RYAN S ROUTH TO BE CHARGED WITH THE WRONG CRIME
HIS CRIME IS NOT GUN POSSESSION
HIS CRIMES INCLUDE GUN POSSESSION, AN AK 47, TRESPESS AND FIRST DEGREE PREMEDITATED HOMICIDE
SAME TACTIC HILLARY CLINTON USED TO GET THE RAPIST OF KATHY SHELTON OFF THE HOOK
PARTICULAR LAWFARE TACTIC IS BASED ON THE FALLACY OF COMPOSITION
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fallacy_of_composition#:~:text=The%20fallacy%20of%20composition%20is,some%20part%20of%20the%20whole.
TRUMP AS THE VICTIM HAS THE MAXIMUM RIGHT TO CONTROL THE INVESTIGATION AND GET ALL THE EVIDENCE
ALL HE MUST DO IS FILE CRIMINAL CHARGES FORMALLY AS A PARTY WITH THE RIGHT PAPERWORK AND FEES AND FILE THE REQUESTS FOR EVIDENCE AT THE PALM BEACH COURT WITH JURISDICTION
BETTER HE DOES IT HIMSELF AFTER CONSULTING LAWYERS THAN LEAVES IT TO A POTENTIALLY CORRUPTED LAWYER WHO FAILS TO LODGE THE COMPLAINT THROUGH A TECHNICALITY LIKE FAILING TO PAY THE RIGHT FEE TO BECOME A PARTY ETC
WILL ONLY TAKE HIM 2 HOURS IF HE GETS LAWYERS AND HIS KIDS TO DRAW UP THE SUMMARY, ADD THE EVIDENCE, FIND OUT THE PROCEDURE FOR HIM TO PERSONALLY LODGE HIS COMPLAINT AND REPRESENT HIMSELF
CAN JOIN THE FEDERAL AND FLORIDA CASE TOO AS A PARTY
CAN APPOINT ONE OF HIS SONS, LARA OR MELANIA TO REPRESENT HIM AND FILE PAPERS FOR HIM
MUST BE VERY CAREFUL TO NOT GIVE THE POWER OF ATTORNEY TO ANYONE EXCEPT THOSE HE ABSOLUTELY TRUSTS
COSTS MINIMAL AMOUNT TO GET THE MAXIMUM EFFECT
CAN INSIST ON A MAJOR TRIAL WITH HARRIS, ROWE, WRAY QUESTIONED
SUBPOENA RECORDS
IF WEST PALM FEDERAL COURT LETS ROUTH OUT, TRUMP CAN FILE AN APPEAL TO ENSURE HE STAYS IN PRETRIAL DETENTION
From media
The suspect in the apparent assassination attempt against former President Donald Trump is only facing gun charges so far, but former federal prosecutors said stiffer charges may be coming.
https://eu.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2024/09/21/donald-trump-assassination-attempt-charges/75250489007/
It s a pattern, a method, a way the WEF elite corrupt justice.
The method uses the logical fallacy of composition.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fallacy_of_composition#:~:text=The%20fallacy%20of%20composition%20is,some%20part%20of%20the%20whole.
We see in the Austrian and Greek prosecutor probes, a method of Soros, Gates, Buffe
In 1975, Hillary Clinton as a lawyer used the fallacy of compositoon to get a alleged rapist off the hook by reducing the evidence to a tiny piece of fabric from the underwear of the child victim, which was not covered wih his incriminating blood and stain ,and claiming that piece of underwear showed his innocence.
Using the fallacy of composition, she knowingly and deliberately falsely claimed that what was true of the small part of underwear was true of the whole of the underwear when it was not. The rest of the underwear of the child victim which was the physical evidence of rape was excluded.
In 1984 Clinton talked about the case on audiotape with a writer hired to write a profile for Esquire that was never published.
In the tape, Clinton says she had her client take a polygraph test. He passed, she says, and adds with a chuckle, it "forever destroyed my faith in polygraphs", that is to say, he passed the test despite lying
She laughs again in the tape when saying that prosecutors mishandled evidence, underwear from which they'd cut out the vital part of the fabric. "Yes, indeed," she says, "I had a right to see the evidence":"
So, on tape, Clinton admits to a massive crime to help the rapist get the minimal sentence.
The fallacy of composition is an informal fallacy that arises when one infers that something is true of the whole from the fact that it is true of some part of the whole. A trivial example might be: "This tire is made of rubber; therefore, the vehicle of which it is a part is also made of rubber." This is fallacious, because vehicles are made with a variety of parts, most of which are not made of rubber.
....
This fallacy is related to the fallacy of hasty generalization, in which an unwarranted inference is made from a statement about a sample to a statement about the population from which it is drawn. The fallacy of composition is the converse of the fallacy of division
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fallacy_of_composition#:~:text=The%20fallacy%20of%20composition%20is,some%20part%20of%20the%20whole.
It is a method used by the same circle to get their tools Lukas Kenner and Theodekti off the hook. When caught committing major crimes, the corrupted prosecutors chaarge with the minimal crimes and offer the weakest evidence to let them off to encourage more crimes, more assassination attempts.
Now the same Harris, Clinton WH are using the same method to try to prevent Ryan Routh, darling of their media, interviewed by the NYT, FT, with multiple contacts to Congress, standing trial for his actual crime, which is gun possession, trespass and a clear assassination attempt, because this would compell witnesses, testimony and records which could implicate them by charging him for mere gun possession, not even trespass.
Ryan Routh was not caught possessing guns in some vehicle in the middle of nowhere but possessing guns after trespassing on Trump s golf club in order to set up a sniper s perch with the clear intent to kill Trump!!!
Trump must step in and file his own criminal charges.
He can do so by summarizing the events and the evidence, including the fact that Routh had the ultra deadly AK 47 rifle in his possession, and adding the context of the J 13 assassination attempt, going to the court house and filing the papers as a victim and a party paying whatever fees are necessary.
From the moment, he files the charges, he can submit requests for evidence such as the phone and bank records of Routh and his daughter and his GoPro video.
He has the right to a speedy and fair trial.
There is no question.
Any Appeals court or Supreme Court hearing the case will agree with Trump that the totality of evidence and the context warrant charges of an attempted assassination. Everything Ryan Routh did was consistent with the notion he intended to assassinate Trump, including travelling to Florida, trespassing, hiding in the bushes of the golf club at night, lying in wait for 12 hours, using an AK 47! rifle, bring an improvised flak jacket made out of two back packs with ceramic tiles, trying to flee the scene.
In addition, he has a long criminal record with firearms and has gone to the Ukraine, so he is semi mercenary, who knows what he is doing.
To not charge Routh with the crime he actually committed which is attempted assassination, is a massive failure of federal prosecutors strongly suggesting complicity
It is the logical fallcy of composition to reduce his many crimes and actions to mere gun possession and charge him only with that.
The Federal prosecutors trying to Routh off the hook are prosecutors as Alvin Bragg caught joining in a conspiracy to use illegal lawfare to do the opposite and charge the political opponent of Harris, Donald, Trump for the maximum felonies for NO crime.
The Florida Federal prosecutors are under the control of the same Harris, WH which allowed the perimeter tof the golf club in Palm Beach to be unguarded.
But while the FBI and SS claim they did not have enough personnel, to guard the golf club and prevent Routh trespassing and setting up a sniper s nest with the obvious intent to kill Trump, they do have enough personnel suddenly to guard the same golf club after the attempt failed in order to stop Florida prosecutors from investigating the region.
It s clear the FBI and SS had the personnel all along to guard the golf club and stood down to let the shooter enter, trespass, set up a snipers nest, nearly kill Trump and flee, for he was only caught by a passer by.
But the final proof the WH Harris are involved is this attempt to reduce Routh s crimes to a mininmal using a logical fallacy, and the very one used by Harris close ally, Hillary Clinton in 1975!
No comments:
Post a Comment