of US and international public interest. Because the allegations concern conduct that I contend had consequences beyond Greece, I believe the case file deserves independent examination by journalists and, where legally appropriate, by the competent authorities in other jurisdictions.
I do not ask readers to accept my allegations as established fact. I ask that the official records, witness statements, and procedural history be reviewed on their merits to determine whether they warrant further investigation.
I ask for an independent review of whether Trump can be arrested on the basis of these criminal proceedings and whether the legal requirements are met, such as:
a law enforcement officer having probable cause for an arrest (or a valid warrant being issued);
prosecutors determining that the evidence supports criminal charges;
the alleged conduct fitting the elements of a specific criminal offense under federal or state law;
the case being within the jurisdiction of the relevant authority; and
any constitutional protections or procedural requirements being satisfied.
For allegations involving a president or former president, additional issues may arise, including:
whether the alleged conduct was official presidential action or private conduct;
whether constitutional doctrines affect prosecution;
whether the statute of limitations has expired;
whether federal, state, or local authorities have jurisdiction; and
whether prosecutors believe the evidence meets the standard required for charges.
I am available to provide documentation, answer questions, and facilitate access to the public records associated with this matter.
Thank you for your attention.
Yours sincerely,
Jane Burgermeister,
Larisa, Greece
.png)