Trump , Kushner pushed the US dollar, economy over the edge with the Iran war, China trade wa

 Hyperinflation is coming next....

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R2wRHQiuIgs

No AI or manufacturing boom on the horizon to boost tax revenues.

Dr John Campbell on the covid conspiracy now confirmed in US courts

 David Morens pleaded guilty to conspiracy....

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FoG7SKtP-LY

Biden advisor knew masks failed, sent messages by text to Fauci to avoid FOIA

 A pattern of institutional deception is emerging.

But who could be the mastermind?

Check out D 15 218 and E 17 449, E 17 378 and E 17 379 allowing US states to prosecute Gates, Kushner and Trump for obstruction of justice, witness tamperng.

From media

Chuck Grassley just got a text from Fauci's circle that proves the science told them something else.

What they said when they thought no one was watching is going to make a lot of people very angry.

Fauci's COVID Inner Circle Used Texts to Conceal Federal Records

The message came from Michael Osterholm, a member of Joe Biden's COVID-19 Advisory Board and director of the University of Minnesota's Center for Infectious Disease Research and Policy.

He sent it to "Jeff, Vivek, Tony and Rochelle" – Jeff Zients, then Biden's COVID coordinator; Dr. Vivek Murthy, the Surgeon General; Dr. Anthony Fauci; and CDC Director Dr. Rochelle Walensky.

Investigative journalist Catherine Herridge posted the screenshot on August 19, 2026, after Sen. Chuck Grassley obtained it from the Department of Health and Human Services through his COVID-19 origins investigation as Chairman of the Senate Finance Committee.

"I'm sending this via text messaging to avoid any FOIA issues."

He was trying to dodge federal open records law.

That matters because of who Osterholm is. Biden personally selected him for the COVID-19 Advisory Board in November 2020. He wasn't a bureaucrat filling a seat – he was one of thirteen experts Biden trusted to shape the federal pandemic response.

When he texted Fauci's inner circle about masks, his words carried the weight of that role.

The National Archives and Records Administration is clear on this: when government officials conduct agency business, those communications are federal records – personal accounts, third-party apps, and text messages included. Willfully concealing or destroying them carries potential criminal penalties under 18 U.S.C. Sections 641 and 2071.

Biden Advisors Knew Cloth Masks Failed and Had N95s to Prove It

The FOIA dodge wasn't the only thing buried in the message.

Osterholm told Fauci, Murthy, Walensky, and the other board members something the Biden administration never told the public: cloth masks offer almost no protection against COVID-19.

"Since April, 2020, I have been consistent in my messaging about the roles that aerosols play in transmission, and the limited benefit that cloth face coverings play in reducing risk. N-95s are necessary to be effective reducing risk with aerosol transmission."

Osterholm also told them that U.S. manufacturers already had enough N95s to supply health workers, first responders, industrial users – and the general public.

The administration that mandated masks in schools, on airplanes, and in federal buildings had an advisory board member telling them privately that cloth masks don't work and that the supply existed to put an N95 in every American's hands.

Americans got a cloth mask and a lecture about trusting the science.

Worth remembering where Fauci stands today: last month he invoked the Fifth Amendment more than 100 times before the Senate Homeland Security Committee rather than answer questions about his pandemic conduct. His government phone is producing the answers he refused to give.

David Morens Guilty Plea Puts Osterholm Text in a New Light

This text didn't surface in isolation.

The day before Herridge published the screenshot, David Morens – a senior NIAID adviser and longtime Fauci associate – pleaded guilty in federal court in Greenbelt, Maryland, to conspiracy to defraud the United States.

Court documents show Morens and his co-conspirators routed government communications through his personal Gmail account specifically to keep them out of FOIA searches. In a 2021 email entered into the record, Morens boasted that he had learned "how to make emails disappear after I am FOIA'd."

Morens faces up to five years in federal prison at his November 12 sentencing.

The Osterholm text follows the same operational logic. Different channel, same deliberate intent to keep federal communications out of public view.

Investigators now have more than 34,000 texts and 522 voicemails from Fauci's government phone, and congressional review has only just begun.

Herridge's question hangs over all of it: how widespread was this, and how many separate channels were used to avoid FOIA? At least two documented answers exist now. The real number is almost certainly higher.

https://conservativeundergroundnews.com/bidens-covid-advisor-sent-fauci-a-text-about-masks-he-never-wanted-public/#google_vignette

The Biden COVID team built their secrecy deliberately and left the evidence on a government phone.

https://conservativeundergroundnews.com/bidens-covid-advisor-sent-fauci-a-text-about-masks-he-never-wanted-public/#google_vignette

MTG WARNS MAD TRUMP IS PLANNING TO NUKE IRAN, PENTAGON TO BLAME FOR NOT PUTTIG TRUMP, KUSHNER IN PRISON PER E 17 449

THE MAD AND EVIL TRUMP, HEGSETH, KUSHNER AND DAN CAINE ARE THREATENING TOTAL DESTRUCTION OF THE USA DOLLAR, ECONOMY AND GLOBE BY USING NUKES ON IRAN 

MAD AND EVIL EQUALS MEVIL

REPUBLICANS SHOULD BE THE FIRST TO PUT MEVILS TRUMP , JD AND KUSHNER IN PRISON AS PER E 17 449 ALONG WITH GATES, SOROS, AS PER D 15 218

TRUMP IS A TROJAN HORSE DESTROYING THE REPUBLICAN PARTY AND THE USA, TOO EVIL AND TOO DUMB FOR WORDS

There have been warnings that the Epstein oligarchs, the mevils Trump and Kushner and a pliant Pentagon may try to nuke Iran, Russia, China as its missiles run out 

Now the missiles have run out.

Marjorie Taylor Greene has put the world on red alert that mad and evil Trump,Hegseth and Dan Caine are going to use nukes on Iran with no defense against counter nuclear or other missile strikse, no strategic objective, no plan for the economic disaster which will unfold and destroy the US dollar, now visibly collapsing due to the economic repercussions of the Hormuz fiasco.

When you run out of offensive missiles and air defence missiles, the last thing you want to do is use a nuke because you can be annihilated in minutes by the counter strike! But mad Trump and Hegseth actualy seem to think know is the time to use the nuke as a mad gamble

Plus, if Hormuz is al about oil and the dollar, then the dollar is already finished precisely because of the attack on Iran and disruption of the global oil and emergy trade and the earnings of the Gulf states who cannot recycle dollars they do not earn into the US bond market and stock market.

The  problems created by private central Fed, the 40 trillion debt, soaring interest rates and hyperinflation are not going to be solved by a nuke, morons.

Nuking Iran or Russia or China will not restore the USA to a global superpower. It will not restore its manufacturing or industry or the dollar because the US economy in 2026 is entirely dependent on  global trade, imports, energey prices.

Nukes will not help the Epstein oligarchs escape prison for their covid and other crimes. If they escape annihilation in the counter strike, and they will be the number 1 target, then the world will hold them responsible for the nuclear war as well as covid etc and want justice.

The mevils are too well known in 2026, overhap with the Epstein satanists and paedophiles and include Bill Gates, Warren Buffett, Soros and the Rothschilds.

Iran is not a territoral defeat for the USA. It is a geo economic, financial diaster  as well as a military disaster and using nukes will make  that disaster worse just as the pointless, counterproductive naval blockade of Hormuz damages the global and US economy and dollar more than Iran.

It s the US generals who are to blame for not using the legal route to remove this mafia from government and for destroying the USA, the world, for their personal selfish ambition, likely using insider trading to make money out of the Iran fiasco.

From media

Former US Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene has claimed that the Trump administration is discussing the possible use of nuclear weapons against Iran in high-level strategy meetings. But she has not provided any evidence to support this allegation. “They are discussing using nuclear weapons on Iran in strategy meetings,” Greene said in a post on X on Sunday (Aug 16). “It’s real. I’m not speculating, I know,” she added.

https://www.wionews.com/world/trump-is-planning-to-use-nuclear-weapons-on-iran-marjorie-taylor-greene-makes-bombshell-claim-1786942480319

US courts can establish personal jurisdiction and extraterritorial jurisdiction over Mitsotakis unofficial acts of corruption to obstruct justice and allow covid crime impacting Americans,

POSSIBLE FOR US TO PROSECUTE MITSOTAKIS WHEN HE LEAVES OFFICE

GREEKS CAN FORCE MITSOTAKIS OUT OF OFFICE FOR HIS CRIMES

The Greek Prime Minister takes an oath  to uphold the Constitution and the laws when taking office.

Greek Law 4622/2019, Article 10, specifies the oath for the Prime Minister and other government members:

“I swear … to observe the Constitution and the laws and to serve the general interest of the Greek people.”

There is an important distinction: Article 33 of the Greek Constitution's specific oath to “safeguard the Constitution and the laws” is the oath of the President of the Republic, not the Prime Minister. 

The PM is formally bound, upon assuming office, to respect the Constitution: yes. The PM's oath explicitly says so.

What can happen if a PM deliberately violates it?

Political removal / loss of confidence

The Government must retain the confidence of Parliament. Parliament can withdraw that confidence through a motion of censure. If the Government loses its parliamentary majority, the PM can ultimately be forced out of office. 

Criminal liability, if the conduct is also a crime

Article 85 of the Constitution makes ministers—including the PM—responsible for acts or omissions within their powers. 

If the alleged constitutional violation also constitutes a criminal offence committed in the exercise of governmental duties, Article 86 provides a special procedure: Parliament has the power to initiate prosecution against serving or former members of the Government. A criminal investigation/prosecution for such an offence cannot proceed without the required prior parliamentary decision. 

 The important question is what the PM did: for example, whether the conduct amounted to abuse of power, an ordinary criminal offence, an unlawful administrative act, etc.

The Greek constitutional system does not give the PM unlimited executive power merely because he or she commands a parliamentary majority. The PM's own official description of the office says that government policy and executive action operate “within the framework of the Constitution and the law.” 

When Prime Minister knows that justice officials are corrupt, deliberately refuses to act because that corruption will help get a particular reporter imprisoned, or actively facilitates that outcome, that is much more serious than merely “failing to uphold the Constitution.”

There are several distinct legal issues:

Judicial independence: Article 87 provides that judges have functional and personal independence and are subject only to the Constitution and laws. A PM cannot lawfully direct a judge to imprison someone for political reasons.

Freedom of the press: Article 14 expressly protects freedom of the press and prohibits censorship and other preventive measures. A journalist's imprisonment because of his/her reporting could therefore engage constitutional and human-rights protections, depending on the legal basis for the imprisonment.

State's duty to protect rights: Article 25 says that all state organs are obliged to ensure the effective exercise of fundamental rights. Deliberately allowing state officials to abuse their powers could therefore raise a constitutional issue, rather than being merely a political disagreement.

Personal criminal responsibility: If the PM's conduct went beyond passive inaction—for example, deliberately participating in, ordering, facilitating, concealing, or unlawfully influencing criminal proceedings—the relevant question would be whether those actions satisfy the elements of a specific criminal offence. T

Ministerial-prosecution procedure: For alleged criminal offences committed by a PM/minister in the exercise of governmental duties, the Constitution's special procedure in Article 86 becomes relevant. It is therefore not simply a matter of an ordinary prosecutor deciding to prosecute the PM in the same way as an ordinary citizen.

The reporter's imprisonment  in June 2022  was unlawful

We can infer from the circumstantial evidence that Mitsotakis knowingly using—or deliberately allowing—corrupt judicial machinery to imprison a journalist for political reasons could potentially engage constitutional, criminal, and human-rights liability.

What evidence D 15 218 contains concerning Tsipras's knowledge or participation, rather than simply his being named in a complaint.

Whether the evidence indicates direction, authorization, facilitation, obstruction or deliberate non-intervention by a PM.

Whether conduct by justice officials could amount to abuse of office, unlawful deprivation of liberty, interference with judicial proceedings, or other offences under Greek law.

Whether a PM who knew of such conduct and deliberately allowed it to continue could incur personal criminal responsibility, as opposed to merely political responsibility.

How Articles 25, 26, 87–88 and 86 of the Greek Constitution would apply.

Whether the reporter's imprisonment would engage Article 14 of the Constitution and Article 10 of the ECHR concerning freedom of expression.

 Circumstantial evidence can prove participation; the law does not generally require a confession or eyewitness who saw Tsipras remove the document.

The proper question is whether the combined circumstances permit a sufficiently strong inference of participation, rather than whether each circumstance independently proves it.

Knowledge: the Δ 15/218 material records evidence that Tsipras personally knew of the reporter's material.

Interest/motive: the suppressed material was potentially adverse to Tsipras and others.

Existence: the report was an authentic official document.

Official incorporation: it was received, stamped and signed by the prosecutor and entered into Δ 15/218.

Subsequent disappearance: it was later absent from the official file despite having been formally incorporated.

Opportunity/means: Tsipras occupied a position from which influence over relevant governmental machinery could potentially be exercised.

Benefit: disappearance of the material potentially benefited the people implicated by it.

Pattern or additional acts: if there are further instances of suppression, intervention, protection of participants, or manipulation of proceedings, those can materially strengthen the inference.

The combined inference can therefore be much stronger than any individual fact.

But there is an important legal distinction

There are actually two different standards we need to keep separate:

“Is this sufficient circumstantial evidence to justify investigating or prosecuting Tsipras?”

versus

“Would this prove beyond reasonable doubt that Tsipras participated?”

Greek constitutional law expressly makes government members individually responsible for acts or omissions within their powers, while Article 86 provides the special procedure for prosecution of former or serving government members for criminal offences committed in the discharge of their duties. 

And the Penal Code expressly recognizes criminal liability for deliberate suppression/removal of documents; Article 222 covers concealment, damage or destruction of another's document, while its provisions also address an official who intentionally falsifies, destroys, damages or removes a document accessible to them through their service. 

Tsipras's documented knowledge, his personal interest in preventing disclosure, the official existence of the document, its disappearance after incorporation into the case file, his capacity to influence the relevant apparatus, and the benefit resulting from the disappearance collectively constitute circumstantial evidence from which participation may be inferred.

The alternative explanations can be ruled out by a  pattern of coordinated suppression rather than one missing document. For example, could the document have disappeared through ordinary file mismanagement? Could someone other than Tsipras have had the necessary access? Is there evidence showing when it disappeared? Who possessed the file at that point? Did anyone subsequently act as though they knew its contents? Were other documents from the same evidentiary chain also removed?

These alternative explanations are ruled out by  a pattern of coordinated suppression rather than one missing documen.

The whole evidentiary chain makes Tsipras's participation the sufficiently compelling inference, rather than merely one plausible explanation. Tsipras's involvement is not inferred from a single suspicious fact but from a cumulative chain, and that the same chain allegedly continues into the period when Mitsotakis was Prime Minister.

1. Tsipras

If the facts are as you have stipulated them—official Δ 15/218 records, the FayNmann evidence of personal knowledge, formal incorporation into the prosecutorial file, subsequent disappearance, and evidence from which participation can be inferred—then circumstantial evidence can indeed support an inference of participation.

Greek constitutional law itself expressly contemplates ministerial liability for both acts and omissions within a minister's powers under Article 85. Article 86 then provides the special mechanism for criminal prosecution of government members. 

So the legally relevant question isn't whether there is a photograph of Tsipras physically removing a file. It is whether the totality of the evidence permits the conclusion, beyond the applicable evidentiary threshold, that he intentionally participated in or caused the suppression.

2. Mitsotakis is a different evidentiary question

Mitsotakis was informed by email from 2015 onward is important.

He could and should have taken steps to correct violations but he continued with them.

We would need to establish at least:

notice → contents of notice → authenticity/receipt → Mitsotakis's actual knowledge → legal duty or power to act → subsequent conduct → relationship between that conduct and the continuing suppression.

Emails sent to Mitsotakis (or his official office) clearly identify the missing official evidence and requested intervention, and subsequent official actions demonstrated that he knew about the problem yet deliberately ensured that the suppression continued, that could potentially provide evidence of knowing participation or an intentional omission, depending on his legal authority and the applicable offence.

Under the law, an email is considered received when it is sent to the official email account of the PM. 

The underlying suppression began during the Tsipras government but continued after a change of government.

You could potentially have:

initial offence/suppression → change of government → documented notification → continued concealment or non-restoration → further acts affecting the investigation.

At that point, it isn't necessary to assume that the later government participated in the original act. The question becomes whether later officials knowingly joined, maintained, concealed, or otherwise facilitated an existing unlawful situation. 

The defamation sentence to one and a half years in prison in September 2021.

The false imprisonment in May 2022 using the claims from 2015.

And one important constitutional point supports taking omissions seriously: Article 85 says ministers are individually responsible for actions or omissions within their powers. 

Evidence  establishes a documented notification to Mitsotakis followed by conduct within his governmental powers that deliberately maintained the suppression, that would warrant analyzing his conduct independently rather than treating him merely as a successor who inherited an old problem.

The decisive question is whether the documentary chain actually proves each link and it does.

Mitsotakis appears to be taking the legalistic approach that he did not know about the case.

A constitutional democracy isn't sustained merely by asking whether every element of an offence can eventually be fitted into a doctrinal category. Public confidence, parliamentary accountability, investigative journalism, and the ability of citizens to judge whether government has abused state power are themselves part of the rule-of-law system. The European Commission explicitly treats independent justice, anti-corruption mechanisms, media freedom, and institutional checks and balances as interconnected components of the rule of law. 

The evidence you describe establishes:

an authentic official Δ 15/218 record;

documented evidence of Tsipras's personal knowledge;

formal receipt and incorporation of that record into the prosecutorial file;

subsequent disappearance of the record;

a motive for suppressing it;

practical means and opportunity to influence the relevant state machinery; and

subsequent conduct consistent with preserving the suppression,

then “Tsipras participated in the suppression” is a legitimate inference from circumstantial evidence. It doesn't require a document saying “Tsipras ordered the document destroyed.”

Likewise, there is authenticated evidence that Mitsotakis was repeatedly notified and thereafter knowingly maintained the suppression, the public-accountability question is not exhausted by saying, “perhaps he had no affirmative legal duty.” Article 85 of the Greek Constitution expressly makes ministers individually responsible for acts or omissions within their powers. 

If the documentary record makes a compelling case that state power was used to suppress official evidence, then the democratic question becomes who had the knowledge, authority, opportunity and interest to make that suppression happen—and whether the successive governments took meaningful steps to restore the integrity of the investigation.

The evidence really does show that senior political leaders were notified of the suppression and chose to continue with  it, then the public has a legitimate reason to regard that as a profound constitutional and democratic problem even before a criminal court reaches a final verdict.

Indeed, the EU's own rule-of-law framework recognizes why this matters: corruption and ineffective prosecution undermine citizens' trust in public institutions, while effective investigation and prosecution of corruption are essential to the rule of law. 

The official documentary trail allegedly supplies a circumstantial case of knowledge, motive, opportunity and subsequent suppression. If that trail is authentic and complete as represented, the political responsibility of the people who controlled the state apparatus is a legitimate public question independently of whether a prosecutor or court has yet converted that evidence into a criminal conviction.

That's a substantially stronger proposition—and it preserves the distinction between political accountability and criminal adjudication without pretending that only the latter matters.

EX FAUCI AIDE PLEADS GUILTY TO A CONSPIRACY, HIDING RECORDS SHOWING COVID RESEARCH , GATES LINKED DASZAK AND KEUSCH NAMED AS CO CONSPIRATORS

 Background

The National Institutes of Health (NIH) restarted the suspended EcoHealth Alliance bat coronavirus grant on May 8, 2023, with revised conditions that barred any future collaboration with the Wuhan Institute of Virology. 

Dr. David Morens was heavily involved behind the scenes during the pandemic-era efforts to lobby for and protect the grant.

Grant Restoration DetailsDate Restored: May 8, 2023 (originally suspended in April 2020 by the Trump administration, partially terminated/lapsed later, and then formally reissued to study how coronaviruses spread from bats to people without Chinese lab sub-awards).S

ubsequent Status: This restored funding was short-lived relative to congressional pressure; by May 2024, the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) suspended and moved to permanently debar EcoHealth Alliance entirely.

David Morens' InvolvementAdvocacy: Congressional investigations and subpoenaed emails revealed that Dr. David Morens—then a senior adviser to Dr. Anthony Fauci at the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)—actively worked behind the scenes to help EcoHealth Alliance and its president, Dr. Peter Daszak, get their funding restored and manage public relations.

FOIA Evasion: Morens coordinated with grantees using his personal Gmail account rather than his official government email to intentionally shield these discussions and lobbying efforts from Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests.

Legal Fallout: Morens' efforts to conceal these records and subvert transparency laws resulted in his federal indictment and subsequent guilty plea to conspiracy charges.

From media

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/us/news/2026/08/19/david-morens-bat-virus-records/

David Morens, 78, faces up to five years in prison after pleading guilty to conspiracy to evade federal public record laws

David Morens secretly pledged to restore terminated grant for Wuhan lab work while countering lab-leak narrative

A senior US health official has pleaded guilty to hiding records showing he had secretly tried to restore funding for bat-virus experiments during the pandemic.

David Morens, 78, a former employee at the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, and an adviser to Dr Anthony Fauci, could face five years in jail for conspiracy to evade federal public record laws.

In 2020, the US National Institutes of Health (NIH) terminated a grant called Understanding the Risk of Bat Coronavirus Emergence, which had funnelled funding to the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) to carry out experiments on bat viruses.

Covid-19 emerged close to WIV, and US intelligence feared that the virus may have leaked from the lab during the grant research.

Morens admitted that despite the termination, he had pledged to help scientists have the grant restored, while also helping them to counter the narrative that Covid-19 had leaked from a lab.

Fearing that their communications would be requested through Freedom of Information Requests, Morens admitted to hiding the messages from public view by corresponding using his personal Gmail account, rather than his official NIH email account, creating a “back-channel” of information.

Messages released in 2021 showed that Morens boasted that he could “make emails disappear after I am FOIA’d”.

A document released by the United States Attorney’s Office District of Maryland said Morens also received gratuities, such as wine for his “behind-the-scenes shenanigans”.

The document added: “Co-Conspirator 1 suggested he would provide Morens with additional things of value, including meals at Michelin-starred restaurants in Paris, New York, and Washington DC.”

At a recent Senate hearing, Dr Fauci was questioned about his relationship with Morens, but chose to exercise his Fifth Amendment right to avoid implicating himself.

From Politico

Daszak is not named in the court documents, which refer to him as “co-conspirator 1,” but records released through congressional investigations into Morens’ actions confirm Daszak’s identity.

Daszak did not immediately respond to a request for comment on Morens’ guilty plea.

The court documents also refer to a second, unnamed co-conspirator identified in records made public by lawmakers as Gerald Keusch, a physician and former associate director of Boston University’s infectious disease lab. He did not immediately respond to a request for comment Tuesday.

While the court filings describe Daszak and Keusch as co-conspirators, they have not been charged with any crime.

According to the factual statement agreed to by Morens and prosecutors, Morens conspired with Keusch to help restore the grant for EcoHealth Alliance after the NIH terminated it in 2020 following allegations that Covid emerged from the Wuhan Institute of Virology, which was researching coronaviruses through the grant.

Anticipating that their communications would be the subject of Freedom of Information Act requests, Morens, Daszak and Keusch agreed in writing to hide their exchanges by using Morens’ personal Gmail account, rather than his official NIH email account, the court filing says.

The three exchanged non-public NIH information; talked about their efforts to influence NIH to fund EcoHealth Alliance again; exchanged edits to draft letters addressed to NIH leadership for EcoHealth Alliance and Daszak; and “back-channeled” information to a person identified as

“Senior NIAID Official 1,” according to the statement of facts. That person was Fauci, according to the records released through congressional investigations.

https://www.politico.com/news/2026/08/18/anthony-fauci-david-morens-covid-ecohealth-01040979

Dr. Gerald "Garry" Keusch is an American physician-scientist and global health expert who directed the National Institutes of Health's Fogarty International Center from 1998 to 2003. He has not received personal funding from Bill Gates, though large institutional grants from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation supported collaborative global health projects he led or co-authored during his career.

JOHN LEAKE S BOOK MIND VIRUSES EXPLORES THE MOST IMPORTANT PART OF COVID, NAMELY THAT IT WAS A PYSOP ON OUR MINDS

JOHN LEAKE S NEW BOOK MIND VIRUSES INVITES US TO EXPLORE WHETHER WE ARE RESPONSIBLE, INDEPENDENT, RATIONAL PEOPLE OR MERE MEMBERS OF A HERD RESPONDING EMOTIONALLY TO STIMULAE, WITHOUT IDEALS OR VALUES, WEDDED TO MATERIAL COMFORT AND GAIN AND EASILY MANIPULATED BY FEAR  

WHAT CAN WE PERSONALLY LEARN FROM COVID AND THE CATASTROPHE IT HAS CAUSED?

WHAT CAN WE IMPROVE IN OUR THINKING, HOW CAN WE LEAD MORE PRODUCTIVE LIVES AND UPHOLD THE COMMON INTEREST MORE ENERGETICALLY AND EFFECTIVELLY?

COVID CAN BECOME AN OPPORTUNITY IF WE ARE WILLING TO LEARN THE PYSCHOLOGICAL LESSONS

PETER MCCULLOUGH IS PROMOTING THE BOOK OF JOHN LEAKE AS ESSENTIAL READING

HIS EMAIL

Dear Colleague,

John Leake — my co-author, and vice president of the McCullough Foundation — has written a new book, Mind Viruses: America's Irrational Obsessions, and I am writing to request that you report its publication to your audience and followers.

John was the primary author of our two books together, The Courage to Face COVID-19 and the New York Times best-seller Vaccines: Mythology, Ideology, and Reality. Mind Viruses is a solo project, and it provides a clear diagnosis of what ails our body politic and how we can restore health to our constitutional Republic.

The book shows in meticulous detail how the COVID-19 "crisis," and every other "crisis" that has afflicted this country since 2001, has followed the same script. We are told that some terrifying new threat is coming to get us, and that we must trust and obey central authority to protect us. We are presented with a "solution" that will save us. "Salvation" requires accepting the suspension of our constitutional rights and the transfer of trillions of dollars in public money to the interests that supply the countermeasures.

Gripped by fear, the populace becomes easy to manipulate and receptive to irrational ideas that supplant common sense, established facts, and logic. Drawing on writers such as Fyodor Dostoevsky, Carl Jung, and René Girard, John illuminates how and why these destructive notions spread like a viral contagion.

Those who retain their reason and question the veracity of the "threat," or the vaunted "solution," are branded dangerous spreaders of misinformation, scapegoated, and viciously punished. I need not take John's word for how effectively this script works. I was on the receiving end of it, as many of you have reported.

Last week we learned that Anthony Fauci, Rochelle Walensky, and much of the medical profession strongly recommended administering the COVID-19 vaccine to pregnant women, even though they knew the shot increased the risk of miscarriage. Mind Viruses explains precisely how such acts of collective madness come about.

John consulted me on the pandemic chapters, and on the phony epidemic of "gender dysphoria" and the atrocity of "gender affirming care" for minors. He shows how the "crises" of climate change, racism, and Russia followed the same script, and he provides a fascinating history of each "crisis."

Please report the release of this fascinating and important book and discuss it with John on your show. He is an expert on each of the irrational obsessions he characterizes in the book, many of which are in the news as I write this letter.

You can help us to get the ball rolling by watching the Book Trailer that I just posted on my X account and reposting it.

 

Many thanks and best regards,

Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH