MAIN ARGUMENT
DRAFT
MORE SOON
The evidence from the Greek prosecutor probes concerning Gates prior knowledge of warnings about the harms of pandemic vaccines, the suppression of those warnings also by employing crimes against a reporter, and corrupting due process over a period of more than ten years, to uphold a continuous threat against the reporter and his later covid vaccine mis representations and the resulting vaccine harm to Dutch residents establish the liability of Gates.
I will show how the Greek prosecutor probes in conjunction with other evidence, clinical studies, testimony, public statements, funding records establish the five elements required by the Dutch civil law to find Gates guilty and personally liable under the civil law for Unlawful actions, namely, Unlawful actions, Attribution, Damage, Causation and Relativity.
I will show the same applies to Albert Bourla who joined in a repeat of the very crimes of D 15 218 using the same people and same documents in 2022 after receiving an email warning from me as I discuss.
I. The central case and its historical foundation
1. The central question is whether Bill Gates personally participated in a continuing course of conduct involving material misrepresentations about the special class of experimental pandemic vaccines to which covid, ebola, the swine flu etc belong, suppression of information challenging those representations, and alleging the vaccines are actually designed to cause mass sickness and death, and so are legally and functionally indistinguishable from biowwapons, and so is responsible for the resulting harm to members of the public who took the vaccines based on false assurances and deprived of the capacity to give genuine informed consent.
The Greek prosecutor probe D 15 218 in particular sheds light not merely on what Gates said publicly, but what he knew, when he knew it, what information was available to him, what actions he took, and whether those actions contributed to misleading Dutch residents about covid vaccines and whether the deception was deliberate.
2. The Greek prosecutorial investigation D 15 218 and its interconnected proceedings E 17 449, E 17 378 and E 17 379, are significant because they provide an earlier documentary record in the form of official state prosecutor probe records against which Gates's subsequent conduct can be examined.
The probes contain police and prosecutor reports documenting my allegations and warnings dating from 2014, including warnings about the special class of vaccines to which ebola, covid belong, specifically, that they are designed to cause mass sickness and deaths to the UK Parliament, and the crimes against me in April 2015 with the motive given as precisely the above warnings, and the evidence that the subsequent police investigation was corrupted and the files were removed illegally.
These records help establish prior notice, motive, the identity of Gates and Bourla and the state of their knowledge when they made claims about covid vaccines being safe and effective personally or organized and snactioned intermediaries to do so by comparing their public claims to their private suppression of scientific evidence and criticism using ordinary sense crimes and corruption of due process, witness tampering and obstruction of justice.
3. The reporter's status as a civil party is particularly important. It identifies me, the reporter, as an individual who formally asserted rights in the original criminal proceedings D 15 218 capturing Bill gates, rather than merely someone who subsequently expressed allegations in public.
The original complaint, civil-party documentation and police records establish the precise procedural status, the offences investigated and the rights recognised under Greek law. This gives the investigation a concrete historical foundation.
X
Z
V
4. The starting point for examining prior knowledge is the reporter's 2014 warnings concerning Ebola and experimental pandemic vaccines.
My warnings identified biological risks, irregularities in pandemic vaccine trials and development and concerns about the scientific basis for claims of safety and efficacy.
Some of the original publication and supporting scientific documents are preserved and should be examined.
The issue is whether Gates personally received and understood the material information, not simply whether the warnings existed.
5. The reported Gates Foundation commentary in the Tampa Bay Times/PunditFact in August 2014 is an important evidentiary link.
The original article, the complete Foundation response and the reporter's underlying publication can be compared word for word.
A comparison establishes that the Gates Foundation commented on a claim of mine and on a paragraph lifted from my blog out of context.
The commentary demonstrates that the Foundation had examined specific scientific objections, it may establish institutional notice.
Gates was in 2014, the co chair with Melinda and Bill Gates Sr of the family Foundation.
He is now the sole chairman.
The co-chairs were Bill Gates, Melinda French Gates until 2024 and, until 2020, Bill Gates Sr.
Warren Buffett was a trustee until June 2021.
The significance of this piece of evidence for tying Gates to the original crimes and subsequent corruption and to a campaign of deliberate deception about the covid vaccines seems to be known to Gates himself.
AG EVIDENCE TAMPERING CLOUD
MAY 2022
PAR FROM MY BLOG MISSING IN THE SCRIBD UPLOADS SENT TO AGS
DRASTIC ACTION
GATES COMES TO GREECE NOURA
USE THEODEKTI s original corrupted probe
Taken together with other cumulative evidence, it can be established Gates himself and not just his family Foundation, knew about my warnings and that he personally directed the attempt to imprison me without due process to suppress my warnings that pandemic vaccines are actually bioweapons.
6. The reporter's submission to the UK Parliament on 17 February 2015 provides another important chronological element.
My Open letter called " Ebola Vaccines Open Letter " presented detailed objections concerning experimental pandemic vaccines and their potential risks.
Correspondence with parliamentary representatives, including MPs Sarah Teather's office, also about vaccines in Kenya containing secret sterilizing agents, and Dr Sarah Wollaston, then Chair of the UK Health committee, is a part of the original police evidence records in D 15 218.
These documents demonstrate that my warnings were communicated to public authorities and were sufficiently specific to warrant examination.
7. The subsequent UK parliamentary developments should be examined as independent corroboration of the existence and seriousness of the controversy.
On receipt of my warnings, the party of Sarah Teather unexpectedly stopped Medical Innovation Bill, and so the possibility of giving the UK population the experimental Merck Ervebo vaccines in 2015 at the time of an ebola outbreak and the rparliamentary correspondence with Dr Sarah Wollaston establishes a proposed investigation into pandemic preparedness in which I am invited to testify.
There are also correspondence with Jean Claude Juncker, then ECP president and members of his pandemic team.
The records establish what Parliament considered and decided, including my specific request to the UK Parliament that Gates, Foundation be investigated.
II. The crimes against the reporter
8. The events of April 2015 require particular attention because attempts were made to secure my imprisonment without due process in retaliation for my warnings and science reporting.
The original police complaints, witness statements, contemporaneous communications and reports should establish what happened, who was involved, what instructions were given and what reasons were expressed, namely, my reports, my blog.
The crimes happened in the Monastery of St John the Forerunner in Anatoli, Greece, and the accused are the Abbess, Theodekti and Theoniki
A police doctors report documenting a beating as part of the attempt at imprisonment without due process.
Two police reports document the attempt by Theodekti to bribe by then lawyer and with the knowledge of the Holy Synod on April 27th 2015 and her insistence that I should leave Greece and not ask for my money to the monastery back, specifically 96,000 euros in bank transfers to the private bank account of Theodekti, Polychronia Vallianatou and her then Skete in Estonia.
The attempt to bribe my then lawyer Konstantinos Christopoulos provides important corroboration fo my allegations
If the claims I had made were unfounded, there is no need to bribe a lawyer.
If my 96,000 euros in bank transfers had been returned to me, there is no need to bribe a lawyer expressly to make sure I do not ask for my money back.
9. The motive which Theodekti gave for her crimes is relevant to the question of whether the reporter was targeted because of the information I was attempting to disclose.
Theodekti before witnesses expressly said that the reporter's publications were expressly identified as the reason for the offences, supporting an inference of retaliatory intent.
She framed them using the same language as the TBT, Punditfact and later Gates and Bourla talking points of a conspiracy theorist who was "mentally ill" suggesting the content of my reports criticizing the pandemic vaccines, showed I was crazy and evil
She committed the attempt to imprison me without due process just as I was about to leave the monastery and was organizing my things, at the last opportunity, so to speak.
She knew she was committing a crime, as shown by the fact that when the police refused to participate and required hr to follow due process, she abandoned the attempt and I was able to leave the monastery and file charges.
The timing following the parliamentary submissions is also relevant. Motive and temporal proximity and the TBT, Punditfact article independently support that Gates ordered the suppression.
10. The decisive issue is Gates's personal connection to the original crimes and cover up.
The TBT, Punditfact article connects Gates or authorised representatives to the planning, instigation, financing or execution of the original crime.
But the definitive proof comes in the corruption of due process to remove all the evidence against Gates, my inability to have it reconsidered in ten years, his role in two SLAPP charges and in ongoing threats to my life and economic coercion violating my rights as a politiki enagon and civil party.
His personal responsibility is shown by the evidence in the probe and the applicable legal standard, not an inference based solely on his wealth, position or institutional associations.
11. The subsequent treatment of the reporter's civil-party rights raises a separate issue requiring investigation.
The records show that I started the case as a civil party, paying the requisite fee and my status was changed from civil party to witness in order to deny me access to file, prevent me from seeing the removal of the evidence and prevent me from effectively challenging decisions concerning the investigation and loding an appeal.
I was never notified of any reason for the change of my status from civil party to witness and repeated attempts to restore my civil party status and appeal were rejected in violation of my rights in order to allow Gates to escape investigation under due process.
The original files, , notifications, appeals and relevant Greek legal provisions establish these actions are unlawful and communications establish that justice officials deliberately interfered with the reporter's rights and continued to do so despite having the evidence that the original police reports had been removed from the file illegally.
12. The disappearance or omission of original police and prosecutorial reports is particularly important.
When the original records, which were returned to me by police and prosecutors in early 2016, when the Greek Supreme Court reopened an investigation, are compared with the later versions of D 15 218, including the April 2016 prosecutorial indictment of Theodekti, where I am named as a witness, it is simple to identify which documents existed, which subsequently became unavailable, who had custody of them, who authorised any changes and whether the omissions were intentional.
Because repeated and deliberate suppression is established, it constitute separate misconduct and may explains why the original allegations against gGates did not receive proper examination.
13. The role of individual officials must be examined independently. This includes the roleof prosecutor Aikaterina Papaiannou and other persons identified in the reporter's documentation as knowingly removing the files in 2016 to allow Gates to escape investigation and to retaliate against the reporter, myself.
The corruption is proven from the particular decisions made, by the fact these decisions did not comply with the law, which requires all the evidence gathered to be considered.
Ongoing corruption is proven by the fact that the same prosecutor Aikaterina Papaiannou is now in charge of that file as the top prosecutor in the court of first instance and is actively blocking requests by me reinvetigate the original evidence along with the Greek Supreme Court and Ministry of Justice
III. The connection to covid vaccine representations
14. The knowledge and conduct documented in the earlier proceedings have a demonstrable connection to Gates's subsequent covid vaccine statmentsactivities.
The reporter maintains that the same class of experimental pandemic vaccines was involved with the same risks (Simian Virus, Cytokine storms, irregular trials) and that the scientific objections raised before covid were relevant to the later public representations.
When we compare the earlier warnings and the private information available to Gates, which he tried to suppress, before and during and after the covid vaccine development and rollout with his public statements, we see a gap.
15. Gates's public statements concerning covid vaccines can be examined against the claims in the criminal probes which Gates tried to suppress using crimes.
This includes statements about safety, efficacy, protection against infection, transmission and the duration of protection.
Each statement must be assessed in its original context and against the evidence available from the reporter suppressed in the probe D 15 218 to determine that Gates made a knowingly false or misleading claim about the covid vaccines when he communicated them to the public.
He lied by omission. He did not tell the public there was a criminal probe opened in Greece in 2015 in which he was named and that he had escaped investigation and trial only by removing the files and had revictimized the reporter precisely to stop the warnings covid vaccines were designed to cause mass death and sickness.
16. Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla's public representations should be examined separately.
The investigation should establish which statements Bourla personally made, what information Pfizer possessed when those statements were approved, and whether internal documents contradicted material assurances communicated to consumers.
Gates's conduct and Bourla's conduct can be considered as a joint conduct from 2022 when they knowingly joined together to imprison the reporter without due process after the AGs in the USA were sent the evidence in D 15 218 and he evidence of evidence tampering .
SCRIBD
LAWFARE
E 17 449
E 17 378
E 17 379
ECONOMIC COERCISON
17.
Gates used grants and institutional relationships and intermediaries to disseminate representations he knew to be falseto the public.
Relevant material includes Gates Foundation funding records, communications with pharmaceutical companies, public-health organisations, governments, regulators and media organisations.
The question whether Gates knowingly directed or facilitated a coordinated communication strategy involving materially misleading claims can be seen also from his coordination with Kushner, Trump, Soros and Ursula von der Leyen in the crimes against a reporter in D 15 218, E 17 449 and others
18. The suppression of the reporter becomes relevant to the covid vaccine proceedings because the connection can be established between the suppression and the information subsequently communicated to the public.
If Gates personally knew that the reporter was attempting to disclose material information about the risks of covid vaccines, and if evidence establishes that Gates participated in efforts to prevent that information from reaching the public, this supports an inference of intentional concealment.
The investigation establishes who acted, what information was suppressed, why it was suppressed and how the conduct affected the information available to the Dutch and the central personal role of Gates in both the crimes and suppression and in the covid vaccine campaign.
19. The central issue is that the public was deliberately deprived of material information necessary to make informed decisions.
Gates public statements omitted material limitations, understated known risks or presented uncertain scientific conclusions as established facts.
He omitted to tell the public also about the criminal probe D 15 218 and the significance of the evidence against him and its removal from the file and why he has done nothing to restore the evidence and allow a due process investigation if he is innocent
This despite my emailing AGs, law enforcements, Senators, governments around the world and the media the evidence
I allege it is because Gates knows the prosecutor records and evidence support my allegations against him and he does not want them to be scrutinized.
Russian TV interviewed me on them in 2016 as discussed in E 17 449
I allege the Broad Gates funded media and alt media do not want to publicize the probes because it would betray their role as propaganda for Gates and how rare and dangerous genuinely independent reporting about the risks of covid vaccine harms is.
The relevant evidence including about the irregular covid vaccine and ebola vaccine clinical-trial protocols, regulatory submissions,clinical studies, adverse events reports.
20. My warnings concerning cytokine storms, simian virus contamination and the deliberate design of covid vaccines as biological weapons have been substantiated by research and clinical studies
McKernan et al
A 2025 peer-reviewed study examined residual plasmid DNA and SV40 promoter-enhancer sequences in Pfizer and Moderna vaccine samples. It raises questions about residual DNA quantities and the suitability of certain measurement methods.
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/08916934.2025.2551517?utm_source=chatgpt.com
E 17 449
CONTAMINATION
Pfizer changed from Process 1 to Process 2 when moving from clinical-trial manufacturing to commercial-scale manufacturing.
Process 2 used plasmid DNA containing SV40 promoter/enhancer sequences, and Pfizer subsequently acknowledged detecting those sequences in residual DNA in its commercial vaccine drug-substance batches.
yet this is the very promoter I warned about in a report written as a concerned citizen for the FBI in 2009 which was sought by the Russian TV researchers whom Kushner allegedly helped with a visa and allegations whihc Kushner sought to suppress using crimes in 2017 triggering the investigation E 17 449
1. What is established?
A. Pfizer used two different manufacturing processes.
Documented
Process 1: Used to manufacture the vaccine batches used in the original clinical trials.
Process 2: Developed for large-scale commercial manufacturing and used for the wider vaccine rollout.
This is explicitly acknowledged in the European Medicines Agency's (EMA) original assessment report.
Documented
Process 1 used PCR-generated DNA templates. Process 2 used bacterial plasmids, which were linearised before being used to manufacture mRNA.
This is a significant manufacturing difference, not simply an increase in production volume.
C. SV40 promoter/enhancer sequences are present in the plasmid DNA used in Process 2.
Documented
Pfizer's residual DNA characterisation report, subsequently made publicly available through the EMA, explicitly acknowledges the presence of SV40 promoter sequence elements in residual DNA.
Does this establish that Bourla and Pfizer changed the process to introduce SV40 contamination?
There are three different issues here:
Pfizer changed the manufacturing process. Established.
Process 2 introduced a plasmid DNA template containing SV40 promoter/enhancer sequences, some of which remained in the final product. Documented.
Pfizer deliberately changed the process in order to introduce SV40-containing material into vaccines for mass distribution. Not established by the available documentation.
The documented manufacturing rationale was scaling up production to meet commercial and emergency supply requirements.
There are also legitimate scientific questions about the adequacy of residual DNA testing, the size of DNA fragments, and the methods used to quantify them.
But when we consider the events in 2017 concerning my warning of this, the role of Kushner, who helped negotiate the covid vacicnes with Bourla for the USA, in trying to suppress these warnings, it can be argued that the change from Process 1 to Process 2 was not an innocent technical substitution
Bourla and Pfizer's leadership knew that there was a plan to introduce additional DNA sequences, including SV40 promoter/enhancer elements, into the manufacturing chain to cause mass sickness and deaths.
I discussed this very plan in an FBI report in 2009 sought and obstained by then Kremlin based TV who allegedly worked with Kushner to carry out the research.
It must be asked why a product tested predominantly under Process 1 was replaced by a commercially manufactured product using a materially different process, and whether the risks and differences were fully disclosed to regulators and what the likelihood of this being a random event.
But the crimes to silence a reporter specifically for such warnings are the crucial evidence relevant to consciousness of wrongdoing and corporate conductas discussed in D 15 218 .
The crimes in D 15 218 and E 17 449 supprt an inference of intent.
Gates joined by Bourla and Kushner and Ursula von der Leyen sought to silence a reporter because they knowingly concealed material information while ensuring that the Process 2 product reached the public.
CYTOKINE STORMS
MY WARNING FROM 2009
An adverse inflammatory reaction does not establish that a product was designed to cause it, and the presence of a biological mechanism does not establish that a vaccine is legally a biological weapon.
The crimes in D 15 218 and E 17 449 etc to suppress my warnings about just this support an inference of intent.
Gates joined by Bourla and Kushner and Ursula von der Leyen sought to silence a reporter because they knowingly concealed material information about the covid vaccines being designed to cause cytokine storms.
21. Emergency authorisation and accelerated development must also be examined in their proper regulatory context.
The applicable clinical-trial, regulatory and pharmacovigilance requirements were satisfied, what limitations were disclosed and whether any individual knowingly misrepresented the status of the evidence.
I documented from 2009 and again from 2014, 2015 onwards in detail the way emergency use authorization was being used to subvert scrutiny of the harmful effects of this special class of pandemic vaccines.
The parallels between the irregular ebola vaccine trials and the covid vaccine trials are striking
PARALLELS X
Yet, despite these facts, both Merck s ervebo ebola vaccine and the mrna covid vaccines obtained not just emergency use authorization but a regular license. CHECK
IV. Establishing the causal chain and harm to Dutch residents
22. We must establish the connection between the misconduct and identifiable members of the Dutch public.
It is insufficient to demonstrate that controversial statements were made or that the public received repeated messaging. The investigation must identify the representations communicated to consumers, the individuals responsible for them, the means of communication and whether the representations were material to the decisions made by the affected individuals.
23. The role of intermediaries acting for Gates and Bourla must be examined because deception can be communicated through media and institutions rather than through direct personal contact between the person making a representation and every Dutch resident.
Government communications, pharmaceutical marketing, public-health campaigns and media coverage with funding links to Gates, Bourla, Pfizer repeated in coordination the same false claims as Gates and Bourla.
24. The covid vaccine injuries claimed by Dutch residents must be established independently.
Under the ECJ Curia 2017, a vaccine is identified as causing an injury if 3 conditions are met
Temporal proximity
The absence of the condition before the vaccine or in the individual or family history
A pattern of similar harms
All cause excess death mortality, adverse events, clinical studies and other evidence establishes a plausible association and individual causation.
25. We need to distinguish between unlawful representations about covid vaccine safety, individual injuries of people who relied on these representations and took the covid vaccine and the health, economic and others losses suffered by plaintiffs.
These are related but separate questions.
Evidence of a misleading commercial representation establishes a consumer-protection violation
while scientific evidence establishes that everyone of the seven, now plaintiffs, who received a covid vaccine suffered an injury from it.
Two have died.
The Greek prosecutor probes and the suppression of a reporter giving warnings proves Gates, Bourla committed deliberate deception.
26. The five central elements of the proposed investigative theory should therefore be examined together:
Unlawfulness:
It is shown that Gates,Bourla knowingly made materially misleading representations, deliberately concealed warnings and engaged in probibited acts both in relation to the reporter and in relation to the public who reasonably relied on their assurances that the covid vaccines were safe and effective to take them
Attribution: The Greek prosecutor probes connects Gates personally to the misrepresentations while Gates funding of WHO and GAVI gave him an outsized role in determining the response to covid would be covid vaccines also in The Netherlands
Damage: The seven plaintiffs, now five surviving, have suffered identifiable physical, financial or other legally recognised harm, which they have described in detail.
Causation: The unlawful conduct of Gates in particular documented in D 15 218 and continuing to today with the ongoing of my civil party rights shows the intent of Gates to deceive the Dutch people and the plaintiffs and this deliberate deception did materially contribute to their decision to take the covid vaccines and to their oresulting injury, under the applicable legal standard
Relativity: The legal rule allegedly breached to protect the particular interests of the affected plaintiffs or consumers includes the requirement to give informed consent to experimental,emergency use pandemic vaccines.
The Greek prosecutor probes show that Gates and later Bourla committed crimes against a reporter, and continue to commit them, to withhold vital and relevant warnings needed to give informed consent to the pandemic vaccines.
V. The case for including me as a witness in the civil case and for a criminal investigation
27. As a civil party to the Greek probes D 15 218 and E 17 449, my testimony should be obtained as potentially important investigative evidence.
The fact that material originated in a foreign criminal investigation does not, by itself, make it inadmissible in a Dutch proceeding. Its evidentiary value and admissibility must be assessed under the applicable rules.
Because the very prosecutor who corrupted the probes and removed the files is now in charge of the file, the Dutch court should seek independent certification of the authenticity of the police and prosecutor records originally belonging to file D 15 218 and the accompanying evidence.
Aikaterini (Katerina) Papaioannou – Αικατερίνη Παπαϊωάννου who played a key role in 2016 in corrupting the file knowingly now holds a senior position in the Larissa Prosecutor's Office (Εισαγγελία Πρωτοδικών Λάρισας).
Her current position
Title: Prosecutor of First Instance (Εισαγγελέας Πρωτοδικών).
Position: Head/Director of the Larissa Prosecutor's Office.
Appointment: She assumed the leadership position on 16 September 2025.
Current status: Reports from September 2026 confirm that she remains in charge.
Her malicious intent to continue to protect Gates, Bourla and others from investigation as well as herself is shown by her refusal to correct her violations or submit them to an independent authority for correction in 2026 or restore my civil party rights.
28. The Greek prosecutor probe from 2015 establishes that Gates conduct to suppress warnings about pandemic vaccines represents a continuing pattern rather than isolated incidents.
The relevant chronology extends from the 2014 warnings and the alleged 2015 reprisals, through the subsequent handling of the Greek investigation, the removal of the files from D 15 218 by Aikaterina Papaiaonnou, the interconnected probe E 17 449, the SLAPPs, the prison sentence, the seizure of the reporter in 2022 and escape from confinement close to Thessaloniki, the ongoing violation of my civil party rights, economic coercision and threats from the circle of Theodekti, Gates from D 15 218 now in 2026 to the covid vaccine representations and the Leeuwarden civil lawsuit.
Repeated conduct over more than years involving prior knowledge, deliberate concealment, coordinated communications and retaliation against a science reporter warning the covid vaccines are designed to cause mass sickness and death supports an inference of a common purpose.
29. The Dutch civil court should use the powers available under Dutch law to establish the facts including obtaining the records of the probes and admitting a witness, myself, with relevant evidence before deciding on the violations and the civil penalties and a criminal referral.
30. The ultimate question of whether Bill Gates personally participated in a course of conduct that knowingly misled the Dutch public, suppressed material information abotu the covid vaccine harms and contributed to legally recognisable harm to Dutch residents is answered by the Greek prosecutor probes, particularly D 15 218.
. The Greek investigative probes are important because they may provide an earlier documentary trail of Gates, Foundation knowledge, motive, personal connections and efforts to silence a reporter giving warnings about pandemic vaccines before the covidvaccine campaign began.
When examined alongside my actual warnings from 2009, Gates Foundation knowledge, the actual harms from the covid vaccine show a remarkable match. That connection is not accidental. Gates and Bourla knew of my warnings, knew they were accurate and knew the covid vaccines would produce the harms I warned of and wanted me silenced.
The most important feature of this case is not simply that Gates and Bourla and associates made public statements about vaccines, nor simply that a reporter alleges I persecuted for challenging them.
It is that original criminal probe D 15 218, predating covid by several years, establish a connection between Gates's knowledge of specific warnings, his personal involvement in efforts to suppress reporter author, and subsequent mis representations concerning pandemic vaccines.
Bourla joined Gates in repeating the crimes of D 15 218 in 2022 using the same people, Theodekt, the same documents as discussed immediately after receiving an email from me.
The question whether Gates and Bourla knew of substantial warnings about the dangers of covid vaccines, and subsequently participated in concealing those warnings while promoting representations about the safety and effiacy of the covid vaccine upon which the Dutch people were expected to rely and did rely is answered by the evidentiary chain of the Greek prosecutor probes, and by the authentic police and prosecutor records with time stamps,dates, court stamps.
These crystallize the criminal personal responsibility of Gates and later Bourla and others for deliberately deceiving the Dutch public to lure them to take covid vaccines they knew to be dangerous while committing crimes to silence a reporter.
All the five elements needed to find them guilty are proven.
The Dutch court is asked to apply the rule of law fairly to Gates, Bourla and their associates and to hold them accountable and personally liable for the damage they have caused the plaintiffs by their deliberate deception as to the dangers of the covid vaccine.
The depraved conduct of Gates and Bourla is shown by the way the lawyers they sent to represent them at the trial showed no willingness to admit to any of these facts, to show repentance and Gates and Bourla themselves continue to violate my civil party rights and threaten me in Larisa today.
This, even as they appear to be trying to organize a new ebola mass vaccination campaign with Merck s Ervebo, the very pandemic vaccine I warned about in 2014, 2015 was going to cause ebola, and whose warnings triggered the crimes in D 15 218 which captured Gates personal knowledge in the first place.
XXXXX
