TRUMP S NEW LAWYER JOHN SAUER PRESENTS A PROPER APPEALS CASE TO THE NEW YORK CIVIL CASE FRAUD UNLIKE BLANCHE AND BOVE WHO DID NOT EVEN FILE APPEALS
A RANDOM, POSSIBLY CONFLICTED AND BIASED EVALUATION OF TRUMP S ASSETS SEEMS TO HAVE BEEN USED TO CLAIM HIS ORIGINAL VALUATION WAS WRONG AND INTENTIONALLY SO
THE FACT HIS VALUATIONS PRODUCED THE RETURNS TRUMP SAID THEY WOULD STRONGLY SUGGESTS THE VALUATIONS WERE ACTUALLY CORRECT
SAME NY AG S OFFICE INVOLVED IN THE HUSH MONEY ILLEGAL LAWFARE IS BEHIND THE CIVIL FRAUD LAWFARE USING SIMILAR METHODS
UP TO THE TRUMP FAMILY TO BE VIGILANT AND CHECK EVERYTHING, LEARN EVERYTHING THEY CAN ABOUT THE LAW TO OVERSEE THEIR OWN CASES
A LAWYER CAN START OFF HONEST AND END UP BEING BRIBED, BLACKMAILED OR THREATENED
We have to hope the Appeals court in NY overturns the 489 million fine for Trump in the civil case in because if Trump can be convicted of fraud when no harm to any party is shown or alleged, then every American can be convicted of fraud. or a similar crime.
The line between a police state and the rule of law is drawn at that place where there is harm to others, public interest.
There has to be a precise and narrow interpretation of the laws, cystallizing first and foremost the harm, the crime, the damage alleged to have been committed. When the crime is identified, the evidence and witnesses can be marshalled and collected for a trial to see if a crime has been committed or not.
https://www.zerohedge.com/political/appeals-court-seems-skeptical-new-york-civil-fraud-suit-against-trump
Trump s illegal warfare turns this due process unpside down.
No cimes or harms are alleged. No harm to the public, no public interest is shown as Trump s new lawyer John Sauer made it clear.
Instead, random transactions are fallaciously used to proof some arbitrary hypotheisis or claim when the random transaction do not support the claim.
Valuations of assets are called into question apparantly on some arbitrary basis, using some flawed assessment and or some random method.
It has not even been shown that Trump did misstate the value of his assets. These assets did, after all, generate the value Trump claimed they would. The clients got the money promised to them. This fact strongly suggests Trump did value his assets correctly and the claim he did not is based on some kind of fallacious method.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/alisondurkee/2024/09/26/appeals-court-questions-trumps-troubling-450-million-fine-in-civil-fraud-case/
Offering a return for an investment and paying the return is ordinary day to day business. Trump did this. How can this be punishable as fraud and gain such a hefty fine?
The fine of 486 million dollars is absurdly disporportionate.
If some fine is justified, it might be about 486,000 dollars. And maybe it should be imposed on AG James for wasting tax payers money!!!
The gigantic fine represents a serious harm to Trump s business...and to also to his political campaign to become president.
But that seems to be the objective of this illegal lawfare coming from the NY AG s office. The goal seems to be to damage Trump s reputation as a business man and destroy his financial basis for campaigning to be president.
What are the logical fallacies involved in this particular illegal lawfare?
Well, there seem to be several overlapping logical fallacies to justify a confused, muddled and illegal mess resulting in huge headlines and fines.
There seems to be some kind intensional fallacy alleging some sort of neubulous intention to commit fraud on the part of Trump which never manifested in actual fraud or any actual complaint or loss to anyone.
But people are not punished for their intention to commit crimes or harms
They are pinished for actual crimes or harms under the rule of law.
There seems to be some kind of red herring fallacy whereby the transactions paired with complicated arguments and an overly broad interpretation of rule 63 12 as well as a huge fine divert from the fact there is no underlying crime or offense and so no basis for the legal action at all.
There seems to be a hasty generalization whereby claims that certain valuations show fraud are not supported by the facts but the claims are left to stand as if they were supported by the totality of facts.
There seems to be some kind of false or incomplete evaluation of Trump s assets possibly by conflicted parties
These valuations are accepted as the true evaluation. This for apparantly no particular objective reason, showing bias by the AG s office.
The civil case fraud case against Trump is illegal warfare against a political opponent similar to the hush money case.
It is part of a worrying trend by the NY AG s office to turn the USA into some kind of police state whereby politicized judges misuse their office to eliminate political opponents.
AG James should withdraw the civil fraud suit of her own free will.
She should accept she misused her powers to prosecute transactions which caused no harm and so are not strictly an offence at all.
What is at stake is not Tump, but the rule of law and the Constitution.
Everyone in the USA will suffer if the rule of law is replaced by a illegal lawfare whereby crimes are created out of thin air untethered to any harms and used to prosecute political opponents selectively and penalize them for conducting their every day business using bank or tax or other transactions without causing any harm to anyone.
AG James would like to find herself being charged by a Trump attorney for fraud for ordinary bank transactions one day. Yet, if she continues to destroy the rule of law, she may find herself the subject of illegal lawfare very soon.
We have to hope Trump does not go down this path and builds a case to prosecute James and NY AGs using the rule of law.
No comments:
Post a Comment