Friday, 20 February 2026

EPIC ARREST OF ANDREW, REMOVAL OF THE WINDSORS , COULD ALTER THE CHARACTER OF THE BRITISH STATE, SAVE BRITAIN FROM COLLAPSE UNDER DEBT, INFLATION, BEING TAKEN OVER BY CHINA

CAMOUFLAGING THEMSELVES AS JUST ONE OF THE BRITISH ETON ELITE, WILLIAM AND NAT ROTSCHILD HELPED DRIVE THE COVID JAB SCHEME WHICH MASS POISONED  THE ETON SCHOOL BOYS AS WELL AS THE BRITISH POLICE AND ARMY AS WELL AS DRIVING THE ECONOMIC SLAVERY OF THE BRITS UNDER PRIVATE BANKSTER DEBT

 

The arrest of Prince Andrew is the first arrest of a member of the Monarchy since the Bank of England was privatized in 1666 to benefit the private bankers like the Rothschilds, who set up a contol system of corrupt elites to ensure they were above the law.

Andrew s arrest may be a sign that 350 years of lawlessness and looting  by the private bankster is coming to an end. But Andrew is only one member, albeit it a very senior one, of the criminal organization operating out of the Royal Palace for the benefit of private bankers and Billionaires. Charles, William and Anne are still in power running the government as their private business and as a feudal state using corrupted networks which answer to them, the Rothschilds and Billionaires and not the people or the rule of law.

The private banksters and the Windsors have been fused together in one single criminal organiztion working seamlessly together for their personl enrichment for nearly 300 years.

Books like Money Manipulation and Social Order by Denis Fahey

http://www.liberius.net/livres/Money_manipulation_and_social_order_000000317.pdf

and also by Stephen Zerlanga explain the way money printing by private banks alters everything in a society, the  character of a state, the trajectory of the economy, of history, of geopolitics.

https://library.uniteddiversity.coop/Money_and_Economics/Lost_Science_of_Money.pdf

When a central bank allows the private bankers to print money out thin air  and charge interest for it, as happened in 1666 in Britain with the Act of Coinage, then it also alters the essential purpose of the State.

The purpose of the State no longer becomes the protection of life and prosperity of the people. Its purpose becomes to enforce the extraction and the expropriate of as much money from the people as possible by the bankers and Billionaires who have gained control of the issurance of money and can charge interest for nothing as part of a gigantic fraud.

Law is replaced by lies. Solidarity by predatory manipulation.

The inevitable result of this system of expropriation is that an economy collapses. All the value produced by the productive class is transferred to the robber baron class as interest on money printed out of thin air.

The robber barons know better than anyone that economic ruin, inflation, deflation, debt and interest are the result of their macro fraud. 

They know ultimately they need  armed gangs to protect them.

The UK police themselves have been turned into an armed gang protecting the mafia at the heart of the government, with Constables sweaing an oath to the monarch rather than to the rule of law.

The Courts have been turned into instruments of lawless by the mafia masquarading as a royal family.

The fact that ths mafia have lost controal of the instruments they rely on to carry on their criminal activity with impunity for the first time since 1666 is hopeful.

And the arrest of Andrew shows the mafia have lost control of the instruments they need to remain above the law.

Mass arrests of this criminal gang could pave the way for radical reform of the money system, poliical system and save the UK as it risks being destroyed by inflation, deflation, interest, debt, poverty caused by cost of letting private bankers control money.

When the essential purpose of the State is altered, then the character of the people leading the state has to be altered.

The character required is no longer that of the honest upholder of the law, ethics, the creative entrepreneur and businessman or the courageous and energetic thinker.  The character required is that of the robber baron, the mafia boss, the secretive, manipulative human wolf,  who is ready to take everything from their victims. That is the character to be found among Satanists and child rapists, violent thugs, the dim witted.

To insulate themselves from  their impoverished victims, that is, the entire country they rule, this clique  have created a sphere of equally corrupt people, includng, it seems, in the court circles, in the royal police squad, in the secret services, and freemasons, who protect their crime bosses  from the consequences of their private  actions by corrupting and or intimidating the police, parliament, media.

Jeff Epstein lays out the method of deception in emails adivising JP Morgan how to take over China. He advises the banksters to do everything to hide their true intention to loot China, appear to be biggest supporters of CCP and completely aligned with their interests to gain trust and access. 

Parallel, they are to set up ways of funnelling money to whoever is identified as especially susceptible to corruption through their love of luxury among the CCP and their families.

These corrupt networks are then set to work for them inside the Chinese government structures.

MP Christopher Hollis describes the same method in his book about the history of money. He talks  about the way the private bankster camouflage themselves as the elite, the patriot,  to disguise their fundamental difference from the people they rule  over.

"The individual gentleman would .. . be unwilling to ' do anything that would let down the school,' or the regiment, or what not. But, if you could trick the whole school into connivance at injustice, then, on the gentleman's code, it would become disloyalty to question the conduct of the school. So Shylock exchanged the Jewish gaberdine for the Old School Tie and was elected with acclamation to the governing body" (The Two Nations, p. 50).

So, we find Nat Rothschild, Pr William going to Eton, but while the pair are ever  so chummy with their contemporaries, playing rugger, drinking pints,  they are also scheming in secret to do things like give them toxic covid shots, loot them of their last penny, their property, remove their rights.

Nat Rothschild at Oxford University  helped run the Bullingdon Club, which seems to be a place to groom people to work for him in position of power and government like David Cameron, Boris Johson, George Osborne. His pal Mandelson worked with Tony Blair also to get Andrew elected trade envoy.

This clique  build secret networks of corruption, grooming people who can be inserted into government structures to change policies so that they become richer at the expense of every one else.

Epstein s network was just  a huge network of corrupt people who the Rothschuld control and it included Andrew, Mandelson, Blair. 

Policies are tailored to suit the private banksters.

The expansion of the military becomes paramount because when the locals are drained of all their cash, then the robber band has to go abraod to find new victims to shake down.

Hence British Colonialism, the East India Company, gunboard diplomacy, globalism, the US led hegemony.

Parallel, the impoversihed domestic population, in as far as it cannot fulfil useful functions in the military, colonial service, has to be kept under tight control. 

On no account can the people find out where all their money has gone, what the true cause of inflation, deflation, depression, recession, poverty, debt, interest and taxes are. And if any one of the people do, they must be punished,  intimidated and even eliminated if necessary on mass. Hence, we find mass extermination, entire classes and groups of people exterminated, with chilling frequency in the past 3 centuries.

We also find the development of the totalitarian surveillance society of Orwells 1984, propaganda and an education system designed to destroy critical thinking and the emphasis on forever wars, divide and rule  and "two minutes hate", devaluing life, slavery, torture, mass death etc

This model has been extremely profitable for the banksters and Winsors for 350 years.

It culiminated in covid.

 It was the Rothschilds ntroduced Andrew to Jeff Epstein as part of subordinating him to their control.Once under their control, they inserted Andrew as trad envoy using the influence of Peter Mandelson and Tony Blair

But now there has been a geopolitical development in addition to the covid crisis.

These developments linked to the rise of the social media and spread of information.

 China has come to the top of the global power structure with a model which is in direct competiton with it. Its  model of state central bank providing free money to spur private business has been extremely successful.The purpose of the  Chinese state is to make its people prosperous, secure and free in an economic sense. The Chinese economy has grown ten times since 2007

The wealth is spread around. 800 million people have been lifted out of poverty.  The state is encouraging children to be born, albeit its new policies have still not been enough to encourage a baby boom. Life expectancy has risen. China did not give its people the covid mRNA jabs.

 It is trying to increase domestic consumption and succeeding by and large. 

It invests in education and research.

It is now well in advance of the West.

I do not believe the Chinese want any war with the West or anyone. But we can see from the Epstein files, the private bankers want the wealth of China by hook or by crook. They discussed removing Xi in 2019 if he is an obstacle to plans to loot China. The trade war, tariff war, Hong Kong colour revoltion are all attempts by the private banksters to topple Xi and the CCP and take over China.

The CCP which knows everything just from the Greek prosecutor probes, knows it is the target.

They have armed themselve to the teeth, created a vast spy agency of more than a half a million people, as self defence.

It is going to buy up the UK eventually if it does not destroy it with its new weapons (hypersonic etc)

The future of the Brits depends on whether they can remove the banksters and their political arm, the Windsors, change their central bank and money system so it serves the people again.

The Bank of England was taken over by the private bankster in 1666 during chaotic events. (false flags?) A key figure was the mistress of King Charles 2nd who was given a cut of the coinage minted by the bank and who had an incentive to push the Act of Coinage in 1666.

Barbaria Villiers was the Ghislaine Maxwell of the 17th century and Charles 2nd, the Prince Andrew.

Great Plague and Great Fire

In 1665, the Great Plague of London began, peaking in September with up to 7,000 deaths per week.[38] Charles, his family, and the court fled London in July to Salisbury; Parliament met in Oxford.[39] Plague cases ebbed over the winter, and Charles returned to London in February 1666.[40]

After a long spell of hot and dry weather through mid-1666, the Great Fire of London started on 2 September 1666 in Pudding Lane. Fanned by strong winds and fed by wood and fuel stockpiled for winter, the fire destroyed about 13,200 houses and 87 churches, including St Paul's Cathedral.[41] Charles and his brother James joined and directed the firefighting effort. The public blamed Catholic conspirators for the fire.[42]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_II_of_England

From AI

The Coin Act of 1666 (18 & 19 Car. II c. 5), also known as the "Act for Encouragement of Coinage," benefited private bankers—specifically goldsmith-bankers—by establishing free and open coinage at the Royal Mint. This meant the government abolished charges (seigniorage) for turning precious metal into coins, allowing bankers to convert gold and silver into legal tender at no cost. 

Here is how the Act benefited private bankers:

Elimination of Minting Costs: By removing seigniorage, the Act allowed bankers to bring bullion to the Mint and receive the same weight back in coin without paying fees. This made the conversion of bullion into currency, and thus liquidity, free for them.

Increased Liquidity and Profitability: Bankers could take gold or silver (often held on deposit for clients) to the mint, have it coined for free, and then lend out the newly minted, recognized money at interest.

"Free Coinage" for Foreign Exchange: The Act encouraged bringing in foreign coins or bullion for conversion, facilitating the expansion of money supply for bankers.

Protection of Assets: The Act stipulated that gold or silver brought to the Mint was "freed from attachments," meaning it was protected from seizure while being processed.

Legal Standing for Paper Receipts: The Act mandated that the Mint Master provide bills (receipts) to those bringing bullion, which helped formalize the paper instruments and notes of hand that bankers used as currency. 

More about the Ghislaine Maxwell of the 17th century, Babara Villiers here


Barbara Villiers; or, A History of Monetary Crimes (1899) by Alexander Del Mar is a historical analysis framing the financial shifts of the 17th-century English Restoration, including actions by Charles II's mistress Barbara Villiers, as deliberate, corrupt schemes to manipulate currency. It posits that she and the East India Company manipulated coin supplies. 

Key Aspects of the Work:

Context: The book, written by a 19th-century economist, treats monetary law alterations as "crimes against mankind".

Barbara Villiers' Role: Del Mar alleges that in the late 17th century, Villiers was involved in schemes that altered the coinage and monetary laws of the state, specifically relating to the export of precious metals.

The "Crime of 1666": This refers to the Free Coinage Act, which Del Mar argued removed the government's control over money, handing it to private interests.

Broader Scope: The text covers the Coining Mill, the East India Company, and accusations of bribery and corruption that undermined the value of money. 


https://www.heritage-history.com/index.php?c=read&author=delmar&book=barbara&story=crime1666


I. The Crime of 1666

From the remotest time to the seventeenth century of our era, the right to coin money and to regulate its value (by giving it denominations) and by limiting or increasing the quantity of it in circulation, was the exclusive prerogative of the State. In 1604, in the celebrated case of the Mixed Moneys, this prerogative was affirmed under such extraordinary circumstances and with such an overwhelming array of judicial and forensic authority as to occasion alarm to the moneyed classes of England, who at once sought the means to overthrow it. These they found in the demands of the East India Company, the corruption of Parliament, the profligacy of Charles II., and the influence of Barbara Villiers. The result was the surreptitious mint legislation of 1666-7: and thus a prerogative, which, next to the right of peace or war, is the most powerful instrument by which a State can influence the happiness of its subjects, was surrendered or sold for a song to a class of usurers, in whose hands it has remained ever since. In framing the American mint-laws of 1790-2, Mr. Hamilton, a young man (then 33 years of age), and wholly unaware of the character or bearings of this English legislation, innocently copied it and caused it to be incorporated in the laws of the United States, where it still remains, an obstacle to the equitable distribution of wealth and a menace to public prosperity.


From wikipedia

From that year dates a new order of men in England. The Estates formerly consisted of the Crown, the Church, the Lords and the Commons. To these were now added the financiers, or Billoneurs, who have since almost entirely swallowed the others. Originally the financiers consisted of 215 monopolists under the title of the East India Company: they now comprise the entire world of moneychangers and bankers. This cosmopolitan band threatens the peace of mankind.


 In 1660, Barbara became the King's mistress, and on 20 August 1660 was awarded two pennies seigniorage on every Troy pound of silver minted into coins.[9][10] 


She influenced the King in her position as royal mistress and helped herself to money from the Privy Purse as well as taking bribes from the Spanish and the French, in addition to her sizable allowance from the King.


She also participated in politics, combining with the future Cabal ministry to bring about Lord Clarendon's downfall. On his dismissal in August 1667, Lady Castlemaine publicly mocked him; Clarendon gently reminded her that if she lived, one day she too would be old. There are also accounts of exceptional kindness from Lady Castlemaine; once, after a scaffold had fallen onto a crowd of people at the theatre, she rushed to assist an injured child, the only court lady to do so.[17] Others described her as great fun, keeping a good table and with a heart to match her famous temper. +1



No comments:

Post a Comment