POLITICS WILL NOT BE SAFE IN AMERICA AGAIN UNTIL MERCHAN, BRAGG, AND RYAN ROUTH ARE PROSECUTED AND FACE SEVERE PENALTIES
VITAL IS FOR TRUMP S LAWYERS TO ADDRESS THE PUBLIC BY LAYING OUT THE CRIMES IN CLEAR AND SIMPLE LANGUAGE
THE OVERLY COMPLICATED, ALMOST INTELLIGIBLE LEGALESE USED IN MOTIONS BY BLANCHE AND BOVE IS NOT HELPFUL TO SHOWING THE AMERICAN PUBLIC WHY MERCHAN, BRAGG AND SMITH ARE SO DANGEROUS TO POLITICS, DEMOCRACY IN THE USA AND WHY THEY NEED TO FACE SEVERE PENALTIES
CONGRESS CAN PASS A BILL DEFINING ILLEGAL LAWFARE AND ASSINSATION ATTEMPTS AGAINST A PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE AS AN ACT MERITING THE DEATH PENALTY
Florida Representatives Anna Paulina Luna and Cory Mills have suggested that criminal charges could be brought against Judge Juan Merchan, and his daughter for illegal lawfare.
A criminal prosecution could reveal who ordered Merchan and DANY Alvin Bragg to pursue a plan to label Trump as a convicted felon during a crucial phase of the election campaign, in order to imprison him and overthrow the elections and democracy, smear and eliminate a political opponent by putting him in prison and likely killing him there. All this, on baseless, disportionate charges. All this to secure power for the Biden,
Harris and the Dem party and their mega donors such as Alex Soros and Bill Gates despite their dreadful record in office, including covid jab fascism.
The charges of falsification of business records as part of some election interference scheme were based on the implausible testimony of a single discredited witness, Michael Cohen. Tellingly, the indctment against Trump failed to specify a single criminal charge because no criminal action on Trump s part could be shown.
Ponder that. An inditement without a crime....
To hide a gaping vaccuum, Bragg and Merchan conspired together to substitute 34 book keeping entries for felonies. This, although book keeping entries are not, and cannot, logically be felonies in themselves but only a part of an overarching felony or scheme, which has to be specified. No crime has ever been specified in the indiitement, the sine qua non of a conviction and prison sentence.
Let us consider, for example, how simply owning a radom car also cannot become a felony in itself unless a crime is specified for which the car was used by the owner such as running over and killing a person deliberately etc as in "Hit and run murder" carried out using X car by person Y.
The illegal lawfare against Trump was a truly dangerous attack against him and his rights to a fair trial which could have ended up in his being put in prison for four years and being Epsteined there as well as an attack on the Constitution and American people, who were to be denied the right to vote Biden, Harris out of office in free and fair elections and so to avert total tyranny. When there are no fair and free elections, it is tyranny.
The crime was carried out with the help of a complicit media which failed to explain why the case was illegal and failed to investigate the significace of the vast sums of money which were funnelled to judge Merchan through his daughter and which clearly served as bribes and failed to question the validity of the gag order which Merchan issued to hide the sums of money.
It is regrettable that the Supreme Court has not weighed and balanced Trump s right to expose a conflict of interest against Merchan s right to be protected from "incendiary" remarks and lifted or modified the gag order.
The right to free speech, to a fair trial are core Constitutional rights which Trump enjoys and should be protected by the Supreme Court.
Whether Merchan and his daughter really saw the nearly 500 K donated by Kamala Harris campaign as a bribe does not matter. Any neutral observer will see the sums as a classicial bribe in return for favours, as a payment made to selected, specific people in the NY criminal justice system, who have the power to put Harris political opponent in prison misusing the law.
By laying all of this before the American public using simple language, facts and logical arguments, Trump can make putting Merchan and Bragg on trial a milestone in the return of the rule of law.
The kind of legalese language used by Trump s lawyers Blanche and Bove does not help the American public understand the gravity of the crimes in my view.
Trump needs to get his lawyers to view their target audience as the American public and address their legal actions to them using simple language.
It has to be clear that he is not a fascist, a dicator when he pursues Merchan and Smith but a person defending his rights against massive and dangerous violations from a criminal network, who sought to make it impossible for him to oppose them in elections.
Unless people like Merchan, Bragg and above all their funders are punished, illegal lawfare will not stop.
There must be a criminal prosecution to prevent a repeat. The aim should be deterrence and not retribution.
At the same time, Trump is entitled to punitive damages and compensation for an egrgious, brutal, slanderous, distressing, determined attack on his civil rights simply because he became the main challenger of the Dem party candidate and the opposition candidate, the Republican candidate.
Trump was subjected to about four separate illegal lawfare attacks at the same time in civil and criminal courts.
Harris is on record saying the illegal lawfare is a good thing because it keeps Trump from campaigning!!!
There is a clear precedent in Greece of Alex and George Soros as well as Bill Gates personally ordering illegal lawfare against a reporter for warning the public about their Ebola, bird flu, covid virus and jab scheme using corrupted Greek justice officials.
This is an important precedent. It shows a system, a method and who is behind it. It turns out to be the same mega donor Soros and Gates who poured money into the campaign o Biden and Harris to fund the brbe to Judge Merchan. Alex Soros even tweeted the Dems he bankrolled should use every opportunity to refer to Trump as convicted felon. Personally attacking and smearing Trump seemed to be the main campaign strategy of Soros and the Dems for winning, rigging the elections.
The same logic of prosecution as needed for deterrence applies to Ryan Routh, who tried to assassinate Trump apparatntly with deep connections to media and the Dem party.
The death penalty is appropriate in such a case because democracy was at stake. It cannot be allowed that assassins are paid 100 K and to try to kill presidential candidates or other political candidates and get off with a light penalty. That is an incentive to use the method in the future to obtain political power in federal and state and even county political races.
It must be made clear that such a crime will result in the death penalty for the assassin and their funders and backers....
The death penalty was also insituted by God in Genesis precisely because God values human life and knows how far human evil will go unless there is a death penalty and a deterrence for those depraved individuals who place no value on human life.
The same logic applies to Alex Soros, Bill Gates, Warren Buffett and Albert Bourla, who have deliberately and knowingly given even babies and school kids a shot they knew to be poisonous, showing an utter disregard for human life and a desire to profit from mass poisoning which is truly stomach churning.
If Merchan overturns the flawed jury verdict which he enabled and facilitated by conspiring together with Bragg to allow a bait and switch and substitute 34 book keeping entries for a criminal charge, and if Merchan shows some repentence, then he will put himself in a better position to avoid the severest penalties. The law recognizes recompetance and the willing correction of wrongs as an extentuating factor.
By continuing to pursue the illegal conviction of Trump in his December 9th submission, Bragg has exposed himself to the severest penalty. He is as guilty as Merchan for prosecuting Trump without showing any crime.
Open, transparent trials for Bragg and Merchan, which includes Harris and Soros and their flows of money, in which the public can see clearly where their crimes are and why they, the American public, were the target, are the best way to deal with dangerous, illegal lawfare and ensure it does not happen again.
Soros cannot possibly be put in prison over the illegal lawfare against Trump. But he can be put in pretrial detention today and the family foundation closed, his killer clergy and judges in Greece extradited to America under the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act today using the golden standard Greek prosecutor probes.
When the American public understand the nature of the proofs, they will demand the death penalty for Soros, Gates, Biden, Bourla and Harris. Not Trump. The 100s of millions of covid jab victims will demand it.
The media owners, editors and journalitsts who took the Billionaires cash to lie to the public also need to face trial.
https://www.aol.com/republicans-push-criminal-probe-judge-220718212.html
Republicans push for criminal probe into judge in Trump hush money case – and the judge’s daughter
The Independent US
MIKE BEDIGAN
November 12, 2024 at 9:45 PM
In the wake of Donald Trump’s sweeping victory, Republicans are turning their attention to those in the judicial system who went up against the president-elect in the courts.
Speaking on Fox News’ Sunday Morning Futures, Florida Representatives Anna Paulina Luna and Cory Mills floated the idea that criminal charges could be brought against Judge Juan Merchan – and his daughter
Loren Merchan.
Merchan oversaw Trump’s high-profile hush money case where he was ultimately convicted of 34 felonies in New York earlier this year. His daughter subsequently became the target of attacks by the president-elect
due to her Democrat-leaning political activities.
“Let’s look at Judge Merchan and his daughter, who was actually a fundraiser and was actually trying to support Kamala Harris and Joe Biden when it came to raising funds on the back of President Trump being in the
New York court system,” Mills said.
“I think that what we’re seeing right now is that the Department of Injustice and the lawfare that was going on is now coming to a screeching halt with President-elect Donald Trump coming back into office.”
During the hush money trial, Trump ignored an order from Merchan that he should rein in his fiery posts on social media, in which he accused the judge of having a “Trump-hating family” with ties to Kamala Harris.
Florida Representatives Anna Paulina Luna (left) and Cory Mills (right) floated the idea that criminal charges could be brought against Judge Juan Merchan, and his daughter (Fox News)
“I have a Trump-hating judge with a Trump-hating wife and family, whose daughter worked for Kamala Harris, and now receives money from the Biden-Harris campaign – and a lot of it,” he said.
According to Mike Nellis, founder of political consulting firm Authentic Campaigns Inc, which employs Loren Merchan, she did some work for Harris’s presidential campaign in 2019 but never “developed an
individual personal relationship” with the candidate, and had only “minimal input or contact with any political clients” during the 2024 election cycle.
Nellis said Merchan had received death threats following Trump’s comments and had been advised to stay away from the family home.
In August, the House judiciary chairman Jim Jordan, a key ally of Trump, subpoenaed the firm to testify as part of his investigation into what he called the “weaponization” of the federal goverment. However, Nellis said
any suggestion that the company played any part in Trump’s criminal trial or conviction was “completely false and purely politically motivated.”
On Sunday, Mills and Luna also discussed possible criminal cases being pursued against Special Counsel Jack Smith, who brought charges against Trump for trying to subvert the 2020 presidential election and
mishandling classified documents.
It was reported this week that Smith and the Justice Department are trying to “wind down” the federal criminal cases agaiWhite House in January, in order to comply with its long-standing policy not to prosecute sitting
presidents.
“What I will tell you… is that Jack Smith violated the Constitution,” Luna said.
“And I’m really happy that Jim Jordan and the House Judiciary is telling him to preserve evidence because even after President Trump is elected, we need to ensure that this never happens to any other candidate for
president ever again.”
She added: “And so we have to follow through, see who exactly ordered that," she continued. "And if it means that we need to bring criminal prosecution, I think that we need to.”
It was recently reported that Jack Smith (pictured) and the Justice Department are trying to ‘wind down’ the federal criminal cases against Trump before he returns to the White House (AFP via Getty Images)
Their comments stopped short of shocking remarks previously aired on Fox, in which hosts Dana Perino and Greg Gutfeld joked that Smith and others who had prosecuted Trump should receive the death penalty.
“Dana… a lot of the people that were on this and wanted it so badly, how are they going to survive? Do you think they need therapy,” Gutfeld asked Perino.
“Yes, they definitely need therapy,” the former White House press secretary responded. “Maybe also the death penalty?”
A brushfire in Malibu prompts evacuations as it burns near Pepperdine University
A brushfire in Malibu prompts evacuations as it burns near Pepperdine University
Advertisement
Republican candidate for NC Supreme Court files lawsuit against Board of Elections
WNCN
STARLETTA WATSON
November 19, 2024 at 3:40 PM
RALEIGH, N.C. (WNCN) — As the counting of ballots concludes in the race for a Supreme Court seat, one candidate took his issue of demanding a recount to court.
Judge Jefferson Griffin, the Republican candidate for the NC Supreme Court District 6 seat, with his campaign committee and the state’s Republican Party, filed a lawsuit Monday alleging that the state Board of
Elections failed to provide voting records within the deadline for Griffin to request a recount, according to court documents.
State law allows a trailing candidate in a statewide race to seek a machine recount, where tabulator machines run the ballots again. State law also says the request for a recount must be submitted in writing and
received by the Board of Elections by noon on the second business day after the 10-day canvass period. That would mean the request would need to be submitted by noon Tuesday.
As of Tuesday morning, the Democrat incumbent Justice Allison Riggs is ahead of Griffin by just 623 votes. “We expect a recount to be called in this race,” said Embry Owens, Rigg’s campaign manager. “Recounts
are a normal part of election processes and show our democracy at work.”
Griffin and the NC GOP said in court documents that there were “four significant requests relevant to the 2024 General Election that remain incomplete and outstanding from Defendant.” They also cited six other times
that requests for public records were sent to the Board of Elections, but were not fulfilled in time.
24CV036912-910Download
In a statement sent to CBS 17, the Board of Elections said that despite providing the records Monday morning, Griffin and the NC GOP filed the lawsuit anyway. “The lawyers for this campaign demanded over the
weekend that the requested records be produced by 7 a.m. today (Monday),” the statement said. “In fact, the lawyers for this campaign were informed this morning that the records would be provided today, but they
served the agency with the lawsuit anyway. In sum, this lawsuit is thoroughly unnecessary.”
Copyright 2024 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
For the latest news, weather, sports, and streaming video, head to CBS17.com.
No comments:
Post a Comment