BATTLE BETWEEN CHINA AND USA IS REALLY THE BATTLE BETWEEN A STATE CENTRAL BANK MAKING ITS PEOPLE WEALTHY AND A PRIVATE CENTRAL BANKSTERS MAKING EVERYONE POORER AS PART OF A FRAUD
NEW EMAILS GIVE FRESH INSIGHT INTO THE SHIP OF FOOLS WHO EXERCISE POWER BEHIND THE CURTAIN, EXPLAIN WHY THE USA NOW IS ON THE BRINK OF COLLAPSE AND CHINA IS ALREADY THE NEW GLOBAL SUPER POWER
IN THE C 17 YEARS SINCE I FIRST REPORTED ON CHINA S STATE CENTRAL BANK, CHINA HAS GROWN 3 TO 4 TIMES IN SIZE TO OVERTAKE THE USA, ITS HYPERSONIC WWEAPONS CAN WIPE OUT US AIRCRAFT CARRIERS IN MINUTES ACCORDING TO PETE HEGSETH
New emails analysed by reporters at Jacobin reveal that Epstein and his right hand, Steve Bannon, were most focussed on destroying China, identified as the geopolitical rival of the private central banking cartel running the West. China, powering its economic, military and technology ascendancy using a state central bank and sound money, is the subject of discussions and schemes.
https://jacobin.com/2025/11/epstein-summers-bannon-war-israel-china
Steve Bannon has emerged as a key fixer in the Epstein, JP Morgan determined to destroy China using trade and currency wars while lacking any understanding of China s economy or its elite.
In an email chain, Bannon arrogantly dismisses Xi and the CCP as peasants.
From media
In one May 2019 exchange, Epstein sardonically chided Bannon for his insistence that the Trump administration would “break” China.
“They have North Korea, 3 trillion in reserves. People that work 29 hours per day. A command structure that is efficient. Not sure what breaking them means,” Epstein wrote.
“It’s a group of peasants trying to run a world economy — Xi barely has high school education, completely panicked when they read thru the deal — already leaking oil,” Bannon replied.
To his credit, Epstein dismisses Bannon s contempt for Xi and the CPP, pointing out the CCP identified NSA spyware and used it against them.
Throughout the email exhange, Epstein appears, indeed, to have been far more in touch with reality than Bannon. But that would not be hard. The emails give an insight into how the simplistic minds of the Epstein circle, happily untroubled by facts, logic or reality and barely able to muster a grammatical sentence , see the world.
In 2025, Pete Hegseth has had to admit that China s hypersonic missiles can destroy all US aircraft carriers before Bannon can spell the words" Descendent of Irish Bog Trotters made good in the CIA mafia"
Caught in Greek prosecutor probes giving the entire game away about central banks to Xi and Putin in 2015 already, Bannon emerges as a figure of pathological pride. whose policies are guided by a bundle of biases, racist assumptions and teflon proof ignorance of the facts.
Far from destroying China in trade wars, China is in the process of destroying the USA, crushing it by withholding rare metals.
This, after Trump, and the same Epstein circle started another ill advised trade war. despite all the warning from people like me that China with its state central bank has vast flexibility and limitless free money to adjust its trade and economic policies while the US economy is on the ropes due to the accmumulation of debt and interest generated by the issuance of its legal tender by a privatized Central Bank., the Fed.
China is now poised to set up an alternative financial architecture to the dollar dominated SWIFT system together with Russia and the BRICS.
The war with Russia has accelerated this development.
Key handler of Bannon and the private Fed, JP Morgan and its current CEO Jamie Dimon, have also emerged as the biggest funders of Epstein.
Elizabeth Warren has called for the JP Morgan chief executive, Jamie Dimon, to testify in front of the US Senate banking committee.
...
“They opened about 134 different accounts for Jeffrey Epstein over these years. They did more than a billion dollars in transactions for Jeffrey Epstein … He literally could walk into the bank and get $50m from JP Morgan Chase.
To clarify, it is JP Morgan which enabled Epstein, and his close associate Bannon, to set up a ring of blackmailed politicians, gov officials, CEOs and media figures to allow the private banks to de facto control the machinery of US gov, the policies and the media.
This network is why possibly the biggest story in the past decade, the battle between the private central bankers, making Americans poorer and sicker, and the Chinese state central bankers, making their people wealthier and healthier , is barely featured in the news.
The email exchange single out Bannon for his IQ in the negative sphere. Bannon makes Epstein and even Trump look clever.
Jamie Dimon may come a close to Bannon in stupidity if he thinks he needs to be tied personally to Epstein to avoid accountability for his bank funding him to the tune of billion plus dollars using over 100 different accounts whlile hiding the transactions.
He is obviously at the top of the command structure and his CEOs jumped to his orders.
One of his orders may have been to avoid him being personally linked directly to Epstein, Bannon and also the crimes against a reporter in Greece in D 15 218 and E 17 449.
If Jamie Dimon thinks that personal comms are needed to prove his responsibility, knowledge and guilt in a trial, he is delusional. But not more dumb than we have learned Bannon and the Epstein circle to be.
Whatever "good genes" Jamie Dimon , Bannon may have inherited with Bill Ackmann, intelligence does not seem, alas , to have been among them.
A scelortotic and arrogant Bannon must now also be the prime suspect along with, Soros, Rothschild in giving the entire financial and central bank and other secrets of the network away in their ill advised crimes against a reporter and massive corruption of due process in Greece while failing to correct this stunning own goal in 10 years despite the fact these state prosecutor probes can, and will be used, to put Bannon himself along with Trump, Kushner, Gates, and Soros on trial using international law very soon.
From media
US regulators say they are taking allegations that top banks may have facilitated Jeffrey Epstein’s criminal activity “very seriously”, as they faced calls to investigate executives including the former Barclays boss Jes Staley.
In correspondence seen by the Guardian, bosses from the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) said they had reviewed a letter from the Democratic senator Elizabeth Warren, which raised concerns over bankers’ alleged support for the convicted child sex offender Epstein.
That includes Staley, who Warren said had allegedly protected Epstein’s access to the banking system while working at JP Morgan in the early 2000s. Staley has already been banned from the UK banking sector for playing down his relationship with Epstein.
...
Last week Warren used an appearance on The Late Show with Stephen Colbert to urge the JP Morgan chief executive, Jamie Dimon, to testify in front of the US Senate banking committee.
...
“They opened about 134 different accounts for Jeffrey Epstein over these years. They did more than a billion dollars in transactions for Jeffrey Epstein … He literally could walk into the bank and get $50m from JP Morgan Chase.
“So, what I’d like to do, over on the banking committee, is I’d like to have Mr Dimon and some of those other bankers come in and, under oath, testify about exactly what the financial trail is that kept Jeffrey Epstein afloat for so long.”
JP Morgan said in a statement: “Jamie never met with Epstein, spoke with him, emailed with him, and was not involved in any decisions about his account, to which he testified under oath. There are over a million pages of emails and other documents produced in this case, and not one comes even close to suggesting otherwise.”
https://www.theguardian.com/business/2025/nov/28/us-regulators-taking-seriously-allegations-of-bankers-support-for-epstein
"China China China”
But the country that featured most heavily in Epstein’s private discussions contained in the files wasn’t Israel; it was China.
The subject of the United States’ chief geopolitical rival clearly loomed large for Epstein. Among the influential contacts he had collected was Robert Kuhn, an investment banker and intellectual whose overriding personal interest seemed to be in extracting funding from Epstein for a science docuseries he wanted to make, and he regularly plied Epstein with his China analysis before pivoting to talking about the project.
Another was billionaire hotel magnate Tom Pritzker, cousin of Illinois governor J. B. Pritzker, and executive chairman of the hawkish Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS). The two regularly exchanged messages about meeting up, emails show, and in 2016, Pritzker sent Epstein a presentation at a meeting of the Aspen Institute, an annual gathering of largely hawkish national security establishment heavy-hitters.
Chat logs show Epstein repeatedly trying to get a skeptical Bannon to meet with Tom Pritzker.
“Can we use CSIS for anything? Tom has GREAT relations in China,” Epstein messaged Bannon in July 2018.
“Tom is totally sold out to China — CSIS carries,” Bannon replied.
“No space between yours and Tom’s view on China,” Epstein insisted.
It was in his private chats with the virulently anti-China Bannon that the country most often came up, with Epstein often framing China as a serious threat that had to be defeated. He relayed to Bannon in September 2018 that “my French govt guys” agreed with him “that China for the very first time is following an imperialistic strategy, well thought through. Covered in nice ‘silk.’” As evidence, he pointed to China’s entry into Iran, Venezuela (“brilliant move”), and “djubuti,” a characteristic Epstein misspelling of Djibouti, where China set up its first overseas military base in 2017 (“highly dangerous,” he told Bannon).
Epstein bounced between certainty that China was falling apart and warnings that it was a formidable foe. China is “a unified nationalist economic country” whose forty-year-long strategy is “right on track,” Epstein told Bannon in July 2018, relaying “intel” he had gotten; “they have manpower to marshall,” he wrote, and “don’t mind suffering to achieve their goals.” The country was “stronger, plays weakened,” was the opinion of his “China guys,” Epstein relayed to Bannon later that summer, alluding, not for the last time, to one of the lessons in The Art of War.
“They said China stronger today than when we started?” Bannon replied.
A few months later, Epstein gave him some slightly different intel. “I had three China guys today. I told them they should brief you,” he messaged Bannon that December. “Bottom line. Forcing china to turn ineard [sic] is counterproductive to containment. . . . It was decribed [sic] as both stronger but much more brittle.” A few hours later, he reiterated the point: “Brittle. Key.”
“Yes brittle key,” Bannon replied.
In one May 2019 exchange, Epstein sardonically chided Bannon for his insistence that the Trump administration would “break” China.
“They have North Korea, 3 trillion in reserves. People that work 29 hours per day. A command structure that is efficient. Not sure what breaking them means,” Epstein wrote.
“It’s a group of peasants trying to run a world economy — Xi barely has high school education, completely panicked when they read thru the deal — already leaking oil,” Bannon replied.
“My meeting the other day was around how these peasants looked into their own systems, found the NSA cybertools that we had inserted and then used them against us interests,” Epstein wrote back. “Ohh. Yes., I forgot. We have [then-Treasury secretary] Steve Mnuchin, and Ludlow,” he wrote, likely a misspelled reference to then-National Economic Council director Larry Kudlow.
The two men had a similar exchange days later, when Bannon insisted China would struggle in the face of a US-launched trade war. “I will simplify: they are looking down the barrel of an economic shotgun,” Bannon wrote.
“Yes but their finger is on the trigger. It is not simple at all,” Epstein replied.
Looking at the situation from the vantage point of 2025 — after a Trump-led trade war in earnest against the country rebounded disastrously on the United States, exposing its dependence on Chinese imports and forcing several embarrassing climbdowns from Washington as a result — Epstein looks like he had the better of the argument.
Epstein’s views on China fit firmly into establishment thinking.
Nevertheless, one day later, Epstein was telling Bannon that China’s “slavery system is doomed,” pointing to its real estate bubble and what he viewed as its impending collapse. “They need to clean up their internal financial mess and will attempt to blame it on Trump,” he wrote. “It won’t work.”
Epstein told Bannon he agreed the United States was “at war” with China and had “been for years,” only fought with nontraditional weapons like technology and currency. But he also seemed to believe in encouraging that war.
“Your deplorables need an enemy,” he wrote in March 2019. “China China China.”
“Yes yes yes,” Bannon wrote back. “I’m the evangelicalist [sic] on this one.”
In one exchange earlier that month about Bannon’s appearance on Anderson Cooper’s CNN show, they strategized how to encourage such a war through the corporate press. “Turning him to your China side could be easier than one thinks. They need an enemy, China fits the bill,” Epstein told Bannon. “They need the new eyeballs. Big targets. Russia not useful, Trump dead for a while. Health care over. China perfect piñata.”
“Yes yes yes,” replied Bannon.
At the same time, Epstein repeatedly questioned Bannon’s preferred strategy of using trade (“a diversion that they love”) and tariffs (“a non event”) to take on China. “Ok, so if I understand, you want to win by knock out or tko,” he wrote to Bannon. “Their system is brittle. You guys should decide if trade a huge slow moving sledge hammer is the best way.”
Instead, he suggested the Trump administration would be more effective by looking at “attacking their propaganda,” and repeatedly urged him to “point out” or “call out China on currency” — in other words, to point out that China was artificially suppressing the value of its currency to give itself a trade advantage. He urged Bannon to pursue the “great opportunity” that India, with its similarly anti-China views and manufacturing potential, offered, and proposed to set up a meeting with far-right Indian prime minister Narendra Modi two months before he was arrested, noting that “his focus wants to be stopping China.” “Please,” replied Bannon.
Epstein’s views on China fit firmly into establishment thinking. On Russia, however, he took a different tack. “Trump is right in trying to bring them into a partnership,” Epstein told a delighted Bannon in July 2018. “Putin has been kind so far not to point out how the US involves itself in others elections, hasn’t pointed out assassinations to overthrow govts, coup funding,” he elaborated. “Russia a potential friend,” he told Bannon a year later.
The Man Behind the Curtain?
The latest disclosures about Epstein make the billionaire no less an enigmatic figure than before. They reveal a man who, in his conversations about foreign policy, contradicted himself, mirrored what the influential people he collected wanted to hear, and seemed to be driven by a variety of motives.
Yet arguably more important than why Epstein favored certain policies is what those policies actually were. More often than not, that meant a more hawkish posture toward US and Israeli adversaries, a posture that has often not served the United States or its people well. For those convinced Epstein was improperly influencing US foreign policy through his various activities, it should be a disturbing find.
https://jacobin.com/2025/11/epstein-summers-bannon-war-israel-china
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)