Split 5 to 4, the Supreme Court rejected the bid of Trump to halt sentencing today, noting also that Trump can appeal.
In my opinion, this decision is a major failure of the Supreme Court to recognize and stop an act of illegal lawfare carried out against Trump precisely because he ran for the Presidency.
It cannot be separated from his presidential duties. He has been targetted for smear criminal charges by a corrupt circle of judges and prosecutors in order to put him in prison for political reasons as numerous legal experts and the public has recognized given the facts.
Did Trump s lawyer s present the right facts? Or did they again present irrelevant, weak arguments and ignore the core of the case to give the Supreme Court the opportunity to deny the request?
At the hearing, Trump should plead not guilty and vow to address the VIOLATIONS OF HIS RIGHTS AND THE CONFLICTS ON INTEREST IN AN APPEAL.
Again, the question must be asked if Trump s lawyers are mounting the right defence focussing on the Supreme Court ruling presidential immunity, the very thing which will put Biden, Obama in prison.
Why would his lawyers want to undermine this priceless ace in Trump s deck and not focus on the glaring infringement of his rights and the evidence of Merchan s bribery in their appeals?
Why were there no appeal to the original ruling?
Have any of his lawyers presented any of the facts of the 480 K donation to Merchans daughters in any case?
If they have and the Supreme Court still ruled against Trump, they would be violating their duties to stop conflicts of interest.
These facts have been falsely presented as disdain for the rule of law by Merchan who focuses on the social media. Where are these facts where they belong, nanemly, in the papers presented to the Supreme Court, Appeals?
Have any presented the Greek prosecutor probes, the gold card, showing a pattern of lawfare by Dem mega donor Soros?
The notion it is offensive to mention these things and will make a negative impression with the Supreme Cour tis absurd. It is not for Bove an Blanche to prejudge a verdict and exclude the vital exonerating evidence.
Trump NEEDS NEW competent lawyers who are presenting the best case for him and not Biden and Obama when he files the appeals and CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS.
The Presidential Immunity argument is the one he needs to put Biden, Harris and Obama in prison. On no account should he undermine that principle. Yet that is what his lawyers are trying to do.
From Zerohedge
The Supreme Court offered two reasons it said it refused to grant the application. “First, the alleged evidentiary violations at President-elect Trump’s state-court trial can be addressed in the ordinary course on appeal. Second, the burden that sentencing will impose on the President-Elect’s responsibilities is relatively insubstantial in light of the trial court’s stated intent to impose a sentence of ‘unconditional discharge’ after a brief virtual hearing,” a note on the Supreme Court’s docket read.
...
For the sake and sanctity of the Presidency, I will be appealing this case, and am confident that JUSTICE WILL PREVAIL,” Trump wrote.
Trump’s application for a stay was submitted on Jan. 8 and argued that “the prospect of imposing sentence on President Trump just before he assumes Office as the 47th President raises the specter of other possible restrictions on liberty, such as travel, reporting requirements, registration, probationary requirements, and others—all of which would be constitutionally intolerable under the doctrine of Presidential immunity.”
New York Supreme Court Justice Juan Merchan has indicated that he wouldn’t impose a punishment including incarceration. He denied Trump’s request to halt proceedings as did two state appeals courts this week.
Trump told the U.S. Supreme Court that Merchan had erroneously admitted certain evidence of his official acts as president and failed to acknowledge a form of immunity for presidents-elect. He asked the court to take up his case and consider those issues, as well as whether he was entitled to an automatic stay due to an appeal on presidential immunity.
https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/supreme-court-rejects-trumps-request-stop-sentencing-hush-money-case-after-justice-barrett
No comments:
Post a Comment