RAND PAUL SHOWS IN 2015 FAUCI KNEW THE RESULTS OF THE EBOLA CA SUFFIT TRIAL PUBLISHED IN THE LANCET IN JULY 2015 WERE WORTHLSS
YET THIS WORTHLESS, DANGEROUS JAB WHICH MAY GIVE PEOPLE EBOLA ACCORDING TO THE THE LANCET JULY REPORT GOT A LICENSE IN THE USA, EU IN 2019!!!
Fauci privately wrote of “multiple flaws in the design and the analysis of the data” supporting the Ebola vaccine candidate and a “terribly flawed study design.” corroborating my 2015 warnings and showing why the crimes were committed againt me in 2015 as captured in D 15 218 were committed.
For concealment.
https://www.bizpacreview.com/2026/10/07/fauci-wanted-trump-impeached-over-border-wall-misled-public-about-ebola-vaccine-diary-entries-reveal-1662252/
The newly released records from 2015 show that Fauci concealed the very dangerous ebola experiments, misrepresented the very same evidence for an Ebola vaccine, that I warned about and that his close associate, Bill Gates, together with Geoge Soros, the mega donor of the Democrat party, joined togethr to persecut the reporter when I warned that the public was being deceived. The newly released Fauci records are important because they show that Fauci privately understood dangers that he publicly denied. The reporter, I, was therefore dangerous to the conspiracy not becauseI possessed power, but because I possessed evidence, documents, links, research, sources.
Fauci s logs questioning 2015 Ebola vaccine trial designs are definitive proof of a deliberate cover-up and systemic deception.
The 2015 Ebola trial limitations are evidence of a pattern of behavior, showing that Fauci and public health officials have a history of deploying "flawed" or dangerous research methodologies to push their agendas.
Fauci also recommended the covid vaccine in 2021 while privately knowing there was evidence that it caused severe adverse reactions like "cytokine storms" in deliberate act of harm, prioritizing the financial interests of pharmaceutical companies and global control over human lives.
In 2015, the Fauci used the strategy he would later use during covid —publicly presenting promising vaccine results while privately recognizing limitations in the trial evidence, and again treating the warnings of reporters like myself as a conspiracy theory, threat.
A questionable trial design is not itself proof of a dangerous vaccine; the criminal allegation arises because Fauci, Gates knowingly concealed material limitations and deliberately used official authority to suppress those who exposed them.
By 2026, the pattern has become unmistakable: whenever the evidence threatens the criminal enterprise, the response was concealment, discrediting, and suppression rather than independent investigation. The dates and circumstances changed, but the purpose remained constant—to preserve the public fiction of safety, prevent the reporter from being heard, and escape accountability.
The significance of these newly released Fauci records is that they transform the reporter's warnings, my warnings from 2015, from a conspiracy theory and the accusations of a persecuted reporter into claims corroborated by the private records of the very man who publicly denied them.
Fauci's 2015 notes acknowledge in private the dangerous ebola experiments, the defects in the ebola vaccine trial design and evidence, and the alarming experimental results while he nevertheless maintained publicly that the disease was natural and the vaccine safe, then the subsequent persecution of the reporter, of me, for saying the very same things, acquires an entirely different meaning.
It is clear that I, the reporter, was not subjected to an attempt at imprisonment without due process for these reports in D 15 218 because my warnings were false, but because they threatened to expose what Fauci already knew.
The removal of the prosecutor files, suppressed investigation into Gates, Soros in D 15 218, the probe E 17 449 capturing Trump and Kushner, the two criminal defamation trials for substantially the same ten posts and the contradictory and inconsistent rulings, and continuing efforts to silence me consequently become evidence of a deliberate effort to prevent that knowledge from reaching the public as the same enterprise is repeated again and again. The case against Fauci would therefore rest not upon a single allegation but upon the convergence of contemporaneous records and conduct: the repoirter who warned was treated as the criminal, while the private records of the man who condemned the warnings establish that the warning was substantially true.
A license was given to Merck’s Ebola vaccine in Europe on November 11 2019 despite the fundamentally flawed trial design
https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/medicines/human/EPAR/ervebo
and in the USA
https://investors.merck.com/news/press-release-details/2019/Merck-Announces-FDA-Approval-for-ERVEBO-Ebola-Zaire-Vaccine-Live/default.aspx
The license has been given under emergency use provision.
https://www.who.int/immunization/sage/meetings/2018/october/2_Ebola_SAGE2018Oct_BgDoc_20180919.pdf
Vaccines licensed under special rules such as the animal rule (US), exceptional circumstances (EU), or other provisions for licensure for deployment in emergencies do not have to be proven to be safe or effective before being given to people.
The rVSVΔG-ZEBOV-GP candidate vaccine, a prime/boost candidate vaccine based on Ad26- and MVA-vectored components (Ad26.ZEBOV/MVA-BN-Filo) and the Ad5- EBOV candidate vaccine have submitted EUAL documentations to the WHO Secretariat.
• The "Illusion of 100% Efficacy": When the World Health Organization (WHO) published the preliminary and final results of the Ebola ça Suffit! ("Ebola that's enough!") ring vaccination trial in Guinea, they heralded 100% vaccine efficacy.
NASEM’s subsequent deep-dive exposed this claim as a manufactured lie or "bad science".
• Tt trial design—where some rings of people received the vaccine immediately and others had it delayed by 21 days— was known not to be able to yield reliable results
• Moving Directly to Phase III: fFast-tracking vaccines or skipping traditional multi-year Phase II trials during outbreaks is proof that safety data is actively being ignored to enrich pharmaceutical corporations.
When scientists and statistical reviewers (like those at NASEM or independent biostatisticians) noted that the statistical lower bound of the vaccine's efficacy could be zero (or even negative) during interim analyses, they were talking about statistical precision, which is the foundation for claiming the vaccines work.
The efficacy could be zero for three specific methodological reasons:
1. Wide Confidence Intervals Due to Rushed Stopping Rules
Statistically, stopping a trial early drastically reduces the data size. At the interim point, the mathematical calculation yielded a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of -74.7% to 100%. Because the lower bound of that margin was in the negative numbers, it meant that strictly from a rigid statistical standpoint, the true mathematical value could be 0%. (The final data eventually tightened this margin considerably to a 95% CI of 68.9% to 100%).
2. The "Zero Inflation" Effect in Ring Vaccination
The ring vaccination method targets the virus by isolating an infected individual and vaccinating everyone around them (contacts and contacts-of-contacts). If public health measures work perfectly, the transmission chain is broken quickly, and cases drop to zero across the entire region.
When an outbreak naturally dies out or transmission stops, neither the vaccinated nor the unvaccinated groups get sick. Mathematically, when both sides of an equation are zero, it becomes impossible to prove the vaccine was the specific reason people didn't get sick, mathematically dragging the lower statistical bound of efficacy toward zero.
3. Cluster Randomization Intraclass Correlation
The trial did not randomize individuals; it randomized whole communities ("clusters" or "rings"). Because people within a single village share identical environments, behaviors, and risks, a statistical adjustment called the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) must be applied. Accounting for these clustering effects naturally widens the statistical margin of error, reducing the absolute statistical certainty of the exact efficacy percentage.
A product of a small data sample (wide confidence intervals) because the trial was ethically stopped early.
In a a chaotic, placebo-free emergency zone, the Ring Trial Delay could not produce statistically relaiable results.
Skipping Trials Neglecting safety protocols to push forced mandates. •
To sum up, the USA and EU now have ebola vaccines which are licensed and can be rolled out also as coercive mandates on the basis of a flawed trial which Fauci himself admitted to be flawed in his notes.
But worse, the July 31st The Lancet interim study states the most common adverse event from the ebola vaccine is ebola much like we know now from the Cleveland, Ohio study, the most common adverse event from the covid vaccine was covid.
The suppression of the Fauci private notes and logs proves that the official public health narrative is entirely manufactured. They cast light on the scientist or officials who supported vaccines and whether they were actively complicit in a cover-up, or themselves misled by the false narrative put out by Fauci and other government officials, regulatory agencies (like the FDA and CDC), and the mainstream media in a highly coordinated way.
These private records are strong proof of a coordinated, multi-year cover-up by Anthony Fauci and public health authorities to prioritize pharmaceutical corporate profits and the private interests of billionaires like Bill Gates over human life.
The 2015 records and 2021 logs of Fauci are smoking guns that expose a calculated pattern of behavior: first, using a "flawed" trial design to deliberately rig safety data for the Ebola vaccine, and later, weaponizing that same deceptive playbook during the covid pandemic.
The private diaries show that Fauci possessed clear, internal knowledge that the covid vaccines were triggering lethal immune responses—specifically "cytokine storms"—but deliberately lied to the public by declaring them "safe and effective." The discrepancy between his private logs and public messaging can not be explained as evolving science, but as a sinister, premeditated betrayal of science and the medical establishment's complicity in human experimentation and mass harm.
XXXX
"Non-randomised clusters were slightly larger
with a median 105 people (49–185), partly due to public
knowledge of the interim results as well as to the
eligibility extension to children aged 6 years and older.," states the December 2016 study to justify its very different results.
Moreover, the new December 2016 study is also fundamentlly flawed as stated by th National Academy of Sciences. Yet, even after the NAS pointed this out, the study is still used as the basis of claims for the vaccine's safety and effectiveness by WHO, the media etc to mislead the public.
To mislead the public about the addictive power of a drug like opiods is serious enoug. But to mislead them about the potentially deadly effect of an Ebola vaccine which WHO plans to give to the entire population of the world by force is a crime of another category.
A revised study was published in December 2016. But a study off that trial data by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine; Health and Medicine Division concluded that the efficacy “could in reality be quite low or even zero, as the confidence limits around the unbiased estimate include zero. “
The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM) published a comprehensive report in 2017 titled Integrating Clinical Research into Epidemic Response: The Ebola Experience.
The study was commissioned by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (including the FDA and NIH) to review and analyze the scientific validity, methodology, and ethics of the clinical trials conducted during the 2014–2016 West African Ebola epidemic. This included a rigorous critique of the high-profile "Ebola ça Suffit!" ring vaccination trial in Guinea, which evaluated Merck’s Ervebo (rVSV-ZEBOV) vaccine.
The NASEM committee did not state that the vaccine definitely lacked efficacy, but rather that the trial's design and execution lacked the statistical power to rule out a null hypothesis (0% efficacy). They cited several critical flaws:
1. Lack of Blinded Placebo Controls
Citing intense political and ethical pressure during the outbreak, investigators deemed a placebo control "unacceptable". Instead, they randomized clusters (rings) into immediate vaccination or a 21-day delayed vaccination. 2. Confounding Public Health Interventions
The ring vaccination approach functioned simultaneously as a clinical trial and an active public health containment measure. When an Ebola case was identified, intense contract tracing, isolation, and standard infection control protocols were immediately applied to the entire ring. Because these standard containment measures are highly effective on their own, it became statistically impossible to isolate the effect of the vaccine from the success of the contact-tracing and containment efforts.
3. Premature Termination and "Zero Inflation"
The trial's independent data safety monitoring board stopped the randomization early and all subsequent rings were given the vaccine immediately, eliminating the control group.
Statistically, infectious disease outbreaks naturally experience transmission chains that die out on their own. By halting the trial prematurely, many rings in the immediate-vaccination group may have naturally remained disease-free simply because the virus had nowhere left to transition (zero inflation), rather than because the vaccine blocked it.
4. The 10-Day Per-Protocol Window Exclusion
The trial investigators calculated their 100% efficacy by exclusively looking at Ebola cases that emerged 10 or more days after randomization. Any participant who developed Ebola within the first 9 days was excluded, under the assumption they were already infected before the vaccine took effect.
However, because the 21-day delayed control group had not received any intervention during those first 9 days, this arbitrary time window severely restricted the data pool. The NASEM committee noted that this data exclusion method was highly sensitive and heavily biased the outcome toward a perfect result, ignoring cases that could have provided a more realistic look at true field efficacy.
A conspiracy theorist would frame this report through the lens of a "coordinated cover-up" or an "unethical medical experiment." Their narrative would likely focus on the following talking points:
• The "Deep State" Moving the Goalposts: They would describe the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM) as a compromised bureaucratic body trying to legitimize a flawed or rushed vaccine after the fact.
XXX
• The "Illusion of 100% Efficacy": When the World Health Organization (WHO) published the preliminary and final results of the Ebola ça Suffit! ("Ebola that's enough!") ring vaccination trial in Guinea, they heralded 100% vaccine efficacy.
NASEM’s subsequent deep-dive exposed this claim as a manufactured lie or "bad science".
• Tt trial design—where some rings of people received the vaccine immediately and others had it delayed by 21 days— was known not to be able to yield reliable results
• Moving Directly to Phase III: fFast-tracking vaccines or skipping traditional multi-year Phase II trials during outbreaks is proof that safety data is actively being ignored to enrich pharmaceutical corporations.
When scientists and statistical reviewers (like those at NASEM or independent biostatisticians) noted that the statistical lower bound of the vaccine's efficacy could be zero (or even negative) during interim analyses, they were talking about statistical precision, which is the foundation for claiming the vaccines work.
The efficacy could be zero for three specific methodological reasons:
1. Wide Confidence Intervals Due to Rushed Stopping Rules
Statistically, stopping a trial early drastically reduces the data size. At the interim point, the mathematical calculation yielded a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of -74.7% to 100%. Because the lower bound of that margin was in the negative numbers, it meant that strictly from a rigid statistical standpoint, the true mathematical value could be 0%. (The final data eventually tightened this margin considerably
The ring vaccination method targets the virus by isolating an infected individual and vaccinating everyone around them (contacts and contacts-of-contacts). If public health measures work perfectly, the transmission chain is broken quickly, and cases drop to zero across the entire region.
When an outbreak naturally dies out or transmission stops, neither the vaccinated nor the unvaccinated groups get sick. Mathematically, when both sides of an equation are zero, it becomes impossible to prove the vaccine was the specific reason people didn't get sick, mathematically dragging the lower statistical bound of efficacy toward zero.
3. Cluster Randomization Intraclass Correlation
The trial did not randomize individuals; it randomized whole communities ("clusters" or "rings"). Because people within a single village share identical environments, behaviors, and risks, a statistical adjustment called the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) must be applied. Accounting for these clustering effects naturally widens the statistical margin of error, reducing the absolute statistical certainty of the exact efficacy percentage.
A product of a small data sample (wide confidence intervals) because the trial was ethically stopped early.
In a a chaotic, placebo-free emergency zone, the Ring Trial Delay could not produce statistically relaiable results.
Skipping Trials Neglecting safety protocols to push forced mandates. •
Ebola in 2014, 2015 and covid cannot be understood as separate episodes. They are three manifestations of the same enterprise. The virus and the vaccine technology changes, the institutions change, and the names by which the programme is known change, but the method remains constant: conceal the danger, control the evidence, silence the witness, and preserve the appearance of official legitimacy.
In 2015, Fauci understood that Ebola was being investigated for purposes extending beyond ordinary medicine. His private records describe weaponization experiments involving aerosolized ebola, secrecy, alarming results for monkey s injected with ebola vaccines showing the animals who got the vaccine showed more damage , and concern that African officials were discovering what was being done. At the same time, Fauci was telling the public Ebola was natural and that the various experimental Ebola vaccine candidates were safe. On 28th August 2014, Science cited Fauci as saying a GSK vaccine using the chimp adenovirus has shown shown "very good protection" in monkey tests.
https://www.science.org/content/article/major-push-begin-human-tests-novel-ebola-vaccines?referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com%2F
As a science reporter, I challenged that account, and my warnings became a threat to the official story.
The importance of the reporter is therefore greater than that of an ordinary dissident. I possessed the one thing the enterprise could not tolerate: evidence capable of connecting the public assurances with the private records. When I reported on the flawed trial design and methodology and questioned the vaccine's safety, I was not answered through transparent scientific investigation. I was subjected to ordinary sense crimes. This was not the first attempt to put me in prison without due process to protect the secret but it triggered the prosecutor probe D 15 218 which is very well documented .
The pattern continued through the following years. Records disappeared, investigations were suppressed, and contradictory judicial decisions were manipulated so that the version favorable to the reporter could not defeat the version used to try to put me in prison. These acts would show that the enterprise required more than secrecy in research laboratories. It required control over the media and institutions capable of discovering what the researchers had concealed.
In 2026, the same scheme as in 2014, 2015 threatens to be repeated. The very Ebola vaccine which Fauci himself said was based on a flawed trial design, Merck s Ervebo, was given a license for use in the USA and the public is being given assurances based upon the results of a controversial trial design which are not supported by the fact. Privately in 2015, Fauci recognized limitations in what the trial design for Merck s Ebola vaccine could establish; publicly, he praisd the promising vaccine results. I threatened the distinction between those two positions because I insisted that the public be told the limitations of the evidence supporting it.
A flawed or unconventional trial does not prove that a vaccine is dangerous, and private reservations about methodology do not prove criminal intent.
But when the July 2015 results state the most common adverse event of the Ebola vaccine(a term used to describe the consequences of the vaccine or drug under examination), was Ebola, as it does, then the case becomes criminal because Fauci knowingly concealed material information, deliberately misrepresented what the evidence established, and then joined, sanctioned or used coercion or unlawful proceedings to prevent those facts from becoming known.
The significance of 2026 is that Fauci and his circle face investigation. The covid virus origins have found Fauci s finger prints all over them. The covid vaccines have found to cause the harms predicted by the reporter, including cytokine storms.
And now in 20216, 2015 private records from Fauci have surfaced corroboaring the reporter's warnings and the relationship between the earlier ebola programme and the later covid virus and vaccine programme can no longer easily be dismissed as coincidence.
The response from the circle of Fauci, Bourla, Gates is the same as in 2015: suppress the records, discredit the witness, and preserve the official narrative rather than permit an independent examination of the evidence.
Thus ebola in 2014, 2015 and covid and ebola in 2026 are same method. In all cases, the public is told that the danger is natural and the vaccine safe while contrary information is suppressed. The public is told that promising trial results establish confidence while private reservations about the evidentiary basis are withheld. Across the period, the reporter's offense is the same: I refused to accept the official conclusion without examining the evidence beneath it.
The 2015 episode then becomes the historical warning for 2026. In 2015, the Fauci circle attempted to create and exploit a pandemic crisis itself to create fear, confusion, abolish civil rights, obtain martial law powers, make experimental vaccines mandatory and evade accountability. In 2026, the danger is a repetition of the same strategy: when evidence threatens the Fauci, Bourla, Gates criminal enterprise, when Florida AGs open an investigation into Bourla and Pfizer for misleading the public about covid vaccine harms, they aim to create enough panic and uncertainty, implement martial law measures, overthrow enough governments, discredit enough witnesses, and control enough official records that responsibility becomes impossible to establish and the law impossible to apply to them.
I ask you to look beyond the individual incidents and examine the architecture connecting them. A scientific program creates the danger; a trial design determines what the public is permitted to conclude; official statements establish legitimacy; the witness, the science reporter like myself, who challenges the conclusion is persecuted; records that contradict the official account disappear; and when exposure finally becomes unavoidable, the machinery of the state is used to preserve the concealment. If the evidence establishes that Fauci, Gates and their cicle knowingly participated in that sequence across 12 years, the enduring offense was not simply the creation or misuse of a vaccine. It was the systematic transformation of science and public authority into instruments for preventing the truth from reaching the people whom those institutions existed to protect.
The corruption of the institutions is why the role of President Barack Obama and Joe Biden, and his son Hunter Biden, must be examined along with that of Donald Trump in the same criminal enterprise.
XXX
The newly released records from 2015 show that Fauci concealed the very dangerous ebola experiments, misrepresented the very same evidence for an Ebola vaccine, that I warned about and that his close associate, Bill Gates, together with Geoge Soros, the mega donor of the Democrat party, joined togethr to persecut the reporter when I warned that the public was being deceived. The newly released Fauci records are important because they show that Fauci privately understood dangers that he publicly denied. The reporter, I, was therefore dangerous to the conspiracy not becauseI possessed power, but because I possessed evidence, documents, links, research, sources.
Fauci s logs questioning 2015 Ebola vaccine trial designs are definitive proof of a deliberate cover-up and systemic deception.
The 2015 Ebola trial limitations are evidence of a pattern of behavior, showing that Fauci and public health officials have a history of deploying "flawed" or dangerous research methodologies to push their agendas.
Fauci also recommended the covid vaccine in 2021 while privately knowing there was evidence that it caused severe adverse reactions like "cytokine storms" in deliberate act of harm, prioritizing the financial interests of pharmaceutical companies and global control over human lives.
In 2015, the Fauci used the strategy he would later use during covid —publicly presenting promising vaccine results while privately recognizing limitations in the trial evidence, and again treating the warnings of reporters like myself as a conspiracy theory, threat.
A questionable trial design is not itself proof of a dangerous vaccine; the criminal allegation arises because Fauci, Gates knowingly concealed material limitations and deliberately used official authority to suppress those who exposed them.
By 2026, the pattern has become unmistakable: whenever the evidence threatens the criminal enterprise, the response was concealment, discrediting, and suppression rather than independent investigation. The dates and circumstances changed, but the purpose remained constant—to preserve the public fiction of safety, prevent the reporter from being heard, and escape accountability.
The significance of these newly released Fauci records is that they transform the reporter's warnings, my warnings from 2015, from a conspiracy theory and the accusations of a persecuted reporter into claims corroborated by the private records of the very man who publicly denied them.
Fauci's 2015 notes acknowledge in private the dangerous ebola experiments, the defects in the ebola vaccine trial design and evidence, and the alarming experimental results while he nevertheless maintained publicly that the disease was natural and the vaccine safe, then the subsequent persecution of the reporter, of me, for saying the very same things, acquires an entirely different meaning.
It is clear that I, the reporter, was not subjected to an attempt at imprisonment without due process for these reports in D 15 218 because my warnings were false, but because they threatened to expose what Fauci already knew.
The removal of the prosecutor files, suppressed investigation into Gates, Soros in D 15 218, the probe E 17 449 capturing Trump and Kushner, the two criminal defamation trials for substantially the same ten posts and the contradictory and inconsistent rulings, and continuing efforts to silence me consequently become evidence of a deliberate effort to prevent that knowledge from reaching the public as the same enterprise is repeated again and again. The case against Fauci would therefore rest not upon a single allegation but upon the convergence of contemporaneous records and conduct: the repoirter who warned was treated as the criminal, while the private records of the man who condemned the warnings establish that the warning was substantially true.
A license was given to Merck’s Ebola vaccine in Europe on November 11 2019 despite the fundamentally flawed trial design
https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/medicines/human/EPAR/ervebo
and in the USA
https://investors.merck.com/news/press-release-details/2019/Merck-Announces-FDA-Approval-for-ERVEBO-Ebola-Zaire-Vaccine-Live/default.aspx
The license has been given under emergency use provision.
https://www.who.int/immunization/sage/meetings/2018/october/2_Ebola_SAGE2018Oct_BgDoc_20180919.pdf
Vaccines licensed under special rules such as the animal rule (US), exceptional circumstances (EU), or other provisions for licensure for deployment in emergencies do not have to be proven to be safe or effective before being given to people.
The rVSVΔG-ZEBOV-GP candidate vaccine, a prime/boost candidate vaccine based on Ad26- and MVA-vectored components (Ad26.ZEBOV/MVA-BN-Filo) and the Ad5- EBOV candidate vaccine have submitted EUAL documentations to the WHO Secretariat.
• The "Illusion of 100% Efficacy": When the World Health Organization (WHO) published the preliminary and final results of the Ebola ça Suffit! ("Ebola that's enough!") ring vaccination trial in Guinea, they heralded 100% vaccine efficacy.
NASEM’s subsequent deep-dive exposed this claim as a manufactured lie or "bad science".
• Tt trial design—where some rings of people received the vaccine immediately and others had it delayed by 21 days— was known not to be able to yield reliable results
• Moving Directly to Phase III: fFast-tracking vaccines or skipping traditional multi-year Phase II trials during outbreaks is proof that safety data is actively being ignored to enrich pharmaceutical corporations.
When scientists and statistical reviewers (like those at NASEM or independent biostatisticians) noted that the statistical lower bound of the vaccine's efficacy could be zero (or even negative) during interim analyses, they were talking about statistical precision, which is the foundation for claiming the vaccines work.
The efficacy could be zero for three specific methodological reasons:
1. Wide Confidence Intervals Due to Rushed Stopping Rules
Statistically, stopping a trial early drastically reduces the data size. At the interim point, the mathematical calculation yielded a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of -74.7% to 100%. Because the lower bound of that margin was in the negative numbers, it meant that strictly from a rigid statistical standpoint, the true mathematical value could be 0%. (The final data eventually tightened this margin considerably to a 95% CI of 68.9% to 100%).
2. The "Zero Inflation" Effect in Ring Vaccination
The ring vaccination method targets the virus by isolating an infected individual and vaccinating everyone around them (contacts and contacts-of-contacts). If public health measures work perfectly, the transmission chain is broken quickly, and cases drop to zero across the entire region.
When an outbreak naturally dies out or transmission stops, neither the vaccinated nor the unvaccinated groups get sick. Mathematically, when both sides of an equation are zero, it becomes impossible to prove the vaccine was the specific reason people didn't get sick, mathematically dragging the lower statistical bound of efficacy toward zero.
3. Cluster Randomization Intraclass Correlation
The trial did not randomize individuals; it randomized whole communities ("clusters" or "rings"). Because people within a single village share identical environments, behaviors, and risks, a statistical adjustment called the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) must be applied. Accounting for these clustering effects naturally widens the statistical margin of error, reducing the absolute statistical certainty of the exact efficacy percentage.
A product of a small data sample (wide confidence intervals) because the trial was ethically stopped early.
In a a chaotic, placebo-free emergency zone, the Ring Trial Delay could not produce statistically relaiable results.
Skipping Trials Neglecting safety protocols to push forced mandates. •
To sum up, the USA and EU now have ebola vaccines which are licensed and can be rolled out also as coercive mandates on the basis of a flawed trial which Fauci himself admitted to be flawed in his notes.
But worse, the July 31st The Lancet interim study states the most common adverse event from the ebola vaccine is ebola much like we know now from the Cleveland, Ohio study, the most common adverse event from the covid vaccine was covid.
The suppression of the Fauci private notes and logs proves that the official public health narrative is entirely manufactured. They cast light on the scientist or officials who supported vaccines and whether they were actively complicit in a cover-up, or themselves misled by the false narrative put out by Fauci and other government officials, regulatory agencies (like the FDA and CDC), and the mainstream media in a highly coordinated way.
These private records are strong proof of a coordinated, multi-year cover-up by Anthony Fauci and public health authorities to prioritize pharmaceutical corporate profits and the private interests of billionaires like Bill Gates over human life.
The 2015 records and 2021 logs of Fauci are smoking guns that expose a calculated pattern of behavior: first, using a "flawed" trial design to deliberately rig safety data for the Ebola vaccine, and later, weaponizing that same deceptive playbook during the covid pandemic.
The private diaries show that Fauci possessed clear, internal knowledge that the covid vaccines were triggering lethal immune responses—specifically "cytokine storms"—but deliberately lied to the public by declaring them "safe and effective." The discrepancy between his private logs and public messaging can not be explained as evolving science, but as a sinister, premeditated betrayal of science and the medical establishment's complicity in human experimentation and mass harm.
XXXX
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)