UK study of 1.7 million children shows heart damage only in the children who had the covid vaccines

UK STUDY ALSO CONFIRMS VACCINATED WERE MISLEADINGLY AND FALSELY CLASSIFIED AS UN VACCINATED TO HIDE THE DEATHS AND DAMAGE CAUSED AFTER THE JABS

https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.03.09.24304015v1

MY WARNINGS THE VACCINE STATUS DEFINITIONS HAD BEEN CHANGED  IN MAY, JUNE 2021 ON MY FOURTHEMPIRE BLOG SPOT SHOULD BE AVAILABLE TO THE PUBLIC BUT THEY ARE NOT DUE TO SYSTEMATIC CENSORSHIP BY GOOGLE AND CO

THE FACT ALL MY BLOGS EXCEPT THIS LAST ONE HAVE BEEN REMOVED, CENSORED IS PROOF ENOUGH  GOOGLE AND THE SOCIAL MEDIA GIANTS JOINED IN THE CRIMINAL COVID CENSORSHIP SCHEME OF GATES AND SOROS, BOURLA AND HARRIS

From the media 

The Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine provided children and teens in England with only about 14 to 15 weeks of protection against testing positive for the virus, according to a preprint study of over 1.7 million children ages 5 to 15 in the English National Healthcare System (NHS).

Researchers investigating the safety and effectiveness of Pfizer’s vaccine in fully vaccinated, partially vaccinated, and unvaccinated children and teens, also found cases of myocarditis and pericarditis only in vaccinated children.

“This study clearly shows that Pfizer’s COVID vaccine provides almost no benefit to children and adolescents, but does increase their risk of myocarditis and pericarditis,” said Brian Hooker, Ph.D., chief scientific officer of Children’s Health Defense. “It begs the question: Why does the CDC continue to recommend these unlicensed shots for kids? Where is the data they use to support their statement that the benefits of these vaccines outweigh the risks?”

The study found that vaccinated children required slightly fewer emergency room visits and hospital stays, but that those outcomes were extremely rare in children and teens across all groups.

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/kids-teens-pfizer-covid-vaccine-myopericarditis-only-vaxed-groups/

The finding that vaccinated children requried fewer emergency room visits is almost certainly due to the wrong and misleading classification of unvaccinated as anyone who took 2 jabs 

People were only counted as ‘vaccinated’ after two weeks post-second-Covid-shot, so those who died after their injections but before the two weeks were counted as non-vaccinated.

https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.03.09.24304015v1

I pointed this mistaken classification around May, June 2021 on my Google blogspot, fourthempire, which needs to be obtained as evidence in the trial of Larry Page and Google executives for the crime of censorship of vital public health warnings.

The actual views of my blog also have to be ascertained.

A study of the U.K. data has indicated systematic miscategorisations of vaccination status.

“At first glance the ONS data suggest that, in each of the older age groups, all-cause mortality is lower in the vaccinated than the unvaccinated. This conclusion is cast into doubt upon closer inspection of the data due to a range of fundamental inconsistencies and anomalies in the data. Whatever the explanations for these are, it is clear that the data is both unreliable and misleading,” the study said in the ‘Abstract’ section. “It has been suggested that the anomalies are the result of healthy vaccine selection bias and population differences. However, we show why the most likely explanations for the observed anomalies are a combination of systemic miscategorisation of deaths between the different categories of unvaccinated and vaccinated; delayed or non-reporting of vaccinations; systemic underestimation of the proportion of unvaccinated; and/or incorrect population selection for Covid deaths.”

“…the larger story is miscategorization bias. People who received Covid shots and then died were labelled as “unvaccinated.” THAT’S the story. And that’s why “unvaccinated” deaths spiked immediately after the vaccine rollout. That’s how they hid Covid vaccine deaths and kept the rollout going,” Dr. Toby Rogers said on X (formally Twitter).

Roger’s tweet referenced a Substack post from Thursday by ‘Where Are The Numbers’ by Norman Fenton and Martin Neil, professors who research the great pandemic of 2020 and, in their own words, “challenge the global Covid-19 narrative, exposing the use and abuse of statistics.”