What to say about MPs who have passed the Assisted Dying Bill despite warnings from experts it opens the door to mass state sanctioned murder?
To my thinking, the MPs who voted for this bill have cross the line that separates an elected representative s right to shape policy and a criminal mafia by sanctioning death clinics and secret death courts.
The responsibility for this truly horrific criminal package masquarading as a law must rest with WEF elite Keir Starmer and his Labour jackboots, especially Kim Leadbeater.
The bill comes as the UK struggles with massive numbers of people killed and injured by covid jabs, a collapsing NHS and punishingly high interest rates on its national debt for the profit of the private bankers and record taxes.
Rachel Reeves and her WEF cronies may be delighted to have found a way to mass murder 100s of thousands of Brits at virtually no cost and in as much secrecy as they could muster in order to keep feeding the private bankers for a little while longer before the UK collapses.
But when the UK is taken over by the Russians and Chinese, they may well put Starmer, Reeves, and Leadbeater on trial like the German Nazis were put on trial for their euthanasia programme.
At the latest then, the MPs who voted for this bill will realize they, indeed, will go down in history as every bit as evil as the Nazi killers.
Right now, 300 plus MPs seems to believe the lies and propaganda that they have immunity from the law. History shows there is always a come uppence for the corrupted elite of an incompetent dicatorship.
The Lib Dems also must bear responsibility for supporting a bill which violate basic human rights.
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/assisted-dying-bill-votes-uk-mps-current-law-b2656386.html
Will the court proceedings happen in public or private?
Once someone has got approval from two doctors to have an assisted death, they must then apply to the High Court for final approval.
It is not yet clear from the bill whether the judge will make a decision based on the papers, forgoing a formal hearing, or whether a court hearing will take place.
If a hearing takes place, it is unclear whether it will be in public or in private. Unlike in criminal courts, family court hearings are often held in private.
If there is a hearing and it is in public, questions will also arise about whether the person applying for an assisted death should be granted anonymity - and if so, whether that anonymity should be lifted after their death.
...
Can someone else apply for an assisted death on behalf of the patient?
The current bill allows for the applicant for an assisted death to use a proxy. This is to allow for cases where the patient is unable to sign their own name and wants to authorise someone else to apply for an assisted death on their behalf.
The proxy can be either a “person who has known the person making the declaration personally for at least two years” or “a person who is of good standing in the community”.
This person cannot be a family member or someone who is a beneficiary of their will.
...
He raised a particular concern about a clause that suggests that doctors would be able to suggest assisted dying as an option for a terminally ill person. Under the bill, no medical professionals are stopped from using their judgement to “decide if, and when, it is appropriate to discuss the matter with a person”.
The bill also allows for the applicant to seek the opinion of another doctor if they are refused an assisted death.
If a second doctor refuses to affirm the patient’s right to an assisted death, then the first doctor - who granted approval - can refer the patient to another medical practitioner.
No comments:
Post a Comment