Wednesday 11 September 2024

Harris exposed herself to defeat by focussing on personal attacks but Trump failed to deliver the final blow He needs better advisors and preparation

TRUMP NEEDS TO FOCUS ON THE BIG PICTURE AND THE FACTS

REFRAME KAMALA S PERSONAL ATTACKS AS SIGNS OF HER WEAKNESS 

OPPORTUNITIES TO SHOW WIT, HUMOUR, DESTROY KAMALA WENT UNUSED BY TRUMP

WHOEVER PREPARED TRUMP FOR THE DEBATE, FAILED TO PRACTISE THE WITTY RIPOSTE TO THE FORESEEABLE PERSONAL ATTACKS AND FAILED TO TELL HIM TO STICK TO THE FACTS AND FAILED TO INSIST HE MENTION THE GREEK PROSECUTOR PROBES, THE SURE FIRE WAY TO  END THE CAMPAIGN OF KAMALA AND HER MEGAL DONORS SOROS, GATES AND BUFFET

IT MAY ALSO MEAN PRISON FOR JARED  KUSHER BUT BETTER KUSHNER GOES TO PRISON THAN TRUMP 

DOES MELANIA HAVE TO STAND IN FOR TRUMP AT THE NEXT DEBATE OR PUT OUT MORE VIDEO

THE TRUMP FAMILY NEED TO SHOW THEIR BRAINS


Facing the predicted personal attacks of a confused and desperate Kamaa, Trump should have shown humour, wit and got back to the facts and policies.

The Telegraph writes

"Kamala Harris was not an especially clear communicator on Tuesday night, and spent little time on the debate stage talking about her major policy commitments.

But she did accomplish something that Donald Trump’s opponents have tried to achieve since he first ran for office in 2016: she made him look ridiculous.

Twenty minutes into the debate, she launched an attack line tailor-made to wind him up.

“I’m going to actually do something really unusual, and I’m going to invite you to attend one of Donald Trump’s rallies, because it’s a really interesting thing to watch,” she saiid.

You will see during the course of his rallies, he talks about fictional characters like Hannibal Lecter. He will talk about ‘windmills cause cancer’.

“And what you will also notice is that people start leaving his rallies early out of exhaustion and boredom.”

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/us/politics/2024/09/11/who-won-the-trump-harris-presidential-debate/

At that point, Trump should have smiled and said  something like "please do accept the invtitation, dear Democrats out there, Come to one of my rallies and see for yourself if Kamala is describing one of my rallies or one of her own. Because my rallies are about policies that affect you, the public, something kamala never discusses because her record is so bad. Remember how I was nearly shot when I turned to point to a graph, to facts."

Or "Yeah, I agree Kamla, my rallies are more interesting to watch because I talk about the policies that matter to people."

Or "Now we are onto the subject of Hannibal Lecter, Kamala...didn t he wear a suit a bit like mine?"

Or "I don t talk about windmills causing cancer as much as I talk about the Harris administration causing inflation."

Or "I won t reply to personal attacks. People want to hear about our policies. I get why Kamala s record is so poor that she prefers to attack my rallies but the public can tell the difference between personal attacks and substance."

Or "Leaving because they are exhausted and bored? I guess that s how I feel a bit now Kamala listening to your personal attacks and caricatures of my rally."

Or "There you are, America! That s what Kamala thinks of your intelligence. You, the public, come to my rallies because you are so zombie like and witless that you cannot tell the difference between fact and fiction. Well, I tell you this, Kamala, you can insult me but not the American public. They don t come to my rallies to hear about fictional characters but about the facts showing your catastrophic record and to hear how I intend to fix it."

Or a thousand other ironical, humorous things because what she said was ridiculous. Trump had a golden opportunity to show her up.

The Telegraph writes 

Later, she dug in the knife again. “I have travelled the world as vice president of the United States and world leaders are laughing at Donald Trump,” she said.

To which, Trump should replied something like, "well, Kamala, the American public are laughing at you and Biden. They are what matter to me."

Or "I bet you do have to travel the world given your disastrous policy record to persuade people not to join the BRICS, ditch the dollar. Have you been to Germany to talk about the NordStream sabotage? Or the Ukraine to talk about defeat of NATO because there are not enough weapons and ammo. The prce of ammo has gone sky high like everything else in the USA under your administation. You have made America a laughing stock.

Or "Yeah, well, Putin is almost in Kiev now isn t he, Kamala? So what have you accomplished? Millions of dead Ukrainians? And what about Gaza? Look at the way the civilians are being bombed there? War all over the place and ruours of war."

Or "I don t doubt, Kamala, when I see you talkng hear, that Putin really is terrified and shakes in his boots to know you are VP. So much so, he is rushing to secure a peace deal over the Ukraine, right? Where is the peace deal if Putin is so afraid of you , if Xi is so afraud of you."

Or "Sure you have to travel the world as the USA collapses and the dollar collapses to try to persuade people not to abandon the dollar. Have you seen our debt?"

Or "How much did your travel add to our national debt, Kamala? Travelling the world as VP is expensive. But you don t seem to have much to show for all that travel with the BRICS gaining support, the Ukraine losing."

And on and on.

Alas,  Trump cannot reframe and cannot refrain from taking Kamala more seriously than 90% of the US public in 2024.

"Trump, incandescent, began to talk about his friendship with Viktor Orban (who is not wildly popular in the US) and claimed North Korea, China and Russia were “afraid” of him. Harris again looked delighted.

“Perhaps we do not have, in the candidate to my right, the temperament or the ability to not be confused about facts,” she said." according to The Telegraph.

The Telegraph commentator says Kamala was woolly and confused on policy issues.

That is where Trump had to go. 



No comments:

Post a Comment