VD LEYEN HAS TWO MONTHS TO APPEAL THE ECJ RULING ORDERING HER TO PUBLISH HER TEXTS WITH BOURLA
SHE NOW ONLY HAS THE SUPPORT OF HEADS OF EU GOVS LIKE MITSOTAKIS HIMSELF IMPLICATED IN MASSIVE COVID JAB CRIMES IN GREECE, WELL KNOWN ALSO TO THE GREEK PROSECUTORS AND JUDGES IN 2025
FAR FROM BEING ABLE TO PROTECT HER, MITSOTAKIS AND CO ARE GOING TO END UP ON TRIAL WITH HER FOR FORMING A HUGE CONSPIRACY PROVEN BY GREEK PROSECUTOR PROBES D 15 218 AND E 17 449
EPPO WILL NOT BE ABLE TO SHIELD VD LEYEN AND THEHEADS OF GOVERNMENT SUPPORTING HER INCLUDING MITSOTAKIS, TSIPRAS, FAYMANN GIVEN THE WEIGHT OF THE EVIDENCE IN OFFICIAL STATE PROSECUTOR PROBES IN GREECE KNOWN TO THE RUSSIANS AND CHINESE
JUNCKER SHOULD ALSO BE INVESTIGATED FOR HOLDING HIS ENABLING HAND OVER VON DER LEYEN DESPITE ACKNOWLEDGING IN A LETTER TO ME IN DEC 2015 THE SERIOUS IMPLICATIONS OF A CRIMINAL CASE IN GREECE OPENED OVER CRIMES AGAINST A REPORTER CAPTURING SOROS AND GATES, TSIPRAS AND FAYMANN (D 15 218) TO CENSOR INFO
JUNCKERS LETTER TO ME AND EMAILS OF EC OFFICIALS CONSTITUTE OFFICIAL EU DOCUMENTS
https://www.dropbox.com/s/fowewfsmhsrhvhe/JeanClaudeJunckertoMe2015.pdf?dl=0
https://www.dropbox.com/s/9o9h92sanosat7m/EC%20official%20tells%20me%20all%20my%20emails%20are%20given%20to%20President%20Juncker.pdf?dl=0
https://www.dropbox.com/s/s2jplfpayukiwko/Email%20to%20me%20from%20head%20of%20EC%20dept%20responsible%20for%20health%20policy%202016.pdf?dl=0
https://www.dropbox.com/s/95qulu50k6nrjf7/Dr%20Sarah%20Wollaston.pdf?dl=0
https://www.dropbox.com/s/dae9ieuqn7hsyls/Ebola_Vaccines_Open_Letter%20pdf.pdf?dl=0
https://www.dropbox.com/s/8o7li21q39vnj1o/EmailExchangewithSarahTeatherMP2015.pdf?dl=0
THE OFFICALS COMMS PROVE THE EC KNEW IN DETAIL THAT AN EPIDEMIC DISEASE PLOT EXISTED IN 2015, 2016 AND REPORTERS WERE SUBJECTED TO CRIMES TO CENSOR INFO
DOCS PROVE THE ECP KNEW WHO WAS BEHIND IT, WHAT METHODS THEY USED, THE ROLE OF CENSORSHIP IN 2015,2016 IN OFFICIAL DOCUMENTS
COULD CLEARLY IDENTIFY COVID AS THAT CRIMINAL SCHEME
COULD FORESEE THE COVID JABS WOULD RESULT IN MASS DEATH AND INJURY AS THEY HAVE
COULD HAVE FORSEEN A POLITICAL CRISIS
GIVEN THESE DOCS IN HER POSSESSION, VD LEYEN KNEW OR SHOULD HAVE KNOWN THE COVID JAB DEAL WAS A PART OF A CRIMINAL SCHEME WHEN SHE ASSUMED OFFICE
THAT, I ALLEGE, IS WHY SHE RESORTED TO SECRET SMS WITH BOURLA TO ORGANIZE THE COVID JAB CONTRACTS
THE FACT SHE ORGANIZED THE PURCHASE OF TEN JABS FOR EVERY PERSON IN EUROPE UNDERLINES THE CRIMINAL INTENTION TO MASS POISION EVERY ONE
VD LEYEN HERSELF WAS CAUGHT IN CRIMES AGAINST ME, JOINING MITSOTAKIS IN DEC 2022
CRIMES HAPPENED AFTER THE EUROPEAN COURT OF AUDITORS REPLIED TO MY EMAIL, SUGGESTING SHE SHOULD BE INVESTIGATED CRIMINALLY BUT SAYING THEY DID NOT HAVE THE POWER
https://www.dropbox.com/s/95v8ofzrkvl9xfk/Gmail%20-ECA%20reply%20to%20Investigation%20into%20v%20d%20Leyen%20s%20Pfizer%20covid%20vaccine%20contract.pdf?dl=0
https://www.dropbox.com/s/ug21cfr57sxsj9o/Gmail%20-%20My%20request%20to%20ECA%20for%20an%20Investigation%20into%20v%20d%20Leyen%20s%20Pfizer%20covid%20vaccine.pdf?dl=0
https://www.dropbox.com/s/s2jplfpayukiwko/Email%20to%20me%20from%20head%20of%20EC%20dept%20responsible%20for%20health%20policy%202016.pdf?dl=0
EPPO HAS BEEN CORRUPTED, REFUSED ALL THE EVIDENCE, EVEN JOINED VD LEYEN
https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/xmvdermyzjhnje9z1hbkq/GRKProsecutorProbesConvictSoros-GatesOfMurderAttemptsOnReporter.pdf?rlkey=n4gz1whwa9vj8iktkg7ymxn6v&st=obi9i3b4&dl=0
https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/pgbxaxfm8yqmpd0gyvdfz/FProofsMitsotakisTrumpHaveKilledMillionsThroughCovidVaccinesDeliberately.pdf?rlkey=1knlntx5gohtuximxi56sr6cp&dl=0
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1aVXSfUObwdhd2aXPq2vnb7goJ9j5baQa/view
From media
https://europeanconservative.com/articles/news/public-humiliation-meps-call-for-political-consequences-after-pfizergate-verdict/
After being promised early access and a better deal by manufacturers, EU member states were quick to allow the Commission to negotiate joint COVID vaccine procurement on their behalf, which turned out to be a grave mistake. Not only did the vaccines arrive much later than promised, and EU taxpayers ended up paying significantly more for them than the global average, but the Commission also ordered quantities that were simply unjustifiable.
In total, von der Leyen has personally signed contracts for up to 4.6 billion vaccine doses—or over ten doses for every single European, meaning five times as many as the recommended dosage—worth an estimated €71 billion. To date, with all additional booster shots included, EU citizens have been administered just over 1 billion COVID shots, meaning that 3.5 billion since-expired vaccine doses have either been discarded or will be shortly, a waste of taxpayer funds of eye-watering proportions.
What’s more, we still don’t know the exact prices or any other details of the classified contracts, despite both the European Court of Justice and the EU Ombudsman ruling that they must be made publicly available. Not a fan of transparency, the EU Commission immediately appealed the court ruling, and a follow-up decision is still pending behind the scenes.
Europe’s most wanted text messages
Then there’s the case of Pfizer, which in 2021 signed contracts with Brussels for 1.8 billion doses, or about 40% of the total procurement, making it by far the largest supplier of the EU. Understanding the Pfizer contracts, therefore, could be key to understanding how and why the EU Commission made these seemingly unreasonable decisions. And the key to those could still be hidden in von der Leyen’s phone.
It was von der Leyen herself who revealed during an interview in April 2021 that he negotiated the historic vaccine procurement deal with Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla for the 1.8 billion doses at least partly via text messages. The admission immediately sparked the interest of those who already suspected foul play behind the unreasonable numbers, demanding the texts to be released to clear von der Leyen’s name of the corruption allegations.
As you know, von der Leyen refused, claiming that the “short-lived” texts had been accidentally deleted, but there was “nothing substantial” discussed in those messages worth disclosing anyway. The New York Times did not give up, and after more than a year of unsuccessful freedom of information requests—repeatedly backed by the EU Ombudsman, whose non-binding rulings demanding disclosure were simply ignored—the paper sued the EU Commission at the European Court of Justice (ECJ) in January 2023.
This brings us to Wednesday’s ruling, two and a half years later. If we are to speculate on how this will unfold, it’s worth remembering that the ECJ’s case was not the only one trying to uncover the elusive texts and determine whether von der Leyen was promised anything in exchange for spending Europeans’ money like there was no tomorrow.
Where Belgian law failed
There was also a parallel civil lawsuit lodged against von der Leyen by a Belgian lobbyist at the Liège court in April 2023, in which she stood accused of high-level corruption, “usurpation of functions and title,” “destruction of public documents,” and even undermining the “collective faith” in Belgium and its public institutions.
The lawsuit was joined by over 1,000 co-complainants, including NGOs, transparency watchdogs, and two EU member states, Hungary and Poland, although the latter quit the case after long-term von der Leyen ally Donald Tusk took over as PM of the Polish government in December that year.
The lawyers representing the complainants saw three possibilities: continuing with the deleted messages narrative would have amounted to admitting destroying administrative documents—a crime in Belgium; simply refusing to disclose them would have violated the Belgian constitution; and claiming they cannot be disclosed because they are “private” would have been grounds for establishing an intimate relationship with Bourla, amounting to a “serious conflict of interest” under Belgian law.
There seemed to be no way to escape what was coming; that’s why the EU did everything in its power to delay the ruling until they could pressure the courts to drop it. The first hearing in the case was supposed to happen in May last year, but it was mysteriously postponed by six months—possibly on pressure from the Commission to avoid having von der Leyen’s reelection chances influenced by it a month later. Then, the December hearing did not produce any results either, as neither the Belgian public prosecutor nor the judge assigned for the case showed up, something that the lawyer had never encountered throughout her career.
In the meantime, the European Public Prosecutor’s Office (EPPO), the EU body tasked with investigating financial crimes in the EU institutions, opened its own investigation into Pfizergate. EPPO then repeatedly tried to take over the whole case from the Belgian court, saying that it falls under its jurisdiction—no doubt in order to bury it indefinitely, thereby protecting von der Leyen. When that didn’t work, EPPO joined the lawsuit on von der Leyen’s side and argued against stripping the Commission chief of her diplomatic immunity during the January 6th hearing. It’s worth noting that von der Leyen skipped that hearing as well, not appearing in court once throughout all this time.
Subsequently, on January 20th of this year, the Liège court dismissed the case, declaring it inadmissible due to the complainant’s failure to demonstrate “personal harm” resulting from von der Leyen’s actions. The ruling was expected, but still questionable, given that one can argue that each and every EU citizen was personally harmed by the wasteful vaccine procurement.
Why Wednesday’s ruling matters
With the Belgian lawsuit swept aside and the EPPO demonstrating that it’s only interested in burying the case under the guise of its “investigation,” the NYT’s case at the European Court of Justice remains our last hope for some kind of closure.
The ECJ will finally deliver its ruling in that case on Wednesday, deciding whether text messages, when related to policy-making, should be classed as documents and be eligible for disclosure under existing transparency rules. In other words, the Court will decide whether the decision to withhold the texts was legal or illegal in the first place. If ruled against, von der Leyen could be forced to finally reveal the messages; if not, the case will still haunt her until the end of her mandate in 2029.
We shouldn’t hope for too much, though: the ECJ has proven itself to be partial before, especially when it comes to protecting the interests of the EU elite. On the other hand, it could be just as dangerous to side with von der Leyen if the aim was to fix the EU’s rapidly worsening public perception. It would be especially awkward to do so just after another landmark report was dropped by the EU Court of Auditors (ECA), which said that the Commission has been severely violating its own transparency standards for years by deliberately making accountability within existing structures “practically impossible.”
Nonetheless, Pfizergate remains much more than just another alleged corruption scandal. It’s a symbol of the never-ending fight for transparency and democracy in Brussels and a painful reminder that the EU institutions will fight tooth and nail to hide the truth from people like you and me to preserve their power. It’s the Achilles’ heel of von der Leyen’s elitist empire of unaccountable bureaucrats, who believe they stand above even the laws they’ve created. Pfizergate and all these attempts to silence it show how the EU truly works, therefore, it’s a moral duty to keep pursuing the truth, whatever Wednesday’s ruling will be.
Tamás Orbán is a political journalist for europeanconservative.com, based in Brussels. Born in Transylvania, he studied history and international relations in Kolozsvár, and worked for several political research institutes in Budapest. His interests include current affairs, social movements, geopolitics, and Central European security. On Twitter, he is @TamasOrbanEC.
Tags: ECJ, Pfizer, Pfizer text messages, Pfizergate, Ursula von der Leyen
No comments:
Post a Comment