The embarassment and even shame of some of the lawyers defending Gates, Bourla and Rutte at Leeuwarden trial was plain for observers to see and showed that Gates may possess the money and power to buy a defense, but not the power to make himself worthy of defending in their eyes and that his apparent superiority to the law reveals itself as a form of dependence on the very people he imagined he could control.
The lawyers may have regarded themselves as mere professionals accepting money to perform a service.
But confronted with the overwhelming evidence of the guilt of Gates and Bourla and the suffering of the covid vaccine victims, the moral and human consequences of their decision to defend these men with nothing but empty slogans and appeals to authority,seems to have made some ask about their responsibility to victims, society and justice.
Michael Reichel reported from the trial that he " had the opportunity to listen to a discussion about how several of the defence counsel had moral qualms about their assignments."
https://newsvoice.se/2026/10/moral-trial-covid-scandal/
Apparently, having familiarised themselves with the witness statements and evidence, they were moved by what they had realised. They understood what was at stake and that they had chosen the wrong side in the writing of history.
One thing that was clear from the outset was just how weak – indeed, almost non-existent – the defence’s arguments were. No one addressed the documented evidence, despite the fact that the indictment comprises 14,000 pages of material. All the lawyers who spoke repeatedly chanted the mantra: “safe and effective”.
This must be seen as something laughable and, not least, as self-defeating behaviour, as these very words are such clear evidence of how precisely this manipulation of public opinion has taken place. At the same time, given the now vast and openly available clinical and statistical evidence of the deaths and harmful effects caused by the injections, it is no longer possible to dispute these facts. To persist with “safe and effective” in this situation also means persisting in accepting blame.
The defendant’s representative claimed that the injections had saved around 20 million lives, but Bourla’s representative was visibly flustered by the situation, as evidenced by the flush on her face.
https://newsvoice.se/2026/10/moral-trial-covid-scandal/
If their own lawyers paid a fortune to defend them cannot do so with conviction or good conscience, then how can the judges declare them innocent with good conscience or the public accept such a verdict as justice?
Gates and Bourla seem to believe that their wealth and position gives them the power to command even the judgment of others, reducing their lawyers to instruments of their own will
Yet, now they are forced to recognize that no amount of money can overcome their shame at defending them, Gates and Bourla encountered a limit to their power .
They are guilty in the eyes of their own lawyers!
The drama lies the collapse of Gates illusion that everything—and everyone—can be possessed, purchased, and controlled.
For the first time, perhaps, he discovered that although he can purchase their services, he cannot purchase their genuine recognition, and that the very freedom he sought to subordinate to his will returns to confront him as an external force.
That same day, on the day of the trial, Gates was also confronted with accusations he caused covid on the Decoder podcast and that he had little credibilty,showing his tactic of evasion and deflection has reached its limits.
No comments:
Post a Comment