CHARLES ACCUSED OF BEING AT THE HEART OF THE COVER UP OF ANDREW S LINKS TO EPSTEIN, TREATING THE BRITISH PUBLIC AS IDIOTS

BRITISH PUBLIC HAS SEEN THE WAY CHARLES HAS GONE TO GREAT LENGTHS TO INCLUDE HIM IN ROYAL EVENTS DESPITE KNOWING ABOUT HIS EPSTEIN LINKS

TOM SYKES SUGGESTS CHARLES PROJECTS ONTO THE BRITISH PUBLIC AN  IDIOCY, APPARANTLY  AS PART OF THE ARROGANCE OF THE EPSTEIN CIRCLE WHO FETE THEMSELVES AS THE SUPER RACE  IN THE EPSTEIN FILES

CHARLES MISTAKES THE SERVILE ROYAL PRESS CORPS THREATENED WITH BEING CUT OFF FROM ACCESS FOR THE ATTITUDE OF THE PUBLIC ITSELF

From media

According to expert Tom Sykes, after it was revealed that King Charles III reportedly paid to help silence Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor's accuser, Virginia Giuffre, The Firm will have to stop blaming Queen Elizabeth II for trying to keep the former Duke of York in the royal fold. "You do not sign off on a package like that as a bystander. You do it because you are making a hard political calculation about what is in the interests of the Crown. Charles wasn't dragged into this against his will; he was at the heart of the cover-up," the journalist wrote for his The RoyalistSubstack.

...

Tom Sykes emphasized that, despite rumors of Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor's ties to Jeffrey Epstein being floated since 2019, King Charles III continued to allow his younger brother to appear in public with the family. "Charles' camp blaming the late monarch's [Queen Elizabeth II] indulgence of her second son for the scandal now engulfing the House of Windsor is a disgraceful slur on her legacy," he wrote. "Yes, the Queen did allow Andrew to walk her into that memorial, but that was, to be fair, a one-off. Despite her adoration of her favorite son, she otherwise excised him completely from public life. Charles, by contrast, from the moment he became king, starting with his mother's funeral, consistently went to great lengths to ostentatiously include Andrew in the tableau. The most obvious example is Christmas. The last Christmas of Elizabeth's reign, at Sandringham, did Andrew walk to church with the rest of the family in full view of the cameras? No, he did not. He was kept out of that most symbolic of royal photo opportunities. The very first Christmas of Charles's reign, by contrast, Andrew was there, striding to church with the rest of them at Sandringham, very clearly back in the fold. That was a deliberate choice, a piece of choreography that told the world: he's one of us again."

....

Due to King Charles III's reported protection of Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor, the monarchy could be irreparably tarnished. "The British public have regularly been treated like idiots by Charles' office during this long-running debacle, expected to swallow whatever line the palace chooses to feed the royal rota [list] that day," Tom Sykes said. "Too much of the British press, terrified of losing access to the king, simply types up the spin and puts it on the front page. But people can see what is going on because they have eyes."

https://www.aol.com/articles/charles-heart-andrew-scandal-cover-172327340.html?