Trump signs order reducing recommended jabs for children to 11 but all jabs should be abolished becuase they lack a scientific basis

Anyone who understands the basics of biology and immune systems and considers how vaccines are supposed to work realizes something does not add up. 

It is mindboggling that kids are given any jabs let alone 11 that are stll  on the table after Trumps order.

What childen need are good, nourishing food, clearn water, hygenic conditions, exercise and common sense medical interventions like disinfectng wounds, emergency interventions after breaking a leg etc

They do not need to be loaded up with viruses and chemicals and metals at a young age for no discernible health benefit.

My view?  Forcing big pharma corps into bankrupcty would be a gain for US public health.

Whatver genuinely useful drugs they produce can be made as generics.

Homeopathy and emergency, intensive care medicine should be the focus.

From media 

The order also recommends that the number of childhood vaccines drop to 11 from the existing 18 recommended by the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP).

Trump's order serves as guidance, not a mandate, since shots required for school attendance are set at the state level, rather than by the federal government.

The immunisations recommended for all children under the order are for measles, mumps, rubella, diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, polio, Haemophilus influenzae type B, pneumococcal disease, human papillomavirus, and varicella or chicken pox.

"We're reducing them," Trump said. "It's not only that you're doing fewer vaccines, or jabs, as they say, but you're doing them in a series of visits to the doctor."

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/ce3q5vl581wo

It is an inditement of a generation of doctors, paediatricians and their education that they have not realized the entire theory justifying vaccines is wrong, illogical, does not make sense.

But these are the same ones who have just rolled out the toxic covid bioweapon jabs and killed millions of people wth them.

Viruses like flu, covid are removed by the immune defense when they enter via the lungs.. To inject viruses diectly into the blood stream together with chemicals, metals, is to bypass the body s own natural shield and to load the body up with dangerous toxins.

There is much pain with little gain as Emanuel Lasker, the world chess champion, noted  in 1907

What the jabs are are soft kill weapons making a fortune for pharma companies, who, in turn, fund media  and doctors to convey misinformation.

From AI

In his 1907 philosophical book Struggle (Kampf), Emanuel Lasker criticizes vaccination by framing it as "contrary to the principle of economic defense" and arguing that it is illogical because artificial intervention disrupts natural biological adaptation and resistance. [1, 2, 3, 4]

Lasker’s Philosophical Objections

Disruption of Natural Immunity: Lasker viewed life as an ongoing, necessary struggle against environmental forces. He believed that artificially suppressing a disease via vaccination bypassed the body's natural evolutionary process of adaptation. [1]
Contradictory Medical Logic: He asserted that the underlying premise used to justify one specific vaccination should logically apply to all infectious ailments, yet mainstream practitioners would not universally endorse such a blanket approach. [1]
Perceived Negative Side Effects: Writing during an era of early and evolving immunization practices, Lasker speculated that medical interventions might inadvertently assist other ailments—such as claiming that tuberculous bacilli could profit from the procedure or that overall consumption (tuberculosis) might correlate with vaccination efforts. [1]