During a historic rally Sunday at Madison Square Garden, president Trump urged that Kamala Harris is purely “a vessel” and in reality the MAGA movement is fighting against “something far more powerful.”
Trump told the crowd, “We are not just running against Kamala — She means nothing. She is purely a vessel — We are running against something far bigger than Joe or Kamala and more powerful than them, which is a massive, vicious, crooked, radical left machine that runs today’s Democrat Party.”
https://www.zerohedge.com/political/trump-kamala-just-vessel-we-are-running-against-something-far-more-powerful
That powerful oligarchy running the USA includes oligrachs like Jeff Bezos, owner of the WaPo, who has now admitted its relentless propaganda and lies hav discredited the newspaper in the eyes of the American public.
There has a global awakening fuelled by the covid jab crisis. People have seen with their own eyes that the jab which was supposed to be safe and effective has kileld or made sick loved ones. The elite have also been targetted. At least one top prosecutor in the Supreme Court in Greece died after receving the AZ covid jab.
Bezos claimed only indepedent reporters can restore credibility. But where is the room for independent voices in the media when the oligarchs who fund them are facing prosecution for their covid jab lies and crimes?
Trump also said he was not a Nazi and "the opposite of a Nazi".
He can show this by obeying the rule of law and the Constitution and prosecuting the "enemy within" using the rule of law.
John F Kenndly gave an historic address on the role of the press in keeping secret the monolithic and ruthless conspiracy of the Wall Street and Globalsits in 1961.
Dwight D. Eisenhower also delivered in a television broadcast that same year, in 1961, warning of the military industrial complex and the scientific, technological elite to America s prosperity and freedom.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eisenhower%27s_farewell_address
In an Op Ed at The Washington Post, Jeff Bezos has given an honest appraisal of how discredited the media has become through its lies.
The hard truth: Americans don’t trust the news media
The credibility gap can be bridged by independence.
In the annual public surveys about trust and reputation, journalists and the media have regularly fallen near the very bottom, often just above Congress. But in this year’s Gallup poll, we have managed to fall below Congress. Our profession is now the least trusted of all. Something we are doing is clearly not working.
Let me give an analogy. Voting machines must meet two requirements. They must count the vote accurately, and people must believe they count the vote accurately. The second requirement is distinct from and just as important as the first.
Likewise with newspapers. We must be accurate, and we must be believed to be accurate. It’s a bitter pill to swallow, but we are failing on the second requirement. Most people believe the media is biased. Anyone who doesn’t see this is paying scant attention to reality, and those who fight reality lose. Reality is an undefeated champion. It would be easy to blame others for our long and continuing fall in credibility (and, therefore, decline in impact), but a victim mentality will not help. Complaining is not a strategy. We must work harder to control what we can control to increase our credibility.
https://www.zerohedge.com/political/colossal-mass-exodus-over-200000-wapo-subscriber-cancellations-after-bezos-blocks-harris
The media like the WaPo has central pillar of the the financial oligarchy s power. The US media enabled the fascist coup over America which was the covid scheme with its lockdowns, costing trillions to the ordinary Americans, but boosting the profts of Bezos Amazon, fascist censorship, the abolition of fundamental rights, including the right to move freely and especially the right refuse an experimental injection and prosecute the manufacturers for any harms,.
When Jeff Bezos, owner of the WaPo and Amazon, admits the newspaper is read by very few and believed by even fewer, and that the elite it serves has lost contact with reality because the lies and propaganda which the WaPo puts out encourages the elite to live in a fantasy world, then it is a milestone moment in the demise of the WEF elite in the USA.
The next step should be to sue the Bezos and the media owners and editors for their role in the false and deceptive marketing of the covid jab.
Included in the circle of secretly controlled media should be the alt right circle of Alex Jones, Steve Bannon, Reiner Fuellmich, David Martin, Del Bigtree, Ryan Cole, Philipp Kruse and Steve Kirsch. Realizing the American public would look for other sources, the Oligarchy appear to have set up their next line of controlled media on the internet. But that circle is also now exposed.
The reason why Bill Gates thought he would get away with his crimes is almost certaily because he pays these people or has connections with them. Who gained,a fter all, from German lawyer Reiner Fuellmich and his partner Robert Cibis setting up a multi million dollar operation to grap the attention of the German public during covid, raise funds for legal actions only for Fuellmich to divert the funds to his personal use.
The fact he started diverting funds totalling 1 million almost from the beginning shows Fuellmich never thought he would be held to account. How come? Look how far seven plaintiffs in the Netherlands have come with a civil lawsuit and look at the gold standard proofs of the Greek prosecutor probes, which any lawyer can use to prove a criminal conspiracy. The most likely hypothesis is they are bought lock, stock and barrel to fulfill the role of Mr Charrington in 1984 and monitor and register the opposition. That is also increasingly recognized, leaving Gates, Soros and the WEF elite with little or no media influence on the public in 2024 as the legal action starts.
"The President and the Press" Before the American Newspaper Publishers Association, New York City
April 27, 1961
Mr. Chairman, ladies and gentlemen:
https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/address-the-president-and-the-press-before-the-american-newspaper-publishers-association
The merger of the media, and a large part of the internet with controlled puppets posing as opposition, with this monolithic and ruthless conspiracacy has
This deadly challenge imposes upon our society two requirements of direct concern both to the press and to the President--two requirements that may seem almost contradictory in tone, but which must be reconciled and fulfilled if we are to meet this national peril. I refer, first, to the need for far greater public information; and, second, to the need for far greater official secrecy.
I.
The very word "secrecy" is repugnant in a free and open society; and we are as a people inherently and historically opposed to secret societies, to secret oaths and to secret proceedings. We decided long ago that the dangers of excessive and unwarranted concealment of pertinent facts far outweighed the dangers which are cited to justify it. Even today, there is little value in opposing the threat of a closed society by imitating its arbitrary restrictions. Even today, there is little value in insuring the survival of our nation if our traditions do not survive with it. And there is very grave danger that an announced need for increased security will be seized upon by those anxious to expand its meaning to the very limits of official censorship and concealment. That I do not intend to permit to the extent that it is in my control. And no official of my Administration, whether his rank is high or low, civilian or military, should interpret my words here tonight as an excuse to censor the news, to stifle dissent, to cover up our mistakes or to withhold from the press and the public the facts they deserve to know.
But I do ask every publisher, every editor, and every newsman in the nation to reexamine his own standards, and to recognize the nature of our country's peril. In time of war, the government and the press have customarily joined in an effort, based largely on self-discipline, to prevent unauthorized disclosures to the enemy. In time of "clear and present danger," the courts have held that even the privileged rights of the First Amendment must yield to the public's need for national security.
Today no war has been declared--and however fierce the struggle may be, it may never be declared in the traditional fashion. Our way of life is under attack. Those who make themselves our enemy are advancing around the globe. The survival of our friends is in danger. And yet no war has been declared, no borders have been crossed by marching troops, no missiles have been fired.
If the press is awaiting a declaration of war before it imposes the self-discipline of combat conditions, then I can only say that no war ever posed a greater threat to our security. If you are awaiting a finding of "clear and present danger," then I can only say that the danger has never been more clear and its presence has never been more imminent.
It requires a change in outlook, a change in tactics, a change in missions--by the government, by the people, by every businessman or labor leader, and by every newspaper. For we are opposed around the world by a monolithic and ruthless conspiracy that relies primarily on covert means for expanding its sphere of influence--on infiltration instead of invasion, on subversion instead of elections, on intimidation instead of free choice, on guerrillas by night instead of armies by day. It is a system which has conscripted vast human and material resources into the building of a tightly knit, highly efficient machine that combines military, diplomatic, intelligence, economic, scientific and political operations.
its preparations are concealed, not published. Its mistakes are buried, not headlined. Its dissenters are silenced, not praised. No expenditure is questioned, no rumor is printed, no secret is revealed. It conducts the Cold War, in short, with a war-time discipline no democracy would ever hope or wish to match.
Nevertheless, every democracy recognizes the necessary restraints of national security-and the question remains whether those restraints need to be more strictly observed if we are to oppose this kind of attack as well as outright invasion.
No comments:
Post a Comment