Dear Editors,
I am
a reporter who has written for Nature, the British Medical Journal,
American Prospect, among other media and a civil party (πολιτικώς
ενάγων) who
has paid the fee in
criminal proceedings bearing file number E 17/449 in
which
#Donald
J. Trump
#Jared
Kusner are named as the prime suspects by Greek prosecuting
authorities, the Appeals Prosecutors Office, Larisa, Greece.
The complaint I
submitted to the Appeals Prosecutors in Larisa, Greece, in 2017
alleges that Donald J. Trump and Jared Kushner used criminal means to
bring about my imprisonment without due process in retaliation for my
work as a reporter. My complaint further alleges that this
retaliation was connected to my reporting on matters including a
scheme to use disases like covid and Ebola to overrun the USA for
personal enrichment being prepared from 2016 and 2017.
The
Appeals Prosecutors opened criminal file E 17/449 following my
complaint. I participated in the proceedings as a civil party
(πολιτικώς
ενάγων) under Greek law.
I participated in
proceedings as a witness and gave testimony to the prosecutors on the
crimes of Trump and Kushner in November 2017.
I attach my
testimony against Trump and Kushner and other key documents including
my original charges, and proof that I paid the fee to become a civil
party (politik enagon)
I also attach these
key documents as links
E 17 449
CivlPartydocs
https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/95d6wvifskv2upvfnguyi/E17449CivilPartyDocs.pdf?rlkey=zwmypzrfrcqvz7aovbg1fz8vm&st=grjod60g&dl=0
Original charges May
2017 and fee for Politiki Enagon
E17378, E17379
Malicious prosecution docs
https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/xtbsrkk51kxl5eguysy3g/E17378cE17379MaliciousProsecutions_compressed-1.pdf?rlkey=omddnsb6ho0lczh0bk70jp2u8&st=b13ojuqj&dl=0
Summaries with links
is here
https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/frci8gkqajfy8jfwj6cs9/2017-Grk-prosecutor-probes-convict-Kushner-of-covid-treason-Iran.pdf?rlkey=tz6jztrrgfjorigb8p1vzwfj1&st=60q3gz5g&dl=0
https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/yfreupvzbwqrkc2p05quv/GatesCrimesInTheNetherlandsAndD15218.pdf?rlkey=5w6htfz5320qv7pxdkhlmi7kt&st=zpewgcji&dl=0
My
formal
status
in the proceedings gives
me
the legal standing of a victim seeking civil redress within the
criminal case.
Despite having held
this legal status for nearly ten years, I have not obtained a final
resolution or effective remedy. I have been subjected to retaliation
and revictimization for blowing the whistle.
The case has
received little media attention despite involving issues of
significant public interest, including accountability, due process,
and the treatment of victims in proceedings connected to a President
of the United States.
I respectfully ask
your newsroom to review the court records and related filings
independently. The questions raised by this case extend beyond my
personal circumstances and concern the public's interest in
transparent justice and equal application of the law.
I prove the relevant
court documents, procedural history, and supporting materials for
your review as attachments and links.
Summaries in English
of the Greek prosecutor office documents are available with
screenshots of key documents to help navigate the files.
Briefly stated, on
15th February 2017, I published allegations by a Russian journalist
that Jared Kushner and Steve Bannon helped him obtain a visa to
interview in June 2016 for a documentary on a broad epidemic disease
plan involving viruses like ebola, bird flu, swine flu, covid in
which the Russian journalist had sought and obtained a copy of a
report I wrote for the FBI in 2009 describing the risks of
contaminating vaccine material with viruses like the Simian Virus,
SV40.
Following the
reporting described above, events occurred that I allege constituted
retaliation. Specificlly, a lawyer misrepresented a civil action to
file criminal chargs against me for that post, organized that the
summons be sent to the wrong address in May 2017 as a pretext to have
me arrested for not obeying the summons.
By
chance, I found the summons, was able to testify at the required time
at Larisa prosecutors office. I filed a complaint in May 2017 to
Appeals
Prosecutors in Larisa, Greece, against Donald Trump and Jared Kushner
and Simos Samaras for the above conduct.
I
Authority
involved:
Appeals Prosecutors in Larisa, Greece, opened an investigation into
Trump, Kushner and Samaras in July 2017
Case
reference:
E 17/449.
I
submitted the required filing/fee to participate as a πολιτικώς
ενάγων (civil party/civil claimant) in the criminal
proceedings.
I provided a
statement to the prosecutors as a witness in the proceedings in
November 2017.
Despite the passage
of approximately ten years, the matter has not reached a final
resolution.
Personal
impact:
The prolonged proceedings have resulted in severe financial and
personal hardship.
Chronology of
Events and Procedural History
June 2016 —
Contact by Russian journalists regarding proposed interview
In June 2016, I
received emails from Russian journalists then based in the Kremlin
requesting an interview concerning claims of a possible scheme
involving billionaire Bill Gates and the use of viruses for political
purposes in the United States, defective vaccines. In addition, we
discussed crimes against me in a prosecutor probe D 15 218 which
captured Bill Gates and George Soros as having personal knowledge of
my posts, the motive and the means for the crimes.
I discussed the
proposed interview with the journalists before agreeing to
participate.
I also discussed
probe D 15 218 with them.
A due process
investigation into D 15 218 was subjected to massive violations when
all the police reports were illegally removed.
The lawyer Simos
Samaras filed a SLAPP temporary 30 day civil injunction against me
for ten posts when I began to post evidence of the illegal removal of
the official files from D 15 218 from January 2016.
On the way to the
court in Larisa, Greece, to film a scene, the journalist, Alexander
Zamsylov, made the claim about the visa
Evidence
available:
Email correspondence with the Russian journalists.
June 2016 —
Interview in Larisa, Greece
A few days after the
initial contact, the interview took place in Larisa, Greece.
In the emails and
during the interview, the journalist requested and obtained a copy of
a report I had previously written for the FBI in 2009 concerning the
release of seasonal flu virus contaminated with the bird flu virus
from a Baxter BSL3 facility in Austria, which triggered an
investigation by Vienna prosecutors after I filed charges in April
2009. My report covers the broad epidemic disease scheme to weaponize
swine flu and use of an emergency as a pretext for rolling out
defective swine flu vaccines matching vaccines. In this report, I
also warn of the risks of contaminated batches of vaccines given to
people, especially of Simian Virus contamination.
At the conclusion of
the interview, one of the journalists stated that Jared Kushner, and
several members of Trump s innermost circle including Steve Bannon,
had assisted him in obtaining a visa.
Evidence
available:
FBI report
February 15, 2017
— Publication of information concerning the visa allegations
On 15 February 2017,
I published information on my since suspended blog concerning the
interview and the statement made by the journalist regarding
assistance with obtaining a visa.
Evidence
available:
Archived blog publication.
February 16, 2017
— Criminal complaint initiated against me
On
16 February 2017, Simos Samaras, lawyer submitted a request for
criminal proceedings against me at Larisa police station for my 15th
February 2017 blog post despite it being under no ruling.
The
filing involved the misrepresentation of the 30 day civil injunction
for ten other blog posts from a year earlier which had expired legal
documents as the legal grounds for prosecuting me for the 15th
February 2017 blog posts. Procedural steps were taken in a manner
designed to create grounds for my arrest, including sending documents
to an incorrect address and preventing proper notice, although this
step was delayed until May and I had moved address in Larisa when I
informed the court officially of my change of address.
Evidence
available:
Criminal complaint, legal filings, service records, correspondence.
2017 —
Discovery of summons and review of case file
I found the summons,
reviewed the case file, and challenged the allegations. I testified
to the examining magistrate hat the accusations were false and that
the supporting documents did not establish the alleged offenses and
showed evidence that the summons had deliberately been sent to the
wrong address.
After I posted this
information on my blog, James Comey, then FBI director, was fired
with the media reporting that Jared Kushner was behind the firing
Evidence
available:
Case file, summons, submissions made in response.
2017 —
Counter-complaint and request for recognition as civil party
Following
my testimony, I submitted criminal charges against Jared Kushner and
Donald J. Trump and applied to participate as a πολιτικώς
ενάγων (civil party/civil claimant) in the proceedings payiing
the requisite fee. In these charges in 2017, I asked what the motive
for Kushner and Trump could be to wish to kee their role in an
alleged biological warfare plan against the USA hidden.
The matter was
assigned file number E 17/449 before the Appeals Prosecutors in
Larisa, Greece.
Evidence
available:
Complaint, filing receipt, procedural documents.
November 2017 —
Testimony before Appeals Prosecutors, Larisa
In November 2017, I
was called to provide testimony regarding the allegations submitted
in the criminal complaint against Trump, Kushner, Samaras, the
Russian journalists and the FBI report
Evidence
available:
Summons, testimony record, prosecutorial file references.
Issues Presented
for Independent Review
I request
independent review of:
1. Whether
the criminal proceedings initiated against me in 2017 over my 15th
February 2017 blog post complied with due process requirements.
2. Whether legal
mechanisms were used improperly to interfere with journalistic
activity.
3. Whether the
evidence and procedural history in file E 17/449 warrant further
investigation.
4. Whether the
matter raises broader questions concerning accountability, press
freedom, and access to justice.
Document
index:
|
Document
|
Date
|
Source
|
What
it proves
|
|
Journalist
emails
|
June
2016
|
Email
records
|
Initial
contact and interview request
|
|
Interview
evidence
|
June
2016
|
Notes/recording
if available
|
What
was discussed
|
|
Blog
post archive
|
15
Feb 2017
|
Web
archive
|
Publication
date/content
|
|
Criminal
filing
|
16
Feb 2017
|
Court/prosecutor
records
|
Filing
and allegations made
|
|
Summons/service
records
|
2017
|
Court
records
|
Notice
process
|
|
Your
complaint
|
2017
|
Prosecutor
file
|
Allegations
submitted
|
|
Testimony
record
|
Nov
2017
|
Prosecutor
file
|
Your
participation
|
2021—
Subsequent defamation proceedings concerning blog publications
Following the events
described above, the same lawyer who had initiated the February 2017
criminal complaint against me later brought two separate criminal
defamation proceedings concerning the same ten blog posts that had
formed part of the earlier dispute.
After
several postponements, te proceedings resulted in two trials E 17
378 and E 17 379 in Larisa in September 2021 for the same ten posts
which had been central to the events of February 2017 and that the
timing and handling of the cases raise questions about whether the
defamation proceedings were acts of retaliation and malicious
prosecution to silence me for my post on 16th
February 2017
The
two trials took place on the same day, 20th
September 2021, one following immediately on the other.
In
the first proceeding E 17 378, handling the ten blog posts and the
15th
February 2017 blog posts received an innocent verdict after Simos
Samaras asked for me to be declared innocent.
I protested the
verdict and asked to be able to present the evidence from E 17 449 as
it was material to proving my innocence and the misuse of Samaras of
the ten posts to suppress allegations.
The judge agreed
with Samaras to declare me innocent in the first minute of the trial.
I was not able to
present the evidence in E 17 449.
In the second
proceeding E 17 379, the court found me guilty.
I was refused the
court judgment from E 17 378 but given the judgment from E 17 379.
I appealed the
decision on the grounds the two trials involved the same ten blog
posts violating double jeopardy rules and had been cennral to the
events of February 2017 when Samaras, Trump and Kushner had ended up
being investigated for crimes against me, showing a pattern.
My Appeal was
rejected but my prison sentence for one an a half years for offending
the honour of Samaras was suspended.
Evidence
available:
The two defamation
complaints.
Court judgments
from trial E 7 379. I was never given the judgment from trial E 17
378 despite requests.
The ten blog posts
at issue.
The February 2017
complaint and related procedural records.
Records from the
investigation in file E 17/449.
Questions for
independent review:
1. Whether the two
defamation proceedings were legally and factually independent from
the earlier complaint.
2. Whether
the two trials concerned the same ten blog posts (the ten blog posts
were identical in both cases but with the 15th
February 2017 blog post added to one, E 17 378, for which I was
declared innocent
3. Whether the
differing outcomes in the two trials raise procedural questions.
4. Whether the
refusal to give me the judgment to E 17 378 raises procedural
questions
5. Whether any
information relevant to the 2017 investigation was affected by the
subsequent proceedings.
//////////////////////////////////////
I ask your newsroom
to review the complaint, the prosecutorial records, and any related
court documents independently. My request is not that you accept my
allegations as established fact, but that you examine whether the
proceedings and the evidence raise issues of public interest
deserving further investigation.
The central question
is not whether any individual is above criticism, but whether the
institutions responsible for ensuring accountability are functioning
independently and consistently. When allegations arise that executive
authority has been used to influence legal proceedings, delay or
avoid accountability, or target journalists through questionable
prosecutions or other forms of legal pressure, those allegations
deserve careful, evidence-based reporting.
If government power
is being used to undermine due process or to discourage investigative
reporting, the implications extend beyond any one case. Such actions,
if substantiated, would affect public confidence in the rule of law,
judicial independence, and constitutional protections for a free
press.
I encourage your
newsroom to review the available court records, public filings,
official statements, and reporting related to these events.
Independent scrutiny by multiple news organizations is essential
whenever questions arise about the impartial administration of
justice or the treatment of members of the press.
This is not a
request for advocacy, but for investigation. The public benefits when
allegations involving the use of governmental power are examined
thoroughly, fairly, and without fear or favor. Regardless of where
the evidence ultimately leads, comprehensive reporting helps ensure
transparency and accountability.
Over the course of
this decade, my case has received little or no sustained media
attention. As a result, I believe significant issues concerning the
administration of justice and the treatment of victims have remained
largely outside public scrutiny.
The prolonged
proceedings have also had a severe personal impact. I am now living
in financial hardship, and the continuing lack of resolution has
affected both my livelihood and my ability to continue my work.
I recognize that my
personal experience alone is not the story. The broader
public-interest question is whether a victim in a matter involving a
sitting or former president has received the same access to justice,
transparency, and timely process that would be expected in any other
case.
Please note, I am
both a
a
witness
(martyres)
who gives evidence, and
a
πολιτικώς
ενάγων
(civil party/civil claimant) asserting a civil claim within the
criminal proceedings.
In
Greek criminal proceedings, as πολιτικώς
ενάγων (politikós
enágon) and means a person who participates in a criminal case to
seek civil compensation (for example, damages for harm caused by the
alleged crime). I am seeking compensation from Donald Trump and Jared
Kushner and Simos Samaras.
I include the
document from the Appeals Prosecutors from July 2017 showing that
they accepted my charges against Trump and Kushner for investigation.
To sum up
I
was granted legal standing as a πολιτικώς
ενάγων (civil party) in criminal proceedings
against Donald Trump and Jared Kushner
before the Appeals Prosecutors in Larisa, Greece, concerning file
number E 17/449. I believe the legal and factual issues arising from
those proceedings warrant independent examination by the
international press.
The
file E 17 449 contains evidence
that could potentially be relevant to authorities in the USA. The
proceedings before the Appeals Prosecutors in Larisa, Greece,
contains evidence and witness testimony that I believe are relevant
to matters of US and international public interest. Because the
allegations concern conduct that I contend had consequences beyond
Greece, I believe the case file deserves independent examination by
journalists and, where legally appropriate, by the competent
authorities in other jurisdictions.
I do not ask readers
to accept my allegations as established fact. I ask that the official
records, witness statements, and procedural history be reviewed on
their merits to determine whether they warrant further investigation.
I ask for an
independent review of whether Trump can be arrested on the basis of
these criminal proceedings and whether the legal requirements are
met, such as:
a
law enforcement officer having probable
cause
for an arrest (or a valid warrant being issued);
prosecutors
determining that the evidence supports criminal charges;
the alleged conduct
fitting the elements of a specific criminal offense under federal or
state law;
the case being
within the jurisdiction of the relevant authority; and
any constitutional
protections or procedural requirements being satisfied.
For allegations
involving a president or former president, additional issues may
arise, including:
whether the alleged
conduct was official presidential action or private conduct;
whether
constitutional doctrines affect prosecution;
whether the statute
of limitations has expired;
whether federal,
state, or local authorities have jurisdiction; and
whether prosecutors
believe the evidence meets the standard required for charges.
I am available to
provide documentation, answer questions, and facilitate access to the
public records associated with this matter.
Thank you for your
attention.
Yours sincerely,
Jane Burgermeister,
Larisa, Greece
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)