HITLER S DOCTOR KARL BRANDT WHO CARRIED OUT A SECRET EUTHANASIA PROGRAMME FOR HITLER WAS PUT ON TRIAL AT NUREMBERG in 1946,1947
THE EUTHANASIA TRIALS WERE MAJOR TRIALS OF NAZIS WHO KILLED
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Euthanasia_trials
https://nuremberg.law.harvard.edu/nmt_1_intro
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karl_Brandt
UP TO 300,000 PEOPLE WERE KILLED MAINLY IN PYSCHIATIC HOSPITALS BETWEEN 1939, 1945
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aktion_T4
MANY RESISTANCE TO THE NAZIS WERE PUT IN PYSCHIATRIC HOSPITALS
WIDOWS WERE ALSO TARGETTED TO REDUCE THE PENSION BURDEN ON THE NAZI GERMANY STATE AND FISCAL STRAIN
FAMILIES WERE TOLD THEIR LOVED ONES DIED OF NATURAL CAUSES
KIM LEADBEATER, KEIR STARMER AND ANY JUDGES AND DOCTORS ENGAGING IN MASS MURDER IF THE EUTHANASIA BILL IS EVER PASSED SHOULD FACE TRIAL TOO
100S OF THOUSANDS OF GERMANS WERE EUTHANASISED IN GERMANY AND AUSTRIA IN THE NAME OF COMPASSION IN TOTAL SECRECY WITH THEIR FAMILIES OFTEN FALSELY TOLD THEY DIED OF NATURAL CAUSES
THE PARALLELS BETWEEN AKTION T4 AND THE ASSISTED DYING BILLS PROVISION FOR TOTAL SECRECY AND NO APPEAL MAY NOT BE A CONCIDENCE
WEF ELITE KEIR STARMER BACKS THE NAZI STYLE EUTHANASIA BILL VIOLATING THE RIGHT TO LIFE
ANTI CHRISTIAN PLAN TO KILL PEOPLE IN SECRECY FOR INSCRUTABLE REASONS HAS NO PLACE IN HOSPITALS AND IS OPPOSED BY FAITH LEADERS
https://www.cbcew.org.uk/joint-statement-of-faith-leaders-in-wales-on-assisted-suicide/
A top retired UK judge has warned that people in the UK could be sentenced to death by a single judge in secret hearings with no input from the patient or their family or loved ones.
There is also no right to appeal if a judge allows a medical murder wihtout the knowledge or consent of the patient or the loved ones.
From media
He warned that under the current legislation, a judge could decide the matter without hearing from the patient or their loved ones. While the legislation states that a High Court judge “may” hear from the terminally ill person who made the application, it is not mandatory. The judge “must” hear from one of the doctors, but this does not have to be in person.
The Bill does not currently make clear whether there would be a hearing at the High Court, or whether the decision would be made just on the papers and without a hearing, Sir James said. He also warned that it is not clear whether any future hearing would be held in public or private.
He also pointed out an apparant flaw in the Bill, which allows an appeal to the Court of Appeal if the High Court refuses an assisted death, but doesn’t seem to permit an appeal if the decision to proceed is approved.
In a recent case in Canada, a British Columbia judge granted an urgent injunction stopping a woman’s assisted death, the day before it was scheduled to take place, after her partner intervened.
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/assisted-dying-bill-high-court-euthanasia-b2647695.html
The secrecy and lawlessness of the procedure is remarkable parallel to Hitler s euthanasisa programme Aktion T4.
100s of thousands of Germans were euthanased as part of a secretive programme with their families often kept in the total darkness.
Families were often falsely informed their loved ones had died of natural causes when they had been selected for murder by killer doctors. People who were deemed to be a financial drain on the state were a high priority for euthanasia including widows who drew pensions although it was also driven by Darwinian and eugenics.
Is this going to be repeated in the UK? For if the families are not told of the plan to murder their loved one before they are murdered, why should they be told after the murder has occurred? Would it not be preferrable for the guilty judges and doctors and government to issue misleading notifications of a natural death to avoid social unrest as Hitler s Nazi doctors did?
Will judges deem having a covid jab injury a greenlight for euthanasia? Or protesting the NHS care or the British government policies a sign of mental illness, meeting the criteria for euthanasia?
Just who is to hold the judges and doctors to account when their decisions may not even be known to anyone and there is no right to appeal?
A small group of hand picked doctors wee allowed to decide who lived and who died as part of Hitler s mass murder programme.
https://collections.ushmm.org/search/catalog/pa15074
The mass murders were called "merciful", compassioante etc when they were brutal, cruel crimes.
As the British government struggles with a huge deficit, may WEF elements like Keir Starmer be seeking to intrdouce a T4 style euthanasia programme to kill vast numbers of British people too sick or old to work?
It is striking that the Assisted dying Bill of Kim Leadbeater has precisely the same secrecy at its core as Hitler s T4 programme. Who wrote the Bill? Did she write it? Who is funding her campaign? Does King Charles, whose father Philipp had SS and Nazi relatives, approve of the Bill?
If MPs vote for the Assisted Dying Bill, it could open the door to 100s of thousands of Brits being killed in total secrecy without their family knowing for financial and fiscal or other reasons as happened in Nazi Germany.
They may find they are also eventually victims of a judge signing papers in secrecy with hand picked doctors who may be in on the criminal scheme and with no knowledge they have been selected for euthanasia and no right to appeal if they ever end up in hospital after an accident, car crash or suffering from covid jab harms.
This Bill must be voted down.
The public will not tolerate more government sanctioned killings after the covd jab scandal.
It is not merciful or compassioante for judges and selected doctors to be allowed in total secrecy and with no right of appeal to oder the deaths of vast numbers of people using injections, drugs and other tortures.
It is a crime. And if the Bill ever does pass, and ever is implemented, Kim Leadbeater and Starmer may find themselves on trial for it like Karl Brandt, Hitler s doctor, who supervised Aktion T4 at Nuremberg.
https://nuremberg.law.harvard.edu/nmt_1_intro
As for Kim Leadbeater, Britis can be sure of one thing. This MP has lied about the safeguards in the Bill and she may be lying about much more, including a financial interest in pushing the Bill on behalf of big pharma or other entities.
Brits cannot count on Kim Leadbeater helping any family whose loved ones have been murdered in secrecy as a result of her Nazi style Bill.
This cynical woman needs to be voted out of office by her constituents at a minimum and put on trial like Karl Brandt if the Bill is ever implemented.
Laws cannot make murder by the government or doctors legal no matter how much a corrupted media and MPs claim. People have rights,, including the fundamental right to life enshrined in ECHR.
