The UK Covid Inuiry has been engaged in a brazen cover up of the covid vaccine harms, virus origins and the fact covid was a scheme and has contributing to the fatal undermining of trust in UK institutions.
Doctors say their expert testimony on the covid vaccine harms has been suppressed, sidelined and blackholed by the Inquiry as part of a white wash of the biggest medical crime in the UK s history ever.
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2026/07/06/covid-inquiry-suppressed-evidence-on-vaccines
The cover up shows that the UK governmentand MPs and also the Monarchy which was responsible for the covid lockkdown and vaccine harms cannot be relied on to police itself
UK MPs cannot be relied on to fight for the public health and transparency.
A cover up is also untenable as evidence of vaccine harms comes out in other countries, including the USA and Germany, Korea and Japan, among other countries.
Incredibly, the UK establishment seems to believe they can uphold propaganda, censorship and minsiformation , put a wall around the UK s covid inquiry in the age of social media, and succeed in a cover up which has cost the UK tax payers 200 million pounds
From media
Covid Inquiry “Suppressed Evidence on Vaccines”
BY WILL JONES 6 JULY 2026 1:07 PM
The Covid Inquiry has been accused by doctors and medical professionals of suppressing evidence that calls into question the ethics of the vaccine rollout, with key contributions disappearing into a “black hole”. The Telegraph has the story.
Doctors and medical professionals who were asked to submit evidence have criticised the inquiry for failing to publish their witness statements on the jabs rollout during the virus crisis, claiming that their contributions simply disappeared into a “black hole” instead.
They had told the inquiry that there was “never any justification for authorising or recommending the use in healthy children of novel technology gene-based vaccines with no long-term safety data”.
However, these statements were not included in the Module 4 report into vaccines, prompting accusations that the inquiry is “completely closing its eyes to the inconvenient narratives”.
The Telegraph previously reported how the inquiry came under criticism for justifying the Government’s covert monitoring of lockdown critics as “lawful, necessary and proportionate”.
Dr Ros Jones, convenor of the Children’s Covid Vaccines Advisory Council, a group of health professionals and scientists who challenged the government over the vaccine rollout for children, was among those invited to give evidence.
She wrote in her witness statement that there was “never any justification for authorising or recommending the use in healthy children of novel technology gene-based vaccines with no long-term safety data”.
“To give such vaccines to children for the possible protection of vulnerable adults is a clear breach of our ethical duty,” she had argued.
However, her evidence was not referred to, nor was it published alongside the Module 4 report into vaccines.
Speaking to the Telegraph, Dr Jones claimed: “I think they asked us as a way to shut us up – I don’t think they really wanted to hear from anyone who had a different view.
“They just do not want the public to realise there is a body of knowledge and experienced senior professionals in the UK and countries across the world who have major questions about the safety of the whole technology.”
Dr Jones claimed the inquiry told her that it only publishes witness statements and documents “if they are formally adduced during the hearings and/or when the Chair is preparing her report”, adding: “Your witness statement does not form part of the adduced material and will not therefore be published.”
Dr Elizabeth Evans, Chief Executive of the UK Medical Freedom Alliance which campaigns for medical ethics and informed consent, also submitted evidence after receiving requests.
But she claimed that her witness statement, which raised ethical questions about the vaccine rollout, had disappeared into a “black hole”.
The inquiry has previously been threatened with legal action amid claims it is biased in favour of lockdowns and has a “predetermined view” of Britain’s pandemic response.
UsForThem, a children’s rights campaign group, wrote to the inquiry to demand that it alter its scope to ensure that harms caused by lockdowns are properly examined and that consideration is given to state censorship by the government’s disinformation unit.
Molly Kingsley, co-chairman of UsForThem, said: “I don’t think it looks good to suppress issues around vaccines, especially given the level of public distrust following the pandemic.
“You have to allow for a range of views – masking them and shrouding them in further secrecy is only going to increase mistrust. The inquiry is completely closing its eyes to the inconvenient narratives. It has been one-sided and wilfully blind from the outset.”
https://dailysceptic.org/2026/07/06/covid-inquiry-suppressed-evidence-on-vaccines/
No comments:
Post a Comment