Wednesday, 12 February 2025

TAXATION WITHOUT REPRESENTATION! TRUMP SHOULD GO TO SUPREME COURT TO CONFIRM AN ELECTED GOV HAS MORE POWER THAN A TOTALITARIAN BUREAUCRACY OVER THE TAX PAYERS MONEY

 NO TAXATION WITHOUT REPRESENTATION WAS THE LOGIC OF THE PEOPLE SUPPORITNG THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION

THE ELECTED REPRESENTATIVES, TRUMP ADMIN, HAVE FULL CONTROL OF ALL THE TAX MONEY OF AMERICANS AND CAN ORDER PAUSES OF FUNDING ESPECIALLY GIVEN THE EVIDENCE OF 100S OF BILLIONS IF NOT TIRLLIONS OF WASTE

EVERY DAY 5 TO 10 BILLION COULD BE SPENT ON CORRUPT OR WASTEFUL ITEMS WITHOUT THE US TAX PAYER HAVING ANY SAY OVER HOW THEIR MONEY IS DISBURSED

100S OF BILLIONS, IF NOT TRILLIONS, MAY BE BEING SPENT ON CORRUPTION, WASTE, ENDANGERING THE FISCAL VIABILITY OF THE USA

WHETHER THE US IS A DEMOCRACY OR A TOTALITARIAN BUREAUCRACY DEPENDS ON WHETHER THE MACHINERY OF GOVERNMENT, THE BUREAUCRACY, IS SUBJECTED TO POLITICAL OVERSIGHT AND CONTROL

SAMANTHAN POWELLS NET WORTH HAS EXPLODED TO 30 MILLION DOLLARS WITH NO CLEAR REASON

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/doge-investigating-feds-whose-net-worths-have-exploded-after-samantha-power-bombshell

IF AMERICANS VOTE FOR TIGHTHER CONTROL OF SPENDING BUT THEY HAVE NO POWER TO IMPLEMENT THEIR POLITICAL WILL BECAUSE THE BUREAUCRACY IS MORE POWERFUL THAN THEY ARE AND THEIR ELECTED REPRESENTATIVES, THE USA IS  A LAWLESS, UNCONTROLLED  TOTALITAIN BUREACUCRACY  LIKE THE SOVIET UNION OR NAZI GERMANY



The difference between a democratic government and a totalitarian state like Nazi Germany or Stalin s Soviet Union is that elected governments determine the budget and have full control of all spending.

No taxation without representation was the rallying cry of the American revolution.

It cannot be that American tax payers who voted overwhelmingly for Trump s plan to cut waste and the budget have no say after Trump is elected.

It cannot be that an unelected and unaccountable bureaucracy can determine where the tax payer money goes with NO oversight, no accountability before the elected President.

Nor can an unelected and unnacountable bureacuy determine what webpages to put on its webiste. What a US agency puts on its website must reflect the policies that the elected representatives want and not what they want.

It is not surprising that judges who have shown immense political bias in the lawfare against Trump should now be feigning that it is legal for bureaucrats to determine on their own and with no oversight where trillions of dollars go despite massive evidence of corruption justifying a pause on spending.

We are talking about 100s of billions of dollars already found to be going to instransparent people or to media, NGOS without any knowledge or consent by the American people. Yes, we may be talking about trillions of waste.

USAID funded covid virus research! How can such an agency be allowed to continue spending without oversight?

Samanthan Powell s net worth has soared to 30 million despite a salary of  less than 250,000 USD

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/doge-investigating-feds-whose-net-worths-have-exploded-after-samantha-power-bombshell

How to explain that? Well, if she can give herself 30 million from the USAID s budget with no oversight, then we can explain that.

Judges cannot protect rampant criminality and a gross violation of the rights of Americans, their elected representatives and the Constitution and rule this can continue lawfully.

There are even reports of conflicts of interest with members of judges families potentially getting huge sums through the wasteful programs.

https://www.infowars.com/posts/corruption-bombshell-federal-judge-who-blocked-trump-admins-doge-from-freezing-billions-of-dollars-being-paid-to-fraudsters-has-daughter-whos-a-high-level-department-of-education-official

Every day the spending on that scale continues creates a financial harm to the USA justifying an immediate pause especially given the huge deficit.

If 1 billion a day is wasted through corruption, or even 10 billion, it is an unacceptable harm to US tax payers.

Trump s team should go to the Supreme Court and argue there is no taxation without representation.

The US Constotution expressly forbids the creation of a totalitarian bureaucracy which acts independently of the political representatives.

If the Supreme Court does not rule against the agencies, then it opens the floodgates to a totalirarian state.

If officials can do whatever they ant with no regard for the law or the voters, then the door is opened to mass arrests, gulags, total lawlessness instigated by bureaucrats.

The rule of law, the Constitution and the power o fthe people must be reaffirmed as the paramount authority over spending and the budget and how tax payers money is spent.

This is especially true for the Trump admin which campaigned on a pledge to cut waste and won a huge mandate for that policy.

From media

The Justice Department had previously asked the appeals court to let it implement sweeping pauses on federal grants and loans, calling the lower court order to keep promised money flowing “intolerable judicial overreach.”


https://apnews.com/article/trump-spending-freeze-judge-federal-grants-loans-df756135aa9015457b6d14d59435cb89


A federal judge on Tuesday ordered U.S. health agencies such as the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to restore data and webpages that were taken down in recent days to comply with a Trump administration order on gender ideology and diversity rules.


...

Pages that were removed in recent days to comply with Trump administration orders include ones for Health Disparities Among LQBTQ Youth, Interim Clinical Considerations for Use of Vaccine for Mpox Prevention, Fast Facts: HIV and Transgender People, HIV data pages, the page for the U.S. global HIV program called PEPFAR, and others.


https://www.zerohedge.com/political/empire-strikes-back-judge-orders-cdc-fda-and-other-agencies-restore-woke-webpages

WASHINGTON (AP) — A federal appeals court on Tuesday rejected a Trump administration push to reinstate a sweeping pause on federal funding, a decision that comes after a judge found the administration had not fully obeyed an earlier order.


The Boston-based 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals turned back the emergency appeal, the latest in a string of court losses that is increasingly frustrating top administration officials as it slows President Donald Trump’s wide-ranging agenda.


The appeals court also said it expected the lower court judge to clarify his original order. The Trump administration quickly pushed to withhold Federal Emergency Management Agency money sent to New York City to house migrants, saying it had “significant concerns” about the spending under a program appropriated by Congress.



No comments:

Post a Comment