Gregg Jarrett focuses on a vital fact in the conviction of Trump, namely, no one knows what he is convicted of.
A person cannot be convicted of a book keeping entry correctly classified as legal expenses, let alone 34 times.
The indictment specifies NO crime.
There can be NO penalty without a crime specified.
If Jarret could understand that no crime has been specified, just implied (because no crime could be substantiated), so could Blanche and Bove. Yet these two lawyers seem to keep focusing on the argument of presidential immunity, the weakest argument and an unnecessary argument instead of the massive violation of Trump s rights.
Trump should get smart and fire this pair of corrupt lawyers. At first, I thought they may have been incompetent. Now it is clear they are corrupt because Blanche and Bove never see their error.
Trump needs new lawyers to file his appeal focussing also on the 480 K paid to Merchan s family by the Harris campaign as the number 1 fact in the Appeal showing Merchan is bribed. How else to interpret it?
From media
Fox News legal analyst Gregg Jarrett said on "Fox & Friends" Monday that Judge Juan Merchan appears "desperate to stain" President-elect Trump with the label of "convicted felon" before the inauguration. Jarrett called out New York officials for focusing on Trump despite rampant crime in the blue state.
...
Alvin Bragg is a prime example. If you're Trump, a misdemeanor business records violation somehow becomes a phantom felony. And in the end, nobody actually knew what he was convicted of. And it wasn't a unanimous jury verdict. The best we can tell, nobody really knows. A bedrock violation.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/opinion/desperate-nyc-judge-torched-by-legal-analyst-over-trump-sentencing-this-has-backfired-spectacularly/ar-AA1x5Vej
No comments:
Post a Comment