FACTS SUGGEST CHARLIE KIRK WAS MURDERED BUT NOT IN THE WAY THE FBI SAYS WITH THE FINGER OF SUSPICION POINTING TO NETANYAHU AND TRUMP
THE MOTIVE SEEMS TO HAVE BEEN CHARLIE KIRK CALLING FOR THE RELEASE OF ALL THE EPSTEINF FILES AND CRITICIZING OCT 7TH TO BEN SHAPIRO
INVESTIGATED DESPITE FEARING ISRAEL WOULD KILL HIM ACCORDING TO A CONTACT, SHOWING GREAT COURAGE, GREAT INTEGRITY
THE SNIPER ON THE ROOF MAY BE A RED HERRING TO HIDE THE INVOLVEMENT OF THE FBI, POLICE, HOSPITAL IN THE SHOOTING RIGHT BESIDE CHARLIE KIRK
THE COVER UP MAY HAVE HAPPENED AT THE HOSPITAL
THE MEDICAL PART AND THE HOSPITAL S ROLE ARE STRANGE
I ATTENDED THE PRESS CONFERENCE IN A VIENNA HOSPITAL IN 2004 ON THE POISONING OF A UKRAINIAN POLITICIAN, VICTOR YUSCHENKO AS A REPORTER AND THE WAY THE UTAH HOSPITAL WAS SO SILENT IS SUSPICIOUS
NETANYHAU S EARLY ANNOUNCEMENT OF CHARLIE KIRK S DEATH HAPPENED 3 HOURS AFTER THE SHOOTING WHEN HE WAS STILL AT THE HOSPITAL, GAVE NO INFO
THE SHOOTING MAY HAVE BEEN CARRIED OUT BY THOSE CLOSE TO CHARLIE KIRK IN THE GAZEBO, THE POLICE AND PRIVATE SECURITY AND MEDIA ENTOURAGE
This is a developing story.
In the light of all the new information, I believe Charlie Kirk was murdered by a professional team but not in the way described by the FBI.
The same FBI which lied about the Epstein files is lying about the muder of Charlie Kirk, I allege.
Yesterday, I thought Charlie Kirk s murder was staged. Now I think he was murdered but not in the way the official narrative claims.
The motive seems to have been that Charlie Kirk had begun to focus on the very topics which Trump and Netanyahu do not want discussed including the Epstein blackmail ring apparantly installed in DC to steer US policy from the shadows.
As Stew Peters tweeted @realstewpeters
"A few days ago: “The DOJ should release ALL the Epstein files.”
Today: Charlie Kirk was assassinated"
I apologize for not having followed Charlie Kirk on media.
I was not aware of his growing criticism of Trump s handling of the Epstein files, which supplies the key motive for shooting him in my view.
That there seems to be a ring of politicians installed in the White House who are blackmailed potentially by Netanyahu, Epstein, Jamie Dimon and other entities to carry out the policies this group want may be the bigget scandal in American history.
My heartfelt apologies to his family and friends for my failure to understand the extent to which Charlie Kirk had begun to ask the really dangerous questions Netanyahu does not want asked also about October 7th and the Gaza genocide and for underestimating the great courage and integrity of Charlie Kirk for goving ahead and asking those questions despite fearing for his life.
Clips show that Charlie Kirk recently asked whether the reason the administration wouldn’t release more documents about Jeffrey Epstein was because he was a Mossad agent.
Charlie Kirk talking about what he believed were spurious accusations of antisemitism he had faced for being critical of Israel.
He asked whether Israel had intentionally allowed the Oct. 7 Hamas terrorist attack to take place.
He had also criticized the attacks on the free speech rights of Candace Owens and Tucker Carlson.
In August, Harrison Smith claimed he was told Kirk “thinks Israel will kill [him] if he turns against them.”
Facts still suggest to me he was, indeed, not shot by a sniper on the roof of the Losee Centre as discussed in my post yesterday.
Evidence still suggests to me that, instead, he was killed by someone close to him in and around the gazebo packed with police, his private security guards, camera men for reasons I discuss below, also connected to the strange events at the hospital.
I now think it seems to have been a carefully orchestrated assassination involving assets in the police and FBI as well as in the local hospital and looks like it was organized by Trump and Netanyahu to silence the MAGA influencer as the Epstein blackmail scandal grows.
I believe the evidence points to Trump and Netanyahu teaming up to carry out a professional assassination of Charlie Kirk with sophisticated decoys, including the sniper on the roof for reasons connected also to the events at the hospital where he was allegedly brought.
The entire official narrative does not add up but one thing that is really strange to my mind is the role of the hospital.
I attended the press conference in a Vienna hospital in 2004 on the poisoning of Ukrainian politician later president Viktor Yushchenko.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/4087253.stm
There were lots of reporters at the Rudolfinerhaus clinic along with myself
The leading doctor gave a detailed description of their medical examination, why they diagnosed poisoning with Dioxin and took questions.
I was also able to ask questions to the chief doctor Michael Zimpfer
https://www.derstandard.at/story/1888030/juschtschenko-wurde-vergiftet
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2001/nov/06/anthrax.uk
https://www.thetimes.com/world/us-world/article/who-poisoned-yushchenko-l8dmm67ncgw
When a patient is a person of public interest, hospitals and doctors do regularly give briefings.
Theere are privacy concerns. But there is also public interest.
When Trump was taken to Walter Reed in October 3, 2020, an entire team of doctors helped the chief doctor give a press briefing about his health.
Why did Timpanogos Regional Hospital not hold a press conference about Charlie Kirk when the shooting was of massive public interest and he was in the hospital for several hours after the shot?
ABC4 Utah media report he was taken to the hospital were he was pronounced dead later.
His body was not taken to the Medical Examiner until later that night.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pYDbcQSd9Z8
Is it customary to keep a dead body at a hospital for hours? If it is not, if it is standard to transport a dead person to the ME in a speedy manner for the autopsy, when exactly did Charlie Kirk die?
Why did the hospital not report in detail of the initial treatment was he given to stop the blood from flowing, the condition he arrived in the hospital, the treatment he was given at the hospital, the cause of his death and exact time?
Benjamin Netanyahu’s tweeted about the death of Charlie Kirk at 12:21 AM · Sep 11, 2025 that is 3 21 PM MT or Utah time.
Jerusalem, Israel is +9h than Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
https://timebie.com/timezone/israelutah.php
Charlie Kirk was shot at around 12 20 pm UTC time on September 10th 2025.
That is 9 20 pm in Israel.
So Netanyahu issued his tweet when Charlie Kirk was in the hospital for three hours but we had no information from the hospital itself at that time about his being there or his death.
How did he know Charlie Kirk was dead? How did Trump know?
When did Erika Kirk know?
Are there ground for saying that to hide the real cause of death as being organized by Trump and Netanyau, the FBI and Mossad, the hospital remained purposefully silent and vague?
As mentioned, I attened a really detailed and long press conference in Vienna in 2004 in a hospital on the poisoning of a Ukrainian politician.
Was Charlie Kirk dead on arrival at the hospital? If not why did the hospital not declare it immediately?
If he died later, as media state, what treatment did the hospital give him? When exactly did he die? What of?
Which doctor was in charge?
Why did the hospital put out a presser to confirm he was in the hospital as local TV reported?
Where is the presser?
I could find no sign of any mention of it on the hospital website when I searched using words like Charlie Kirk or shooting or gun shot wound?
Did Timpanogos Regional Hospital send press releases just to the local news and not put a copy on its website? Why?
https://www.mountainstar.com/locations/timpanogos-regional-hospital/Search?query=Charlie%20Kirk
The hospitals FB page has an update about a new CEO Andrew Zenger who was appointed just a couple of weeks before the shooting
https://www.facebook.com/TimpHospital/
Nothing on its Instagram account.
https://www.instagram.com/timpanogoshospital/
The hospital has a level 3 trauma center.
https://www.mountainstar.com/specialties/emergency-care/trauma-center
Where is the autopsy report?
An autopsy report from the State of Utah or the FBI should reveal details surrounding the death of Charlie Kirk and its precise time and place.
https://www.webmd.com/a-to-z-guides/autopsy-decision
The autopsy should also list Charlie Kirks cause of death and the details of the bullet and weapon?
Utah media report he was taken to the hospital were he was pronounced dead and later that night to the Utah Office of the Medical Examiner.
ABC4 Utah reports that the Medical Examiner releases a body within 24 hours.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pYDbcQSd9Z8
That means, the autopsy should be available.
The Utah Office of the Medical Examiner (OME) investigates all sudden, unexpected, violent, suspicious, or unattended deaths in Utah.
This includes deaths related to accidents, homicides, suicides, and those without clear medical explanations.
They " determine the cause of death (the injury, illness, or disease that made the person die) and the manner of death (the general category of death, including natural, accident, homicide, suicide, or undetermined) for each case that we work on."
https://ome.utah.gov/for-families/
But a scan of the media reports does not show any report of any autopsy has been carried out so far or by whom or what it found or any press conference by the Utah police, FBI referencing an autopsy.
Is that correct? How come?
Why the information vacuum?
The mysterious silence and lapses of the hospital, the apparant lack of an autopsy results so far may be related to a cover up over the true causes of Charlie Kirk s death.
The official version is the shot from the campus' Losee Center by a sniper on the roof with a high velocity rifle.
But official version comes from the same FBI and Kash Patel who lied about the Epstein files and suicide. What credibility does he have?
Dispatch audio described a person on the roof of a nearby building wearing black clothing and carrying a long rifle.
But footage of the event from a camera just beside Charlie Kirk in the gazebo shows that the line of fire was all but impossible due to the angle, the gazebo as well as the dense crowds and media equipment around and in front of Charlie Kirk.
Full video : Charlie Kirk shot dead at Utah Valley University at American comeback Tour 2025
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MNv8d-Ud2xI
https://youtube.com/shorts/mAoyYamVyC0?feature=shared
The camera man appears to sweep the Losee Center building as he films the scene almost from the POV of Charlie Kirk but there appears to be no sign of a sniper on the roof although that may be due to the poor quality of the particular footage.
The angle of the bullet wound below Charlie Kirk s chin is not consistent with a shot from a higher elevation but from a shot close by at a lower level.
The same camera team curiously has no footage of what happened to Kirk s body.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MNv8d-Ud2xI
https://youtube.com/shorts/mAoyYamVyC0?feature=shared
No video has emerged of his body or him being given emergency aide by anyone in the crowd around.
When did Charlie Kirk die exactly?
Where did he die exactly?
Why did the hospital where he was brought not give a press conference about the state of Charlie Kirk s health or death if he was pronounced dead after he arrived at the hospital?
Why did we not hear any details?
Why did the police, private security guards, people around Charlie Kirk not immediately apply or get a paramedic to apply the standard proceedures to stop blood flowing from a severed neck vessels?
The bleeding had to be stopped immediately using a bandage or even a hand to prevent blood loss.
Would it not have been standard to give emergency first aide on the ground to Charlie Kirk and call paramedics from the regional hospital rather than going there?
Emergency responders can get to the scene of a shooting quickly with ambulsances and sirens etc
https://firstaidsaskatoon.ca/emergency-care-severed-neck-blood-vessels/
Who were the six private security personel who rushed him to the SUV without any trace of blood on their hands or clothes according to video? Who hired them?
What about the six police? Why did at least one of them not attend immediately to the body, give first aide and call an emergency responders?
Why did the police rush away from the scene of the crime and focus on a man who was clearly a decoy and had no gun?
Why was no paramedic called by any one around the gazebo?
Why is there no video, footage showing Kirk receiving initial medical care with all the cameras around?
Why did the police and security not call for immediate medical aide at the scene of the shooting?
Is it because they were involved in shooting him in the first place?
The six security personel may have taken a fake body to a black SUV and to the hospital where a pre arranged network certified him dead later.
Footage shows no blood on their hands or clothes as they carry what appears to be a body to a SUV. They surround the body as they move to the SUV obscuring the view.
But there is no blood on any of their hands or clothes.
Anyone who has had a slight cut knows that the amounts of blood can be significant and spill all over the place.
It is not credible that none of these men were completely free of blood.
Why did they take the intiative to drive him to a hospital when they knew it was a medical emergency and the usual procedure is to call for emergency responders or a medic? Did they follow orders? Who from?
Why was there nodiscussion among them about what to do? Why did they all, apparantly, unanimously decide to pick up the body and head for a SUV and drive him to a hospital within seconds of the shooting?
Why did no one stop them and warn them Charlie Kirk was losing blood fast and needed to be kept still on the ground and the wound bandaged or blocked up?
Were they involved in the shooting at close range consistent with the angle of the gun shot wound and cover up a the scene? Was the body put in the car even that of Charlie Kirk when there is no sign of blood on the hands of the security personnel?
Was his body covered up at the scene of the shooting and removed later to hide the evidence that the shooting was done by someone close to him?
The actual dead body may have been removed when the crowds had been scared away in order to obscure the actual cause of death and the actual killers who may have been among his private security guards and, or the police, and, or media teams around him.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cSaJexQIRvI
Was Charlie Kirk shot by someone in his close circle and is that the vital clue that must be covered up at all costs?
Is the gunman on the roof a red herring?
Why are there credible videos of the gunman jumping off the roof different from the FBI s alleged CCTV footage, showing also a man with shorts and a pony tail?
How come the shooting coincideded with a question about trans murders?
The ATF/DHS has now reported that Charlie Kirk’s assassin left the rifle and shell casings it used at the scene and that “anti-fascist”
“ProTrans”messages were carved into the implements of death.
Did the shooter allegedly on the roof who had bullets allegedly engraved with trans and anti fascist slogans just happen to shoot at that same moment? Or was the shooting coordinated with the questiont to support the narrative of a lone wolf motivated by trans violence?
Who engraved the gun and bullets?
Engraving guns and bullets requires hi tech precision equipment which the shooter either had or he had the bullets and gun engraved at a special business?
There do not seem to be many such businesses in the USA.
One example is High Caliber Creations, which custom engaves bullet cartridges.
https://www.highcalibercreations.com/
Have the FBI asked the all businesses engraving bullets if they had an order to engrave the preicse slogans on the bullets allegedly belonging to the shooter?
Noteworthy is that Trump and his allied media including Alex Jones immediately blamed the Left and called for a crack down on free speech etc.
Today, Alex Jones was forced to cover the massive evidence that Charlie Kirk was the victimof a professional, orchestrated hit job and Netanyahu is the prime suspect with the motive and the means. Netanyahu and his controlled politicians in the White House, including Trump, that is. Both have a motive to seek to silence Charlie Kirk as he began asking tough questions about October 7th, the Gaza genocide and the Epstein files.
From Infowars
Update: Internet Questions Whether Charlie Kirk Assassinated by Israeli Intelligence
by Infowars.com September 11th, 2025 9:27 PM
Social media users question whether Turning Point USA founder's murder may have been a carefully orchestrated political hit job.
Infowars host claims Kirk feared Israel would kill him if he stepped out of line.
https://www.infowars.com/posts/charlie-kirk-slaughter-an-israeli-mossad-hit
In one instance, Kirk suggested there was growing evidence showing Jeffrey Epstein was part of a blackmail operation possibly created by Israeli intelligence.
harlie Kirk Was Starting to Notice!
"And this is no longer just speculation. First of all, the evidence that shows that Epstein was a creation of either Mossad, Israeli intelligence, American intelligence..."
Everything is connected!
Stew Peters
@realstewpeters
A few days ago: “The DOJ should release ALL the Epstein files.”
Today: Charlie Kirk was assassinated
In an interview with Ben Shapiro on Tuesday discussing Israel’s recent strike on Hamas in Qatar, Kirk touched on pervasive anti-semitism on the right, saying, “I have 1 or 2 other questions on Israel. I think it’s very important for our audience to hear this though because there is an incessant campaign…And one thing a friend said to me interestingly, which is, okay, ‘Charlie, we push back against the media on COVID, on lockdowns, on Ukraine, on the border…Maybe we should also ask, question is the media totally presenting the truth when it comes to Israel?‘”
“Just a question, you know, that maybe we shouldn’t believe everything the media says, because I know I’ve been conditioned to ask a lot more critical questions over the last couple of years,” Kirk told Shapiro.
Kirk also questioned whether the Israeli military ordered a stand down during the attacks of October 7, 2023, a Hamas incursion which has been used as a pretext to justify the ethnic cleansing of Gaza.
In an interview about a year ago with Patrick Bet-David, Kirk specifically called out Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu for “basically redefining the Israeli constitution,” describing how hundreds of thousands of Israelis were taking to the streets to protest him.
Donald Trump and Netanyahu coordinated their messaging and posts to match during the Charlie Kirk assassination.
Both "leaders" have ties to individuals in the Jeffrey Epstein files, and would benefit from the case being buried away. Both had invested heavily into Kirk and his influence network.
Donald Trump and Netanyahu coordinated their messaging and posts to match during the Charlie Kirk assassination.
Both "leaders" have ties to individuals in the Jeffrey Epstein files, and would benefit from the case being buried away. Both had invested heavily into Kirk and his influence network.
Jackson Hinkle 🇺🇸
@jacksonhinklle
Charlie Kirk said he feared 'Israel would kill him if he stepped out of line?'
Netanyahu paused his attacks on 7 different countries to tweet about Charlie, minutes after the attack?
The arrested suspect was a patsy & the shooter is still on the run?
Am I hearing this right?
🚨🇮🇱🇺🇸 BREAKING: Netanyahu personally requested Charlie Kirk visit Israel two weeks before his assassination.
Kirk was rumored to have denied the request.
Speculation over Israeli involvement in Kirk’s assassination comes as the FBI has released photos of a person of interest, with reports claiming ammo cartridges found by the ATF were “engraved with wording on them expressing transgender and anti-fascist ideology.”
No comments:
Post a Comment