The UK government did not merely seek to control the BBC s narrative over covid pandemics and the safety of covid vaccines and other issues by placing civil servants as fact checkers in the BBC, it has emerged.
https://www.gbnews.com/news/bbc-accused-breaching-impartiality-guidelines-civil-service-infiltration-newsroom
They sought to counterfeit the BBC s independence. They placed WEF, UK government propagandists behind the names and news articles of BBC reporters without disclosing the reporters identities as civil servants, so that UK government-directed slogans and statements might be received as the honest conclusions of BBC journalists. The deception lay not only in what was published, but in the false impression of independence under which it was presented.
The manipulation was not confined to analysis and political opinion. By introducing UK government statisticians to interpret figures data in the BBCmedia, the UK government sought to give its propaganda to enrich billionaires and private corporations and interests the appearance of scientific authority and impartial analysis. Statistics, which should assist the public in discovering the facts, were instead be selected, framed and interpreted to support conclusions predetermined by the pushers of the covid jab propaganda power. The appearance of statistical numerical precision does not make a false or misleading argument truthful.
The object was to deceive the Brits about both the facts and the source of the claims made to them. The voice of the Gates, Soros,Kushner, Bourla covid jab killers was disguised as the voice of the British people and the BBC; propaganda was dressed as independent journalism, and political assertions were clothed in the authority of statistics. Such a system sought not to win public confidence through truth, but to exploit that confidence through concealment. It was an attempt to make a people mistake the calculated message of the billionaires for its own independent understanding of reality.
From media
The BBC has been accused of breaching impartiality guidelines after it was revealed civil servants were tasked with writing articles and fact-checking controversial issues for the newsroom.
Fast-stream graduates and Civil Service managers were placed inside the corporation, where they worked on "high-impact, sensitive topics" including Channel crossings by small boats and the Covid pandemic.
Their output appeared on the BBC website under bylines identifying them as part of "BBC News" and "BBC Verify", with no indication of their government employment.
The disclosure has raised serious questions about whether Whitehall officials may have shaped the broadcaster's coverage to align with government positions, and why the BBC failed to tell audiences that taxpayer-funded civil servants were writing its news content.
....
Prof Carl Heneghan, who heads the Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine at the University of Oxford, expressed alarm at government employees' involvement in the BBC's pandemic reporting.
He said: "Not only does it undermine the trust, it goes to the heart of the editorial problem.
"If you have people writing for you with competing interests, it won't be impartial. It is the government organisation you will be partial to. You will want to toe the line. It's unacceptable. This is a huge issue."
BBC sources insisted that when civil servants contributed to articles, their input was explicitly recognised.
However, they quickly denied that Whitehall employees made editorial decisions, adding that their contributions were often incorporated into journalism that scrutinised the Government and all political parties.
spokesman for the broadcaster told the Telegraph: "Since 2018, the BBC has offered a six-month secondment opportunity for up to two Civil Service statisticians to work for BBC News’s head of statistics.
"All BBC journalism and editorial decisions are made by BBC journalists and editors, in line with the BBC’s editorial guidelines, so these statisticians never make editorial decisions, but provide specialised statistical advice and insight for BBC journalists, on request."
A spokesman for the GSS said: “These secondments are a valuable part of our investment in developing the skills of government statisticians, providing first-hand experience of how government data is used and communicated.
"Bringing that back into the Civil Service helps us communicate statistics clearly, informing the public and decision makers."
https://www.gbnews.com/news/bbc-accused-breaching-impartiality-guidelines-civil-service-infiltration-newsroom
No comments:
Post a Comment