AS TRUMP PUSHES THE FAKE HANTAVIRUS NARRATIVE, RECALL IT WAS OBAMA WHO SPREAD THE SWINE FLU IN MEXICO IN 2009 USING THE MEDIA CIRCUS AROUND HIS VISIT TO MAGNIFY THE SWINE FLU HYSTERI
I WAS RELIABLY INFORMED IN 2009 BY A DOCTOR IN MEXICO CITY THAT POISON HAD BEEN SPREAD TO SIMULATE A VIRUS OUTBREAK
THE FIRST VICTIM OF THE SWINE FLU IN 2009 WAS AN ARCHAEOLOGIST WHO SHOOK HANDS WITH OBAMA
THIS IS A TRUE FACT DESCRIBED IN MY BOOK FALSE PANDEMIC IN 2009 BELOW
(NEVER GOT PAST THE FIRST CHAPTERS DUE TO THE START OF THE DE FACTO MURDER ATTEMPTS IN AUSTRIA WHICH CONTINUED IN GREECE)
WILL TRUMP TRY TO POISON XI WITH A HANDSHAKE DURING HIS VISIT TO BEIJING, SPREAD A POISON AROUND, ALSO IN THE WATER TO SIMULATE A HANTAVIRUS OUTBREAK AND PUT CHINA UNDER TRUMP AND GATES CONTROL THROUGH WHO TO GIVE THE CHINES TOXIC HANTAVIRUS JABS?
HE WILL ONLY BE REPEATING A SCAM USED BY OBAMA IN 2009 TO START THE SWNE FLU SCARE IF HE DOES
XI AND CCP SHOULD DECLARE A HANTAVIRUS OUTBEAK IN ADVANCE AND INSTITUTE SOCIAL DISTANCING TO PREVENT CONTACT BETWEEN TRUMP AND HIS OFFICIALS WITH THE CHINESE AND LIMIT THEIR MOVEMENTS AND JUSTIFY HAVING BIOWEAPONS EXPERTS FOLLOWING THEM WITH BSL4 SUITS
SHOULD LIMIT TRUMP S TEAM TO A TINY GROUP AND CHECK THE US MEDIA FOR HIDEN BIOLOGICAL AGENTS
READ ABOUT WHAT OBAMA DID IN 2009 BELOW
FALSE PANDEMIC
A failed attempt at depopulation and One World Government
CHAPTER ONE
Chapter One
He was 64 years old. He was born in Mexico City and considered one of the world’s leading experts on Aztec civilization. He was a curator of the National Museum and he was selected to give newly-elected US President Barack Obama a tour on his first state visit to Mexico on Friday, 16th of April, 2009.
His hands gestured in a lively way; his shoes hammered on the polished floor. Surrounded by officials, he accompanied Obama as well as Felipe Calderon, the Mexican President, into Room 7, the Mexico Hall or Sala Mexica, where the most famous of all the Aztec treasures is kept.
The Sun Stone, illuminated by a few soft lamps, emerged out of the darkness. Weighing 25 tonnes and 12 feet in diameter, the intricately carved basalt stone, mounted high up on a monolithic slab, illustrates aspects of Aztec cosmology.
Pointing upwards, the archaeologist Felipe Solis explained the Aztec concept of time as a medium that allows things to grow organically, and to evolve and develop to their fullest extent, similar to the way a flower or tree requires a certain period of time to grow, in consecutive stages, from a seed to reach maturity. More importantly, he also discussed what the significance of December 21st, 2012 when the earth moves into a rare alignment with the Galactic centre, might be.
Would it be the start of a new era?
Shortly afterwards, he felt a severe pain in his throat and chest. He thought it was just the regular flu, and continued working on his current project.
He was preparing for an exhibition to be launched the following month, May, called: „Teotihuacan, City of Gods“. He wanted to convey all his awe at what the Aztecs had accomplished, and demonstrate the full glory of their empire, destroyed by Spanish invaders, in a single, ground-breaking display with plenty of background information on the ideological and political dimensions of the ceremonial sites where ritual sacrifices took place for the Aztec empire had a brutal side; large numbers of human beings were sacrificed to appease the gods.
The following morning, he got up and told his family he found it hard to breathe. Fire burned his lungs. His condition deteriorated fast. That same day, Saturday, he went to hospital. He was put straight into an intensive care unit. His doctors diagnosed viral pneumonia, aggravated by diabetes. He lapsed into a coma, recovered briefly, but lost consciousness again.
On Thursday, 23 April, at 7 am, Felipe Solis died. The clinical cause given was a heart attack, according to a report in El Notre carrying the headline: „Serves Obama and dies 7 days later; “Atiende a Obama y muere a los 7 días. “
By this time, Mexico was in a state of high alert over an outbreak of swine flu that coincided with the visit of Obama. Outside the hospital where Solis lay in intensive care, soldiers were distributing face masks in the streets as hysteria gripped the South American capital. On the same day that Solis died, Mexico City was placed under quarantine for five days. For five days, 20 million people were forced to stay at home, turning the world’s second largest city into a ghost town. Shops, schools and universities were closed; demonstrations were banned. Soldiers carrying weapons patrolled the streets.
These drastic measures were implemented even though the World Health Organization (WHO), the United Nation’s global health watchdog, had confirmed only 9 deaths from the swine flu in Mexico at the time.
Although the first victim of the swine flu was later reported to be a census worker called Maria Adela Gutierrez who died on April 13th, it was Felipe Solis’s death that was first telegraphed around the world by the media.
On Saturday, April 25th, Bloomberg reported Solis had died the very day after meeting Obama possibly from the swine flu, intertwining the origin and trajectory of the pandemic with the person and movements of the US president from the very beginning.
“Obama was received at Mexico’s anthropology museum in Mexico City by Felipe Solis, a distinguished archeologist who died the following day from symptoms similar to flu, Reforma newspaper reported. The newspaper didn’t confirm if Solis had swine flu or not,” wrote Bloomberg’s Thomas Black.
In fact, without the presence of the international press corps accompanying Obama on his visit to Mexico, the news of the swine flu would not have reached such a large audience so quickly.
The speed with which the swine flu burst upon the world is underlined by the fact that it was nowhere on the media radar screen when Obama and Calderon held a joint press conference on April 16th.
Within days, however, the swine flu exploded onto the global media stage as a fully fledged pandemic, dominating cable TV screens, newspaper headlines and internet news sites. The mainstream media presented the swine flu as threat on a different scale from all other diseases, as a new killer virus that had become threatened the entire world within a very short period of time, and the mainstream media has played a key role in shaping the perceptions and attitude of people towards the swine flu virus ever since.
A five-year-old boy in La Gloria, a remote village of 3,000 people in the hills of the Sierra Madre where many farmers still use horse drawn carts, was declared by the government to have tested positive for the swine flu or A/H1N1 virus when a sample was sent to labs in the US and Canada. The Calderon government declared Edgar Hernández, who recovered rapidly, had had the illness earlier that month and that he was probably the origin of the swine flu outbreak.
But while Edgar Hernández tested positive for the swine flu, he was the only villager in La Gloria to have.
In addition, is not clear how one small boy living in a remote village where foot, bicycle and horse continue to be the main means of transport, could have spread the swine flu to so many people in so short a period of time that the entire country of Mexico – indeed the entire world – was potentially threatened within just days.
The mother of the boy, Maria del Carmen Hernández, added to the mystery.
“I don’t know where the virus came from, and I don’t think anyone else does, either,” she said, according to a report in the FT on May 1 2009.
The virus was reported to have originated in a nearby pig farm. But officials inspecting the pigs in the factory belonging to the company Granjas Carroll de Mexico, which is 50 per cent-owned by the US company Smithfield, found that none of the animals were infected by the swine flu virus.
Yet, according to the narrative of WHO and the mainstream media, the swine flu virus came from this pig farm, infected a small boy and spread from a remote village in Mexico to the USA, Europe as well as the rest of the world in the space of a few days. On Wednesday 29 April 2009, WHO reported cases of the swine flu in 9 countries.
The first death in the USA from swine flu was also reported on 29thApril: 23-month-old child in Texas was diagnosed as having succumbed from the swine flu by Dr. Richard Besser, acting director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the US partner of WHO.
By this date, the number of confirmed swine flu cases in the United States was already reported to be 66 in 6 states, with 45 swine flu in New York, 11 in California, six in Texas, two in Kansas and one in Indiana and Ohio. New York City’s health commissioner said hundreds of schoolchildren were ill at a school and some students had been confirmed to have the swine flu.
Press frenzy reached a fever pitch: pandemic victims were mentioned on the news nightly all around the globe.
“Death flies through the air,” („Der Tod fliegt durch die Luft“) was a typical the headline in Germany’s newspaper Die Sueddeutsche Zeitung on April 27th.
About 6 weeks later, on 11th June, WHO reported cases in 74 countries, and by 1st July, infections had been confirmed by WHO in 120 countries.
Rapid though the spread of the swine flu might have been, it killed few people, however.
By July 7th, just 429 people had died from the swine flu according to WHO’s own figures. This is a fraction of the 36,000 people who are estimated by the CDC to die every year from the seasonal flu in the USA alone.
It would not be going too far to say that the swine flu pandemic is a purely media event in as far as there have been few actual deaths compared to other diseases. In spite of this, the networks have saturated the airwaves with video footage, reports and images suggesting the people of the world are in imminent danger from the swine flu virus.
Video footage of people wearing face masks, waiting in hospital corridors for rare medical therapies, and children on respirators have given a degree of visual support to the claim the world is in the grip of dangerous swine flu pandemic that has absolutely no support in the facts.
But from the emergence of the swine flu pandemic at the end of April, the media has shaped and framed a narrative to its liking, presenting the story of a virus easily transmissible, raging through Mexico, and killing masses of people that is detached from all reality. The sheer quantity of video clips, and images of alleged pandemic victims, pig farms and soldiers with face masks, has actually helped concealed the objective fact that the swine flu is mild and has killed very few people, even according to the WHO’s own figures.
However, the true aim of the media coverage has not been to give factual information about the nature of the swine flu virus. The goal of the coverage has been to instill fear in the audience watching at home, and to drive them to rush out and get the swine flu vaccine.
For, from the very same moment the swine flu virus burst onto the global media stage as a villain, the swine flu vaccine has made an appearance, as a hero, and a savior in this global drama. That, in spite of the verifiable, objective fact the swine flu pandemic vaccine has not been adequately tested and contains mercury as well as the adjuvant, squalene, known to cause autoimmune diseases.
WHO immediately issued instructions to the CDC and pharmaceutical companies to start preparing to develop a swine flu vaccine.
Shares of the five major vaccine manufacturers companies Baxter, Novartis, GlaxoSmithKline and Sanofi and CSL, soared on the expectation they would earn billions from orders for pandemic vaccines.
Plans had been put into place in 2005 to vaccinate billions of people in the event of a pandemic emergency. Most of the world’s governments, including all the governments in Europe as well as the governments of the USA, Canada and Australia, had sealed contracts with pharmaceutical companies to supply bird flu pandemic vaccines in 2005. These contracts for pandemic vaccines began to be activated in April 2009
The US government sealed contracts with Novartis, Sanofi Pasteur, GlaxoSmithKline, CSL and MedImmune to produce the swine flu vaccine. France bought 94 million individual vaccinations from Baxter, Sanofi, GlaxoSmithKline, and Novartis at a cost of 869 million euros, and Canada placed an order for 50.4 million doses from GlaxoSmithKline at a cost of $400 million to give just two examples.
Wasting no time, WHO on April 24th, ordered its Pandemic Control Room, which is designed to track the spread of a pandemic around the globe and so equipped with supercomputers tied to UN member states security forces, to be manned 24 hours a day, seven days a week for the first time ever as a prelude to declaring a pandemic level 6 emergency, the highest alert level on the planet, and the level that triggers the implementation of existing plans for mass vaccination by governments around the world.
Dire predictions a bird flu pandemic that could cause the deaths of millions of people worldwide as well as the collapse of economic and social infrastructure have been made in recent years, and magnified by coverage in the mainstream media in spite of the fact that there is no scientific basis for these predictions.
In fact, the closest the world has ever come to a bird flu pandemic was in February 2009 a matter of only about 10 weeks before the Mexico swine flu pandemic outbreak. A bird flu pandemic was nearly triggered when the pharmaceutical company Baxter --- headquartered close to Chicago in Deerfield, Illinois where Obama has his Senate seat -- contaminated 72 kilos of seasonal flu vaccine material with the live bird flu virus in its facilties in Orth an der Donau, and then proceeded to distribute this material via a company called Avir Green Hills Biotechnology in Vienna to 16 labs in Austria, Slovenia, Czech Republic and Germany.
A WHO reference laboratory supplied the bird flu virus that Baxter used to contaminate the vaccine material, according to a Baxter spokesperson quoted in the media.
It is not clear why Baxter had the bird flu virus in its facilities in the first place. The bird flu virus is considered to be one of the most deadly viruses known to humankind with a 60 % mortality rate. It was bioengineered in US weapons labs from the Spanish flu virus, according to a report from October 2005 in Der Spiegel.
Baxter itself has said that the contamination of the 72 kilos of vaccine material was an accident. However, the company has not given an account of what sequence of actions were performed inside its facilities that could have resulted in the accidental contamination of such a large quantity of vaccine material or how so much contaminated material could have left its facilities undetected.
Because Baxter is obliged to use biosafety level 3 regulations when experimenting with the bird flu virus, an accidental contamination can, in fact, be virtually ruled out. The standards for protecting a virus classified as among the most dangerous bioweapons in the world are very different from those for work on harmless material in a standard lab. They include the requirement to work in a sealed laboratory environment accessible only using electronic codes, double doors, airlocks and also the need for staff to wear special protection clothing and face masks.
The contamination of the vaccine material was only discovered after a technician at the Czech lab of BioTest injected the material into ferrets. They became sick and had to be destroyed. Biotest raised the alarm and emergency pandemic control measures began to be implemented on Friday, February 6th, 2009.
As a result, 35 lab staff from Avir in Austria and from BioTest in the Czech Republic, who had come into contact with the contaminated material had to be treated preventatively for the bird flu in hospital underlining the danger that this material -- which was destined for use in vaccines -- posed to people who had come in contact with it even in a laboratory setting.
The Times of India reported Baxter had almost triggered a global bird flu pandemic.
„Virus mix-up by lab could have resulted in pandemic,“ was a headline from March 6th, 2009.
This incident in Austria in February 2009 strongly suggests the notion that pharmaceutical companies are actively engaged in attempting to trigger the very pandemics that they stand to profit from because they have sealed lucrative contracts in advance to supply pandemic vaccines.
Although the Austrian police opened an investigation after I filed charges at the Vienna State Prosecutor’s office on April 8th, the investigation was dropped in September 2009 shortly before Baxter applied for its final EU wide marketing approval for its swine flu vaccine, Celvapan.
It is not clear what the basis for the decision to drop the investigation was.
Baxter itself has said that the contamination of the vaccine material was an accident. However, the company has not explained exactly what sequence of actions was performed inside its biosecurity lab that could have resulted in such an accidental contamination of 72 kilos of seasonal flu vaccine material.
Panasonic and other corporations such as IBM have made their own internal company plans to deal with a pandemic emergency, indicating they may have some inside knowledge.
There is also evidence that the swine flu virus may have been bioengineered in labs. Australian virologist Adrian Gibbs published a study in Virology Journal in November 2009 showing that the swine flu virus was most likely the product of three strains from three continents that swapped genes in a lab or a vaccine-making plant.
A vaccine for the swine flu H1N1 virus was patented in 2007 by Baxter – and yet the virus was presented as completely new by WHO. It was the novelty of this virus that was supposed to be the reason why people had no immunity, and so the justification for the mass vaccination campaign in the first place.
There was also a swine flu outbreak in 1976, which resulted in a mass vaccination campaign in the USA that had to be abandoned because more people died from the vaccine than from the mild flu.
Nevertheless, in 1994, Laurie Garrett, Senior Fellow for Global Health at the Council on Foreign Relations authored a book called „The Coming Plague”, implying that a deadly pandemic was inevitable without any scientific basis for such a claim. Garrett was also among the first to advocate the establishment of a global pandemic response system focussed on the WHO.
In June 1996, the U.S. Air Force published a study called „Air Force 2025, describing the emergence of a deadly influenza pandemic emerging in 2009 as a possible “future scenario” in a conflict setting.
In 2003, Garrett stepped up the rhetoric, warning “doom may loom” with the “emergence of a virus „capable of infecting 40 percent of the world's human population and killing unimaginable numbers.”
“The havoc such a disease could wreak is commonly compared to the devastation of the 1918-19 Spanish flu, which killed 50 million people in 18 months. But avian flu is far more dangerous.. …humanity could well face a pandemic unlike any ever witnessed,“ Garrett wrote in a 2003 report called “The Next Pandemic” for a Council on Foreign Relations publication.
In 2005, UN official David Nabarro said that flu pandemic could kill between 5-150 million people, and that a pandemic disaster could strike at any time, without any scientific evidence for such a prediction.
The World Bank estimated in 2008, a flu pandemic could kill 71 million people around the world. and push the global economy into a “major global recession”, costing more than $3 trillion.
Governments have joined in the pandemic scare mongering.
Former US Secretary of Homeland Security Michael Chertoff predicted in an essay published in the Joint Force Quarterly Issue 51, in 2008, a „severe pandemic influenza may affect the lives of millions of Americans, cause significant numbers of illnesses and fatalities, and substantially disrupt our economic and social stability.”
In 2005, WHO had expanded existing regulations for handling infectious diseases -- the International Health Regulations -- to create a single, unifying strategic concept of how to manage the consequences of a pandemic on a worldwide scale that involved synchronizing the actions taken by all governments and pharmaceutical companies with those of WHO as soon as WHO identified a pandemic.
On July 7th, WHO’s Strategic Advisory Group of Experts (SAGE) on Immunization held a meeting in Geneva and recommended the implementation of a worldwide vaccination programme with new and largely untested pandemic vaccines, which were, however, to be allowed onto the market in the event of a pandemic emergency.
A few days later on July 11th, WHO’s Director General Dr Margaret Chan endorsed the recommendations of SAGE, launching the world’s biggest ever mass vaccination campaign using these new vaccines to be administered in two doses and formulated with oil-in-water adjuvants as well as thiomersal containing mercury.
Health workers, fire fighters and the police, followed by babies, children and pregnant women were designated as the priority groups for vaccination when the swine flu jab campaign started autumn 2009 even though there is no clinical data on the consequences of the new pandemic vaccines on the health of pregnant women and children.
Under special pandemic emergency regulations, vaccine companies do not, however, have to provide any clinical data proving that their vaccines are safe or efficacious. The fast-track testing process allowed under in a pandemic emergency reduced some clinical trials to as little as 5 days. Also, these brief and rare trials were limited mainly to healthy adults.
The French government unveiled plans to set up 1,100 special vaccine centres around the country to carry out the largest vaccine campaign in its entire history. The CDC in the US announced that 90,000 swine flu vaccine outlets would be set up across the USA. Countries like Germany and the UK prepared to implement plans to use football stadiums for the vaccine campaign.
But by January 2010, the ambitious mass vaccination campaign initiated by WHO lay in tatters. The French government had aimed to have 100 % of its people vaccinated by the end of January 2010. But the government was forced to abandon its programme at the beginning of January because of the refusal of vast majority of people to take the vaccine as well as growing protests over the campaign.
Against the expectations of WHO and national governments, only small proportions of the people in North America and Europe took the swine flu vaccine, leaving governments sitting on gigantic surplus stocks.
In addition, investigations had begun into whether WHO had communicated an objectively false content about the danger of the swine flu pandemic and also about the safety of the swine flu vaccines.
It is verifiable, documented fact that WHO, national governments and the mainstream media consistently and systematically exaggerated dangers of the swine flu virus and the threat of a lethal mutation. It is a verifiable, unambiguous fact that the swine flu pandemic vaccine, on the other hand, was presented as safe, tested and effective even though there was inadequate clinical data to support these claims. It is a fact that false statements were made about the usefulness of the vaccine for children and pregnant women that had no basis in clinical trial results whatsoever.
In the USA, it was the alternative media and radio stations that allowed the facts about the swine flu vaccine to spread rapidly. People like Dr Rebecca Carley, Dr Robin Falkov, Dr Joseph Mercola, Dr Ghislaine Lanctot and Mike Adams helped spread the information about the dangers of the vaccine that the mainstream media suppressed. Radio shows like Project Camelot, Rumor Mill news and Coast to Coast played a big role in warning people of the risks of the new vaccine as well as about the laws allowing forced vaccination and quarantine.
In Europe, where the alternative media is less developed and there are far fewer independent radio stations, information circulated through reports on blogs like Switzerland’s Alles Schall und Rauch.
In France, the information about the vaccine galvanized the internet. Christian Cotton, French campaigner, said that he had never seen so much internet activity in his whole life as in the past seven months when people debated the merits of taking the swine flu jab on the internet. Raymond Haugustine in Belgium, Vicky Chrysou in Greece, Claire Knox in Scotland and Joanna Karpasea-Jones in England, Jagoda Savic in Bosnia, Marek Podlecki in Poland, Jean- Jacques Crevecoeur in Canada and Dr Marc Girard and Dr Marc Vercoutere, Danka Derifaj were just a few of the people who spent time and energy bringing information into circulation.
In Spain, the video of a nun Teresa Forcades helped spread the word together with Claudia Calvo’s translations. Penny Bright, Jon Eisen, the editor of Uncensored and film maker Brian Dodd helped spread the word in New Zealand.
It was mainly individual citizens using the internet that allowed information about the swine flu vaccine to circulate unfiltered among people in Europe. Facts about the swine flu vaccine suppressed by WHO, governments, pharmaceutical companies were spread through email, youtube clips, facebook and independent news sites. Bloggers have kept issues such as the danger of the antiviral drug Tamiflu as well as of the adjuvant, squalene, in the public eye when this information has been consistently omitted by the mainstream media.
The news that hundreds of people, including nurses, in Sweden -- the first country in Europe to implement the mass swine flu vaccination programme -- had become seriously sick or even died soon after getting GlaxoSmithKline’s Pandemrix jab in October circulated rapidly.
So did the news that the German army had refused Baxter’s Celvapan vaccine in September after its doctors had issued a recommendation against forcing Baxter to drop the squalene in a bid to find a market.
Crucially, the Polish Health Minister, Ewa Kopacz, a family doctor, refused to buy the swine flu vaccines at the end of October because the jabs were not adequately tested, news which also spread rapidly throughout the world thanks to the internet.
The objective facts about the potential dangers of the swine flu jab were also presented by sections of the mainstream media, for example, France 24 which gave Dr Marc Girard a platform, contributing to the erosion of support for the swine flu vaccination.
As of the end of January 2010, only about 30 million people in Europe, including 218,000 pregnant women, have been vaccinated with the swine flu in spite of the unprecedented campaign of scaremongering by WHO, governments and media over the swine flu threat. According to a CDC estimate, 61 million Americans wеrе vaccinated against swine flu or аbουt 20% οf thе U.S. population. In the US too, the overwhelming majority of people rejected thе vaccines.
In an address to WHO’s Executive Board on January 18th, Director General Dr Margaret Chan said that the organization had not anticipated that people would refuse to take the swine flu vaccine. She attributed the refusal to the growth of the new communication and information technologies, which had indeed enabled people to access information, documents and facts about the swine flu vaccine suppressed by WHO and pharmaceutical companies as well as the mainstream media.
The internet has also proved to be a powerful, even revolutionary tool, in gathering support for critical investigations into the swine flu “scam.”
On January 26th, the Council of Europe Parliamentary Assembly (PACE) held an urgent public hearing into whether WHO had exaggerated the danger of the swine flu pandemic in order to force governments to buy vaccines and so enrich pharmaceutical companies.
Former SPD member of the German Bundestag and chairman the health committee at PACE Dr Wolfgang Wodarg, who is an epidemiologist and lung specialist, introduced the resolution for an inquiry into what he called one of the “greatest medical scandals of the century.”
The text of Wodarg’s motion stated: "In order to promote their patented drugs and vaccines against flu, pharmaceutical companies influenced scientists and official agencies responsible for public health standards to alarm governments worldwide and make them squander tight health resources on inefficient vaccine strategies, and needlessly exposed millions of healthy people to the risk of an unknown amount of side-effects from insufficiently tested vaccines. The bird-flu campaign of 2005-2006 combined with the swine-flu campaign of 2009-2010 seem to have caused a great deal of damage not only to some vaccinated patients and to public health-budgets, but also to the credibility and accountability of important international health-agencies.”
WHO’s special advisor on pandemic influenza Dr Keiji Fukuda together with a representative of European vaccine manufacturers, Sanofi executive, Dr Luc Hessel, faced tough criticism at the public hearing but denied accusations of hyping the swine flu to make money.
"The world is going through a real pandemic. The description of it as a fake is wrong and irresponsible. We welcome any legitimate review process that can improve our work,“ Fukuda said after the hearing.
But many of the WHO experts who had claimed to be independent have turned out to have financial links to the very pharmaceutical companies that have benefitted most from their recommendations.
Danish journalist Louise Voller reported on SAGE group members with financial links to pharmaceutical companies. These include Professor Juhani Eskola is the director of the Finnish research vaccine programme (THL) whose institute received almost 6.3 million Euro from GSK for research on vaccines during 2009, according to documents acquired through the Danish ‘Freedom of Information Act, making GSK the institute’s primary source of funding.
It was on the recommendation of THL and SAGE that the Finnish government bought millions of doses of GSK’s Pandemrix vaccine.
Eskola did not reveal his conflict of interest as was the case with other WHO vaccine experts. Dr. Neil Ferguson has received funding Baxter, GlaxoSmithKline und Roche as well as insurance companies that he advised about pandemics but this was only revealed by WHO after the Danish newspaper publicized the fact. Dr. Friedrich Hayden, consultant to MedImmune and Sanofi Pasteur has also received money from Roche, RW Johnson und SmithKline Beecham. These interests were not declared on WHO website.
Other WHO experts that have links to the vaccine manufacturers include Professor Malik Peiris from University of Hong Kong has received money from Baxter GSK und Sanofi Pasteur. Dr. Peter Figueroa, Professor at the University of the West Indies, has received money from Merck; Dr. Arnold Monto is an advisor to Chiron, GlaxoSmithKline, MedImmune, Roche, Novartis, Baxter und Sanofi Pasteur. Dr. Albert Osterhaus, head of the European Scientists Fighting Influenza, financed by Baxter, Crucell, Novartis, Hoffmann-La Roche, MedImmune, Nobilon, Sanofi Pasteur, MSD, Glaxo SmithKline und Solvay.
In addition, dozens of managers belonging to pharmaceutical companies attended the SAGE meeting on July 7th that recommended a global vaccination campaign with pandemic vaccines, albeit with the official status of „observers“. It is not clear what role these pharmaceutical executives belonging to companies like Novartis and Baxter played in generating the decision by SAGE to recommend the vaccines because WHO has refused to publish the minutes, maintaining there no minutes were taken.
This lack of transparency has fuelled concerns that pharmaceutical companies have played a key role behind the scenes in WHO, also crucially in getting the pandemic criteria changed to allow a pandemic emergency level 6 to be declared over the mild swine flu.
In fact, to be able to declare the pandemic emergency at all, WHO had to change the criteria. WHO changed its definition of a pandemic on its website at the end of May 2009, dropping the need for “an enormous number of people to have contracted the illness or died” for a pandemic to be declared. Instead, a virus that spread in two WHO zones was considered enough.
The change in the criteria enabled a pandemic level 6 declaration to be finally made by WHO in June 11th on the recommendation of an emergency committee whose names WHO has refused to release so that no assessment of their links to pharmaceutical companies or of conflicts of interest is possible.
WHO has defended itself, saying that it did not change the pandemic criteria but simply reverted to an original, looser definition.
By definition a pandemic is, however, a one off event and qualitatively different from a seasonal flu type infection.
To define a pandemic to include every single flu, even one as mild as the swine flu, is to distort the very meaning of the word “pandemic” beyond recognition.
WHO’s new pandemic definition is so loose it could apply to any flu, undermining the raison d’etre of a global pandemic emergency management system altogether.
Fukuda claimed at the CoE public hearing that WHO’s pandemic definition was the result of the work of 135 experts. If that is the case, WHO has to be held responsible for hiring, and listening to, experts who are so incompetent.
"Rational scientific independent advice should be supreme, but there was an imperative behind this which was a financial one," said Paul Flynn, UK MP said at the Council of Europe's hearing.
Adding to the impression that WHO was manipulating data to justify declaring a pandemic, the organization stopped logging cases of swine flu infection and told governments they should stop testing to see whether people had the swine flu on July 10th.
Though there is no evidence that the swine flu virus will mutate into a lethal virus. WHO has maintained that this was a likely scenario.
A lethal virus is only likely to emerge, in fact, if a scientist with strong links to WHO, Professor Bruno Lina, succeeds in mixing the swine flu and the bird flu virus in a lab in Lyon as reported by Nature.
Concerns about the influence that pharmaceutical organizations have on WHO are reinforced by the fact the organization derived 81% of its budget for 2008-2009 from voluntary contributions, according to an estimated budget on the Council on Foreign Relations website. WHO’s member states gave just $958 million while three times as much -- $3.2 billion -- came from voluntary donations from the private sector, national governments, NGOS, and private foundations, such as the Rockefeller foundation.
Because WHO has not replied to my requests for access to its annual budge at the time of writing, it is not possible to see which pharmaceutical companies contribute to WHO using what channels. Pharmaceutical industry associations are classified as NGOs in WHO’s budget.
From the funding alone, it can be seen that behind WHO stand powerful pharmaceutical companies, and, ultimately, the banks, and these entities are also the main beneficiaries of any swine flu emergency pandemic declaration and mass vaccination campaign.
The Council of Europe public hearing of Fukuda and Hessel was just one of many investigations that have been launched into whether WHO exaggerated the threat of the swine flu virus in order to enrich pharmaceutical companies. In France, a parliamentary inquiry into the government’s handling of the swine flu vaccine campaign was announced in January.
In 2009, the Dutch parliament investigated the conflicts of interest of WHO expert and Dutch government advisor Albert Osterhaus. Osterhaus was also chairman of the European Scientific Working group on Influenza (ESWI), which is entirely financed by Baxter, Novartis, GlaxoSmithKline, MedImmune, Roche and other pharmaceutical companies that make billions from a pandemic emergency declaration.
Many of the scientist acting as advisors to national governments have turned out to have links to vaccine manufacturers. UK government swine flu advisor and SAGE group member Sir Roy Anderson sits on the board of GSK, for example.
The European Medicines Agency, the EU vaccine regulator, is two thirds funded by pharmaceutical companies.
Serious though the allegations that pharmaceutical companies have sought to profit from a false pandemic are, there is strong evidence to support the notion that the mass vaccination campaign was an attempt to cause damage and death to millions of people.
If the swine flu vaccines had just been designed for profit or as part of patenting scam, the pharmaceutical companies could have put some harmless substance like sugar water into them.
But the swine flu vaccines contain mercury known to cause neurological damage and autism in children. In addition, they contain, the adjuvant squalene. There is a substantial body of scientific evidence showing that squalene contributed to the Gulf War Syndrome among US and UK veterans.
Both these vaccines are classified as biodefense stockpile drugs by the EU and US regulators according to biopharma databases. They are, therefore, bioweapons. This classification by government regulators was the reason why the GSK and Novartis swine flu vaccines were stored in military barracks in countries such as France and Switzerland before being distributed to vaccine centres. One UN employee based in Switzerland was summoned to a military base to receive his swine flu jab.
These vaccines cannot be given to people under ordinary circumstances because clinical trials proving they are safe have nto been performed.
However, as soon as WHO makes a pandemic level 6 declaration, new standards for vaccines and anti viral drugs come into force.
Anti viral drugs, such as Tamiflu, associated with severe side effects, were allowed to be used months after their expiry date.
Under special emergency pandemic approval procedures, pandemic vaccines do not have to be proven to be safe or efficacious before they are administered to populations.
The vaccine manufacturers are only obliged to carry out a study to ascertain whether the vaccines have serious side effects after the vaccines are administered.
GSK is currently carrying out a study on the Pandemrix swine flu vaccine in the UK.
Governments are not obliged to carry out any study on whether the vaccines have adverse side effects.
Polish health minister and family doctor, Ewa Kopacz, rejected the swine vaccines for Poland precisely because they haven’t been adequately tested.
Both GSK’s and Novartis’ swine flu vaccines contain squalene, which can lead to autoimmune disease. In addition, Baxter’s Celvapan was made using diseased kidneys of African green monkeys, the cell culture that gave the world AIDS.
Novartis’s Focetria swine flu vaccine contains MF59, an adjuvant containing squalene and polysorbate 80, two ingredients that have been linked to diseases.
GSK’s Pandemrix contains the squalene fASO3 as well as polysorbate 80.
These ambiguous bioweapon/vaccines could only be given to civilian populations because a declaration of a pandemic emergency by WHO triggers new standards for vaccine approval in the EU. The safety and efficacy of vaccines no longer need to be proven under EMEA guidelines under the pretext of the urgency of managing a deadly pandemic.
It is true that squalene is an oil molecule that is found naturally in the human body, but given intravenously it incites the immune system to destroy all the natural squalene in the body including squalene that had been injected into the bloodstream.
Dr Joseph Mercola explains:
“Oil-based vaccination adjuvants like squalene have been proved to generate concentrated, unremitting immune responses over long periods of time.”
A 2000 study published in the American Journal of Pathology demonstrated a single injection of the adjuvant squalene into rats triggered “chronic, immune-mediated joint-specific inflammation,” also known as rheumatoid arthritis.
Your immune system recognizes squalene as an oil molecule native to your body. It is found throughout your nervous system and brain. In fact, you can consume squalene in olive oil and not only will your immune system recognize it, you will also reap the benefits of its antioxidant properties.
The difference between “good” and “bad” squalene is the route by which it enters your body. Injection is an abnormal route of entry which incites your immune system to attack all the squalene in your body, not just the vaccine adjuvant.
Your immune system will attempt to destroy the molecule wherever it finds it, including in places where it occurs naturally, and where it is vital to the health of your nervous system.
Gulf War veterans with Gulf War Syndrome (GWS) received anthrax vaccines which contained squalene. MF59 (the Novartis squalene adjuvant) was an unapproved ingredient in experimental anthrax vaccines and has since been linked to the devastating autoimmune diseases suffered by countless Gulf War vets.
The Department of Defense made every attempt to deny that squalene was indeed an added contaminant in the anthrax vaccine administered to Persian Gulf war military personnel – deployed and non-deployed – as well as participants in the more recent Anthrax Vaccine Immunization Program (AVIP).
However, the FDA discovered the presence of squalene in certain lots of AVIP product. A test was developed to detect anti-squalene antibodies in GWS patients, and a clear link was established between the contaminated product and all the GWS sufferers who had been injected with the vaccine containing squalene.
A study conducted at Tulane Medical School and published in the February 2000 issue of Experimental Molecular Pathology included these stunning statistics:
“ … the substantial majority (95%) of overtly ill deployed GWS patients had antibodies to squalene. All (100%) GWS patients immunized for service in Desert Shield/Desert Storm who did not deploy, but had the same signs and symptoms as those who did deploy, had antibodies to squalene.
In contrast, none (0%) of the deployed Persian Gulf veterans not showing signs and symptoms of GWS have antibodies to squalene. Neither patients with idiopathic autoimmune disease nor healthy controls had detectable serum antibodies to squalene. The majority of symptomatic GWS patients had serum antibodies to squalene.”
According to Dr. Viera Scheibner, Ph.D., a former principle research scientist for the government of Australia:
“… this adjuvant [squalene] contributed to the cascade of reactions called “Gulf War Syndrome,” documented in the soldiers involved in the Gulf War.
The symptoms they developed included arthritis, fibromyalgia, lymphadenopathy, rashes, photosensitive rashes, malar rashes, chronic fatigue, chronic headaches, abnormal body hair loss, non-healing skin lesions, aphthous ulcers, dizziness, weakness, memory loss, seizures, mood changes, neuropsychiatric problems, anti-thyroid effects, anaemia, elevated ESR (erythrocyte sedimentation rate), systemic lupus erythematosus, multiple sclerosis, ALS (amyotrophic lateral sclerosis), Raynaud’s phenomenon, Sjorgren’s syndrome, chronic diarrhoea, night sweats and low-grade fevers.”
A study of 39,000 Germans who received a FLUAD vaccine with squalene in 2000 does little to clarify the long-term consequences of squalene because no follow up study on whether the subjects developed autoimmune disorders over a longer period of time was performed.
“Autoimmune disorders like those seen in Gulf War Syndrome frequently take years to diagnose due to the vagueness of early symptoms. Complaints like headaches, fatigue and chronic aches and pains are symptoms of many different illnesses and diseases,” notes Dr Mercola.
Dr Jürgen Seefeldt calculated that 850,000 people would have died from the swine flu vaccine in 15 years if the German government had given it to all 50 million people as planned. He based his estimates on the number of young and healthy US soldiers who died from cancer of autoimmune diseases 15 years after receiving anthrax vaccinations containing squalene in the Gulf War.
In 1991, a total of 696,841 US soldiers were given anthrax vaccines with squalene and mercury. By 2005, 11,620 of these soldiers were dead, many from autoimmune diseases and cancer.
Another 256,000 soldiers applied for compensation and 196,000 of these received damages. Only 29,000 applications were turned down while 31,000 are still being reviewed.
Scaling up these figures, it can be estimated that about 20 million Germans would have suffered from severe side effects as a result of the jab.
Seefeldt called the “biggest crime since the Holocaust” and called for the resignation of the health minister as well as the German Chancellor Angela Merkel.
However, his calculations of the number of people who are damaged by the swine flu vaccines could be an underestimate.
Much higher concentrations of squalene are present in the swine flu jabs than in the anthrax vaccines, and they could be proportionately more harmful.
Gary Jacobucci writes:
“The average quantity of squalene injected into the US soldiers abroad and at home in the anthrax vaccine during and after the Gulf War was 34.2 micrograms per billion micrograms of water. According to one study, this was the cause of the Gulf War syndrome in 25% of 697.000 US personnel at home and abroad. You can find this table of FDA analyses from the Gulf War lots on The Military Vaccine Resource Directory website
a.. AVA 020 - 11 ppb squalene (parts per billion)
b.. AVA 030 - 10 ppb squalene
c.. AVA 038 - 27 ppb squalene
d.. AVA 043 - 40 ppb squalene
e.. AVA 047 - 83 ppb squalene
These values were confirmed by Prof. R. F. Garry before the House of Representatives. Prof Garry was the man to discover the connection between the Gulf War syndrome and squalene.
According to his findings, the Gulf War syndrome was caused by squalene, which was banned by a Federal Court Judge in 2004 from the Pentagons use.
As seen on p. 6 of this EMEA document, the Pandremix vaccine contains 10,68 mg of squalene per 0,5 ml. This corresponds to 2.136.0000 microgrammes pr. billion microgrammes of water, i.e. one million times more squalene per dose than in. There is any reason to believe that this will make people sick to a much higher extent than in 1990/91. This appears murderous to me."
Moreover, the Pandemrix vaccine contains particles that are nano in size, but data on the safety of nanovaccines is scant.
In August, a study published in the European Respiratory Journal, however, showed that seven young Chinese women suffered permanent lung damage and two died after working for months without adequate protection in a paint factory using nanoparticles.
"These cases arouse concern that long term exposure to nanoparticles without protective measures may be related to serious damage to human lungs," Yuguo Song from the occupational disease and clinical toxicology department at Chaoyang Hospital in Beijing told Reuters.
But squalene is not the only toxic ingredient.
“Mercury, which makes up 49.6% of thiomersal, is an extremely toxic substance that causes cancer,” says Dr Seefeldt
“Mercury is the most toxic non-radioactive element on Earth and poisonous even in small quantities.”
The Pandemrix vaccine contains 5 microgramms of thiomersal. Two doses -- two doses were originally planned -- would have resulted in people receiving 10 microgramms of thiomersal.
The measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccine containing thimerosal is believed to have contributed to the huge increase in autism in children in the USA.
In spite of the fact there was no clinical data on how these new swine flu vaccines with mercury and squalene would affect the health of young children and pregnant women, these were designated as priority groups by WHO.
Assurances were given as to the safety of the vaccine with reference to the regulatory approval of the European Medicines Agency and other authorities – but not with reference to clinical data because there are no clinical data.
In fact, the few clinical studies to be conducted by the pharmaceutical companies on the health consequences of the swine flu vaccine on pregnant women and children started at the same time as the actual swine flu vaccination campaign and they are not due to be concluded until one year later in autumn 2010.
The mass swine flu vaccination campaign is, in effect, a gigantic biological experiment, even though such experiments are banned under law.
Moreover the outcome of this experiment will never be fully known because there is no proper system of pharmacovigilance is in place.
Angelika Kögel-Schauz of the Parents for Vaccine Information (Eltern für Impfaufklärung) has written about the manipulation of data about vaccine side effects by the Paul Ehrlich Institute in an apparent violation of the law.
In addition, there authorities are making no attempt to track how many of the people vaccinated with the swine flu jab contracted swine flu from the actual vaccination as was reported to happen in one case in Israel. There is evidence the Spanish flu of 1918 was caused by the mass vaccination of soldiers.
No comments:
Post a Comment