Tucker Carlson focussed on Bill Gates own statements in which advocates for Nazi style death panels in his latest video called. "They Tried to Hide What Bill Gates Said… But Here It Is."
Tucker Carlson Network
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_1b_e22684I
Well worth listening to in the light of the massive numebrs of elderly murdered de facto in care homes under covid and the incredible pressure put on the elderly and pensioners to take the toxic covid jabs!
Bill Gates is a man who has launched monumental projects (global depopulation projects, AI projects) based on unverified assumptions rather than empirical evidence.
Gates is typical product of the superficial, thin and low quality modern American education system, which has left 14% of college students with the reading level of a ten year old while Israel has 20% of collge students testing at the level of ten year olds.
https://www.zerohedge.com/personal-finance/some-college-students-are-testing-level-10-year-olds
21% of Israelis are underachieving at maths, outscoring even the abysmal 15% of the USA.
Dr. Michael Nehls told Tucker Carlson that the hippocampus—the brain's memory and learning center—shrinks by (1.4\% per year after reaching its peak volume around the age of 25. He asserts that this continuous, age-related atrophy can lead to dementia and indoctrination if left unchecked.
The annual loss rate leads to a cumulative shrinkage of approximately 14 per cent per decade in adults.
He argues that this loss is not an inevitable genetic fate but a preventable consequence of modern lifestyle factors and chronic stress, which inhibit adult hippocampal neurogenesis.While the brain's physical volume is at its peak around age 25,
Dr. Nehls' research suggests that the hippocampus is uniquely capable of lifetime growth and neurogenesis when supported by the right environment.
Gates is floating a plan to euthanize the elderly to free up resources, which was used by the Nazis. He almost certainly does not even know his "death panel" proposal was used by the Nazis to free up funds, but not for education or teachers.
Bill Gates is likely thinking of the need to free up funds for projects like AI, which have turned out to be pretty useless, useless because he did not do the necessary thinking needed to produce an AI which does the task it is assigned.
Under the Nazi "Action T4" program , the Nazis systematically murdered between 200,000 and 300 000 individuals with physical or mental disabilities including the eldelry and pensioners for financial motives.
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ballastexistenzen
The Nazis labelled pnsioners and widowers victims as "useless eaters" and a financial drain on the economy, who needed to be killed to free up funds likely for the bankers who supported and ran the Nazi regime and the arms dealers.
Pensioners and widows living in state-run nursing homes were particularly vulnerable. Because they were deemed "incurably sick" or incapable of physical labor, the Nazi regime considered their care an unjustifiable economic burden.
Nazi propagandists claimed that eliminating these individuals would allow the state to reallocate resourcesto "healthy" families billionaires.
In fact, millions of elderly died in care homes during covid.
Bill Gates suffers from what the ancient Greeks called hubris —an overestimation of his own knowledge and an underestimation of the limits of that knowledge.
As a result he is happy to display total historical ignorance, ideological naivete, and the failure of critical due diligence in every field leading to what the ancient Greeks called Nemesis, his downfall.
Wealth and power insulate the billionares from dissenting opinions, creating an echo chamber where flawed assumptions are rarely challenged.
They go to invitation only forums, camps and dialogues where they meet other billionaires with exactly the same levels of arrogance, ignorance, bias to discuss plans which are doomed to fail precisely for that reason, as if they were certain successes.
A eugenicist, advocating semi openly for death panels and a reduction in the global population, Gates seems to have no idea that he is repeating what the Nazis did before him because he seems to have very little or no history.
He seems to unaware of the Nazis enacted these policies with catastrophic results for them and others.
His error reflects a naive assumption that his own,random ideas are objective and universally applicable just because it is he who thinks them.
He does not understand the Nazi ideology was a random collection of thoughts built on unproven, pseudoscientific assumptions about human biology, race, and the state.
For a billionaire with vast resources, and an entire foundation to do research Gates the failure to research the historical and philosophical background to his projects represent a profound character flaw, a failure of curiosity, of basic inquiry, research, and planning process
AI Overview Epistemic arrogance is a cognitive bias and intellectual vice where a person overestimates their own knowledge, expertise, and predictive abilities while drastically underestimating uncertainty.
It leads individuals to dismiss alternative perspectives and ignore the limits of what they actually know.
Core ConceptsThe Illusion of Certainty: People who suffer from epistemic arrogance assume they understand complex systems better than they do. They fail to recognize their own fallibility and the inherent unpredictability of the future.
Confirmation Bias and Dismissiveness: An epistemically arrogant person unfairly dismisses those who disagree with them, acting as if dissenting opinions have no value.
Confidence vs. Knowledge: Popularized by thinker Nassim Nicholas Taleb in The Black Swan, this trait describes a phenomenon where human confidence grows significantly faster than actual knowledge, resulting in misplaced certainty.
Real-World ImplicationsDecision-Making: It often plagues experts—such as financial analysts, economists, or forecasters—whose predictive confidence exceeds objective reality.Public Discourse: It obstructs civil dialogue by fostering intellectual rigidity, political polarization, and an unwillingness to engage collaboratively.
The Antidote: Epistemic HumilityThe opposite of epistemic arrogance is epistemic humility. This is the intellectual virtue of recognizing that one's knowledge is limited, being open to new evidence, and genuinely valuing the perspectives of others.
The exact phrase "epistemic arrogance" is a modern construct (coined in recent philosophy and popularized in fields like behavioral economics), but it is rooted in Ancient Greek concepts:
Hubris (Ὕβρις): The ancient equivalent of this concept is hubris, which the ancient Greeks defined as excessive pride, insolence, or an overestimation of one's own power. While hubris was often applied to physical aggression or acting like a god, it frequently described overstepping the boundaries of human knowledge and ignoring mortal limitations.
Alazoneia (Ἀλαζονεία): This was the ancient Greek term for boastfulness, charlatanry, or pretentious claims to knowledge and authority beyond what a person actually possessed.The Greek Philosophy of Knowledge
The ancient Greeks actually spent a great deal of time warning against "epistemic arrogance" without using that exact label:
Socrates and "Epistemic Humility": Socrates epitomized the fight against epistemic arrogance. According to Plato's Apology, Socrates concluded that he was the wisest man in Athens simply because he was aware of his own ignorance—popularly summarized as knowing that he "knows nothing".Xenophanes: The philosopher Xenophanes was famously skeptical of human knowledge, arguing that our beliefs and even our depictions of the gods are largely just projections of human biases.Nemesis (Νέμεσις): In Greek mythology and literature, hubris was never just a character flaw; it was a cosmic disruption that brought down nemesis (retribution). The Greeks believed that humans who pretended to have divine or perfect knowledge would inevitably be humbled by fate or the gods.
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ballastexistenzen
No comments:
Post a Comment