HOW IS IT POSSIBLE THAT BLANCHE AND BOVE ONCE MORE IGNORED THE HEART OF THE CASE AGAINST MERCHAN IN OFFICIAL PROCEEDINGS, WHERE IT REALLY MATTERS, AND FOCUSED ON AN IRRELEVANT ARGUMENT EVERYONE KNEW WOULD FAIL
TRUMP CAN PLACE THE ACE CARD AND HAVE ALL THE SOROS KILLER JUDGES, PROSECUTORS EXTRADITED TO THE USA AS PART OF THE FOREIGN CORRUPT PRACTISES ACT TO SHOW THE AMERICAN PUBLIC WHAT ILLEGAL LAWFARE IS AND HOW THEY ARE THE ULTIMATE TARGET OF SOROS, GATES AND CO
Judge Merchan has rejected Trump s attempt to dismiss the guilty verdict after his lawyers advanced the very argument which could be predicted to fail. Why?
The heart of the case, the massive violations of due process and rights, the conflicts of interest of Merchan and his daughter, the political motivation for the illegal lawfare appear to have been left out of the submission to Merchan or been treated as an irrelevant manner.
By focussing on immunity, Trump s lawyers Blanche and Bove made it easy and lawful for Merchan to dismiss the hush money case. Because it is a fact which the public can verify that Trump s act were unofficial and private and so not covered by presidential immunity under the new Supreme Court ruling.
No Supreme Court ruling is needed to list the massive violations of rights and irregularities in due process in the indictment including the lack of a crime.
34 book keeping entries are NOT a crime. The bok keeping entires are netural unless linked to a crime.
Book keeping entries are like a knife which can be used for good or evil.
Owning knives is not a crime unless a knife is used in a crime. And that crime has to be specified on the indictment first. Then the evidence is listed, including thespecific knife.
Owning 34 knives cannot become 34 felonies if it is not shown they were part of a crime which has to be specified in the inditement. How can there be a proper Appeal when there is no crime named in the indictment to appeal about?
When no crime is listed on the indictment it is a huge red flag no crime was committed or could be proven, certainly not falsification of business records and election interference. What the media say is irrelevant. The indictment alleges no crime.
The unrealiability and implausible of key witness Michael Cohen are ignored as well by Trump s lawyers in the submission or not given the weight it shoudl be since every effort to tie Trump falsification and election interference rests on him.
The 480 K in money are ignored in the submission. How is that possible? Here is the heart of the matter and it belongs in the submission. Only when it goes into the submission does it become a legal fact the courts are compelled to address. The stuff in the media, Merchan is not obliged to address.
Merchan did not seem even to address his own conflicts of interest. How is that possible? It should have been put first in the submission to Merchan that he had conflicts of interests which made him incapable of delivering a fair verdict.
It does not matter how often this is said on social media. It only matters if it is in official proceedings and so becomes something Merchan must address under due process. It is incredible that Blanche and Bove have left out the core evidence of massive corruption, which can be proven and could have gotten the verdict overturned.
My thinking is Trump needs new lawyers, who present the core evidence in a simple way to the public, and also to get his verdict overturned.
Corrupt, and or inept lawyers are the most dangerous allies of a corrupt lawyer as the Greek prosecutor probes show. Either Bove and Blanche are corrupt or they are incompetent to the point where Trump should sue them for their tens of millions in fees. They have not delivered the bare bones of a good case or addressed all the facts.
To retain Trump s trust and so be able to knive in the back as his lawyers, Blanche and Bove are taking the trouble to appear to be defending him when in reality they are not.
The law is clear. Lawyers are obliged to present the best, most relevant facts to a judge not irrelevant ones.
Plus, he can demonstrate to the US public Alex Soros illegal lawfare by having Soros keiller Greek judges and prosecutors extradited to the USA and put on trial in a matter of huge public interest.
The borad American public will get the point and so find the accusation of corruption against Merchan very easy to understand. Indeed, the landslide vote for Trump shows they already have rejected the notin he is a lawfully "convicted felon"
From media
President-elect Donald Trump does not have immunity in the so-called “hush money” case in New York, Judge Juan Merchan ruled in a decision on Dec. 16.
The conduct described by the 34 felony counts of which Trump was convicted earlier this year is related “entirely to unofficial conduct entitled to no immunity protections,” Merchan wrote.
...
Trump’s attorneys contended that New York prosecutors introduced evidence during his seven-week trial that was protected by the Supreme Court’s presidential immunity doctrine.
Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg (D) urged the judge to reject Trump’s arguments, arguing that no evidence placed before the jury was protected, and even if it was, it paled in comparison to “other overwhelming evidence of defendant’s guilt.”
https://www.zerohedge.com/political/judge-rules-trump-doesnt-have-immunity-new-york-hush-money-case
No comments:
Post a Comment