Any person who wants to examine the objective evidence, use their logic and reason, must now conclude the Shroud of Turin is authentic and by extension Christ rose from the dead and is divine and the Son of God.
Dr John Campbell and Dr Richard Sorenson give a great overview of the evidence for and against from the point of view of sceptics.
They conclude, as any logical person must, the amazing impint on the Shroud must have been caused by a burst of radiation 2000 years ago, and there is no explanation for it (other than the Resurrection)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-GH8Hag5dUw
Whether someone wants to believes or no longer the issue
That Jesus Christ is real and true, was crucified and rose from the dead now has the status of the scientific fact.
Myself, a Christian, I did not believe the Shroud was authentic. But I was convinced by the evidence laid out so clearly.
Whether we are Christians or not, any logical, reasonable person who studies the evidence is now obliged to believe that Jesus Christ was real, was Crucified just as described in the Gospels and rose from the dead, just as described in the Gospels, showing his divinity, he was and is the Son of God.
Why might Jesus Christ have decided now was the time to appeal to logic and reason to make his claim as King of our hearts and minds?
No comments:
Post a Comment