NEW VIDEO EVIDENCE SUGGESTS CHARLIE KIRK S SECURITY TEAM WAS IN ON IT
Whatever killed Charlie Kirk it clearly was not a 30.6 bullet from a rifle.
His former security director Ryan Deere has questioned the security gaps at the Utah event.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CZ2od9ZX5T4
Now new video evidence from Gary 828 suggests it was the security team Rockhouse Integrity Group, dba Integrity Security Solutions (Open Source). whose founder is Brian Harpole, the man who appears to have been the "medic" who applied the gauze, although there is no video showing any trauma bag being opened or medical items applied.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZX1mn3ijgOc&t=17s
Plus James Li " uncovers the disturbing pattern of Google searches made in Washington, D.C. before Charlie Kirk’s assassination — digging into the digital breadcrumbs first exposed by @realbaronpodcast that suggest someone had foreknowledge of the killer’s name, weapon, and location long before a single shot was fired."
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZX1mn3ijgOc&t=17s
Check out the video from Gary 828
NEW VIDEO EVIDENCE Exposes Charlie Kirk's CROOKED SECURITY TEAM
I am skeptical of the Charlie Kirk incident. Going over some new footage I found of the event Charlie Kirk was assassinated at - and seeing new angles of Charlie's security team looks very suspicious. One guy in particular looked like a blatant criminal. The security team continued to send subtle signals to one another moments before Charlie Kirk was shot.
Transcript
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_bmq0GmTuRE&t=1s
More info on the security team here
https://crossroadsreport.substack.com/p/focus-on-charlie-kirks-security-team
The new video evidence is also discussed by Valhalla VFT
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t1knBjIWw2c
The new video highlights a potential culprit and weapon.
A woman dressed in black filming with a camera may have been involved.
A key man in a grey shirt who has been identified by Candace Owens as TPUSA employee (his name is in comments) can be seen standing beside the woman before he appears to move to the side of the tent. As soon as the "shot goes" off, he rushes to the parking lot where he is next seen standing to the side on an elevated place filming the scene of the bodyguards moving the body to the car) How did he know to be ready to film?). He then goes to the camera behind Charlie and removes the SD card.
The angle of the camera would align with the angle of the shot.
Was it really poor training, planning, preparation? Or were the security detail in on it? All or some?
Why was there no one overlooking the roofs?
A bodyguard standing in front of Charlie Kirk was staring at him when the shot went off, and not at the crowd.
He also appears to pul at something in his shirt which could be a switch to detonate a small explosive device hiden inside Charlie Kirk s clothing or his equipment or some other device like a camera.
The trauma medicine definitely would require the security detail to keep the pressure applied to the artery as they carry him to the car if they are going to do something so risky. But they do not apply pressure as they carried him to an SUV.
Why did they risk his life by moving him when the common sense decision would be to keep on the ground and apply pressure to the artery until paramdeics arrive from the hospital two minutes away.
It looks like they wanted to avoid declaring the place of his murder as a crime scene because there was something to hide.
The fact the SD card from the camera was removed immediately was very suspicous because this kind of thing fuels conspiracy theories.
"Wait for the police and investigators to arrive before going to ask them to return your camera or other items from a crime scene. Never take them out, touch them, or move them, as commentator noted.
M
"You guys missed the most important thing. How come in such a big gathering, there is not even one ambulance. It's mandatory for such a gatherings in order to get the permission. The agents who transported Charly were not authorized nether qualify to transport him. With an immediate paramedics intervention, Charly would have a chance to survive. With with those agents moving him to their car and letting him bleed. No way he can survive and they know that very well cuz they see him bleeding and they have nothing to do to help him."
No paramedic team or ambulance on standby for a big event
As a medical professional who works in an ER-
This was 100% unacceptable for a security team!
Let's say the bleeding was under control (well, that's bc we now know fragments were found in the cervical spine, c1 I think?) In this case, life support would be required almost immediately. I would assume with C1 he would be paralyzed, leading to respiratory failure then cardiac failure.
CPR requires a flat surface. They wouldn't be able to accomplish this in a back seat, and BASIC LIFE SUPPORT would tell u this!! Absolutely despicable security, nobody should ever hire them again!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t1knBjIWw2c
No comments:
Post a Comment