Tuesday, 17 June 2025

LAWMAKERS RUSH TO PASS LAWS TO STOP TRUMP DECLARING WAR WITHOUT A MANDATE, POLLS SHOW ONLY 14 % SUPPORT US MILITARY ACTION TO DESTROY IRAN S NUCLEAR PROG

And Rep or Dem lawmaker who supports Trump s attempt to start WW3 to enhance his personal fortune and to benefit oligarchs faces being voted out of offices in the midterms.

My bet? There will be a lot more independents or break away Rep and Dem faction sstanding as the public realizes voting for the classical Dem or Reps is pointless. They are a uniparty who carry out the policies of an oligarchy (Gates, Soros, Buffett, Thiel, Bezos, Zuckerberg, Page etc)

Trump has mislead the voters, deceived them also about his links to Epstein and so is in office under false pretences. If a president does not implement the policies he was elected to implement, he has no legitimacy or authoriy. An elected president is not a King who decides unilaterally to do whatever pleases him or fills his pocket with cash.

The ultimate means to remove Trump from his office also as Commander in Chief are the proofs of his crimes and corruption in Greece in the state prosecutor probes D 15 218, E 17 449 when he and Kushner were caught forming a secret alliance with Gates, Soros to carry out the covid and other WEF ops under censorship. 

The very existence of these probes from 2015,2017 means Trump is a priori in office under false pretences and all his orders are null and void.

From media 

Reps. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.) and Ro Khanna (D-Calif.) announced plans to introduce a resolution on Tuesday that asserts the requirement of Congress’ approval if Trump wants to commit armed forces to military action in the region.


“This is not our war. But if it were, Congress must decide such matters according to our Constitution,” Massie posted on X.


The resolution has already gained the support of progressive Rep. Alexandra Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.), who replied “Signing on” to Massie’s post.


It’s also not the first proposal by a lawmaker seeking to limit U.S. military engagement in the conflict. 


Sen. Tim Kaine (D-Va.) introduced a war powers resolution in the upper chamber on Monday that would terminate the unauthorized use of U.S. armed forces against Iran, given that there has not been a declaration of war, which only Congress can issue. War powers resolutions are “privileged,” meaning that the Senate is required to promptly debate and vote on the resolution.

...


Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) also introduced a separate bill, cosponsored by Sens. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) and Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.), on Monday that would prohibit the use of federal funds for “any use of military force in or against Iran” without congressional approval, with the exception of self-defense.


“Another war in the Middle East could cost countless lives, waste trillions more dollars and lead to even more deaths, more conflict, and more displacement,” Sanders said in a statement. “I will do everything that I can as a Senator to defend the Constitution and prevent the US from being drawn into another war.”


While the measures seeking to constrain Trump are unlikely to pass in the Republican-majority House or Senate, proponents have said that they want to force lawmakers to show where they stand on an issue where the public has been very clear. According to a University of Maryland poll in May, before Israel launched its strikes against Iran last Friday, only 14% of U.S. respondents across political parties supported “Military action in attempt to destroy Iran’s nuclear program.”


“It’s time for every member to go on record,” Khanna posted. “Are you with the neocons who led us into Iraq or do you stand with the American people?”


What the Constitution says

War powers are divided between Congress and the President, according to the Constitution. While the President is named the Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy, only Congress has the authority to decide whether the U.S. should go to war—either a total war or more limited uses of force. The President retains inherent defensive powers to use military force without congressional authorization if the U.S. is attacked, but congressional approval is still needed for a prolonged war.


The War Powers Resolution of 1973 provided further guidance on the President’s war powers, including that the President must have congressional approval for the use of force abroad except for certain circumstances like safely removing troops or rescuing Americans overseas. 


Nevertheless, the executive branch has expanded its view of the President’s defensive war powers, most notably with its interpretations of the 2001 and 2002 Authorizations of Use of Military Force (AUMF). Congress passed the 2001 AUMF after the September 11 attacks to allow the use of force against entities that “planned, authorized, committed, or aided” in the attacks or “harbored such organizations or persons.” The 2002 AUMF authorized military action against Saddam Hussein’s Iraq government “to defend the national security of the United States against the continuing threat posed by Iraq” and was used to justify the 2003 invasion of Iraq.


But the authorizations have been criticized for effectively giving Presidents a “blank check” to direct military actions without congressional approval far beyond their original intended scope. There have been multiple unsuccessful efforts by both parties to repeal the authorizations, including by Kaine in 2023 with the support of then-Sen. J.D. Vance (R-Ohio), who said at the time: “I think the fact that you have a lot of Republicans who are very skeptical of continuing to provide a blank check here I think is a good sign.”


When Trump in his first term authorized the killing of Iranian general Qasem Soleimani, Defense Department general counsel explained at the time that it distilled the President’s constitutional and statutory authority to direct military action into a broad two-part test: first, “whether the President could reasonably determine that the action serves important national interests,” and second, whether the military action does not necessarily “bring the nation into the kind of protracted conflict that would rise to the level of a ‘war.’”

Party splits

Conflict with Iran has divided Democrats and Republicans—not along party lines but within them.

https://time.com/7294985/iran-israel-trump-us-war-powers-congress-massie-khanna-kaine/

No comments:

Post a Comment