More developments in the biggest stories in decades in the globe as the Western elite, including Trump and Andrew, are exposed as ordinary sense rapists and paedophiles.
To undermine the credibility of the Epstein files, Trump may have sanctioned or intiated the release of sensationalist and fantastical claims about a rape, a well known disinformation tactic.
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/us/news/2025/12/23/epstein-files-latest-andrew-trump/
While sensationalist claims are among the files released, evidence that Trump did rape children may be being withheld.
The Telegraph warns against accepting claims without corroborating evidence.
However, the public look for factual evidence has fond vast swathes of the Epstein files redacted.
It is suspicious that a particular implausible claim was not redacted, in fact.
From media
The credibility issues do not end with the Trump rape claim itself.
In the same testimony, the speaker also discusses “John W Nichols”, a figure frequently cited in conspiracy theories surrounding the Clintons. They reference an alleged incident in which Hillary Clinton was seen “drunk”, and claim they were once set up for “the bombing in Oklahoma City” — an apparent confusion with the 1995 Unabomber attack.
After the Trump allegation, the speaker also refers to a murder supposedly covered up as a suicide, involving a Mexican drug cartel and Ghislaine Maxwell.
Without additional context, it is difficult to give these claims any more weight than that of an anonymous hoaxer wasting the authorities’ time. It also strains credulity that Mr Trump would have spoken so openly about alleged crimes in a setting where he could be overheard by a driver he did not know. The testimony further references attempts — apparently by the driver’s ex-partner — to extract money from Ghislaine Maxwell.
There is a danger for the president in material like this being released without filtering. It may generate headlines alleging he raped a woman alongside Epstein.
But there is also a danger for the media. Reporting such material as a serious allegation, without further corroboration, risks backfiring — handing ammunition to those who argue that the Epstein files are unreliable, and that their release muddies rather than clarifies the truth.
From media
US prosecutors wanted to interview Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor
US prosecutors wanted to interview Andrew Mountbatten Windsor under caution as part of its investigation into Jeffrey Epstein, newly-released files show.
The US Department of Justice invoked a legal treaty with Britain, asking for a “voluntary interview” with “Material Witness PA”.
They requested that it be videotaped and recorded in the presence of the FBI, the district attorney, and a detective from the New York Police Department.
It states: “US authorities seek to conduct an investigative interview of Prince Andrew.
“US authorities specifically request to conduct the questioning themselves in the presence of UK authorities to ensure that all necessary lines of inquiry are completed in the most efficient fashion.
“The specific subject matters of questioning are set forth in Attachment A.
“US authorities request that the interview be recorded using both video and audio recording equipment.
“US authorities further request that the witness be cautioned in the event of a voluntary interview that if he were to provide false information to authorities…he could be prosecuted for perverting the course of justice in the UK, and he may be prosecuted for making a false statement in the US.”
...
Mark Epstein has long suggested that his brother did not die by suicide but was murdered in prison.
He has hinted that Donald Trump and his administration may have been involved, without presenting evidence.
In the latest document release, an FBI agent reports that Mark Epstein submitted an online tip to the National Threat Operation Centre on the 22nd February 2023.
The deceased paedophile’s brother claimed by text: “I have reason to believe he [Epstein] was killed because he was about to name names. I believe Presient [sic] Trump authorized is [sic] murder.”
....
Mark Epstein has long suggested that his brother did not die by suicide but was murdered in prison.
He has hinted that Donald Trump and his administration may have been involved, without presenting evidence.
In the latest document release, an FBI agent reports that Mark Epstein submitted an online tip to the National Threat Operation Centre on the 22nd February 2023.
The deceased paedophile’s brother claimed by text: “I have reason to believe he [Epstein] was killed because he was about to name names. I believe Presient [sic] Trump authorized is [sic] murder.”
From media
Representative Ro Khanna, a California Democrat, said Monday that some Republicans are "on board" with potentially impeaching Attorney General Pam Bondi over the Department of Justice's (DOJ) failure to release all of its files related to the late financier and convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein by the congressionally mandated deadline.
Pointing out that Representative Thomas Massie, a Kentucky Republican, would be "leading" the effort if it moves forward, Khanna said during an interview with Morning Joe on MS Now that "there are a few Republicans who are on board with it." However, he noted that this would not be the first step to pressure Bondi and the DOJ, highlighting that they'd first move forward with pushing to hold her in contempt of Congress.
https://www.newsweek.com/republicans-pam-bondi-impeachment-ro-khanna-epstein-11255847
No comments:
Post a Comment