AS TRUMP PUSHES THE FAKE HANTAVIRUS NARRATIVE, RECALL IT WAS OBAMA WHO SPREAD THE SWINE FLU IN MEXICO IN 2009 USING THE MEDIA CIRCUS AROUND HIS VISIT TO MAGNIFY THE SWINE FLU HYSTERI
I WAS RELIABLY INFORMED IN 2009 BY A DOCTOR IN MEXICO CITY THAT POISON HAD BEEN SPREAD TO SIMULATE A VIRUS OUTBREAK
THE FIRST VICTIM OF THE SWINE FLU IN 2009 WAS AN ARCHAEOLOGIST WHO SHOOK HANDS WITH OBAMA
THIS IS A TRUE FACT DESCRIBED IN MY BOOK FALSE PANDEMIC IN 2009 BELOW
(NEVER GOT PAST THE FIRST CHAPTERS DUE TO THE START OF THE DE FACTO MURDER ATTEMPTS IN AUSTRIA WHICH CONTINUED IN GREECE)
WILL TRUMP TRY TO POISON XI WITH A HANDSHAKE DURING HIS VISIT TO BEIJING, SPREAD A POISON AROUND, ALSO IN THE WATER TO SIMULATE A HANTAVIRUS OUTBREAK AND PUT CHINA UNDER TRUMP AND GATES CONTROL THROUGH WHO TO GIVE THE CHINES TOXIC HANTAVIRUS JABS?
HE WILL ONLY BE REPEATING A SCAM USED BY OBAMA IN 2009 TO START THE SWNE FLU SCARE IF HE DOES
XI AND CCP SHOULD DECLARE A HANTAVIRUS OUTBEAK IN ADVANCE AND INSTITUTE SOCIAL DISTANCING TO PREVENT CONTACT BETWEEN TRUMP AND HIS OFFICIALS WITH THE CHINESE AND LIMIT THEIR MOVEMENTS AND JUSTIFY HAVING BIOWEAPONS EXPERTS FOLLOWING THEM WITH BSL4 SUITS
SHOULD LIMIT TRUMP S TEAM TO A TINY GROUP AND CHECK THE US MEDIA FOR HIDEN BIOLOGICAL AGENTS
READ ABOUT WHAT OBAMA DID IN 2009 BELOW
FALSE
PANDEMIC
A
failed attempt at depopulation and One World Government
CHAPTER
ONE
Chapter
One
He
was 64 years old. He was born in Mexico City and considered one of
the world’s leading experts on Aztec civilization. He was a curator
of the National Museum and he was selected to give newly-elected US
President Barack Obama a tour on his first state visit to Mexico on
Friday, 16th
of April, 2009.
His
hands gestured in a lively way; his shoes hammered on the polished
floor. Surrounded by officials, he accompanied Obama as well as
Felipe Calderon, the Mexican President, into Room 7, the Mexico Hall
or Sala
Mexica,
where the most famous of all the Aztec treasures is kept.
The
Sun Stone, illuminated by a few soft lamps, emerged out of the
darkness. Weighing 25 tonnes and 12 feet in diameter, the intricately
carved basalt stone, mounted high up on a monolithic slab,
illustrates aspects of Aztec cosmology.
Pointing
upwards, the archaeologist Felipe Solis explained the Aztec concept
of time as a medium that allows things to grow organically, and to
evolve and develop to their fullest extent, similar to the way a
flower or tree requires a certain period of time to grow, in
consecutive stages, from a seed to reach maturity. More importantly,
he also discussed what the significance of December 21st, 2012 when
the earth moves into a rare alignment with the Galactic centre, might
be.
Would
it be the start of a new era?
Shortly
afterwards, he felt a severe pain in his throat and chest. He thought
it was just the regular flu, and continued working on his current
project.
He was
preparing for an exhibition to be launched the following month, May,
called: „Teotihuacan, City of Gods“. He wanted to convey all his
awe at what the Aztecs had accomplished, and demonstrate the full
glory of their empire, destroyed by Spanish invaders, in a single,
ground-breaking display with plenty of background information on the
ideological and political dimensions of the ceremonial sites where
ritual sacrifices took place for the Aztec empire had a brutal side;
large numbers of human beings were sacrificed to appease the gods.
The
following morning, he got up and told his family he found it hard to
breathe. Fire burned his lungs. His condition deteriorated fast. That
same day, Saturday, he went to hospital. He was put straight into an
intensive care unit. His doctors diagnosed viral pneumonia,
aggravated by diabetes. He lapsed into a coma, recovered briefly, but
lost consciousness again.
On
Thursday, 23 April, at 7 am, Felipe Solis died. The clinical cause
given was a heart attack, according to a report in El Notre carrying
the headline: „Serves Obama and dies 7 days later; “Atiende a
Obama y muere a los 7 días. “
By
this time, Mexico was in a state of high alert over an outbreak of
swine flu that coincided with the visit of Obama. Outside the
hospital where Solis lay in intensive care, soldiers were
distributing face masks in the streets as hysteria gripped the South
American capital. On the same day that Solis died, Mexico
City was placed under quarantine for five days. For five days, 20
million people were forced to stay at home, turning the world’s
second largest city into a ghost town. Shops,
schools and universities were closed; demonstrations were banned.
Soldiers carrying weapons patrolled the streets.
These drastic measures were
implemented even though the World Health Organization (WHO), the
United Nation’s global health watchdog, had confirmed only 9 deaths
from the swine flu in Mexico at the time.
Although
the first victim of the swine flu was later reported to be a census
worker called Maria Adela Gutierrez who died on April 13th,
it was Felipe Solis’s death that was first telegraphed around the
world by the media.
On
Saturday, April 25th, Bloomberg reported Solis had died the very day
after meeting Obama possibly from the swine flu, intertwining the
origin and trajectory of the pandemic with the person and movements
of the US president from the very beginning.
“Obama
was received at Mexico’s anthropology museum in Mexico City by
Felipe Solis, a distinguished archeologist who died the following day
from symptoms similar to flu, Reforma newspaper reported. The
newspaper didn’t confirm if Solis had swine flu or not,” wrote
Bloomberg’s Thomas Black.
In
fact, without the presence of the international press corps
accompanying Obama on his visit to Mexico, the news of the swine flu
would not have reached such a large audience so quickly.
The speed with which the
swine flu burst upon the world is underlined by the fact that it was
nowhere on the media radar screen when Obama and Calderon held a
joint press conference on April 16th.
Within
days, however, the swine flu exploded onto the global media stage as
a fully fledged pandemic, dominating cable TV screens, newspaper
headlines and internet news sites. The mainstream media presented the
swine flu as threat on a different
scale from all other diseases, as a new killer virus that
had become threatened the entire
world within a very short period of time,
and the mainstream media has played a key role in shaping the
perceptions and attitude of people towards the swine flu virus ever
since.
A
five-year-old boy in La Gloria, a remote village of 3,000 people in
the hills of the Sierra Madre where many farmers still use horse
drawn carts, was declared by the government to have tested
positive for the swine flu or A/H1N1
virus
when a sample was sent
to labs in the US and Canada.
The Calderon government declared Edgar
Hernández,
who recovered rapidly, had had the illness earlier that month and
that he was probably the origin of the swine flu outbreak.
But while
Edgar Hernández tested positive for the swine flu, he was the only
villager in La Gloria to have.
In
addition, is not clear how one small boy living in a remote village
where foot, bicycle and horse continue to be the main means of
transport, could have spread the swine flu to so many people in so
short a period of time that the entire country of Mexico – indeed
the entire world – was potentially threatened within just days.
The mother of the boy, Maria
del Carmen Hernández, added to the mystery.
“I
don’t know where the virus came from, and I don’t think anyone
else does, either,” she said, according to a report in the FT
on
May 1 2009.
The virus
was reported to have originated in a nearby pig farm. But officials
inspecting the pigs in the factory belonging to the company Granjas
Carroll de Mexico, which is 50 per cent-owned by the US company
Smithfield,
found that none of the animals were infected by the swine flu virus.
Yet, according to the
narrative of WHO and the mainstream media, the swine flu virus came
from this pig farm, infected a small boy and spread from a remote
village in Mexico to the USA, Europe as well as the rest of the world
in the space of a few days. On Wednesday 29 April 2009, WHO reported
cases of the swine flu in 9 countries.
The
first death in the USA from swine flu was also reported on 29thApril:
23-month-old child in Texas was diagnosed as having succumbed from
the swine flu by Dr. Richard Besser, acting director of the Centers
for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the US partner of WHO.
By this date, the number of
confirmed swine flu cases in the United States was already reported
to be 66 in 6 states, with 45 swine flu in New York, 11 in
California, six in Texas, two in Kansas and one in Indiana and Ohio.
New York City’s health commissioner said hundreds of schoolchildren
were ill at a school and some students had been confirmed to have the
swine flu.
Press
frenzy reached a fever pitch: pandemic victims were mentioned on the
news nightly all around the globe.
“Death
flies through the air,” („Der Tod fliegt durch die Luft“) was a
typical the headline in Germany’s newspaper Die Sueddeutsche
Zeitung on April 27th.
About
6 weeks later, on 11th June, WHO reported cases in 74 countries, and
by 1st July, infections had been confirmed by WHO in 120 countries.
Rapid
though the spread of the swine flu might have been, it killed few
people, however.
By
July 7th,
just 429 people had died from the swine flu according to WHO’s own
figures. This is a fraction of the 36,000 people who are estimated by
the CDC to die every year from the seasonal flu in the USA alone.
It
would not be going too far to say that the swine flu pandemic is a
purely media event in as far as there have been few actual deaths
compared to other diseases. In spite of this, the networks have
saturated the airwaves with video footage, reports and images
suggesting the people of the world are in imminent danger from the
swine flu virus.
Video
footage of people wearing face masks, waiting in hospital corridors
for rare medical therapies, and children on respirators have given a
degree of visual support to the claim the world is in the grip of
dangerous swine flu pandemic that has absolutely no support in the
facts.
But
from the emergence of the swine flu pandemic at the end of April, the
media has shaped and framed a narrative to its liking, presenting the
story of a virus easily transmissible, raging through Mexico, and
killing masses of people that is detached from all reality. The sheer
quantity of video clips, and images of alleged pandemic victims, pig
farms and soldiers with face masks, has actually helped concealed the
objective fact that the swine flu is mild and has killed very few
people, even according to the WHO’s own figures.
However,
the true aim of the media coverage has not been to give factual
information about the nature of the swine flu virus. The goal of the
coverage has been to instill fear in the audience watching at home,
and to drive them to rush out and get the swine flu vaccine.
For,
from the very same moment the swine flu virus burst onto the global
media stage as a villain, the swine flu vaccine has made an
appearance, as a hero, and a savior in this global drama. That, in
spite of the verifiable, objective fact the swine flu pandemic
vaccine has not been adequately tested and contains mercury as well
as the adjuvant, squalene, known to cause autoimmune diseases.
WHO
immediately issued instructions to the CDC and pharmaceutical
companies to start preparing to develop a swine flu vaccine.
Shares
of the five major vaccine manufacturers companies Baxter, Novartis,
GlaxoSmithKline and Sanofi and CSL, soared on the expectation they
would earn billions from orders for pandemic vaccines.
Plans had
been put into place in 2005 to vaccinate billions of people in the
event of a pandemic emergency. Most of the world’s governments,
including all the governments in Europe as well as the governments of
the USA, Canada and Australia, had sealed contracts with
pharmaceutical companies to supply bird flu pandemic vaccines in
2005.
These contracts for pandemic vaccines began
to be activated in April 2009
The US
government sealed contracts with Novartis, Sanofi Pasteur,
GlaxoSmithKline, CSL and MedImmune to produce the swine flu vaccine.
France
bought
94 million individual vaccinations from Baxter, Sanofi,
GlaxoSmithKline, and Novartis at a cost of 869 million euros,
and Canada placed an order for 50.4 million doses from
GlaxoSmithKline at a cost of $400 million to give just two examples.
Wasting
no time, WHO on April 24th,
ordered its Pandemic Control Room, which is designed to track the
spread of a pandemic around the globe and so equipped with
supercomputers tied to UN member states security forces, to be manned
24 hours a day, seven days a week for the first time ever as a
prelude to declaring a pandemic level 6 emergency, the highest alert
level on the planet, and the level that triggers the implementation
of existing plans for mass vaccination by governments around the
world.
Dire
predictions a bird flu pandemic that could cause the deaths of
millions of people worldwide as well as the collapse of economic and
social infrastructure have been made in recent years, and magnified
by coverage in the mainstream media in spite of the fact that there
is no scientific basis for these predictions.
In
fact, the closest the world has ever come to a bird flu pandemic was
in February 2009 a matter of only about 10 weeks before the Mexico
swine flu pandemic outbreak. A bird flu pandemic was nearly triggered
when the pharmaceutical company Baxter --- headquartered close to
Chicago in Deerfield, Illinois where Obama has his Senate seat --
contaminated 72 kilos of seasonal flu vaccine material with the live
bird flu virus in its facilties in Orth an der Donau, and then
proceeded to distribute this material via a company called Avir Green
Hills Biotechnology in Vienna to 16 labs in Austria,
Slovenia, Czech Republic and Germany.
A WHO
reference laboratory supplied the bird flu virus that Baxter used to
contaminate the vaccine material, according to a Baxter spokesperson
quoted in the media.
It
is not clear why Baxter had the bird
flu virus in its facilities in the first place. The bird flu virus is
considered to be one of the most deadly viruses known to humankind
with a 60 % mortality rate. It was bioengineered in US weapons labs
from the Spanish flu virus, according to a report from October 2005
in Der Spiegel.
Baxter
itself has said that the contamination of the 72 kilos of vaccine
material was an accident. However, the company has not given an
account of what sequence of actions were performed inside its
facilities that could have resulted in the accidental contamination
of such a large quantity of vaccine material or how so much
contaminated material could have left its facilities undetected.
Because
Baxter is obliged to use biosafety level 3 regulations when
experimenting with the bird flu virus, an accidental contamination
can, in fact, be virtually ruled out. The
standards for protecting a virus classified as among the most
dangerous bioweapons in the world are very different from those for
work on harmless material in a standard lab. They include the
requirement to work in a sealed laboratory environment accessible
only using electronic codes, double doors, airlocks and also the need
for staff to wear special protection clothing and face masks.
The
contamination of the vaccine material was only discovered after a
technician at the Czech lab of BioTest injected the material into
ferrets. They became sick and had to be destroyed. Biotest
raised the alarm and emergency pandemic control measures began to be
implemented on Friday, February 6th,
2009.
As a result, 35 lab staff
from Avir in Austria and from BioTest in the Czech Republic, who had
come into contact with the contaminated material had to be treated
preventatively for the bird flu in hospital underlining the danger
that this material -- which was destined for use in vaccines -- posed
to people who had come in contact with it even in a laboratory
setting.
The Times of India reported
Baxter had almost triggered a global bird flu pandemic.
„Virus
mix-up by lab could have resulted in pandemic,“ was a headline from
March 6th, 2009.
This incident in Austria in
February 2009 strongly suggests the notion that pharmaceutical
companies are actively engaged in attempting to trigger the very
pandemics that they stand to profit from because they have sealed
lucrative contracts in advance to supply pandemic vaccines.
Although the Austrian police
opened an investigation after I filed charges at the Vienna State
Prosecutor’s office on April 8th, the investigation was dropped in
September 2009 shortly before Baxter applied for its final EU wide
marketing approval for its swine flu vaccine, Celvapan.
It is not clear what the
basis for the decision to drop the investigation was.
Baxter
itself has said that the contamination of the vaccine material was an
accident. However, the company has not explained exactly what
sequence of actions was performed inside its biosecurity lab that
could have resulted in such an accidental contamination of 72 kilos
of seasonal flu vaccine material.
Panasonic
and other corporations such as IBM have made their own internal
company plans to deal with a pandemic emergency, indicating they may
have some inside knowledge.
There
is also evidence that
the swine flu virus may have been bioengineered in labs. Australian
virologist Adrian Gibbs published a study in Virology Journal in
November 2009 showing that the swine flu virus was most likely the
product of three strains from three continents that swapped genes in
a lab or a vaccine-making plant.
A
vaccine for the swine flu H1N1 virus was patented in 2007 by Baxter –
and yet the virus was presented as completely new by WHO. It was the
novelty of this virus that was supposed to be the reason why people
had no immunity, and so the justification for the mass vaccination
campaign in the first place.
There
was also a swine flu outbreak in 1976, which resulted in a mass
vaccination campaign in the USA that had to be abandoned because more
people died from the vaccine than from the mild flu.
Nevertheless,
in 1994, Laurie Garrett, Senior Fellow for Global Health at the
Council on Foreign Relations authored a book called „The Coming
Plague”, implying that a deadly pandemic was inevitable without any
scientific basis for such a claim. Garrett was also among the first
to advocate the establishment of a global pandemic response system
focussed
on the WHO.
In
June 1996, the U.S.
Air Force published a study called „Air
Force 2025,
describing the emergence of a deadly influenza pandemic emerging in
2009 as a possible “future scenario” in a conflict setting.
In
2003, Garrett stepped up the rhetoric, warning “doom may loom”
with the “emergence of a virus „capable of infecting 40 percent
of the world's human population and killing unimaginable numbers.”
“The
havoc such a disease could wreak is commonly compared to the
devastation of the 1918-19 Spanish flu, which killed 50 million
people in 18 months. But avian flu is far more dangerous.. …humanity
could well face a pandemic unlike any ever witnessed,“ Garrett
wrote in a 2003 report called “The Next Pandemic” for a Council
on Foreign Relations publication.
In
2005, UN official David Nabarro said that flu pandemic could kill
between 5-150 million people, and that a pandemic disaster could
strike at any time, without any scientific evidence for such a
prediction.
The
World Bank estimated in 2008, a flu pandemic could kill 71 million
people around the world. and push the global economy into a “major
global recession”, costing more than $3 trillion.
Governments
have joined in the pandemic scare mongering.
Former
US Secretary of Homeland Security Michael Chertoff predicted in an
essay published in the Joint Force Quarterly Issue 51, in 2008, a
„severe pandemic influenza may affect the lives of millions of
Americans, cause significant numbers of illnesses and fatalities, and
substantially disrupt our economic and social stability.”
In 2005,
WHO had expanded existing regulations for handling infectious
diseases -- the International Health Regulations -- to create a
single, unifying strategic concept of how to manage the consequences
of a pandemic on a worldwide scale
that
involved synchronizing the actions taken by all governments and
pharmaceutical companies with those of WHO as soon as WHO identified
a pandemic.
On
July 7th, WHO’s Strategic Advisory Group of Experts (SAGE) on
Immunization held a meeting in Geneva and recommended the
implementation of a worldwide vaccination programme with new and
largely untested pandemic vaccines, which were, however, to be
allowed onto the market in the event of a pandemic emergency.
A
few days later on July 11th,
WHO’s Director General Dr Margaret Chan endorsed
the recommendations of SAGE, launching
the world’s biggest ever mass vaccination campaign using these new
vaccines to be administered in two doses and formulated with
oil-in-water adjuvants as well as thiomersal containing mercury.
Health
workers, fire fighters and the police, followed by babies, children
and pregnant women were designated as the priority groups for
vaccination when the swine flu jab campaign started autumn 2009 even
though there is no clinical data on the consequences of the new
pandemic vaccines on the health of pregnant women and children.
Under special pandemic
emergency regulations, vaccine companies do not, however, have to
provide any clinical data proving that their vaccines are safe or
efficacious. The fast-track testing process allowed under in a
pandemic emergency reduced some clinical trials to as little as 5
days. Also, these brief and rare trials were limited mainly to
healthy adults.
The French government
unveiled plans to set up 1,100 special vaccine centres around the
country to carry out the largest vaccine campaign in its entire
history. The CDC in the US announced that 90,000 swine flu vaccine
outlets would be set up across the USA. Countries like Germany and
the UK prepared to implement plans to use football stadiums for the
vaccine campaign.
But by
January 2010, the ambitious mass vaccination campaign initiated by
WHO lay in tatters. The French government had aimed to have 100 % of
its people vaccinated by the end of January 2010. But the government
was forced to abandon its programme at the beginning of January
because of the refusal of vast majority of people to take the vaccine
as well as growing protests over the campaign.
Against
the expectations of WHO and national governments, only small
proportions of the people in North America and Europe took the swine
flu vaccine, leaving governments sitting on gigantic surplus stocks.
In
addition, investigations had begun into whether WHO had communicated
an objectively false content about the danger of the swine flu
pandemic and also about the safety of the swine flu vaccines.
It is
verifiable, documented fact that WHO, national governments and the
mainstream media consistently and systematically exaggerated dangers
of the swine flu virus and the threat of a lethal mutation. It is a
verifiable, unambiguous fact that the swine flu pandemic vaccine, on
the other hand, was presented as safe, tested and effective even
though there was inadequate clinical data to support these claims. It
is a fact that false statements were made about the usefulness of the
vaccine for children and pregnant women that had no basis in clinical
trial results whatsoever.
In the
USA, it was the alternative media and radio stations that allowed the
facts about the swine flu vaccine to spread rapidly. People like Dr
Rebecca Carley, Dr Robin Falkov, Dr Joseph Mercola, Dr Ghislaine
Lanctot and Mike Adams helped spread the information about the
dangers of the vaccine that the mainstream media suppressed. Radio
shows like Project Camelot, Rumor Mill news and Coast to Coast played
a big role in warning people of the risks of the new vaccine as well
as about the laws allowing forced vaccination and quarantine.
In
Europe, where the alternative media is less developed and there are
far fewer independent radio stations, information circulated through
reports on blogs like Switzerland’s Alles Schall und Rauch.
In
France, the information about the vaccine galvanized the internet.
Christian Cotton, French campaigner, said that he had never seen so
much internet activity in his whole life as in the past seven months
when people debated the merits of taking the swine flu jab on the
internet. Raymond Haugustine in Belgium, Vicky Chrysou in Greece,
Claire Knox in Scotland and Joanna Karpasea-Jones in England, Jagoda
Savic in Bosnia, Marek Podlecki in Poland, Jean- Jacques Crevecoeur
in Canada and Dr Marc Girard and Dr Marc Vercoutere, Danka Derifaj
were just a few of the people who spent time and energy bringing
information into circulation.
In
Spain, the video of a nun Teresa Forcades helped spread the word
together with Claudia Calvo’s translations. Penny Bright, Jon
Eisen, the editor of Uncensored and film maker Brian Dodd helped
spread the word in New Zealand.
It was
mainly individual citizens using the internet that allowed
information about the swine flu vaccine to circulate unfiltered among
people in Europe. Facts about the swine flu vaccine suppressed by
WHO, governments, pharmaceutical companies were spread through email,
youtube clips, facebook and independent news sites. Bloggers have
kept issues such as the danger of the antiviral drug Tamiflu as well
as of the adjuvant, squalene, in the public eye when this information
has been consistently omitted by the mainstream media.
The
news that hundreds of people, including nurses, in Sweden -- the
first country in Europe to implement the mass swine flu vaccination
programme -- had become seriously sick or even died soon after
getting GlaxoSmithKline’s Pandemrix jab in October circulated
rapidly.
So did
the news that the German army had refused Baxter’s Celvapan vaccine
in September after its doctors had issued a recommendation against
forcing Baxter to drop the squalene in a bid to find a market.
Crucially,
the Polish Health Minister, Ewa Kopacz, a family doctor, refused to
buy the swine flu vaccines at the end of October because the jabs
were not adequately tested, news which also spread rapidly throughout
the world thanks to the internet.
The
objective facts about the potential dangers of the swine flu jab were
also presented by sections of the mainstream media, for example,
France 24 which gave Dr Marc Girard a platform, contributing to the
erosion of support for the swine flu vaccination.
As
of the end of January 2010, only about 30
million people in Europe, including 218,000 pregnant women, have
been vaccinated with the swine flu in
spite of the unprecedented campaign of scaremongering by WHO,
governments and media over the swine flu threat. According to a CDC
estimate, 61
million Americans wеrе vaccinated against swine flu or аbουt 20%
οf thе U.S. population. In the US too, the overwhelming majority of
people rejected thе vaccines.
In
an address to WHO’s Executive Board on January 18th,
Director General Dr Margaret Chan said that the organization had not
anticipated that people would refuse to take the swine flu vaccine.
She attributed the refusal to the growth of the new communication and
information technologies, which had indeed enabled people to access
information, documents and facts about the swine flu vaccine
suppressed by WHO and pharmaceutical companies as well as the
mainstream media.
The
internet has also proved to be a powerful, even revolutionary tool,
in gathering support for critical investigations into the swine flu
“scam.”
On
January 26th,
the Council of Europe Parliamentary Assembly (PACE) held an urgent
public hearing into whether WHO had exaggerated the danger of the
swine flu pandemic in order to force governments to buy vaccines and
so enrich pharmaceutical companies.
Former
SPD member of the German Bundestag and chairman the health committee
at PACE Dr Wolfgang Wodarg, who is an epidemiologist and lung
specialist, introduced the resolution for an inquiry into what he
called one of the “greatest medical scandals of the century.”
The
text of Wodarg’s motion stated: "In
order to promote their patented drugs and vaccines against flu,
pharmaceutical companies influenced scientists and official agencies
responsible for public health standards to alarm governments
worldwide and make them squander tight health resources on
inefficient vaccine strategies, and needlessly exposed millions of
healthy people to the risk of an unknown amount of side-effects from
insufficiently tested vaccines. The bird-flu campaign of 2005-2006
combined with the swine-flu campaign of 2009-2010 seem to have caused
a great deal of damage not only to some vaccinated patients and to
public health-budgets, but also to the credibility and accountability
of important international health-agencies.”
WHO’s
special advisor on pandemic influenza Dr Keiji Fukuda together with a
representative of European vaccine manufacturers, Sanofi executive,
Dr Luc Hessel, faced tough criticism at the public hearing but denied
accusations of hyping the swine flu to make money.
"The
world is going through a real pandemic. The description of it as a
fake is wrong and irresponsible. We welcome any legitimate review
process that can improve our work,“ Fukuda said after the hearing.
But
many of the WHO experts who had claimed to be independent have turned
out to have financial links to the very pharmaceutical companies that
have benefitted most from their recommendations.
Danish
journalist Louise Voller reported on SAGE group members with
financial links to pharmaceutical companies. These include Professor
Juhani Eskola is the director of the Finnish research vaccine
programme (THL) whose institute received almost 6.3 million Euro from
GSK for research on vaccines during 2009, according to documents
acquired through the Danish ‘Freedom of Information Act, making GSK
the institute’s primary source of funding.
It was
on the recommendation of THL and SAGE that the Finnish government
bought millions of doses of GSK’s Pandemrix vaccine.
Eskola
did not reveal his conflict of interest as was the case with other
WHO vaccine experts. Dr. Neil Ferguson has received funding Baxter,
GlaxoSmithKline und Roche as well as insurance companies that he
advised about pandemics but this was only revealed by WHO after the
Danish newspaper publicized the fact. Dr. Friedrich Hayden,
consultant to MedImmune and Sanofi Pasteur has also received money
from Roche, RW Johnson und SmithKline Beecham. These interests were
not declared on WHO website.
Other
WHO experts that have links to the vaccine manufacturers include
Professor
Malik Peiris from University of Hong Kong has received money from
Baxter GSK und Sanofi Pasteur. Dr.
Peter Figueroa, Professor at the University of the West
Indies,
has received money from Merck; Dr. Arnold Monto is an advisor to
Chiron, GlaxoSmithKline, MedImmune, Roche, Novartis, Baxter und
Sanofi Pasteur. Dr. Albert Osterhaus, head of the European Scientists
Fighting Influenza, financed by Baxter, Crucell, Novartis,
Hoffmann-La Roche, MedImmune, Nobilon, Sanofi Pasteur, MSD, Glaxo
SmithKline und Solvay.
In
addition, dozens of managers belonging to pharmaceutical companies
attended the SAGE meeting on July 7th
that recommended a global vaccination campaign with pandemic
vaccines, albeit with the official status of „observers“. It is
not clear what role these pharmaceutical executives belonging to
companies like Novartis and Baxter played in generating the decision
by SAGE to recommend the vaccines because WHO has refused to publish
the minutes, maintaining there no minutes were taken.
This
lack of transparency has fuelled concerns that pharmaceutical
companies have played a key role behind the scenes in WHO, also
crucially in getting the pandemic criteria changed to allow a
pandemic emergency level 6 to be declared over the mild swine flu.
In
fact, to be able to declare the pandemic emergency at all, WHO had to
change the criteria. WHO changed its definition of a pandemic on its
website at the end of May 2009, dropping the need for “an enormous
number of people to have contracted the illness or died” for a
pandemic to be declared. Instead, a virus that spread in two WHO
zones was considered enough.
The
change in the criteria enabled a pandemic level 6 declaration to be
finally made by WHO in June 11th on the recommendation of an
emergency committee whose names WHO has refused to release so that no
assessment of their links to pharmaceutical companies or of conflicts
of interest is possible.
WHO
has defended itself, saying that it did not change the pandemic
criteria but simply reverted to an original, looser definition.
By
definition a pandemic is, however, a one off event and qualitatively
different from a seasonal flu type infection.
To
define a pandemic to include every single flu, even one as mild as
the swine flu, is to distort the very meaning of the word “pandemic”
beyond recognition.
WHO’s
new pandemic definition is so loose it could apply to any flu,
undermining the raison d’etre of a global pandemic emergency
management system altogether.
Fukuda
claimed at the CoE public hearing that WHO’s pandemic definition
was the result of the work of 135 experts. If that is the case, WHO
has to be held responsible for hiring, and listening to, experts who
are so incompetent.
"Rational
scientific independent advice should be supreme, but there was an
imperative behind this which was a financial one," said Paul
Flynn, UK MP said at the Council of Europe's hearing.
Adding
to the impression that WHO was manipulating data to justify declaring
a pandemic, the organization stopped
logging
cases of swine flu infection and told governments they should stop
testing to see whether people had the swine flu on July 10th.
Though
there is no evidence that the swine flu virus will mutate into a
lethal virus. WHO has maintained that this was a likely scenario.
A
lethal virus is only likely to emerge, in fact, if a scientist with
strong links to WHO, Professor Bruno Lina, succeeds in mixing the
swine flu and the bird flu virus in a lab in Lyon as reported by
Nature.
Concerns
about the influence that pharmaceutical organizations have on WHO are
reinforced by the fact the organization derived 81% of its budget for
2008-2009 from voluntary contributions, according to an estimated
budget on the Council on Foreign Relations website. WHO’s member
states gave just $958 million while three times as much -- $3.2
billion -- came from voluntary donations from the private sector,
national governments, NGOS, and private foundations, such as the
Rockefeller foundation.
Because
WHO has not replied to my requests for access to its annual budge at
the time of writing, it is not possible to see which pharmaceutical
companies contribute to WHO using what channels. Pharmaceutical
industry associations are classified as NGOs in WHO’s budget.
From
the funding alone, it can be seen that behind WHO stand powerful
pharmaceutical companies, and, ultimately, the banks, and these
entities are also the main beneficiaries of any swine flu emergency
pandemic declaration and mass vaccination campaign.
The
Council of Europe public hearing of Fukuda and Hessel was just one of
many investigations that have been launched into whether WHO
exaggerated the threat of the swine flu virus in order to enrich
pharmaceutical companies. In France, a parliamentary inquiry into the
government’s handling of the swine flu vaccine campaign was
announced in January.
In
2009, the Dutch parliament investigated the conflicts of interest of
WHO expert and Dutch government advisor Albert Osterhaus. Osterhaus
was also chairman of the European Scientific Working group on
Influenza (ESWI), which is entirely financed by Baxter, Novartis,
GlaxoSmithKline, MedImmune, Roche and other pharmaceutical companies
that make billions from a pandemic emergency declaration.
Many
of the scientist acting as advisors to national governments have
turned out to have links to vaccine manufacturers. UK government
swine flu advisor and SAGE group member Sir Roy Anderson sits on the
board of GSK, for example.
The
European Medicines Agency, the EU vaccine regulator, is two thirds
funded by pharmaceutical companies.
Serious
though the allegations that pharmaceutical companies have sought to
profit from a false pandemic are, there is strong evidence to support
the notion that the mass vaccination campaign was an attempt to cause
damage and death to millions of people.
If the
swine flu vaccines had just been designed for profit or as part of
patenting scam, the pharmaceutical companies could have put some
harmless substance like sugar water into them.
But
the swine flu vaccines contain mercury known to cause neurological
damage and autism in children. In addition, they contain, the
adjuvant squalene. There is a substantial body of scientific evidence
showing that squalene contributed to the Gulf War Syndrome among US
and UK veterans.
Both
these vaccines are classified as biodefense stockpile drugs by the EU
and US regulators according to biopharma databases. They are,
therefore, bioweapons. This classification by government regulators
was the reason why the GSK and Novartis swine flu vaccines were
stored in military barracks in countries such as France and
Switzerland before being distributed to vaccine centres. One UN
employee based in Switzerland was summoned to a military base to
receive his swine flu jab.
These
vaccines cannot be given to people under ordinary circumstances
because clinical trials proving they are safe have nto been
performed.
However,
as soon as WHO makes a pandemic level 6 declaration, new standards
for vaccines and anti viral drugs come into force.
Anti
viral drugs, such as Tamiflu, associated with severe side effects,
were allowed to be used months after their expiry date.
Under
special emergency pandemic approval procedures, pandemic vaccines do
not have to be proven to be safe or efficacious before they are
administered to populations.
The
vaccine manufacturers are only obliged to carry out a study to
ascertain whether the vaccines have serious side effects after the
vaccines are administered.
GSK is
currently carrying out a study on the Pandemrix swine flu vaccine in
the UK.
Governments
are not obliged to carry out any study on whether the vaccines have
adverse side effects.
Polish
health minister and family doctor, Ewa Kopacz, rejected the swine
vaccines for Poland precisely because they haven’t been adequately
tested.
Both
GSK’s and Novartis’ swine flu vaccines contain squalene, which
can lead to autoimmune disease. In addition, Baxter’s Celvapan was
made using diseased kidneys of African green monkeys, the cell
culture that gave the world AIDS.
Novartis’s
Focetria swine flu vaccine contains MF59, an adjuvant containing
squalene and polysorbate 80, two ingredients that have been linked to
diseases.
GSK’s
Pandemrix contains the squalene fASO3 as well as polysorbate 80.
These
ambiguous bioweapon/vaccines could only be given to civilian
populations because a declaration of a pandemic emergency by WHO
triggers new standards for vaccine approval in the EU. The safety and
efficacy of vaccines no longer need to be proven under EMEA
guidelines under the pretext of the urgency of managing a deadly
pandemic.
It is
true that squalene is an oil molecule that is found naturally in the
human body, but given intravenously it incites the immune system to
destroy all the natural squalene in the body including squalene that
had been injected into the bloodstream.
Dr
Joseph Mercola explains:
“Oil-based
vaccination adjuvants like squalene have been proved to generate
concentrated, unremitting immune responses over long periods of
time.”
A
2000 study published in the American
Journal of Pathology
demonstrated a single injection of the adjuvant squalene into rats
triggered “chronic, immune-mediated joint-specific inflammation,”
also known as rheumatoid arthritis.
Your
immune system recognizes squalene as an oil molecule native to your
body. It is found throughout your nervous system and brain. In fact,
you can consume squalene
in olive oil
and not only will your immune system recognize it, you will also reap
the benefits of its antioxidant properties.
The
difference between “good” and “bad” squalene is the route by
which it enters your body. Injection is an abnormal route of entry
which incites your immune system to attack all
the squalene in your body, not just the vaccine adjuvant.
Your
immune system will attempt to destroy the molecule wherever it finds
it, including in places where it occurs naturally, and where it is
vital to the health of your nervous system.
Gulf
War veterans with Gulf War Syndrome (GWS) received anthrax vaccines
which contained squalene. MF59 (the Novartis squalene adjuvant) was
an unapproved
ingredient in experimental anthrax vaccines
and has since been linked to the devastating autoimmune diseases
suffered by countless Gulf War vets.
The
Department of Defense made every attempt to deny that squalene was
indeed an added contaminant in the anthrax vaccine administered to
Persian Gulf war military personnel – deployed and non-deployed –
as well as participants in the more recent Anthrax Vaccine
Immunization Program (AVIP).
However,
the FDA discovered the presence of squalene in certain lots of AVIP
product. A test was developed to detect anti-squalene antibodies in
GWS patients, and a clear link was established between the
contaminated product and all the GWS sufferers who had been injected
with the vaccine containing squalene.
A
study conducted at Tulane Medical School and published in the
February 2000 issue of Experimental
Molecular Pathology
included these stunning statistics:
“ … the
substantial majority (95%) of overtly ill deployed GWS patients had
antibodies to squalene. All (100%) GWS patients immunized for service
in Desert Shield/Desert Storm who did not deploy, but had the same
signs and symptoms as those who did deploy, had antibodies to
squalene.
In
contrast, none (0%) of the deployed Persian Gulf veterans not showing
signs and symptoms of GWS have antibodies to squalene. Neither
patients with idiopathic autoimmune disease nor healthy controls had
detectable serum antibodies to squalene. The majority of symptomatic
GWS patients had serum antibodies to squalene.”
According
to Dr. Viera Scheibner, Ph.D., a former principle research scientist
for the government of Australia:
“… this
adjuvant [squalene] contributed to the cascade of reactions called
“Gulf War Syndrome,” documented in the soldiers involved in the
Gulf War.
The
symptoms they developed included arthritis, fibromyalgia,
lymphadenopathy, rashes, photosensitive rashes, malar rashes, chronic
fatigue, chronic headaches, abnormal body hair loss, non-healing skin
lesions, aphthous ulcers, dizziness, weakness, memory loss, seizures,
mood changes, neuropsychiatric problems, anti-thyroid effects,
anaemia, elevated ESR (erythrocyte sedimentation rate), systemic
lupus erythematosus, multiple sclerosis, ALS (amyotrophic lateral
sclerosis), Raynaud’s phenomenon, Sjorgren’s syndrome, chronic
diarrhoea, night sweats and low-grade fevers.”
A
study of 39,000 Germans who received a FLUAD vaccine with squalene in
2000 does little to clarify the long-term consequences of squalene
because no follow up study on whether the subjects developed
autoimmune disorders over a longer period of time was performed.
“Autoimmune
disorders like those seen in Gulf War Syndrome frequently take years
to diagnose due to the vagueness of early symptoms. Complaints like
headaches, fatigue and chronic aches and pains are symptoms of many
different illnesses and diseases,” notes Dr Mercola.
Dr
Jürgen Seefeldt calculated that 850,000 people would have died from
the swine flu vaccine in 15 years if the German government had given
it to all 50 million people as planned. He based his estimates on the
number of young and healthy US soldiers who died from cancer of
autoimmune diseases 15 years after receiving anthrax vaccinations
containing squalene in the Gulf War.
In
1991, a total of 696,841 US soldiers were given anthrax vaccines with
squalene and mercury. By 2005, 11,620 of these soldiers were dead,
many from autoimmune diseases and cancer.
Another
256,000 soldiers applied for compensation and 196,000 of these
received damages. Only 29,000 applications were turned down while
31,000 are still being reviewed.
Scaling
up these figures, it can be estimated that about 20 million Germans
would have suffered from severe side effects as a result of the jab.
Seefeldt
called the “biggest crime since the Holocaust” and called for the
resignation of the health minister as well as the German Chancellor
Angela Merkel.
However,
his calculations of the number of people who are damaged by the swine
flu vaccines could be an underestimate.
Much
higher concentrations of squalene are present in the swine flu jabs
than in the anthrax vaccines, and they could be proportionately more
harmful.
Gary
Jacobucci writes:
“The
average quantity of squalene injected into the US soldiers abroad and
at home in the anthrax vaccine during and after the Gulf
War was 34.2 micrograms per billion micrograms of water. According to
one study, this was the cause of the Gulf War syndrome in 25% of
697.000 US personnel at home and abroad. You can find this table
of FDA analyses from the Gulf War lots on The Military Vaccine
Resource Directory website
a..
AVA 020 - 11 ppb squalene (parts per billion)
b..
AVA 030 - 10 ppb squalene
c..
AVA 038 - 27 ppb squalene
d..
AVA 043 - 40 ppb squalene
e..
AVA 047 - 83 ppb squalene
These
values were confirmed by Prof. R. F. Garry before the House of
Representatives. Prof Garry was the man to discover the connection
between the Gulf War syndrome and squalene.
According
to his findings, the Gulf War syndrome was caused by
squalene, which was banned by a Federal Court Judge in 2004 from
the Pentagons use.
As
seen on p. 6 of this EMEA document, the Pandremix vaccine contains
10,68 mg of squalene per 0,5 ml. This corresponds to 2.136.0000
microgrammes pr. billion microgrammes of water, i.e. one million
times more squalene per dose than in. There is any reason to believe
that this will make people sick to a much higher extent than in
1990/91. This appears murderous to me."
Moreover,
the Pandemrix vaccine contains particles that are nano in size, but
data on the safety of nanovaccines is scant.
In
August, a study published in the European Respiratory Journal,
however, showed that seven young Chinese women suffered permanent
lung damage and two died after working for months without adequate
protection in a paint factory using nanoparticles.
"These
cases arouse concern that long term exposure to nanoparticles without
protective measures may be related to serious damage to human lungs,"
Yuguo Song from the occupational disease and clinical toxicology
department at Chaoyang Hospital in Beijing told Reuters.
But
squalene is not the only toxic ingredient.
“Mercury,
which makes up 49.6% of thiomersal, is an extremely toxic substance
that causes cancer,” says Dr Seefeldt
“Mercury
is
the most toxic non-radioactive element on Earth and poisonous even in
small quantities.”
The
Pandemrix vaccine contains 5 microgramms of thiomersal. Two doses --
two doses were originally planned -- would have resulted in people
receiving 10 microgramms of thiomersal.
The
measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccine containing thimerosal is believed
to have contributed to the huge increase in autism in children in the
USA.
In
spite of the fact there was no clinical data on how these new swine
flu vaccines with mercury and squalene would affect the health of
young children and pregnant women, these were designated as priority
groups by WHO.
Assurances
were given as to the safety of the vaccine with reference to the
regulatory approval of the European Medicines Agency and other
authorities – but not with reference to clinical data because there
are no clinical data.
In
fact, the few clinical studies to be conducted by the pharmaceutical
companies on the health consequences of the swine flu vaccine on
pregnant women and children started at the same time as the actual
swine flu vaccination campaign and they are not due to be concluded
until one year later in autumn 2010.
The
mass swine flu vaccination campaign is, in effect, a gigantic
biological experiment, even though such experiments are banned under
law.
Moreover
the outcome of this experiment will never be fully known because
there is no proper system of pharmacovigilance is in place.
Angelika
Kögel-Schauz of the Parents for Vaccine Information (Eltern für
Impfaufklärung) has written about the manipulation of data about
vaccine side effects by the Paul Ehrlich Institute in an apparent
violation of the law.
In
addition, there authorities are making no attempt to track how many
of the people vaccinated with the swine flu jab contracted swine flu
from the actual vaccination as was reported to happen in one case in
Israel. There is evidence the Spanish flu of 1918 was caused by the
mass vaccination of soldiers.
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)